innovating nanoscience High-throughput electronic structure theory: are all calculations useful ?
Stefano Sanvito (sanvitos@tcd.ie)
School of Physics and CRANN, Trinity College Dublin, IRELAND MaX Conference, Trieste January 2018
innovating nanoscience High-throughput electronic structure theory: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
MaX Conference, Trieste January 2018 innovating nanoscience High-throughput electronic structure theory: are all calculations useful ? Stefano Sanvito (sanvitos@tcd.ie) School of Physics and CRANN, Trinity College Dublin, IRELAND My objectives
Stefano Sanvito (sanvitos@tcd.ie)
School of Physics and CRANN, Trinity College Dublin, IRELAND MaX Conference, Trieste January 2018
US permanent magnets market ~22.6B$ (2021)
4 Be 9.01 12Mg 24.21 2 He 4.00 10Ne 20.18 24Cr52.00
19K38.21
11Na 22.99 3 Li 6.94 37Rb 85.47 55Cs 132.9 38 Sr87.62
56Ba137.3
59Pr 140.9 1 H 1.00 5 B 10.81 9 F 19.00 17Cl 35.45 35Br 79.90 21Sc44.96
22Ti47.88
23V50.94
26Fe55.85
27Co58.93
28Ni58.69
29Cu63.55
30Zn65.39
31Ga69.72
14Si28.09
32Ge72.61
33As74.92
34Se78.96
6 C 12.01 7 N 14.01 15P30.97
16S32.07
18Ar 39.95 39 Y88.91
40 Zr91.22
41 Nb92.91
42 Mo95.94
43 Tc97.9
44 Ru101.1
45 Rh102.4
46 Pd106.4
47 Ag107.9
48 Cd112.4
49 In114.8
50 Sn118.7
51 Sb121.8
52 Te127.6
53 I126.9
57La138.9
72Hf178.5
73Ta180.9
74W183.8
75Re186.2
76Os190.2
77Ir192.2
79Au197.0
61Pm 145 70Yb 173.0 71Lu 175.0 90Th 232.0 91Pa 231.0 87Fr223
88Ra226.0
89Ac227.0
62Sm 150.4 105 66Dy 162.5 179 85 67Ho 164.9 132 20 68Er 167.3 85 20 58Ce 140.1 13 8 O 16.00 35 65Tb 158.9 229 221 64Gd 157.3 63Eu 152.0 90 66Dy 162.5 179 85 Atomic symbol Atomic Number Atomic weight Antiferromagnetic TN(K) Ferromagnetic TC(K)Cost Periodic Table
80Hg200.6
36Kr83.80
54Xe83.80
81Tl204.4
82Pb207.2
83Bi209.0
84Po209
85At210
86Rn222
Metal Radioactive Nonmetal BOLD Magnetic atom 25Mn55.85
96 20Ca40.08
13Al26.98
69Tm 168.9 56 312 9636
78Pt195.1
1043 1390 629 60Nd 144.2 19 292 < $10/kg $10 - 100/kg $100 - 1000/kg $1000 - 10000/kg >$10000/kg 92U 238.0 93Np 238.0New tech. to deploy
Fe3O4 SrTcO3
with Stefano Curtarolo, Duke
Virtual Materials Growth 1) Simulating existing materials 2) Simulating new materials Rational materials storage Creating searchable database where to store information Materials selection Search the database for 1) new materials, 2) physical insights Robust electronic structure method: density functional theory (VASP) Database Creation (AFLOW) Finding descriptors
Virtual Materials Growth 1) Simulating existing materials 2) Simulating new materials Rational materials storage Creating searchable database where to store information Materials selection Search the database for 1) new materials, 2) physical insights Robust electronic structure method: density functional theory (VASP) Database Creation (AFLOW) Finding descriptors
structure type.
Virtual Materials Growth (existing materials)
Duke calculated single elements, binary, ternary and some quaternary (about 100,000) Calculations:
polarization, effective mass, magnetic moment, etc.) Virtual Materials Growth (existing materials)
Yang, O. Levy, M. Mehl, H. T. Stokes, D. O. Demchenko, and D. Morgan, Comp. Mat. Sci. 58, 218 (2012)
www.aflowlib.org
Rational materials storage
Buongiorno-Nardelli, N. Mingo, O. Levy, Comp. Mat. Sci. 58, 227 (2012)
www.aflowlib.org
Virtual Materials Growth 1) Simulating existing materials 2) Simulating new materials Rational materials storage Creating searchable database where to store information Materials selection Search the database for 1) new materials, 2) physical insights Robust electronic structure method: density functional theory (VASP) Database Creation (AFLOW) Finding descriptors
Advances 3, e1602241 (2017)
Total 235,253 Possible 35,602 Unique 105,212 6,778 Possible Magnetic
Descriptor 1: Enthalpy of formation Al Ni Mn
Ni2MnAl
MnAl MnNi3 NiAl
This is very much on-going
Look at the transition metal intermetallics
Extrapolating For real …. 70 magnetic predicted 80 magnetic known
Descriptor 2: Critical temperature Known Heusler ferromagnets Co2XY Mn2XY Ni2MnY Rh2MnY Cu2MnY Pd2MnY Au2MnY Fe2MnY Generalized regression model based on valence, volume, spin decomposition Prediction of TC
Material V (Å) µ ΔE (eV) T ….. T Co 47.85 2.0
3007 352 Mn 48.93 2.0
3524 760 … … … … … … Mn 54.28 9.03
1918 ?
Analysis Co2XY Mn2XY X2MnY
25 26 27 28 29 30
1 2 3 4 5 6
25 26 27 28 29 30
200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Co2MnTi Co2FeSi Co2AB 1 Co2CrGa Co2MnAl/Co2MnGa Co2NbAl Co2VSn Co2NbSn Co2VZn Co2NbZn Co2TaZn Co2VGa/Co2TiGe Co2VAl Co2AB 2 Co2TiGa Co2TiAl Co2FeSi Co2MnTi Co2MnTi Co2FeGa Co2FeAl Co2MnSi Co2MnGe Co2MnSn Co2MnAl/Co2MnGa Co2CrGa Co2NbAl Co2NbSn Co2CrAl Co2VSn Co2VGa/Co2TiGe Co2VAl Co2TaAl Co2AB 3 Co2VZn Co2NbZn Co2TaZn Co2TaZn Co2TiAl Co2TiGa Co2CrAl
Slater- Pauling
4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5
200 400 600
NV = 27 = 28 = 29 = 27 = 28 = 29 = 30 = 31 = 32 = 33
4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5
1 2 3 4 5
Ru2MnV Pd2MnCu Rh2MnTi Pd2MnZn Pt2MnZn Ru2MnNb Ru2MnTa Rh2MnSc Pd2MnAu Rh2MnHf Rh2MnZr Rh2MnZn
Castelliz- Kanomata curve
Mn2YZ
45 50 55 60 65
3)
100 200
Co2XY Mn2XY
Regular Heusler Inverse Heusler
Mn2CoCr (529) Mn2PtCo (1918) Mn2PtV (3353) Mn2PtPd (3218) Mn2PtRh (3247) Mn2PtGa (2236) Mn2PtIn (841)
229 candidates 80 used for DFT + ML 149 remaining ML TPR 60% (50:50 population) Don’t calculate 30% = 50 2000 candidates 80 used for DFT + ML 1920 remaining Don’t calculate 30% = ~650 250,000 candidates 1000 used for DFT + ML 249,000 remaining Don’t calculate 30% = ~80,000
Advances 3, e1602241 (2017)
Co2MnTi Courtesy J.M.D. Coey’s Lab (P. Tozman, M. Venkatesan) Prepared by arc melting in an Ar atmosphere
Courtesy J.M.D. Coey’s Lab (P. Tozman, M. Venkatesan) Complex antiferromagnetic
TCD Team: Duke Team:
Tom Archer, Anurag Tiwari, Mario Zic, James Nelson
Stefano Curtarolo, Junkai Xue, Kevin Rasch, Corey Oses