Implementing the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act In the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

implementing the sustainable groundwater management act
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Implementing the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act In the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SVBGSA.org Implementing the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act In the Salinas Valley 2011-2017 2011-2017 Who Does SGMA Apply To? There are 515 groundwater basins in the State SGMA applies to the 127 high and medium priority


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Implementing the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act In the Salinas Valley

SVBGSA.org

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2011-2017

2011-2017

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Who Does SGMA Apply To?

  • There are 515 groundwater basins in the State
  • SGMA applies to the 127 “high and medium priority”

basins

  • 21 basins are critically-over drafted
  • Parts of Salinas Valley
  • Santa Cruz Mid-County
  • Pajaro Valley
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency

  • Formed as a Joint Powers Authority
  • Monterey County
  • Monterey One-Water
  • Monterey County Water Resources

Agency

  • Castroville Community Service District
  • Cities
  • King City
  • Soledad
  • Gonzales
  • Salinas
  • Contract Agency
  • No full time employees
  • No legacy costs
  • Regional Government Services

5 9/30/19 Add a footer

  • Board Representation
  • Agriculture
  • Forebay
  • Eastside/Langley
  • Pressure 180-400
  • Upper Valley
  • CPUC Regulated Water Company
  • Environmental
  • Disadvantaged Community/ Small Public

Water Systems

  • Other Eligible GSA Entity
  • City of Salinas
  • South County Cities
  • Public Member
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Guiding Principles

  • Understanding where people are and what they

want will direct our actions

  • Inclusion and diversity produce better results
  • Doing it together is the right, though difficult,

thing to do.

7 9/30/19 Add a footer

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Board Advisory Finance Planning Executive

24 23 14 8 14 Total Governance Meetings 83

Fee Boundary GSP Outreach

19 7 4 Total Public Info Meetings 35 Number of Meetings 128 5 Public Meetings 2018-19

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Fee Approved March 14, 2019

Calculated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2019/20

Proposition 26 Regulatory fee

Sustainable Groundwater Beneficiary Annual Fee FY 2019/20 Water Usage Agricultural $4.79 Per Irrigated Acre 90% All Other $2.26 Per Service Connection 10% State of California Cost $110 Row Crop $93.50 Berries Per Irrigated Acre Per Irrigated Acre Estimated Domestic Water Usage Per Connection .36 acre foot (approximately 117K) gals)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SGMA Timeline

Basin Modification 2016 SGMA Start Jan 1, 2015 GSA Formation 2017 GSP Development 2018 – Jan, 31 2020 (or 2022) 2020 – 2040 Achieve Sustainability within 20 years 2040 – 2070 Maintain Sustainability for next 30 years

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11 9/30/19 Add a footer

All the Data In Between

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12 9/30/19 Add a footer

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13 9/30/19 Add a footer

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14 9/30/19 Add a footer

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15 9/30/19 Add a footer

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Chapter 9 Projects and Actions Addressing the Issues

16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Important Points

17

  • This chapter is our proposal on how to reach sustainability. Modifications will

be made over the next three to five years

  • Not all projects and actions will need to be implemented
  • Many details need to be developed
  • Developed over first two to three years of implementation
  • Informed by other GSPs as they are written
  • Opportunity for more input
  • Demonstrate to DWR that we have the tools to reach sustainability
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Project Assumptions

18

  • Interlake tunnel
  • Jarrett Dam
  • Additional water supplies will trigger a

reassessment of which projects to implement

  • Limited time to confirm new water

supplies

¨ Projects are designed to attain sustainability with existing water

supplies

¨ Additional water supplies can be incorporated during early GSP

implementation

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Priority Projects

19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Invasive Species Eradication

20

  • Work with existing programs
  • Multiple benefits
  • Direct groundwater benefit to 180/400-Foot

Aquifer Subbasin is limited

  • Indirect benefit through better river

management, potential direct benefit in Southern Subbasin

slide-21
SLIDE 21

CSIP Projects

  • Four individual projects identified
  • Optimize CSIP
  • Upgrade M1W plant for winter flows
  • Maximize CSIP use of existing SRDF diversion
  • Expand CSIP area
  • All projects work together – no one

project is sufficient

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Seawater Extraction Barrier

22

  • Designed to halt and reverse seawater intrusion
  • Relatively high cost, but a definitive fix
  • State of extracted water TBD
  • Optional injection barrier addressed
slide-23
SLIDE 23

11043 Water Right

23

  • Divert using radial collectors
  • Project 1: radial collector at Chualar provides water to eastern

Salinas area

  • Project 2: radial collector at Soledad provides water to southern

Eastside Subbasin

  • Although this is a priority project, not all parts may be built
  • Many details still to be worked out.
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Inject Winter Flows from SRDF

24

  • Extract at SRDF
  • Injection wells add water to 180-Foot and 400-Foot-

Aquifers

  • Likely require a change in time of diversion on an

existing water right

  • May reduce size, or need for, seawater intrusion

barrier

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Alternative Projects

25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Alternative Projects

26

  • Serve desalinated water to municipalities
  • Recharge local runoff from Gabilan Range
  • Recharge winter M1W advanced treated water if available
  • Conjunctive use of southern 180-Foot Aquifer
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Management Actions

27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Management Actions

28

  • Outreach and Education
  • Best practices
  • Reservoir reoperation
  • Reliant on HCP
  • SVBGSA supports particular purposes for reservoir reoperation
  • Agricultural retirement
  • Only applicable to willing sellers
  • Potential to subsidize rotational fallowing or partial fallowing
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Management Actions

29

  • Restrict pumping in CSIP area
  • Implemented after the CSIP projects are developed
  • Support extension of emergency ordinance in Deep Aquifer
  • Avoid too many wells in deep aquifer
  • Avoid severe water restrictions
  • Temporary until the Deep Aquifer study is complete
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Water Charges Framework

30
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Water Charges Framework

31

  • System to fund projects and actions
  • Provide a financial incentive to control pumping
  • Allow individual well owners, including municipalities, to make financial decisions on water

use.

  • Identical framework in each Subbasin, but different details in each Subbasin
  • Other options will be reviewed, including regulatory fees, per acre charges
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Water Charges Framework

32

  • Tiered system based on extraction
  • Tiers are unique in each Subbasin
  • Charges are unique in each Subbasin
  • Tradeable allowances (to some degree)
  • Rollover

This will be a negotiated framework. Desired outcome is an equitable and agreed to system.