Information Seeking Behavior of Scientists in the Electronic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

information seeking behavior of scientists in the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Information Seeking Behavior of Scientists in the Electronic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Information Seeking Behavior of Scientists in the Electronic Information Age: Astronomers, Chemists, Mathematicians, and Physicists by C.M. Brown Christopher Maier INLS 279: Bioinformatics Research Review 2004 - 09 - 14 Setting The Stage


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Information Seeking Behavior of Scientists in the Electronic Information Age: Astronomers, Chemists, Mathematicians, and Physicists by C.M. Brown

Christopher Maier INLS 279: Bioinformatics Research Review 2004-09-14

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Setting The Stage

  • 1999 - Internet use becoming widespread
  • Primary importance placed on refereed

journals in print

  • Prediction that, with Internet, all scientific

dissemination will eventually take place electronically

  • How valid is this assumption?
slide-3
SLIDE 3

This Article

  • Survey of scientists at the University of

Oklahoma (Norman, OK)

  • How have these scientists’ information needs

and seeking habits been affected by the changing electronic information environment?

  • Determine course the scientific libraries must

take in the future to accommodate these changes

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Different Disciplines, Different Information Usage

  • Chemists - “continuous and on-demand”

needs, rely heavily on current journals

  • Mathematicians - older material more

important, in addition to monographs

  • Physicists and Astronomers - current journals,

as well as reliance on pre-print archives

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Survey

  • Email questionnaire
  • How do you use the library in general, the

university library system in particular, indexing/abstracting tools at the university?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Respondents

slide-7
SLIDE 7

31% 29% 41% 4% 2% 10% 22% 62%

Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor Visiting Professor Other Chemistry / Biochemistry Mathematics Physics / Astronomy

Field of Study Position

slide-8
SLIDE 8

43% 14% 22% 22%

0 - 5 Y ears 6 - 10 Y ears 10 - 15 Y ears > 15 Y ears

Y ears at OU

23% 19% 15% 29% 15%

0 - 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 20 > 20

Publications / Y ear

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Library Resources

  • Chemistry / Mathematics Library
  • 70,000 V
  • lumes, 500 Journal Titles
  • Physics / Astronomy Library
  • 35, 000 V
  • lumes, 185 Journal Titles
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Current Information

  • Chemists use current awareness services
  • Mathematicians and Physicists / Astronomers

use personal communication and conference attendance

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Less Recent Information

  • Article Citations are important for all
  • Personal communication important for

Mathematicians

  • One mathematician commented on the desire

to have bibliographic service in electronic form

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Index and Abstract Tool Usage

  • Chemists - Many used printed CA, few used

Medline, while some used outside services at personal

  • Mathematicians seemed to use an array of

print and electronic services

  • Physicists / Astronomers use services provided

by OU infrequently

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Obtaining Articles

  • Everyone photocopies from the library
  • Non-Chemists request reprints from authors
  • About 2/3 of all researchers favored print over

electronic format

  • Comment: electronic format preferred only if

“printable”

slide-14
SLIDE 14

What do the researchers ant?

  • Generally pleased with existing library services
  • W

ant access to all available electronic journals and bibliographic sources

  • Personal searching of titles, abstracts, and full

text, followed by download and hard-copy printout

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusion

  • “science librarians must be aware of how the

scientists they serve prefer to access information”

  • “a primary goal ... should be to obtain access to

as many appropriate electronic bibliographic finding aids and databases possible”

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Conclusion Concluded

  • Remember: this is at one institution, talking

with 49 researchers. Y

  • ur mileage may vary.
  • Also, it was in 1999. Internet is a lot different

now.

  • Take home message, though: Don’t assume

behaviors - actually investigate! Results may surprise you.