application of pip model
play

Application of PIP Model for case of a small town in Maharashtra - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Application of PIP Model for case of a small town in Maharashtra City in Maharashtra BASE INFORMATION City details Civic status Municipality Class C Demography ASSESS CITY Area 3.64 sq. km PRIORITIES Population (No) 36,053 Location 90


  1. Application of PIP Model for case of a small town in Maharashtra

  2. City in Maharashtra BASE INFORMATION City details Civic status Municipality Class C Demography ASSESS CITY Area 3.64 sq. km PRIORITIES Population (No) 36,053 Location 90 Kms from Pune SELECT IMPROVEMENT Households (No) 7580 ACTIONS Number of Wards 5 Prabhags / 19 wards Slum Population 2140 % of slum population 6% DEVELOP IMPROVEMENT HHs in slums (No) 342 PLAN REVIEW IMPROVEMENT PLAN MAKE FINANCIAL DECISIONS REVIEW FINANCING City PLAN 2 Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) project, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

  3. City in Maharashtra BASE Administrative details Administrative divisions INFORMATION ASSESS CITY PRIORITIES SELECT IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS Slum Settlements DEVELOP IMPROVEMENT • Two slum settlements house 342 PLAN households and 6% of the city population REVIEW IMPROVEMENT PLAN Prabhag Wards Total HHs Population 1 1,7,8,9 1524 6607 2 2,3,4,6 1491 6916 NAME AGE POPULATION MAKE 3 10,11,12,13 1826 7805 FINANCIAL DECISIONS 4 14,15,16,19 1438 8023 Gurebazar 30 1328 5 5,17,18 1464 6702 Kashikapadi 50 812 REVIEW FINANCING Total 7743 36053 Total 2140 PLAN Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) project, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

  4. City in Maharashtra BASE INFORMATION ASSESS CITY PRIORITIES SELECT IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS DEVELOP IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVIEW IMPROVEMENT PLAN MAKE FINANCIAL DECISIONS REVIEW FINANCING PLAN Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) project, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

  5. Sanitation BASE Coverage of sanitation facilities On-site disposal facility INFORMATION HH having individual toilets 2% 9% 2% Households having Toilets having Septic tanks 7% Individual toilets 30% 44% ASSESS CITY Toilets having non fuctional septic PRIORITIES HH depending on tanks Community toilets 68% Toilets having Other facility 38% SELECT HH practising OD IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS Toilets needed for augmenting onsite disposal system to Septic tank Sanitation value-chain DEVELOP User interface Collection Conveyance Treatment Reuse /Disposal IMPROVEMENT PLAN Existing Pit and Septic Open / covered Pour flush latrines tank with drain field drains Into river or natural REVIEW drain No conveyance IMPROVEMENT system in new PLAN developments No treatment of fecal Dumping along with sludge solid waste MAKE Old city area - Inadequate primary treatment but good FINANCIAL conveyance through open drains DECISIONS Lack of 100% coverage of Lack of scientific disposal Lack of treatment facility conveyance system of septage New developments - Improved primary treatment through septic tanks but no drains REVIEW FINANCING Missing links PLAN 5 Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) project, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

  6. Sanitation BASE COLLECTION/ CONVEYANCE USER INTERFACE TREATMENT/ DISPOSAL INFORMATION STORAGE (through natural drains) ASSESS CITY PRIORITIES SELECT IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS DEVELOP IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVIEW IMPROVEMENT PLAN MAKE FINANCIAL DECISIONS REVIEW FINANCING PLAN 6 Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) project, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

  7. Sanitation BASE INFORMATION ASSESS CITY PRIORITIES SELECT IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS  Lower individual toilet coverage of city is lower than peer group & State  Slum level individual toilet coverage is 0 % , the slum HHs are dependent on Access & Coverage DEVELOP community toilets IMPROVEMENT  Absence of drainage network in newly developing area PLAN Service level &  REVIEW Absence of any kind of treatment facility for both waste water and septage IMPROVEMENT  Only 3 % of the septic tanks are cleaned annually Quality PLAN Efficiency in service  No quality tests before disposal of waste water flowing through drains  No quality tests before disposal of septage on dumping grounds operation MAKE Financial FINANCIAL  15% of No charges for sanitation services provided in the city. Only source is DECISIONS septic tank cleaning charges Sustainability REVIEW The city is non – sewered, so majority of sewerage indicators are not generated FINANCING PLAN 7 Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) project, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

  8. Sanitation High dependence on community toilets Effluent from septic tanks let off in un- scientific ways. Households having Households not Toilets having sanitary Toilets not having latrines having latrines disposal system sanitary disposal system 8 Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) project, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

  9. Sanitation No waste water or septage treatment facility No tax to recover costs incurred for Only part of septage that needs to the service There is no waste water conveyance system in the city and hence it be collected is collected, and is not collected. none treated No revenue stream for sanitation 9 Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) project, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

  10. Solid Waste Management BASE Type of waste generated 6% INFORMATION Waste from nalla cleaning, construction debris etc. 22% Biodegradable waste 30% ASSESS CITY recyclable waste PRIORITIES 42% Inert SELECT IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS 5 Gap in generation and Source wise generation and collection of waste (MT) 4.5 collection of solid waste Quantity of waste 4 (MT) 14 3.5 3 12 DEVELOP 2.5 IMPROVEMENT 10 2 PLAN 8 1.5 1 6 REVIEW 0.5 4 IMPROVEMENT 0 PLAN Domestic Street sweeping Hotels and Markets Commercial Others 2 restaurants estabs. Sources of waste 0 Generation Collection Generation Collection MAKE FINANCIAL DECISIONS REVIEW FINANCING PLAN 10 Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) project, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

  11. Solid Waste Management BASE INFORMATION COLLECTION TRANSPORTATION TREATMENT DISPOSAL 81% Door to 6 Ghatagadis Door collection Residential areas Non-residential ASSESS CITY No Collection in Tractor trailer / Dumping ground PRIORITIES community bins Dumper Placer (3 km away from town) Treatment areas Partial SELECT Open dumps/ collection IMPROVEMENT 2.5 MT/day ACTIONS Nallas/ drains Un-collected waste Regular collection DEVELOP Door to door Collection in bins Dumping along natural Dumping ground IMPROVEMENT Collection drains PLAN REVIEW IMPROVEMENT PLAN Collection from Collection in secondary bins Dumping in river Dumping ground bins Krishna MAKE FINANCIAL DECISIONS REVIEW FINANCING PLAN 11 Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) project, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

  12. Solid Waste Management BASE INFORMATION ASSESS CITY PRIORITIES SELECT IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS  HHs level D-D coverage of city is better than peer group & State, however D-D services have yet not reached the newly developing areas Access & Coverage  D-D collection services are not provided in slums DEVELOP IMPROVEMENT PLAN  100 % collection efficiency of wastes Service level &  REVIEW No segregation of waste Quality IMPROVEMENT  Vermi composting non functional due to management issues PLAN Efficiency in service  Dumping of solid waste in the dumping grounds operation MAKE FINANCIAL DECISIONS  No dedicated charges for solid waste related services Financial  15% of property tax is transferred for O&M of solid waste related services Sustainability REVIEW FINANCING PLAN 12 Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) project, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

  13. Solid Waste Management No segregation of waste Crude Households served by D2D collection dumping of system most of the collected waste Households not served by D2D collection system of the city No tax to recover costs Waste treated and converted to manure incurred for the service Waste dumped without any treatment No revenue stream for SWM Majority of expenses are towards salaries of permanent and temporary employees 13 Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) project, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

  14. Water Supply BASE Billed metered Meter consumption INFORMATION Distribution Authorised 0 MLD Revenue water Meter 4.57 MLD Billed unmetered (78.39%) 4.57 MLD Treatment Source Storage ASSESS CITY PRIORITIES R. Krishna Apparent GSR WTP losses ESR SELECT Unbilled authorized Non Ground Water 3.5 LL IMPROVEMENT 16.6 LL 4.8 MLD 0.04MLD 7 Private well revenue ACTIONS 1 Bore well water Total 5.83 MLD Unauthorized use 17% 1% 1.02 and leakages 1n losses MLD Surface Water Real transmission and distribution (21.61%) Ground water DEVELOP 0 .98 MLD 82% IMPROVEMENT Others PLAN Coverage of WS connections Water Supply Zones REVIEW IMPROVEMENT 10000 80% PLAN Households served 8000 76% 75% 73% Coverage 73% 72% 6000 70% 4000 MAKE FINANCIAL 5750 65% DECISIONS 2000 0 60% REVIEW 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 FINANCING Served Unserved Coverage PLAN 14 Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) project, CEPT University, Ahmedabad

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend