Information to energy conversion in an electronic Maxwells demon and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Information to energy conversion in an electronic Maxwells demon and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Information to energy conversion in an electronic Maxwells demon and thermodynamics of measurements. Stony Brook University, SUNY Dmitri V. Averin and Qiang Deng Low-Temperature Lab, Aalto University Jukka P. Pekola and M. Mttnen
Outline
- 1. Statistical distribution of the heat generated in adiabatic
transitions: classical thermal fluctuation-dissipation theorem (FDT).
- 2. Driven single-electron tunneling (SET) transitions as
prototype of reversible information processing.
- 3. Electronic Maxwell’s demons based on the SET pump and
nSQUID array.
- 4. Detector properties in Maxwell’s demon operation and
thermodynamics of quantum measurements.
Distribution of heat generated in adiabatic transitions reversible logic operations are adiabatic transitions; potential reversible circuits are based on small, mesoscopic or nano, structures large role of fluctuations Example: driven SET transitions
O.-P. Saira et al., PRB (2010); and t.b.p.
. ) ( , ) ( 2 ) ( ) (
2
n E n U n t n E n U n U
C g C
= − = Driven single-electron tunneling (SET) transitions
Slow evolution of a system of levels En(t) weakly interacting with an equilibrium reservoir, between the two stationary configurations Heat generated in the reservoir in this evolution
Q T
Q
2
2 =
σ
[ ]
. , p p p p p
n nm m mn n m
Γ = Γ − Γ =∑ & &
( )
. , ) ( ) (
) (
Q S T Q t E t E Q
tot jumps m n
+ ∆ − = − = ∑
:
) ( ) (
= Γ p p
- local equilibrium
Noise of the generated heat in driven adiabatic evolution
. ) ( ) / 1 (
) ( 1 , m m nm m n n
p E E dt T Q & &
−
Γ − =
∫ ∑
Average generated irreversible heat
. ; ; :
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 − − − − − − −
Γ Γ = Γ Γ Γ = Γ Γ Γ Γ = Γ Γ Γ Γ
Γ-1 – “group” inverse:
. 2 ) ( 2 ~
) ( 1 , 2 2
Q T p E E dt Q
m m nm m n n Q
= Γ − = =
−
∫ ∑
& & σ
Noise in generated heat Two-state system
. ) ( ) ( , ) 2 / ( cosh ) 2 / 1 (
2 1 2 10 01 2 2
t E t E T dt
Q
− = Γ + Γ =
−
∫
ε ε ε σ &
Conclusion: irreversibly generated heat vanishes not only
- n average but for each individual transition protocol.
Jarzynski equality and statistics of the generated heat
. 1 } / ) ( exp{ = ∆ − − T F Wth
In the limit of adiabatic switching, this relation and thermal FDT imply Gaussian probability density of the heat distribution
. 2 ~2
2
Q T Q
Q
= ≡ σ
In the case of “deterministic” transitions, ∆F=∆U, and
. ) 4 / 1 ( ) (
4 / ) ( 2 / 1
2
Q T Q Q
e Q T Q
− −
= π ρ
{ }
. 1 / exp = − T Q
Statistics of heat in driven SET transitions
C Cg ne
Vg
∆U(t)
∫ ∫ ∑
− = + − = ∆ − = ∆ − = ) ( 2 , ) ( ) 1 ) ( 2 ( ) ( t dn n E W W Q U t I t n dt E t U Q
g C th th g C j j β βλ ηβ βσ
Thermodynamics of the transitions
Electronic Maxwell’s demon based on SET pump “Information-to-energy conversion”
C C C Cg Cg Vg1 Vg2 C0 V n1 n2
- N+n
N-n-n1-n2
Alternative approach: G. Schaller et al., PRB (2011).
Generated power:
). 3 / ( 3 / eV eV P Γ =
Demon inverts the Landauer principle: bit
- f information gained in
a measurement can be used to convert roughly kBT of thermal energy into free energy.
Maxwell’s demon based on nSQUID array For M/L≈1 dynamics of individual nSQUIDs reduces to that
- f the differential phase φ describing the circulating
current: . 2 ] , [ , cos cos 2 2 ) ( 4
2 2 2 2
ei Q E L C Q H
J e
= − − Φ + = ϕ ϕ χ ϕ ϕ π
Detector properties for demon operation Qualitative similarity to quantum measurements: trade-off between the information acquisition and back-action. Standard quantum detector set-up:
- Error-free and rapid detection:
- No back-action excitations
V I
1
∆
Heisenberg uncertainty relation for detectors:
. ) 4 / (
2
π λ h ≥
V I S
S
Quantitative requirements for Maxwell’s demon:
. , 8 / /
1 2 2 −
<< Γ << τ π τ λ e SI )]. / ln( /[ , / , ) ( / )] ( 1 )[ (
2 2 2 2 2
T e T S S e U f f d d e G
C V V f i f i f i T
ω π γ γ ε ε π γ ε ε ε ε h h << = + ∆ − − − = Γ
∫
. ) 2 ( , ) ( 2 ), ( 2 ) (
2 / 1 2 2
L eI C e m x U mv x U H H
C J J z
h h = ≈ + + + = λ λ δ σ
E ,C
J
. . . reciever
r(k) t(k)
U(x)
generator L
. . .
x
qubit (a) (b)
k
D.V. A., K. Rabenstein, V.K. Semenov, PRB 73, 094504 (2006).