Initial Consideration of Hybrid DUNE Near Detector Chang Kee Jung - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

initial consideration of hybrid dune near detector
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Initial Consideration of Hybrid DUNE Near Detector Chang Kee Jung - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Initial Consideration of Hybrid DUNE Near Detector Chang Kee Jung for Xin Qian and Brett Viren (BNL) Clark McGrew, Jose Palomino, Guang Yang ( Stony Brook University) DUNE ND Workshop CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Jan. 22, 2017 CERN, Jan. 2017


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

Initial Consideration of Hybrid DUNE Near Detector

Chang Kee Jung for Xin Qian and Brett Viren (BNL) Clark McGrew, Jose Palomino, Guang Yang (Stony Brook University) DUNE ND Workshop CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Jan. 22, 2017
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

Impression from the Initial Report of the DUNE NDTF

§ Tremendous progress made in understanding many aspects

  • f the ND options

§ On the other hand, it seems that it will be difficult to compare apple-to-apple and make a choice based on the FOM used § Many other factors to be considered

¬ Cost ¬ Funding sources ¬ Risks involved ¬ Attractiveness of the technology

à In practice, some level of intellectual bias and political consideration is inevitable or perhaps necessary

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

Why a hybrid detector can be attractive for DUNE ND?

§ Hybrid Detector: Active Ar target detector + FGD § More versatile to adopt the advance in the neutrino physics

¬ Projecting to the status of our knowledge in 10 years

  • Utilize both the knowledge to be gained from the LAr TPC experiments

(ProtoDUNE and SBN detectors) and Scintillator detectors (MINERvA, T2K and NOvA)

  • Prepare for unexpected sources of systematic errors

e.g.) 2p2h

§ More diverse and rich cross-section measurements and ND physics program § A broader participation of collaborating institutions and countries leading to Broader funding sources § Can start with all ideas on the table with participation open to all collaborators § Achieve the final design through a collaboration-wide consensus

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

Some Lessons Learned from the Past and Current Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

K2K, MINOS, T2K and NOvA

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

K2K Near Detector – a Hybrid Detector

§ 1kt (mini-SuperK): similar systematics as SuperK § Scifi (scintillating fiber tracker): 19 layers of 6 cm thick water target w/ 20 layers of scifi (x,y), precision tracking § LG (Lead Glass calorimeter): Measure νe contamination § MRD (muon range detector): 12 layers of iron plates w/ D.C.s

(1kt) (Scifi) (MRD) (LG)

10 m

Neutrino beam

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

K2K Scibar Detector

ν

The LG (ECAL) detector energy threshold was too high to be useful.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

Lessons Learned from K2K

§ Employing the same detector technology for Near and Far detectors (1kt and SuperK) does not necessarily produce the intended benefit, namely, canceling the detector systematic errors

¬ Different detector size, granularity, calibration … ¬ Something to pay attention for the ND LAr TPC option

§ Merits of the reverse configuration (1 kt behind FGD) was debated

¬ In the end, 1 kt and FGD were used independently ¬ Something to pay attention for the ND hybrid design

§ Recycling a detector system (LG ECAL) has obvious cost benefits but actual utilization must be made based on the scientific needs § A detector at an intermediate distance was considered in order to avoid the uncertainties associated with the neutrino “line” source, and was abandoned

¬ This was the correct decision considering the limited statistics

§ Overall, the K2K near detector system was sufficient for the original K2K physics goals

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

T2K Near Detector Complex

Off-Axis Detectors

  • ν flux/spectrum
  • cross-sections

On-Axis Detector (INGRID)

  • ν beam direction, profile
  • n-axis νµ

µ beam

2.5o off-axis νµ

µ beam

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

T2K ND280 Off-axis Detector

2.5o off-axis νµ beam

SMRD

  • 0.2 T Magnet
  • Active (scintillator)

and passive (water) targets

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

T2K Systematic Uncertainty on the Predicted Event Rate @ Far Detector by Source

“First combined analysis of neutrino and antineutrino

  • scillations at T2K” arXiv:1701.00432 [hep-ex] 2 Jan 2017

The T2K’s overall systematic uncertainties has now reached far lower than the original goal (~10%) for νe appearance but to pursue CPV at 3 σ level much more improvement is needed

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

Lessons Learned from T2K

§ Difficult to overcome the different active nuclear targets for near (mostly C) and far (mostly H2O) detectors

¬ Passive (H2O) targets results in large systematic errors stemming from statistical subtraction methods ¬ T2K could not build a water Cherenkov detector at the near detector site due to the expected multiple interactions in the detector

  • A water Cherenkov detector was proposed at a 2 km site, but was not

approved

§ Recycling the UA1 magnet (operating at 0.2 T) was highly cost effective and the magnet performed satisfactorily § The kinematic phase space covered by the ND280 (mostly forward region) was quite different from that by SuperK (4π) § Difficult to handle new source of systematic error stemming from multi- nucleon (2p2h) interactions à NuPRISM proposal § Overall, the T2K near detector system was sufficient for the original T2K physics goals (νe appearance and νµ disappearance)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

T2K Upgrade Proposal

§ Improve the ND280 kinematic acceptance to cover the full cosθ range, especially the high angle region, of the far detector ¬ Current ND280 covers approximately 20~30% of the cosθ region § Improve the event vertex determination in the passive water target ¬ Localized “cell” structure water target

Kinematic acceptance 2p2h modeling

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

Possible T2K ND280 Upgrade

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

MINOS and NOvA Near Detectors

§ Both have identical near and far detectors (besides the sizes)

¬ Mostly cancel detector and cross section (especially signal) related systematic errors ¬ Background characterization introduces relatively large systematic errors ¬ Lack of magnetic field in NOvA could cause larger errors for antineutrino-mode measurements

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

NOvA Systematic Uncertainties for νe Appearance

§ Already excellent overall sys. error for signal § Relatively large sys. error for background

¬ Would be more critical for the anti-νe appearance measurement ¬ A high resolution FGD with a magnetic field could help reduce the errors

Backhouse/Patterson

3.5% 2.5% 2.1% 0.97% 1.0% 5.0% 8.0% 5.3% 3.9% 1.8% 0.61% 10.5%

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

Initial Thoughts on DUNE ND

§ To control the overall systematic errors to few percent, It is likely that we will need a hybrid detector

¬ w/ a magnetic field ¬ An active Ar target detector + a FGD with an excellent kinematic phase-space coverage (~4π) employing scintillator (C) target as well as other targets.

àNext talk by Guang Yang will show recent effort by an ad hoc BNL/SBU group to develop a generic geometry tool for the study of hybrid detector configurations and designs

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Chang Kee Jung CERN, Jan. 2017

The End