Identifying Barriers to Low Pap Smear Screening Rates Monique - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

identifying barriers to low pap
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Identifying Barriers to Low Pap Smear Screening Rates Monique - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Identifying Barriers to Low Pap Smear Screening Rates Monique Merritt East Arkansas Family Health Center West Memphis, Arkansas Introduction East Arkansas Family Health Center (EAFHC) Patient Center Medical Home Model Level III


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Identifying Barriers to Low Pap Smear Screening Rates

Monique Merritt East Arkansas Family Health Center West Memphis, Arkansas

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

  • East Arkansas Family Health Center

(EAFHC)

  • Patient Center Medical Home

Model – Level III

  • 7,826 patients
  • 7 providers
  • Serves 4 counties : Crittenden,

Poinsett, Mississippi, and Phillips Counties

  • 49% of patients are 200% below

Federal Poverty Level

  • 54% patients uninsured
  • 41% patients receive Medicaid
  • Crittenden ranks 70 of 75 in Health

Outcomes

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

  • Singh, G. Rural-Urban Patterns and Trends in Cervical Cancer

Mortality, Incidence, Stage, and Survival in United States, 1950-

  • 2008. J Community Health(2012)37:217-223.

 rural areas: 20% higher cervical cancer mortality risk, 15% higher incidences than non-rural areas Black women have highest mortality risks for cervical cancer

  • The American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology

(ASCCP) Guidelines women ages 21 to 65 : Pap screenings every 3 years.  At age 30: every 3 years or every 5 years w/Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) cotesting

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Methodology

  • El

Electr troni nic c Data Ret etrie rieval: l: eClin linica ical Works, ks, Bridge ge IT

  • pulled data reports from Uniform Data Systems w/

assistance of Continuously Quality Improvement Director

  • Obser

servati tions

  • ns and Inter

ervie views ws

  • questioned providers and staff to obtain opinions on low

Pap smear screening rates

  • viewed center set up and patient- provider and provider-

staff interactions

  • Projec

ject t time: e: 6 week eeks

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Results

Total # of patients 7,827 Total # of female patients 5,095 Total # of females ages 24-64 3,726 Total # of females enrolled in Breast Care 170 Total # of female patients eligible for Breast Care based on age* 2,530

Table 1.1. General statistics of EAFHC female patients from the 3/1/2012 to 3/31/2013. *This number reflects eligibility based upon age range ONLY, not income requirements.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Results

Table 2.2. EAFHC overall Pap Smear Screening Rates 41% 59%

East Arkansas Family Health Center Pap Smear Rates 3/1/2012- 3/31/2013

YES NO

slide-7
SLIDE 7

0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 STATE CHCs National CHCs

Pap Smear Rates by Community Health Center in Arkansas 2010-2012

2010 2011 2012 HP2020

Results

Table 2.1. Pap Smear screening rates by Community Health Centers in Arkansas. Data was taken from graph given at patient centered medical care meeting with CQI directors from Community Health Centers of Arkansas. Identification of center names were excluded for confidentiality.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Results

Provider YES NO Total Patient Count Patient Count Pap% Patient Count Pap% 1 205 52.70% 184 47.30% 389 2 135 39.02% 211 60.98% 346 3 89 36.18% 157 63.82% 246 4 40 51.28% 38 48.72% 78 5 212 44.54% 264 55.46% 476 6 81 25.00% 243 75.00% 324 7 1 4.55% 21 95.45% 22 TOTAL 763 40.56% 1,118 59.43% 1,881 Table 2.4. Pap Smear rates by provider at EAFHC. Provider names were excluded for confidentiality.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Results

53% 39% 36% 51% 45% 25% 5% 41% 93% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% % Paps 3/1/2012 to 3/31/2013 East Arkansas Family Health Center Providers

Pap % By Provider: East Arkansas Family Health Center

Pap %

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Discussion

  • EAFHC had a 41% Pap screening rate from 3/1/2012 to

3/31/2013

  • Individual providers have similar screening rates
  • EAFHC has already begun taking steps to improve numbers
  • Further research is encouraged to explore patient perspectives

Barrie iers s Ide dentified ied

  • Vulnerable patient population
  • Arkansas Breast Care Program is limited
  • Lack of Patient Education
  • Patient financial Insufficiencies
  • Coding Errors
  • Ineffective staff and patient provisions and preparation for

screenings

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Limitations

  • Short time frame for project
  • Data collected for specific time interval
  • No patient interviews
  • Interviews were not documents
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Conclusion

  • 6 out 12 state ranking for screening rates is

satisfactory

  • New facility construction is a positive enhancement
  • Opportunity to enhance services
  • New community partners provide opportunity for

long term financial assistance

  • Keep the compassion
  • Remember the mission of EAFHC
  • Keep communication open
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Recommendations

Short-Term  Strengthen relationships with other organizations (churches, non- profit and private organizations, media)  Make educational materials available at care center  Educate patients on procedure during room preparation  Monitor coding input  Continue to encourage Breast Care enrollment  Reminder mail and phone calls Medium-Term  Hire more staff to focus on tracking and contacting patients  Provider and patient incentives Long-term  Encourage patient access to health information  Expand office hours  Exploit Pap flow sheet to tract normal/abnormal Paps  Address provider resistance to performing Paps  Expand in office follow up services for abnormal screening results (i.e., colposcopy)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Acknowledgements

  • Thank you to GE

GE-Na Nati tional

  • nal Medi

dica cal l Fel ello lowsh ship ip for allowing me the opportunity to participate in the Primary Care Leadership Program.

  • Thank you to Ea

East Ark Arkansas ansas Fami mily ly Health th Cent nter and it’s staff f for opening up their center with welcoming arms and offering a unique learning experience. Speci cial al thank nks s to all provide iders for taking ing the e extr tra time me out ut with th me despi pite thei eir r bus usy y schedules hedules.

  • Thank you to my site mentor, Cher

herry y Whitehea head-Tho Thompso son n and faculty mentor, Dr. David d Maness ss, MD for their guidance and support through this experience.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

THANK YOU!