initial consideration of hybrid dune near detector
play

Initial Consideration of Hybrid DUNE Near Detector Chang Kee Jung - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Initial Consideration of Hybrid DUNE Near Detector Chang Kee Jung for Xin Qian and Brett Viren (BNL) Clark McGrew, Jose Palomino, Guang Yang ( Stony Brook University) DUNE ND Workshop CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Jan. 22, 2017 CERN, Jan. 2017


  1. Initial Consideration of Hybrid DUNE Near Detector Chang Kee Jung for Xin Qian and Brett Viren (BNL) Clark McGrew, Jose Palomino, Guang Yang ( Stony Brook University) DUNE ND Workshop CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Jan. 22, 2017 CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

  2. Impression from the Initial Report of the DUNE NDTF § Tremendous progress made in understanding many aspects of the ND options § On the other hand, it seems that it will be difficult to compare apple-to-apple and make a choice based on the FOM used § Many other factors to be considered ¬ Cost ¬ Funding sources ¬ Risks involved ¬ Attractiveness of the technology à In practice, some level of intellectual bias and political consideration is inevitable or perhaps necessary CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

  3. Why a hybrid detector can be attractive for DUNE ND? § Hybrid Detector: Active Ar target detector + FGD § More versatile to adopt the advance in the neutrino physics ¬ Projecting to the status of our knowledge in 10 years ⁃ Utilize both the knowledge to be gained from the LAr TPC experiments (ProtoDUNE and SBN detectors) and Scintillator detectors (MINERvA, T2K and NOvA) ⁃ Prepare for unexpected sources of systematic errors e.g.) 2p2h § More diverse and rich cross-section measurements and ND physics program § A broader participation of collaborating institutions and countries leading to Broader funding sources § Can start with all ideas on the table with participation open to all collaborators § Achieve the final design through a collaboration-wide consensus CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

  4. Some Lessons Learned from the Past and Current Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments K2K, MINOS, T2K and NOvA CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

  5. K2K Near Detector – a Hybrid Detector § 1kt (mini-SuperK): similar systematics as SuperK § Scifi (scintillating fiber tracker): 19 layers of 6 cm thick water target w/ 20 layers of scifi (x,y), precision tracking § LG (Lead Glass calorimeter): Measure ν e contamination § MRD (muon range detector): 12 layers of iron plates w/ D.C.s (Scifi) (LG) (MRD) (1kt) Neutrino beam 10 m CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

  6. K2K Scibar Detector The LG (ECAL) detector energy threshold was too high to be useful. ν CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

  7. Lessons Learned from K2K § Employing the same detector technology for Near and Far detectors (1kt and SuperK) does not necessarily produce the intended benefit, namely, canceling the detector systematic errors ¬ Different detector size, granularity, calibration … ¬ Something to pay attention for the ND LAr TPC option § Merits of the reverse configuration (1 kt behind FGD) was debated ¬ In the end, 1 kt and FGD were used independently ¬ Something to pay attention for the ND hybrid design § Recycling a detector system (LG ECAL) has obvious cost benefits but actual utilization must be made based on the scientific needs § A detector at an intermediate distance was considered in order to avoid the uncertainties associated with the neutrino “line” source, and was abandoned ¬ This was the correct decision considering the limited statistics § Overall, the K2K near detector system was sufficient for the original K2K physics goals CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

  8. T2K Near Detector Complex Off-Axis Detectors - ν flux/spectrum 2.5 o off-axis - cross-sections µ beam ν µ On-Axis Detector (INGRID) - ν beam direction, profile on-axis ν µ µ beam CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

  9. T2K ND280 Off-axis Detector • 0.2 T Magnet SMRD • Active (scintillator) and passive (water) targets 2.5 o off-axis ν µ beam CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

  10. T2K Systematic Uncertainty on the Predicted Event Rate @ Far Detector by Source “First combined analysis of neutrino and antineutrino oscillations at T2K” arXiv:1701.00432 [hep-ex] 2 Jan 2017 The T2K’s overall systematic uncertainties has now reached far lower than the original goal (~10%) for ν e appearance but to pursue CPV at 3 σ level much more improvement is needed CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

  11. Lessons Learned from T2K § Difficult to overcome the different active nuclear targets for near (mostly C) and far (mostly H 2 O) detectors ¬ Passive (H 2 O) targets results in large systematic errors stemming from statistical subtraction methods ¬ T2K could not build a water Cherenkov detector at the near detector site due to the expected multiple interactions in the detector ⁃ A water Cherenkov detector was proposed at a 2 km site, but was not approved § Recycling the UA1 magnet (operating at 0.2 T) was highly cost effective and the magnet performed satisfactorily § The kinematic phase space covered by the ND280 (mostly forward region) was quite different from that by SuperK (4 π ) § Difficult to handle new source of systematic error stemming from multi- nucleon (2p2h) interactions à NuPRISM proposal § Overall, the T2K near detector system was sufficient for the original T2K physics goals ( ν e appearance and ν µ disappearance) CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

  12. T2K Upgrade Proposal § Improve the ND280 kinematic acceptance to cover the full cos θ range, especially the high angle region, of the far detector ¬ Current ND280 covers approximately 20~30% of the cos θ region § Improve the event vertex determination in the passive water target ¬ Localized “cell” structure water target Kinematic acceptance 2p2h modeling CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

  13. Possible T2K ND280 Upgrade CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

  14. MINOS and NOvA Near Detectors § Both have identical near and far detectors (besides the sizes) ¬ Mostly cancel detector and cross section (especially signal) related systematic errors ¬ Background characterization introduces relatively large systematic errors ¬ Lack of magnetic field in NOvA could cause larger errors for antineutrino-mode measurements CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

  15. NOvA Systematic Uncertainties for ν e Appearance 8.0% 3.5% 5.3% 2.5% 3.9% 2.1% 1.8% 0.97% 0.61% 1.0% 10.5% 5.0% § Already excellent overall sys. error for signal Backhouse/Patterson § Relatively large sys. error for background ¬ Would be more critical for the anti- ν e appearance measurement ¬ A high resolution FGD with a magnetic field could help reduce the errors CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

  16. Initial Thoughts on DUNE ND § To control the overall systematic errors to few percent, It is likely that we will need a hybrid detector ¬ w/ a magnetic field ¬ An active Ar target detector + a FGD with an excellent kinematic phase-space coverage (~4 π ) employing scintillator (C) target as well as other targets. à Next talk by Guang Yang will show recent effort by an ad hoc BNL/SBU group to develop a generic geometry tool for the study of hybrid detector configurations and designs CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

  17. The End CERN, Jan. 2017 Chang Kee Jung

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend