ii
play

II Relative : tasting Galois computation of An a explicit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Galois Group The Galois theory II Relative : tasting Galois computation of An a explicit group Newstead E ' FEKEE , how If Gul 'Elk ) : : " " " . . . . other ? each te subgroups ) Lemma ( Tep sub


  1. Galois Group The Galois theory II Relative :

  2. tasting Galois computation of An a explicit group

  3. Newstead E ' FEKEE , how If Gul 'Elk ) ÷ :÷÷¥÷ : " " " . . . . other ? each te

  4. subgroups ) Lemma ( Tep sub extensions are IF FE KEE , Gal ( Elk ) EGAICEIF ) then . Gall Elk ) C- Gull Elf ) check PI to need we . with re Aut CE ) regal ( Elk ) implies Now = ideate = folk ) If - idf Hence off - idk Mk . ' . it Gal ( Elf ) Therefore . IDK

  5. " also " bottom sub extensions Nhlvral question : are subgroups ? No . = TE Gall KIF ) , do we E If TE Gal ( EIF ) ? I have k - K -5k , and Recall T Ip } ' TEGAKKIF ) defined isn't it on hence of E . all

  6. element of rt Gul ( EIF ) Can make an we Gal ( KIF ) . en E , not k . a fucken Notimnediatdy is : r : K → E 4k know do However , we . element of be for rlk to an order In ion ( rha ) - K need Gall KIF ) - , we . happen ? this When does

  7. field splitting Neaexampte the het be E ( Vz ) x ' -2 , for and let K - - . Q1 ) ( Here F - - : . with TE Gall Ela ) take Suppose we = as rlxz ) and old , ) =L , . homework k ? imlrlk ) we from = Is - * * ④ (a) - K know da ) - - .

  8. " ) " nice Thy ( when restrictions are the splitting field of where k is FE KEE , If the splitting field of gcx ) c- FIX ) is and E re Gal ( EIF ) all for e F EXT , then f- Ix ) im ( Nk ) K have - - . we of glx ) roots the PI let . . , pmek be . pi , ' - - Palm seen then that { 13 , : a- eiadlirfep . " we've F - basis for k . is an

  9. . pm } { is . . permutes key fact : r . . . . im ( Hk ) E K First let's show . - - ' Prem . . - em Pie - Z te ' be k given KEK so Let - . , , ' - - Bim ) = r ( Efe . Observe . . - em Pie ruck ) = Efe . - - r ( Pm ) " E K . . - em r ( pile ' If I . " 2 " resolves argument Hence in ( Hk ) Ek . Similar . ④

  10. ( Restrictions to splitting " nice " ) field Core are field The splitting k where is If FE KEE is th sphlty field and glx ) EF Ix ) E for : Gallet F) → Gal ( KIF ) then f ffx ) EF Ix ) , far homomorphism = rly YG ) is a by given = Gal ( Elk ) Kerl 4) with .

  11. . Operation - defined PI well 4 know is we , Ik k Ik , re Ik o preserving is r = . - idk } = { TE Gall EIF ) : Hk Ker (4) - Now = { re Aut ( E ) = idk } : elk Gal ( Elk ) = . FE

  12. Quotients ) Core ( Galois is th splitting field for k where FEKEE If is the splitting field for E c- FIX ) and separable gcx ) Gul ( Elk ) a Gullet ) f- Ix ) c- FIX , then separable Gal ( Elf ) Kal CE Ik ) Gal ( KIF ) . = and that y from the check we only need to PI surjective result is last .

  13. - IE : F ) I Gul ( EIF ) I and know We - - FT = [ K ( Gul ( KIF ) I separable ' . splitting field fernflxleklx ) the E is Observe that , we get = [ E : KJ . So I Gul ( Elk ) I and - Y;:Y¥i - I' cent " " " ' limits - - - - = [ E : KIK : F ) = ( Gal ( HEH I - I codomain Ik : F) - = T enay

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend