innovation funded project development of ipe 3
play

Innovation Funded Project Development of IPE 3 Jane Lockwood (SHAR) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Innovation Funded Project Development of IPE 3 Jane Lockwood (SHAR) Shelagh Heneghan (SNAM) Allocation of Money 9,050 allocated to Marilyn Andrews ( then Chair of IPE sub committee) in 2008 Money funded 2 staff ( 0.1 WTE each)


  1. Innovation Funded Project Development of IPE 3 Jane Lockwood (SHAR) Shelagh Heneghan (SNAM)

  2. Allocation of Money � £9,050 allocated to Marilyn Andrews ( then Chair of IPE sub – committee) in 2008 � Money funded 2 staff ( 0.1 WTE each) � I Physiotherapy Lecturer + 1 Midwifery Lecturer � ½ day per week Oct. 2008 - June 2009

  3. Purpose � To develop stage 3 of the IPE strand in the curricula of the nine disciplines involved in IPE since its full implementation in Sept. 2007

  4. Background � Interprofessional education (IPE) was fully implemented at Keele University across 9 health and social care disciplines in Sept. 2007 � Clinical Psychology, Health Sciences, Medicine, Midwifery, Nursing, Operating Department Practice, Pharmacy, Physiotherapy and Social Work were the disciplines involved

  5. Background cont’d � IPE strands 1 and 2 are university based and are implemented in years 1 and 2 respectively � Students are allocated to multiprofessional groups (x 34) � PBL scenarios are used to facilitate students' understanding of each professional role, responsibilities and interprofessional collaboration � Assessment is via poster presentations and Root Cause Analysis reports

  6. Development of IPE 3 � ILO’s already in place provided framework for development � Work / practice based IPE � Spontaneously occurring professional groups � Need for multi-source feedback ( a requirement of the majority of disciplines) � Student responsibility and ownership increased

  7. Process � Consultation with all disciplines � Majority use portfolios as a vehicle for learning and assessment � Majority seek multi-source feedback on student performance � Therefore..............

  8. Process cont’d � A generic, IPE 3 outcome focused trigger sheet and guidance notes were designed � These were included in students’ practice based assessment documents

  9. Launch � Presented to IPE Sub-committee for approval � Presented to staff within each School � Launched with all students in Sept. 2009 � Preparation of work based mentors / assessors is the responsibility of IPE co-ordinators in each School � Assessment via portfolio entries, reflection, multi-source feedback and Personal Tutor interviews ( all of which were integral to each curriculum)

  10. Evaluation � Existing evaluation tool (used for IPE 1 and IPE 2) modified to accommodate changes in IPE 3 � Disseminated to students and Personal Tutors in Sept. 2010 � Returned to IPE 3 co-ordinators who will collate data

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend