Innovation Funded Project Development of IPE 3 Jane Lockwood (SHAR) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

innovation funded project development of ipe 3
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Innovation Funded Project Development of IPE 3 Jane Lockwood (SHAR) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Innovation Funded Project Development of IPE 3 Jane Lockwood (SHAR) Shelagh Heneghan (SNAM) Allocation of Money 9,050 allocated to Marilyn Andrews ( then Chair of IPE sub committee) in 2008 Money funded 2 staff ( 0.1 WTE each)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Jane Lockwood (SHAR) Shelagh Heneghan (SNAM)

Innovation Funded Project Development of IPE 3

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Allocation of Money

£9,050 allocated to Marilyn Andrews ( then Chair of IPE sub

– committee) in 2008

Money funded 2 staff ( 0.1 WTE each) I Physiotherapy Lecturer + 1 Midwifery Lecturer ½ day per week Oct. 2008 - June 2009

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Purpose

To develop stage 3 of the IPE strand in the curricula of the

nine disciplines involved in IPE since its full implementation in Sept. 2007

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Background

Interprofessional education (IPE) was fully implemented at

Keele University across 9 health and social care disciplines in

  • Sept. 2007

Clinical Psychology, Health Sciences, Medicine, Midwifery,

Nursing, Operating Department Practice, Pharmacy, Physiotherapy and Social Work were the disciplines involved

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Background cont’d

IPE strands 1 and 2 are university based and are implemented

in years 1 and 2 respectively

Students are allocated to multiprofessional groups (x 34) PBL scenarios are used to facilitate students' understanding

  • f each professional role, responsibilities and

interprofessional collaboration

Assessment is via poster presentations and Root Cause

Analysis reports

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Development of IPE 3

ILO’s already in place provided framework for development Work / practice based IPE Spontaneously occurring professional groups Need for multi-source feedback ( a requirement of the

majority of disciplines)

Student responsibility and ownership increased

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Process

Consultation with all disciplines Majority use portfolios as a vehicle for learning and

assessment

Majority seek multi-source feedback on student performance Therefore..............

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Process cont’d

A generic, IPE 3 outcome focused trigger sheet and

guidance notes were designed

These were included in students’ practice based assessment

documents

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Launch

Presented to IPE Sub-committee for approval Presented to staff within each School Launched with all students in Sept. 2009 Preparation of work based mentors / assessors is the

responsibility of IPE co-ordinators in each School

Assessment via portfolio entries, reflection, multi-source

feedback and Personal Tutor interviews ( all of which were integral to each curriculum)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Evaluation

Existing evaluation tool (used for IPE 1 and IPE 2) modified

to accommodate changes in IPE 3

Disseminated to students and Personal Tutors in Sept. 2010 Returned to IPE 3 co-ordinators who will collate data