ietf itu standardization activities ietf itu
play

IETF & ITU Standardization Activities IETF & ITU - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IETF & ITU Standardization Activities IETF & ITU Standardization Activities Emile Stephan Current Documents Current Documents RMON Protocol Identifier for IPv6 and MPLS Authors: Emile Stephan, Jordi Palet RFC3919


  1. IETF & ITU Standardization Activities IETF & ITU Standardization Activities Emile Stephan

  2. Current Documents Current Documents � RMON Protocol Identifier for IPv6 and MPLS – Authors: Emile Stephan, Jordi Palet – RFC3919 � IPPM registry – Authors: Emile Stephan – Latest Version: draft-ietf-ippm-registry-08.txt, October 2004 Status: 2 nd IESG tour soon – � IPPM MIB – Authors: Emile Stephan, Jessie Jewitt – Latest Version:, draft-ietf-ippm-mib-06.txt February, 2004 – Status: removed from the charter, go to RFC on an individual base � Metrics definition for interdomain – draft-stephan-ippm-multicast-metrics-00.txt, draft-stephan-ippm-spatial-metrics-01.txt – Status: see further � ITU 0.IPtest – Authors: Renée le Viol, Emile Stephan – Status: format defined IETF & ITU Standardization Activities 2

  3. RFC3919 RFC3919 � "Remote Network Monitoring (RMON) Protocol Identifiers for IPv6 and Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS)" � What is a protocol identifier ? – Codification – Defined in RFC 2896 and RFC 2895 � Why protocol identifiers ? – Encourage better interoperability between RMON-2 agent implementations – produce valid protocolDirTable INDEX encodings; – Usage in Remote Network Monitoring MIB (Management Information Base) Version 2 [RFC2021] � Why IPv6 ? – Avoid error during configurationIPIP6 IP6; � Success Story: – 56th IETF:6QM partners identify RMON MIBs where not able to describe IPv6 capabilities; – 57th IETF: individual submission draft-stephan-ipv6-protocol-identifier-00.txt – 58th IETF WG Item: draft-ietf-rmonmib-pi-ipv6-01.txt – After 59th IETF WG last call: draft-ietf-rmonmib-pi-ipv6-02.txt – Before 60th IETF IESG Evaluation; draft-ietf-rmonmib-pi-ipv6-03.txt and 04 – After 60th IETF: RFC Queue – Before 61th IETF: It gained RFC in October 2004. Its number is RFC3919. IETF & ITU Standardization Activities 3

  4. IPPM MIB data model model IPPM MIB data • PointOfMeasureTable • NetMeasureTable • SynchronizationTable • HistoryTable Usage Owners • MetricTable MetricTable • OwnersTable ReportSetup Report Mgmt • AggrMeasureTable • ReportSetupTable AggrMeasure Notification History • ReportTable • Notifications PointOfMeasure Synchronisation B Network NetMeasure Setup Setup ; Measure results A C ; Test Packet Report Report IETF & ITU Standardization Activities 4

  5. IPPM Proxy architecture IPPM Proxy architecture C ReportSetupTable O READ/ AggrMeasureSetupTable N CREATE S SynchronisationTable T R probe pointOfMeasureTable N V probe O probe NetworkMeasureTable A probe L M READ/ C ONLY L History Table M E P Reportable R Notifications IETF & ITU Standardization Activities 5

  6. IPPM Registry Registry IPPM � RFC 2678 " IPPM Metrics for Measuring Connectivity" – Type-P-Instantaneous-Unidirectional-Connectivity,Type-P-Instantaneous-Bidirectional-Connectivity – Type-P-Interval-Unidirectional-Connectivity, Type-P-Interval-Bidirectional-Connectivity – Type-P1-P2-Interval-Temporal-Connectivity � RFC 2679 "A One-way Delay Metric for IPPM" – Type-P-One-way-Delay, Type-P-One-way-Delay-Poisson-Stream, Type-P-One-way-Delay-Percentile – Type-P-One-way-Delay-Median, Type-P-One-way-Delay-Minimum, Type-P-One-way-Delay-Inverse-Percentile � RFC 2680 "One Way Packet Loss Metric for IPPM" – Type-P-One-way-Packet-Loss, Type-P-One-way-Packet-Loss-Poisson-Stream, Type-P-One-way-Packet-Loss-Average � RFC2681 "A Round-trip Delay Metric for IPPM" – Type-P-Round-trip-Delay, Type-P-Round-trip-Delay-Poisson-Stream, Type-P-Round-trip-Delay-Percentile – Type-P-Round-trip-Delay-Median, Type-P-Round-trip-Delay-Minimum, Type-P-Round-trip-Inverse-Percentile � RFC3357: "One-way Loss Pattern Sample Metrics" – Type-P-One-Way-Loss-Distance-Stream, Type-P-One-Way-Loss-Period-Stream, Type-P-One-Way-Loss-Noticeable-Rate – Type-P-One-Way-Loss-Period-Total, Type-P-One-Way-Loss-Period-Lengths, Type-P-One-Way-Inter-Loss-Period-Lengths � RFC3393: "IP Packet Delay Variation Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)" – Type-P-One-way-ipdv, Type-P-One-way-ipdv-Poisson-stream, Type-P-One-way-ipdv-percentile – Type-P-One-way-ipdv-inverse-percentile, Type-P-One-way-ipdv-jitter, Type-P-One-way-peak-to-peak-ipdv � RFC3432: "Network performance measurement with periodic streams" – Type-P-One-way-Delay-Periodic-Stream IETF & ITU Standardization Activities 6

  7. Spatial metrics metrics Spatial � Usage: just a narrow scope of usage ! – Active • a terminal and a node • A node and a terminal – Passive • A node to a node – Multicast tree – interdomain – Troubleshooting – … � Draft Status: – need of spatial metrics definition became very urgent in IETF – request from chair to make archeology ( s ee http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/ ) – merge… IETF & ITU Standardization Activities 7

  8. ITU O.Iptest O.Iptest ITU � benefits: – Network performance and QoS can be monitored – Compare results between different instruments – Interoperability between • instruments of different manufacturers • administrative domains • composite networks • IPv4 and IPv6 measures (NAT PT) IETF & ITU Standardization Activities 8

  9. Discussion: Discussion: What is a MAY ? What is a MAY ? What is a MUST ? What is a MUST ?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend