Applications
I
:statement
- f
Galois
'Great
Theorem
I : Theorem Great Galois ' when polynomial a theorem that - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Applications of statement I : Theorem Great Galois ' when polynomial a theorem that down write today a expresses in something analogous to expressible roots that are has the gvntmhi formula : quadratic formula , cubic formula ,
Applications
I
:statement
Galois
'Great
Theorem
today
write
down
a theorem that
expresses when
a
polynomial
has
roots that are
expressible
in something
analogous to
the gvntmhi
formula
Motivation for
this
: quadratic formula, cubic formula,quarticformula
iwmdn
:
roots of
ax'tbxtc
Cin
Q) are
x
Note :
roots
areexpressible
in form of
held elements, felt ops,
and
not extraction
Cubic
formula
root at
ax't bx'texted
is
where
p
,
r
q= p't bcjaazd Note:
formula
is
in terms
field
elements, field operations,
and
root extinctions
Quartic formula
same takeaway
:
roots
are
in terms of
root extractions
To
generalize these
nations
by
a formula
"Def
( Radical Extension)
A field extension
Elf
is
called
a
radical
extension
if
there
exist
intermediate
fields -
F
= Eo E E , E Ez Eso that
for
all
Kiel
we
have
some
ei E Ei - i
and
some
ni EIN
with
Ei
( where
hifi
is just some
root of
x
"
EI
Ut
E
be
the splitting field of
x'-2€
Ix)
. weknow
E
= Q ( Vz, wt )
where
w= -11¥
=( Vz
,w )
Vz)
=(RE , Fs)
a
..
Define ( solvable by
radicals)
A polynomial
flxltflx)
is
solvnbkbgmdicab if
its splitting field
Kf
is
contained
in
some
radical extension
.its
roots
areexpressible in
terms at
field
elements , field openheirs
root extinctions
.Exe
X3 -2E
ID
is
solvable
by
radicals
since
Kf
where
we've
seen
④(vz, Fs)1a is
a
radical extn
.EI
suppose
char (F) Hn
, and
let
ctf
be given
.Then
f-(x)
"
is
soluble
by
radicals
since
Kf
and
Flora , un)
is
a
radical
extension it
( same
basic
idea
even works if
church In ,
but
need
some
car
with
roots of unity)
EI
Evey
quadratic , cubic, quartic polynomial
are
solvable
by
radicals ( if
charles -42,33)
because
we
have formulas
That
express the
cook
in
terms at
field
element, field
and
root
extinction)
Whit
about
the
" otherside of the
coin
" ?
Ie, if
f
' isnot solvable by
medicals, does Thet
mean
f
has
not that
aren't expressible
in
terms
field element, field
root extractions?
( radical
extensions
are
cloud
under
composition)
If
E
and
k
are
radical
extensions of
F
, Tha
Ev K
is
a radicalextension
F.
Een
'te .
emirate.im,
*
÷
Ez =
,E
, (Vez)Ei
¥
:*,
:*,
Cos If f
is
not soluble radicals, then
There
is
no analogquadratic
formula
for polynomials of degree self)
.PI If
There
were
such
a
formula , Thu
all
roots
would
be
expressible
in
terms of
F ,
Held
, and
root
if
a is
aroot
f
,then
FK)
is
a subfield of some
medical extension.
But by
last
result,
this
means
ke =¥÷Ik
)
is
also
in
someradical extension . Ie , f
is solvable
by
indicaIs ,
BB
So :
looking fr
higher degree analogs of quadratic formula
amounts
to
asking
:
when
is f
solvable by radicals ?
Higginson
How
can figure
if f
is
soluble
by
medicals
w/o
looking fer
a formula for its
roots ?
To
answer this
, we
need to take
an
excursion into
group Theory
.Deth
(solvable group)
A group
G
is
called soluble
it
there
is
a sequencesubgroups
geg)
⇐ Hos HEHE .so that
His Hit ,
fer all
and
Hitya ,
is
cyclic
.⇐ All finite
abelian
groups
are
solvable
. ByFundamental
theorem , GI kn
,④ Renato
. -for
some
4, ne,
. > ne HNand
so
{e) skatoleHo
EL
S,
is
solvable
since
{e) E ( ( 123))
E S3
siteI
size 3size 6
Sime
Iska) > 1=-115,1
,we
have
412317053
and
53/4123,7=12
Also
{e)a ( CRH)
and
4123%3=83
EI
Sy
is
solvable
toe :
{e) s ( ( 12713477 E le , 1127134)
, 1137124), 1147123)) E Ay s Su ,Fun
exercise :
this
chain
desired
properties
Exe
Dn ( symmetries of
a
is
solvable
because
{ e) E { rotations) E Dn
fits
the
bill .
Thin
( As
is
not
solvable)
As
is
not
solvable .
If ( sketch)
⑨ As
is
generated
by
3
means
As
= { o , .KEN
and
Tiff is
some3
⑤ all
3
are
conjugate in
As
,
ie
if
r,
and rz
thin
there is
Sonu
F
c-As sothat
F
, = FTZF"
.④ if
Ho Ag
and
Atle)
,thenH
has
some
3
why
is this
enough ?
If
H As
.and H
, then
Ayy
not cyclic
Hence
fee As to
be
solvable,
we
need
some
Hotty
with
H t le)
subgroups in As
H
contains
some
3- '5k
w/
"consecutiveII.
'
Ii :
tins
. !
1¥
. torments . " "{e) DA 5
pm
Deep
group theory
G
is
solvable, then
evey
subgroup of G
and
every quotient at
G is
solvable too
.CI If
n > 5. Then
Sn
and
A.
are not
solvable .
Pf
can
find
a
subgroup isomorphic to
As
in
Sn
An
( namely
" S's
" ↳ Snsince
{Gesu : Olli) - i
and
tnke the As
inside this)
.for all i >5)
Now FOR THE
BIG
THEOREM !
Great Theorem )
Tt
chart F)
let Kf
be
its splitting field
.Then
f
is
solvable by
radicals
iff
Gal ( KH F)
is
solvable
.PI
Next
time
.A few takeaways
was first
to prove not all quirks
are
solvable
°Abel
could prove
that
certain
polynomials for
,
"
. "!! """
"
hnd.am?i::neiemic
knew
Sa
, 53, Syare
solvable,
so
ay poly
at degree
E 4
is
solvable
by
radicals
EX
In
1962 ,
Feit
proved
that
all
groups
are
solvable . (proof
was
n 250 pgs)
Hence
it
164 ( KHE) )
is
f- is
solvable
by
indicants
.EI
There exist
" unsolvable quintic
"let
flx) E
Ix)
be
any
quintic polynomial
that's irreducible
and
with
precisely
3 real
root
.Claim
: fis not
solvable
by
radicals .
Ff :
514 Gal ( KHAN
, so
group they says That God ( KHQ)
has
an
element r of
5 .
Since Gul LKFIQ) ↳ 55
, we
get
that
that r
is
a5
(thought of in It).
But
complex
conjugation
exchanges the
2
complex
roots but keeps
the
3
rat
roots fixed,
so
its
a
transposition
.So
Gul ( Kha)
(thought of inside
Ss )
has
a
5
cycle
and
a
2
Group Thay faut
: ay
subgroup of
Si
with
a 5.gale
and
a
2- cycle
is
all
Ss
. So ' . Gul (KH@HSIso
is
not
solvable
. So fnot solvable by
For
example
:x
5