In Support Of South Africa’s National HIV Program PEPFAR Oversight and Accountability Results Team (POART) COP16 (F (FY17 Q4) ) Annual Program Results Review 27 Focus Dis istricts
PEPFAR South Africa December 2017
In Support Of South Africas National HIV Program PEPFAR Oversight - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
In Support Of South Africas National HIV Program PEPFAR Oversight and Accountability Results Team (POART) COP16 (F (FY17 Q4) ) Annual Program Results Review 27 Focus Dis istricts PEPFAR South Africa December 2017 COP16 - FY17 Q4 POART
PEPFAR South Africa December 2017
2
COP16 - FY17 Q4 POART – 27 Focus Districts Outline/Table of Contents
Program Area Slides Overview – Results 3-5 VMMC 6-11 DREAMS 12-14 OVC 15-20 Priority Populations Prevention 21-25 Key Populations 26-31 1st 90 32-46 2nd 90 47-63 3rd 90 64-69 Above Site Investments 70-76 SIMS 77-81
3
COP16 (FY17 APR) Overview: 27 Focus Districts
*PP_PREV target excludes SRHR and condom promotion / provision *OVC_SERV results reported for 52 districts APR-Annual Program Results
Good performance against target: HTS, Viral load suppression, and Prevention portfolio
FY2017 Q1 FY2017 Q2 FY2017 Q3 FY2017 Q4 FY2017 APR FY2017 TARGET % Achievement HTS_TST 2,456,092 2,567,085 2,870,112 2,778,479 10,671,768 5,767,766 185% HTS_TST_POS 221,892 234,127 241,300 223,025 920,344 839,648 110% HTS Yield 9.0% 9.1% 8.4% 8.0% 8.6% 14.6% TX-NEW 183,957 191,305 155,646 163,816 694,724 965,131 72% Linkage 83% 82% 65% 73% 75% 115% TX_CURR 2,950,894 3,040,021 3,157,137 3,157,965 3,157,965 3,935,927 80% TX_NET_NEW 235,131 89,127 117,116 828 442,202 1,220,164 36% TX_RET 70% 70% 90% 78% TX_PVLS 85% 85% 91% 93% VMMC_CIRC 44,626 47,280 158,791 189,950 440,647 393,465 112% PrEP_NEW 304 381 698 768 2,151 1,279 168% KP_PREV 116,930 71,115 188,045 109,385 172% PP_PREV 343,849 752,441 1,096,290 579,323 189% OVC_SERV 442,200 762,304 799,820 664,521 120%
NB: Low net increase in Tx_Curr Q3 to Q4 was due to data reporting corrections, which have been addressed. Net increase in reported Tx_Curr was 207,071 for facilities supported in the 27 focus districts.
4
COP16 (FY17 APR) Overview: 27 Focus Districts
*PP_PREV target excludes SRHR and condom promotion / provision *OVC_SERV results reported for 52 districts APR-Annual Program Results
Did not achieve target: TX_NEW, TX_CURR, Retention
FY2017 Q1 FY2017 Q2 FY2017 Q3 FY2017 Q4 FY2017 APR FY2017 TARGET % Achievement HTS_TST 2,456,092 2,567,085 2,870,112 2,778,479 10,671,768 5,767,766 185% HTS_TST_POS 221,892 234,127 241,300 223,025 920,344 839,648 110% HTS Yield 9.0% 9.1% 8.4% 8.0% 8.6% 14.6% TX-NEW 183,957 191,305 155,646 163,816 694,724 965,131 72% Linkage 83% 82% 65% 73% 75% 115% TX_CURR 2,950,894 3,040,021 3,157,137 3,157,965 3,157,965 3,935,927 80% TX_NET_NEW 235,131 89,127 117,116 828 442,202 1,220,164 36% TX_RET 70% 70% 90% 78% TX_PVLS 85% 85% 91% 93% VMMC_CIRC 44,626 47,280 158,791 189,950 440,647 393,465 112% PrEP_NEW 304 381 698 768 2,151 1,279 168% KP_PREV 116,930 71,115 188,045 109,385 172% PP_PREV 343,849 752,441 1,096,290 579,323 189% OVC_SERV 442,200 762,304 799,820 664,521 120%
5
Substantial Improvements Between COP15 and COP16 (FY16 and FY17)
8,968,393 861,291 546,797 63% 2,715,763 285,260 11 10,671,768 920,344 694,724 76% 3,157,965 440,647 2,151
FY2016APR FY2017APR
19% increase 7% increase 27% increase 20% increase 16% increase 54% increase Large increase
6
7
Overall COP16 (FY17) Performance
1,273,212 males circumcised through the PEPFAR program in the past three years 428 486
Oct-Dec 2016 Jan-Mar 2017 Apr-Jun 2017 July-Sep 2017
460 668
100 000 150 000 200 000 250 000 300 000 350 000 400 000 450 000 500 000
FY17 Targets FY17 Results
50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 Jul-Sep 14 Oct-Dec 14Jan-Mar 15Apr-Jun 15 Jul-Sep 15 Oct-Dec 15Jan-Mar 16Apr-Jun 16 Jul-Sep16 Oct-Dec 16Jan-Mar 17Apr-Jun 17 Jul-Sep 17
VMMC Perfomance Linear (VMMC Perfomance)
8
53% 50% 96% 39% 35% 25% 79% 48% 70% 50% 59% 47% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
20 000 30 000 40 000 50 000 60 000
FY17 Oct 16 - Sep 17 Results FY17 Results (%)
FY17 Performance Across Districts
DREAMS Performance above 100%
9
VMMC Age trend FY16 – FY17
49% 47% 49% 55% 43% 32% 38% 50% 23% 18% 16% 17% 16% 26% 26% 20% 11% 10% 11% 9% 12% 12% 15% 10% 17% 23% 23% 18% 27% 28% 20% 19% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1%
131 389 47 400 55 890 121 067 48 878 49 763 163 301 198 410
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% FY16 Q1 FY16 Q2 FY16 Q3 FY16 Q4 FY17 Q1 FY17 Q2 FY17 Q3 FY17 Q4
Total >=50 25-49 20-24 15-19 10-14
10
VMMC Program Quality (SIMS)
VMMC SETS Total CEEs RED YELLOW GREEN 05_01 [069] VMMC Registers (paper) 31 23% 3% 74% 05_02 [070] VMMC Registers (electronic) 1 0% 0% 100% 05_03 [071] Adverse Event Prevention and Management 33 21% 0% 79% 05_04 [072] Voluntarism and Informed Consent 30 7% 0% 93% 05_05 [073] VMMC Clinical Follow-Up 30 7% 10% 83%
11
12
DREAMS Districts (CoJ, Ekurhuleni, eThekwini, uMgungunlovu, uMkandekude)
Distribution of ANC clients by age between COP15 and 16 (FY16 - FY17)
R² = 0.7527
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 FY2016Q1 FY2016Q2 FY2016Q3 FY2016Q4 FY2017Q1 FY2017Q2 FY2017Q3 FY2017Q4
ANC Clients Ages 15-19
ANC Clients (Ages 15-19) Linear (ANC Clients (Ages 15-19)) R² = 0.7534 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 FY2016Q1 FY2016Q2 FY2016Q3 FY2016Q4 FY2017Q1 FY2017Q2 FY2017Q3 FY2017Q4
ANC Clients Ages 20-24
ANC Clients (Ages 20-24) Linear (ANC Clients (Ages 20-24)) R² = 0.3431 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 FY2016Q1 FY2016Q2 FY2016Q3 FY2016Q4 FY2017Q1 FY2017Q2 FY2017Q3 FY2017Q4
ANC Clients Ages 25+
ANC Clients (Ages 25+) Linear (ANC Clients (Ages 25+))
25% % dr drop
between FY FY 16 & & FY FY 17 33% % dr drop
between FY FY16 & & FY FY 17 8 % % dr drop between FY FY 16 & & FY FY 17
13
Distribution of Newly Identified Positives by age between FY 16 & FY 17
Reduction in Identified positives in ANC in DREAMS districts between FY 16 and FY 17:
25%
6.8%
7.4%
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 FY2016Q1 FY2016Q2 FY2016Q3 FY2016Q4 FY2017Q1 FY2017Q2 FY2017Q3 FY2017Q4
DREAMS Districts Newly Identified Positive by Age
Newly Identified Positive (Ages 25+) Newly Identified Positive (Ages 20-24) Newly Identified Positive (Ages 15-19)
DREAMS Districts (CoJ, Ekurhuleni, eThekwini, uMgungunlovu, uMkandekude)
14
742 266 349 600 282 330 12 285 1 501 1 344 771 366 907 257 330 10 769 1 233 181% 105% 91% 88% 82% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 160% 180% 200% 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000 1400000 1600000 HTS_Community PP_Prev OVC_Serv Gend_GBV PrEP New
DREAMS Districts Performance, FY17
Target Result %Achieved
DREAMS Districts (CoJ, Ekurhuleni, eThekwini, uMgungunlovu, uMkandekude)
15
16
OVC Served – Summary Achievement
0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00% 120.00% 140.00% 160.00% 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 90000
FY17 Q4 OVC_SERV Results & % Achievement
OVC_SERV Results DSD +TA % Achieved
% Achieved
Gray = Saturation Districts
*Results over 175% not reported in chart. This includes: Buffalo City Metro, Mopani District, Ugu District, Harry Gwala District, King Cetshwayo District, Alfred Nzo District, Dr. KK District, and Waterburg District.
achieved 115% of FY2017 target
Districts achieved 80% or above target.
17
OVC HIV_Status Program Performance and Linkage to ART
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 ec Alfred Nzo District Municipality ec Chris Hani District Municipality ec Oliver Tambo District Municipality gp City of Johannesburg Metropolitan… kz Uthukela District Municipality gp Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality gp City of Tshwane Metropolitan… fs Lejweleputswa District Municipality lp Capricorn District Municipality kz Zululand District Municipality nw Bojanala Platinum District… mp Ehlanzeni District Municipality wc City of Cape Town Metropolitan… kz Ugu District Municipality lp Mopani District Municipality gp Sedibeng District Municipality mp Gert Sibande District Municipality kz uMgungundlovu District Municipality ec Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality kz King Cetshwayo District Municipality nw Dr Kenneth Kaunda District… fs Thabo Mofutsanyane District… kz eThekwini Metropolitan Municipality kz Harry Gwala District Municipality mp Nkangala District Municipality ec Amathole District Municipality nw Ngaka Modiri Molema District…
OVC_HIV STAT_POS and Linkage to ART FY17 APR
Total OVC_HIVSTAT_POS Total OVC_HIVSTAT_ART Target Proxy Linkage to ART
170 914 9 079 320 775 66 716 100 000 200 000 300 000 400 000 500 000 600 000 APR 2017 Result No of Beneficiaries
OVC_HIVSTAT Results
OVC_HIVSTAT Test Not Indicated OVC_HIVSTAT Other Reasons OVC_HIVSTAT Positive OVC_HIVSTAT Negative
12% 57% 2% 30%
18
Site Improvement Monitoring System (SIMS) Scores: OVC
in South Africa.
assessments.
include: Preventing HIV in Girls and Linkages to HIV testing Note: The assessments take place at different sites in each quarter. Assumption is if IPs are strengthening certain aspects of their support, they are doing so in all their PEPFAR supported sites
Compiled SIMS CEEs include: Case Management Services, Preventing HIV in Girls, Linkages to HIV Testing, Child Protection Services, Education Services, Girls Secondary Education Transition, Economic Strengthening and Social Protection Services, Early Childhood Development Services, Community Pediatric Nutrition Screening & Referral to Clinical Services, Family Planning/HIV Integration Service Delivery in Community Settings
29 assessments 28 assessments 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% FY 16 FY 17
Community Tool Set 3 All Core Essential Elements (CEEs)
Exceeds Expectation Meets Expectation Needs Improvement Urgent Remediation
19
Focus to Reaching Girls Aged 15-17
17 (priority population) with evidence-based, layered programming.
15-17 has increased by 138% from COP 2014 to COP 2016.
to reach almost 140,000 girls ages 15-17 in COP 2017.
37534 47058 89347 139655 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 OVC_SERV (DSD + TA): Beneficiaries 15-17 Female
OVC_SERV Females 15-17
APR 2015 APR 2016 APR 2017 APR 2018 (Target) 1827 1331 823 3366 2542 3474 3638 6132 15330 10507 8313 6938 5000 10000 15000 20000 gp City of Johannesburg Metro gp Ekurhuleni Metro kz eThekwini Metro kz uMgungundlovu District
OVC_SERV Females 15-17: Saturation Districts
Total OVC_SERV Females ages 15-17 APR 2015 Total OVC_SERV Females ages 15-17 APR 2016 Total OVC_SERV Females ages 15-17 APR 2017
Districts: The number of adolescent girls ages 15- 17 increased by almost 460% from APR 2015 to APR 2017.
20
Case Example: Linkages & Layering
Edith Moleko*, 17 years old
skills;
Edith Moleko and her grandmother, Gogo Lizzy at Ikageng Itireleng AIDS Ministry
“She was transformed from being an abused child into being an independent and dedicated young mother. She is determined to live a positive life and succeed in achieving her goals.”
21
22
Priority Population Prevention (PP_Prev) in Non-DREAMS Districts, COP16 (FY17)
209% 132% 123% 115% 111% 107% 105% 99% 98% 80% 71% 59% 39%
0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 RESULT 10-14 RESULT 15-19 RESULT 20-24 RESULT 25-49 RESULT 50+ %Overall Achievement
Focus on High Burden Areas in High Priority Age Cohort
23
PP_Prev by Sex in Non-DREAMS Districts - FY17
209% 132% 123% 115% 111% 107% 105% 99% 98% 80% 71% 59% 39% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Males RESULT Females RESULT %Achieved Overall
24
COP16 Number of people receiving postgender based violence (GBV) clinical care based on the minimum package
GEND_GBV REACH by District, APR 2017
568% 208% 167% 159% 151% 136% 119% 119% 116% 116% 115% 115% 105% 99% 90% 84% 83% 49% 44% 41% 16% 2% 0% 100% 200% 300% 400% 500% 600% 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Target Result %Achieved
Top 5 Districts <50% Achievement
25
Site Improvement Monitoring System (SIMS) Prevention Scores
2 4 1 10 4 21 6 62 1 2 1 23 6 16 3 98 2 1 3 16 32 39 45 92 325 14 20 34 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
C_01_26 [226] Condom Availability at the Service Delivery Point [AP-HTC] C_01_11 [211] Risk Reduction Counseling [AP] C_01_12 [212] Facilitation of Small Group Sessions for HIV Prevention [AP] C_01_13 [213] Small Group Sessions for HIV Prevention [AP] C_01_03 [203] Accessible Services [AP] F_01_03 [003] Risk Reduction Counseling and Condom Availability C_05_02 [255] Preventing HIV in Girls C_05_06 [226] Condom Availability C_03_02 [255] Preventing HIV in Girls 01C 01B 01A 5 3
FY 17, Q4 Scores for Prevention Related CEEs
26
27
Key Population Prevention (KP_PREV) Results and Estimated Reach, FY17
179% 229% 144% 741% 354% 196% 64% 66% 19% 99% 46% 50% 0% 100% 200% 300% 400% 500% 600% 700% 800% 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 Inmates FSW MSM/TGW Male PWID Female PWID Grand Total Results Results (%)
targets at 196% (253,711/129,424)
strengthening MSM response through SNS, social media
28
Comparison of Clinical Cascade by Group, FY17
29
PrEP with FSWs: June 2016 – August 2017
Note: Data as of 5 September 2017 (NDoH)
Estimated SW population size1: 153,000 [132,000 -182,000]; ~95% female Operational PrEP sites: 14 in 7 of the 9 provinces HIV Tests 36,239 HIV-Negatives 31,590 (87%) Initiated 2,311 (7%)
PrEP for Female Sex Workers PrEP for MSM
HIV Tests 2,219 HIV-Negatives 2,098 (95%) Initiated 325 (15%) Estimated MSM population size1: 850,000 -1.2 million Operational PrEP sites: 3 in 2 provinces
30
Increased Collaboration with Global Fund Grantees
Challenges Identified Solutions Implemented Overlap with site and partner funds Regular meetings, sharing plans and targets on grassroots levels Duplication of targets in the same geographic areas Movement out of some sites by PEPFAR where overlap does not justify yield
31
South African Government Shares Responsibility for MSM Clinic
significant barriers to accessing and utilizing public health services
Cape Town has provided sensitized and clinically competent services for MSM
with Western Cape Provincial Government from Dec 2017
populations services
32
33
COP16 HIV Testing (HTS_POS) Yield by District
Comparing HTS_POS Target to Result (#s)
9% 10% 12% 11% 8% 9%9%8% 10% 9%9% 5% 4% 9% 4% 8% 11% 4% 8% 8% 7% 11% 8% 6% 5% 9% 6%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000 200000 kz eThekwini gp City of Johannesburg gp Ekurhuleni gp City of Tshwane mp Ehlanzeni mp Nkangala ec Oliver Tambo nw Bojanala Platinum kz uMgungundlovu kz King Cetshwayo mp Gert Sibande wc City of Cape Town lp Capricorn kz Zululand ec Amathole kz Ugu gp Sedibeng lp Mopani ec Alfred Nzo fs Thabo Mofutsanyane nw Dr Kenneth Kaunda kz Uthukela ec Buffalo City nw Ngaka Modiri Molema ec Chris Hani fs Lejweleputswa kz Harry Gwala Fy2017Apr Fy2017 Targets Yield
Overall improving case finding 24/27 districts have a yield between 5 and 12% Apr – Annual Program Report
34
COP16 HIV Testing Yield by Partner – Facility-based District Support Partners (DSPs)
12% 10% 10% 10% 9% 9% 9% 8% 8% 3% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 Sum of HTS_TST_POS Sum of Yield (%)
Facility yield remains higher when compared to community yield as most cases are identified in facilities
35
Who are we identifying?
AGYW HTS Yield trend in DREAMS Districts <01 – 14 year olds Yield in DREAMS District
Yield by sex and age
Under 15 Case Finding in Facility: Child Health Services, Family Planning, Indexing Community: OVC, CBOs
36
6% 7% 9% 8% 8% 13% 19% 9% 2% 2% 17% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 MobileMod HomeMod Index OtherMod OtherPITC PMTCT ANC TBClinic KeyPop VMMC Pediatric Index Community Facility HTS_TST_POS Yield
HTS Modalities and associated yields
Community index yield improved from 7% in Q3 to 9% in Q4 Actual numbers of index networks tested low: currently training of service providers, standardized SOPs and strengthened M&E underway
37
COP16 Index testing quarterly trend
Remedial Actions Facility: Training of providers, SOPs and correct reporting by implementing partners Community: Reducing costs- classifying the contact list according to the neighborhoods for tracing
33 152 12 205 16 515 14 999
8% 11% 6% 12%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 5 000 10 000 15 000 20 000 25 000 30 000 35 000 Fy2017Q1 Fy2017Q2 Fy2017Q3 Fy2017Q4 HTS Index testing Yield
38
COp16 HTS Index Testing –Identified HIV Positives: Peads and Males
Community HTS Index Peads age distribution
Successes in identifying children of PLHIV and men aged 25-49 through index testing.
0% 0% 0% 0% 30% 50% 62% 86% 70% 50% 38% 14% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Sum of Fy2017Q1 Sum of Fy2017Q2 Sum of Fy2017Q3 Sum of Fy2017Q4 HTS_TST_POS 10-14 01-09 <01 3% 0% 2% 1% 16% 6% 7% 8% 73% 84% 75% 86% 6% 9% 5% 5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Sum of Fy2017Q1 Sum of Fy2017Q2 Sum of Fy2017Q3 Sum of Fy2017Q4 HTS_TST_POS Male 50+ 25-49 20-24 15-19 10-14
Community HTS Index Male age distribution
39
COP15 and COP16: Site Improvement Monitoring System (SIMS) Index Testing Scores
Comment: Index testing has improved in the Gen Pop and PMTCT_ANC from FY16 to FY 17
229 assessments 203 assessments 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% FY 16 FY 17
Facility Tool CEE: F_02.13 Routine HIV Testing of children
194 assessments 147 assessments 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% FY 16 FY 17
Facility Tool CEE: F_02.13 Routine HIV Testing of children of Adult Patients (PMTCT-ANC)
41
Linkage interventions
Facility linkage:
& Pre-ART module)
initiation
and men)
Community linkage:
between facility and community
indicator
ID numbers at community testing sites
Sowetan times: 13 July 2015
42
Linkage Across the 27 Districts
908 881 728 848 693 600 693 600
76% 95%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 100 000 200 000 300 000 400 000 500 000 600 000 700 000 800 000 900 000 1 000 000
Coarse Linkage Facility Linkage
HTS_TST_POS TX_NEW Linkage
COP16 (FY 17) Facility linkage is 95%
43
COP16 Age/Sex Linkage in Saturation Districts
Linkage Challenges in AGYW and Men
Diagnosis: Highest number linked - females 25-49 Remediation: Flexi hour services for linking adolescents
44
COP16 District Linkage
All saturation districts have a linkage rate of above 90%
45
COP15 and COP16 SIMS Linkage Services Scores
234 assessments 204 assessments 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% FY 16 FY 17
Facility tool CEE: F_07.03 HTC Referrals to HIV Care and Treatment
Improved SIMS results for linkage
HTS to ART
46
Direct Linkage Indicator
Community HTS_TST
Referral of HTS_POS clients to facility Work with Facility Staff and Implementing partners Confirmed HIV positive patients in TIER.Net HTS module Confirmed HIV positive patients linkage to ART in TIER.Net HTS module
Beginning in COP17 (FY18), PEPFAR CDC and USAID will require additional data to directly measure ART initiation among persons newly tested positive
47
48
COP15 and COP16 (FY16 &FY17): TX_NEW results by quarter
FY16 total: 546,797 FY17 total: 693,600 (72% of target) Increase of 146,803 vs. FY16 (+27%)
∆ Q1: +39,683 ∆ Q2: +59,208 ∆ Q3: +22,283 ∆ Q4: +25,629
49
COP16 (FY17) TX_NEW Cumulative Results by Partner & District (27 focus districts)
Intrapartner variability across districts-actions:
districts /partners by addressing district-level situational barriers
50
COP16 TX_NEW Achievement by Partner (27 focus districts)
>150%
Remediation/Ongoing interventions:
weekly tracking of results to inform course correction
performing partners
level data quality assessments
tracking to down-referral sites
51
COP16 (FY17): TX_NEW by Age/Sex (4 saturation districts)
Cumulative FY17 performance
For purposes of epidemic control, implement and scale innovative strategies targeting:
workplace ART initiation)
52
Update: Same Day ART Initiation (SDI)
responded to survey to ascertain status of 3 core interventions in the field: SDI, Tx and Retention Acceleration Plan, and community-based ART initiation
– 12 districts (634 facilities) report 100% of supported facilities implementing SDI
25 assessments 110 assessments 47 assessments 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% FY 17 Q2 FY 17 Q3 FY 17 Q4
SIMS Set 12, CEE 12_01: Test and Start
26 assessments 40 assessments 112 assessments 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% FY 17 Q2 FY 17 Q3 FY 17 Q4
SIMS Set 12, CEE 12_02: Appointment Spacing and Multi- Month Drug Dispensing (Differentiated Care)
53
NDoH Treatment & Retention Acceleration Plan
NDoH Engagement and Policy Update Timeline
54
Tx and Retention Acceleration Plan Implementation
13 # of districts responding to data calls 11 # of districts whose DSP is participating in weekly data calls 16 # of districts whose DSP is involved in remediation plans 12
Source: Rapid DSP assessment survey findings (November 2017)
55
eThekwini COP17 Strategy Update –Dec 2017
Core Intervention Progress to date Comments 1.Enhanced M&E (Evaluation by clusters and weekly performance tracking)
communicated to facilities
started.
end March 2018
Current coverage 30% Mitigation plans in place to increase ( 90% coverage 90% by September 2018
professional nurses actively tracking all hospital admissions and all hospital entry points to ART initiation
complicated patients
for CCMDD enrolment
project and ARV Drug Supply and HTS testing kits provided by DOH health facility
Model to USAID 7.Mass Media for TX_NEW
and messaging at all health facilities
engagement ongoing.
reconfiguring of service delivery platforms
eThekwini is 76% green areas
coverage.
formalised linkage processes
awareness on Men’s Health with linkage
57
Current on Treatment (TX_CURR) Progress Toward COP16 Targets - 27 Focus Districts
districts over FY16 (COP15) achievement.
saturation goal in the 27 focus districts.
58
TX_CURR Progress Toward COP16 Targets - 4 Saturation Districts
59
TX_CURR COP16 Achievement vs. TX_CURR % Gap to 2nd 90 by Age and Sex - 4 Saturation Districts
TX_CURR, FY17APR TX_CURR gap to 81% PLHIV coverage Labels show saturation levels (81% of total PLHIV, 2016 estimate)
60
COP16 TX_RET Performance by District - 27 focus districts
Saturation district
61
COP16 TX_RET Performance by Facility - 27 Focus Districts
93% facilities <90% 79% facilities <80% 48% facilities <70%
62
Retention Remediation Activities
▪ Improve Patient Access ▪ Expanded clinic hours and Saturday hours ▪ Expand use of mobile clinics for both initiation and ongoing care ▪ Improve Patient Experience ▪ Encourage appointment time scheduling to reduce waiting time ▪ Direct service delivery support by DSPs to reduce burden on under-staffed facilities ▪ Motivate staff through recognition ▪ Mentors to foster respectful, non-discriminatory care ▪ Implement adolescent & youth friendly services ▪ Expand incorporation of peer navigators/expert patients into facility-based services. ▪ Use of interpersonal health communication products ▪ Maximize effectiveness of Linkage & Retention Coordinators
63
Interpersonal Health Communication Products
64
65
Retention on ART, VL Done, and VL Suppression COPs 14, 15, 16 (Fys 15-17): 27 Focus Districts
76% 61% 79% 77% 63% 87% 70% 80% 85% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 12-month retention VL completed VL <1,000 cp/mL
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY15 FY16 FY17
66
FY 2016 (COP15) TX Cascade thru Retention at 12 Months, , VLD and VL Suppression
100 000 200 000 300 000 400 000 500 000 600 000 700 000 800 000 900 000 1 000 000 South Africa
One Year Outcomes of Persons Initiated on ART in FY16
FY16 HTS_PoS FY16 TX_NEW FY17 TX_RET_N FY17 PVLS_D FY17 PVLS_N
80% of those retained
85% of those tested
70% of TX_NE W FY16 861,291 positive tests in FY16
63% of Positive Tests = Tx_New
67
COP16 Annual Viral Load Done & Suppressed Trend—Saturation Districts
68
NHLS: Monthly Viral Suppression Monitoring
69
VL Suppression by Age, Sex (Source: NHLS)
previous 12 months among 27 focus districts
suppressed VL (< 1000 copies/mL),
copies/mL, and
low of 64% in children < 10 years to 85% in patients 25 years and older.
15+ (84.4% vs 79.4%)
10-14F: 65.0%, 10-14M: 62.9%
70
71
2017 Sustainability Index Dashboard (SID) Summary
Sustainability Analysis for Epidemic Control:
Epidemic Type: Income Level: Upper middle income PEPFAR Categorization: Long-term Strategy (Co-finance) PEPFAR COP 17 Planning Level: $483 million (+ $51 million central VMMC funds) 2015 (SID 2.0) 2017 (SID 3.0) 2019 2021 Governance, Leadership, and Accountability
9.67 9.17
8.45 8.87
7.33 9.04
6.50 9.17
10.00 8.00 National Health System and Service Delivery
7.69 6.71
6.97 6.16
4.67 6.92
8.38 8.00
6.67 9.58 Strategic Investments, Efficiency, and Sustainable Financing
8.61 8.53
8.61 9.28 Strategic Information
6.77 6.90
9.58 8.33
8.73 8.83
SUSTAINABILITY DOMAINS and ELEMENTS
South Africa
Generalized
500 1 000 1 500 2 000 2 500 3 000 2016 2017 2018 (projected) USD MillionsFinancing the HIV Response
Partner Gov't PEPFAR Global Fund Other Donors Private Sector 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 Current U.S. dollarsGNI Per Capita (Atlas Method)
2000 4000 6000 8000 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 Deaths/PLHIV (thousands) Adult Prev./Incid. Rate (%)Epidemiological Data
Adult Prevalence Adult Incidence PLHIV AIDS-related Deaths 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 Fertility/Pop. Growth Rate Total Pop. (millions)Population and Fertility
PopulationNational DoH Clinical Cascade (3/17)
<15 >15 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80+ Population % AgePopulation Pyramid (2017)
Female % Male %CONTEXTUAL DATA CONTEXTUAL DATA
72
SID and Table 6 Activities
Supply Chain: key interventions improved score from 4.67 to 6.92
Lab: significant gains from 6.67 to 9.58 Service Delivery: despite significant efforts, decreased from 7.69 to 6.71 HRH: PEPFAR increased direct service delivery also reflects the decrease from 6.97 to 6.16
73
SID 2.0 & 3.0 Comparison (2015 and 2017)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dark Green Light Green Yellow
SID 2.0 & 3.0 Comparison
SID 2.0 SID 3.0
2017
improved from 2015 to 2017
engagement go from Yellow to Dark Green in
delivery (a reflection
delivery support in the program and other health system delivery challenges)
74
Shift in Laboratory Support
Quality Improvement capacity building
support, and collaboration
laboratory support
75
Strategic Shifts
ensure all activities fall under identified priority areas
activities together
– Redirect activity (change work plan) – Discontinue funding in COP18
76
Strategic Shifts
Key Population Programming Models Laboratory Support New and Efficient Service Delivery
77
78
PEPFAR SA SIMS Sites Surveyed Cumulative Performance
CDC
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total FY15 14 11 22 47 FY16 37 9 30 63 139 FY17 57 39 71 46 213 Total 108 59 101 85 399
USAID
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total FY16 1 68 123 192 FY17 36 8 74 19 137 Total 36 9 142 123 329
* The USAID visits are underreported for FY17 as some of the visits conducted are not showing in the USAID GHSMA system. The USAID HQ team is currently investigating and rectifying this issue.
79
SIMS 2.0/3.0 Scores by Partners FY 16 & FY 17 Facility Tool
Note: The assessments take place at different sites each quarter. Assumption is if IPs are strengthening certain aspects of their support, they are doing so in all their PEPFAR supported sites
FY 17 FY 16
80
SIMS 2.0/3.0 Scores by Partners COP15 & cop16 Community Tool
Note: The assessments take place at different sites in each quarter. Assumption is if IPs are strengthening certain aspects of their support, they are doing so in all their PEPFAR supported sites
FY 17 (COP16) FY 16 (COP15)
81
End – FY 17 Q4 (COP16 Summary Results Review - POART)
Charles Pill SA PEPFAR Coordinator pillc@state.gov