I N V E S T O R U P D A T E
First Quarter 2017 Update
I N V E S T O R U P D A T E First Quarter 2017 Update - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
I N V E S T O R U P D A T E First Quarter 2017 Update Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private
I N V E S T O R U P D A T E
First Quarter 2017 Update
Forward-Looking Statements
This presentation contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act). Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties and you should not rely on them as predictions of future events. Forward-looking statements depend on assumptions, data or methods which may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to realize them. We do not guarantee that the transactions and events described will happen as described (or that they will happen at all). You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes”, “expects”, “may”, “should”, “intends”, “plans”, “estimates”, “continue” or “anticipates” and variations of such words or similar expressions or the negative of such words. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategies, vision, plans or intentions. Risks, uncertainties and changes in the following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements:and redevelopment
high quality, multi-tenant retail assets in our target markets
approach combined with scale provides for the best value creation over the long term
balance sheet through adhering to a simple, low leverage model
platform through an intense focus
talent development and the innovative use of technology and systems
Our Strategy
3First quarter 2017 results
Net Loss Attributable to Common Shareholders/Share $(0.05) Operating FFO/Share $0.28 Same Store NOI Growth 2.0% General & Administrative Expense $11.2 million Disposition Activity2 $568.8 million Acquisition Activity3 $125.5 million Blended Comparable Re-leasing Spreads 10.0% Leasing Volume 121 leases representing 466,000 square feet Retail Leased Rate 94.3% Retail ABR psf $17.522017 guidance1
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders $0.91 - $0.96 Operating FFO/Share $1.00 - $1.05Assumptions supporting 2017 Guidance1:
Same Store NOI Growth 1.25% - 2.25% General & Administrative Expense $42 - $44 million Disposition Activity $800 - $900 million Acquisition Activity $375 - $475 millionOur Performance
T O TA L C A P I TA L I Z AT I O N I N V E S T M E N T G R A D E
BBB-
S & P
Baa3
Moody’s
N Y S E : R P A I
1 5D A L L A S
N E W YO R K C H I C AG O S E AT T L E AT L A N TA H O U S TO N S A N A N TO N I O P H O E N I X A U S T I N TA R G E T M A R K E T S ( R A
R A N K B Y B Y A A B R B R 1)1 4 9 R E TA I L O P E R AT I N G P R O P E R T I E S
25.4 MILLION
SQUARE FEET
6Single-User Retail
Multi-Tenant Retail
Based on Retail ABR 7SIGNIFICANT MULTI-TENANT RETAIL PRESENCE 1
IN TOP NATIONAL MSA S
69%
Located in Target Markets
76%
Located in Top 30 MSAs
81%
Located in Top 50 MSAs
8Based on ABR
Real Estate Driven - Evolving Multi-Tenant Retail Asset Mix
$94,000 Population 117,000
5.4%
$90,000 Population 156,000
5.7%
$122,000 Population 417,000
6.0%
NEIGHBORHOOD/ COMMUNITY CENTERS LIFESTYLE CENTERS/ MIXED-USE PROPERTIES POWER CENTERS
3-mile radius 5-mile radius 5-mile radius
39% 38% 45%
36%
16%
26%
2013 2013 2013 2017 2017 2017 Asset mix based on ABR 9RETAIL ABR PSF
Peer Comparison | Our High Quality Portfolio
10 $19.66 Target MarketsRETAIL ABR PSF - % GROWTH (2013-2017)
21.2% 19.1% 18.0% 15.9% 12.5% 11.4% 10.2% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% RPAI KIM WRI REG DDR FRT BRXRETAIL – THREE MILE POPULATION1
Peer Comparison | Our Dominant Locations
11SUPERZIP - % OF VALUE2
37% 26% 25% 18% 14% 10% 10% 9% 7% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% FRT RPAI REG WRI KIM DDR ROIC BRX UETenant Profile & Anchor Strength
Top Retail Tenants
12 Tenant % of Retail ABR % of Retail Occupied GLA Moody's / S&P Credit Rating Best Buy Co., Inc. 3.0% 3.3% Baa1/BBB- Ahold U.S.A. Inc. 2.6% 2.3% NR/NR Ross Stores, Inc. 2.4% 3.6% A3/A- The TJX Companies, Inc. 2.2% 3.9% A2/A+ Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. 2.0% 2.5% Baa1/BBB+ PetSmart, Inc. 1.9% 2.3% B1/B+ Regal Entertainment Group 1.7% 0.9% B1/B+ Michaels Stores, Inc. 1.5% 2.2% B1/BB- AB Acquisition LLC 1.5% 2.0% NR/NR Ascena Retail Group, Inc. 1.4% 1.1% Ba2/BB-Compelling Grocer Profile
Zero Tenant Exposure
Tenant Considerations
13Backfill Opportunities = Value Creation
feet, ~45 basis points of retail ABR
+20% assuming single tenant backfills
downtime
feet, ~30 basis points of retail ABR
0% to +10%
downtime
1feet, ~30 basis points of retail ABR
store closings
feet, ~20 basis points of retail ABR
Case Study: Accretive Backfilling
RESULTS
Comparable re-leasing spreads +19% Downtime < 12 months In 2015, we proactively recaptured 15 anchor boxes, representing 537,000 square feet
REDUCED EXPOSURE UPGRADED RETAILERS
14Manageable Retail Lease Expiration Profile
15 3.6% 10.8% 14.3% 11.6% 10.8% 41.9% 4.0% 12.7% 16.7% 11.5% 11.9% 42.7% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter % of Total GLA % of Total ABR1
P O R T F O L I O T R A N S F O R M A T I O N
16Retail Real Estate is Bifurcating
Convenience & Density
exposure
Experiential
Commodity
“Consumers must buy” “Consumers want to buy”
17D I S P O S I T I O N S 1 ACQ U I S I T I O N S 1 % D I F F E R E N C E # OF PROPERTIES 105 30
$1.6 billion $1.5 billion
10.9 msf 4.8 msf
$33 million $74 million 124% ABR PSF $13.33 $23.53 77% POPULATION (3-MILE) 67,000 239,000 257%
$72,000 $110,000 53% POPULATION (5-MILE) 150,000 484,000 223%
$72,000 $111,000 54%
Portfolio Refinement
2013 - 2017
18$14.46|$17.52 RETAIL ABR PSF 2013 2017
PORTFOLIO TRANSFORMATION
45%|69%
TARGET MKT. %1
2013 2017
38%|45%
% SMALL SHOP
2013 2017
81.6%|89.5%
SMALL SHOP LEASED RATE
2013 2017
5.6%|8.3%
BLENDED RE-LEASING SPREADS4 2013 2017
12% | 25%
SUPERZIPS2
2013 2017
77K|124K
3-MILE POPULATION5
2013 2017 $445|$510
LIFESTYLE SALES PSF3
2013 2017
Based on retail ABR 19Blended Comparable Re-leasing Spreads
5.6% 8.3% 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00% 20131 20172
20Contractual Rent Increases
65 85 135 170 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210
2013 2017 Acquisitions 2013-2017 Negotiated Leases (January 1, 2017 - March 31, 2017)Basis Points
1 1 3 21 2Rental Growth
10 20 30 40 50
2013 2017
Percent
48% 31% 21%
22R E C E N T A C Q U I S I T I O N S
23PROPERTY OVERVIEW DEMOGRAPHICS
5-mile radius
Loudoun, a 360-acre, mixed-use master planned community that is entitled for residential, hospitality, retail and office uses
Fitness Equation and contains a strong mix of fast casual and sit down restaurants, including matchbox and Uncle Julio’s
One Loudoun Downtown
24 Washington, D.C.MSA
One Loudoun Downtown
REAL ESTATE | Experiential & High Discretionary Spend
has a bachelor’s degree or higher
OPPORTUNITIES
and re-lease to higher quality Grocer concept
units1 and 182,000 square feet of GLA
25PROPERTY OVERVIEW DEMOGRAPHICS
5-mile radius
from Chicago and is the destination of choice for shopping, dining and relaxation with over 100 national and boutique stores, 40 national and local restaurants and 300 businesses, epitomizing the work, shop, play lifestyle.
development in Downtown Naperville and features some of the most highly recognized retailers, including Hugo’s Frog Bar and Fish House, Soft Surroundings, White House Black Market and Sur la Table
educated zip codes in the country
Main Street Promenade
Chicago MSA
26Main Street Promenade
REAL ESTATE | Experiential & High Discretionary Spend
OPPORTUNITIES
R E D E V E L O P M E N T
28Redevelopment Timeline
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 452017 2018 Stabilized AN N UAL P RO J ECT ED RED EV ELOPMENT C O ST S, N E T O F A I R RI G HT S
(Dollars in millions)Our goal is to create a pipeline where we deploy capital, net of air right sales, of $30 to $50 million on an annualized basis
return
costs,
average, in the high single digits to low double digits
Redevelopment - Estimated Air Rights Value
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1602013 2017
Dollars in millions$142 million
$0
30Reisterstown Road Plaza Redevelopment
P R O J E C T OV E RV I E W
and the addition of a multi-tenant retail pad
O P P O RT U N I T Y
P R O J E C T E D I N C R E M E N TA L R E T U R N O N CO S T 1
9.5% - 11.5%
Total Estimated Net Costs2 (000’s): $12,000 - $13,000 Project Commenced: Q3 2016
31Towson Circle Redevelopment
P R O J E C T OV E RV I E W
development that will include double-sided street level retail with approximately 370 residential units above
O P P O RT U N I T Y
P R O J E C T E D I N C R E M E N TA L R E T U R N O N CO S T 1
8.0% - 10.0%
Total Estimated Net Costs2 (000’s): $33,000 - $35,000 Targeted Commencement: Q3 2017
32Towson Circle Redevelopment
33M O V I N G F O R W A R D
34A Look at the Future
% of Multi-Tenant Retail ABR in Target Markets Retail ABR PSF Multi-Tenant Retail Avg. HH Income
(3-Mile Radius)
Multi-Tenant Retail Population
(3-Mile Radius)
Annual Development Spend as a % of Cap Ex Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA3 Investment Grade Ratings 2013
INVESTOR DAY
45% $14.46 $80,000 77,000 0% 6.7x none
2017
69%2 $17.52 $99,000 124,000 11% 5.6x BBB-/Baa3
2018 Vision1
~90% >$19 >$97,000 >135,000 >30% ~4.5x Upgrade
35Capital Recycling
multi-tenant retail ABR in
target markets by the end of 2018
sell approximately $1.6 billion in non-target assets and redeploy up to $850 million into high quality, multi-tenant retail assets in our target markets
69 %
2018 2017 1
90%
362017 Disposition Profile
37assets in 2017 at a weighted average cap rate of 6.5% to 7.5%
dispositions were closed, under contract or in LOI
growth since 2012
DISPOSITION STATISTICS
B A L A N C E S H E E T
38Balance Sheet Metrics
Strength in numbers 2017
5.6 x 3.0x 6.3% 86.0% 20 5.3 years 3.49% BBB-/Baa3 Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA1 Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio2 Secured Debt to Total Assets3 Unencumbered NOI4 # of Properties with Secured Mortgages Remaining Term Interest Rate Investment Grade Ratings
2013
6.7x 1.9x 31.9% 31.3% 171 4.7 years 5.48% none
39Pro Forma Maturity Profile
200 300 400 500 600 700 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Thereafter Dollars in millions
12/31/20171
Fixed Rate Mortgages Term Loan Revolver Unsecured Notes Amortization 15% of Total Debt
The 2017 and 2018 disposition proceeds are expected to be used toward de-levering the balance sheet and redeeming our preferred equity
F O O T N O T E S , N O N - G A A P F I N A N C I A L M E A S U R E S & O T H E R D E F I N I T I O N S
41Footnotes
42Footnotes (continued)
43Non-GAAP Financial Measures & Other Definitions
Gross Leasable Area (GLA) Gross Leasable Area (GLA) is defined as the aggregate number of square feet available for lease. GLA excludes square footage attributable to third-party managed storage units, of which we owned 62,000 square feet as of March 31, 2017. Occupancy Occupancy is defined, for a property or group of properties, as the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of (a) the number of square feet of such property economically occupied by tenants under leases with an initial term of greater than one year, to (b) the aggregate number of square feet for such property. Percent Leased Including Signed (Leased) Percent Leased Including Signed (Leased) is defined, for a property or group of properties, as the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of (a) the sum of occupied square feet (pursuant to the definition above) of such property and vacant square feet for which a lease with an initial term of greater than one year has been signed, but rent has not yet commenced, to (b) the aggregate number of square feet for such property. Funds From Operations (FFO) Attributable to Common Shareholders As defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), an industry trade group, Funds From Operations (FFO) means net income (loss) computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable real estate, plus depreciation and amortization and impairment charges on depreciable real estate. We have adopted the NAREIT definition in our computation of FFO attributable to common shareholders. We believe that, subject to the following limitations, FFO attributable to common shareholders provides a basis for comparing our performance and operations to those of other real estate investment trusts (REITs). We believe that FFO attributable to common shareholders, which is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure, provides an additional and useful means to assess theNon-GAAP Financial Measures & Other Definitions (continued)
Net Operating Income (NOI) We define Net Operating Income (NOI) as all revenues other than straight-line rental income, amortization of lease inducements, amortization of acquired above and below market lease intangibles and lease termination fee income, less real estate taxes and all operating expenses other than straight-line ground rent expense and amortization of acquired ground lease intangibles, which are non-cash items. NOI consists of Same Store NOI and NOI from Other Investment Properties. We believe that NOI, which is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure, provides an additional and useful operating perspective not immediately apparent from "Operating income" or "Net income attributable to common shareholders" in accordance with GAAP. We use NOI to evaluate our performance on a property-by-property basis because this measure allows management to evaluate the impact that factors such as lease structure, lease rates and tenant base have on our operating results. NOI does not represent an alternative to "Net income" or "Net income attributable to common shareholders" in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of our financial performance. Comparison of our presentation of NOI to similarly titled measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in definition and application by such REITs. Same Store NOI and NOI from Other Investment Properties Same Store NOI for the three months ended March 31, 2017represents NOI from our same store portfolio consisting of 140 retail operating properties acquired or placed in service and stabilized prior to January 1, 2016. NOI from Other Investment Properties for the three months ended March 31, 2017 represents NOI primarily from properties acquired during 2016 and 2017, our one remaining office property, three properties where we have begun redevelopment and/or activities in anticipation of future redevelopment, the properties that were sold or held for sale in 2016 and 2017, the net income from our wholly-owned captive insurance company and the historical ground rent expense related to an existing same store investment property that was subject to a ground lease with a third party prior to our acquisition of the fee interest on April 29, 2016. We believe that Same Store NOI and NOI from Other Investment Properties, which are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures, provide an additional and useful operating perspective not immediately apparent from "Operating income" or "Net income attributable to common shareholders" in accordance with GAAP. We use these measures to evaluate our performance on a property-by-property basis because they allow management to evaluate the impact that factors such as lease structure, lease rates and tenant base have on our operating results. Same Store NOI and NOI from Other Investment Properties do not represent alternatives to "Net income" or "Net income attributable to common shareholders" in accordance with GAAP as indicators of our financial performance. Comparison of our presentation of Same Store NOI and NOI from Other Investment Properties to similarly titled measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in definition and application by such REITs. NOI from Retail Properties Included in the 2017 Planned Dispositions, NOI from Properties Excluded from the 2017 Planned Dispositions and NOI from Non-Retail Properties Included in the 2017 Planned Dispositions NOI from retail properties included in the 2017 planned dispositions for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012 represents NOI from those retail properties we plan to dispose of during 2017. NOI from properties excluded from the 2017 planned dispositions represents NOI from all remaining properties in each year presented that are not included in 2017 planned dispositions. NOI from non-retail properties included in the 2017 planned dispositions represents NOI from our one remaining office property. We believe that NOI from retail properties included in the 2017 planned dispositions, NOI from properties excluded from the 2017 planned dispositions and NOI from non-retail properties included in the 2017 planned dispositions, which are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures, provide an additional and useful operating perspective not immediately apparent from “Operating income” or “Net income attributable to common shareholders” in accordance with GAAP. We use these measures to evaluate our performance on a property-by-property basis because they allow management to evaluate the impact that factors such as lease structure, lease rates and tenant base have on our operating results. NOI from retail properties included in the 2017 planned dispositions, NOI from properties excluded from the 2017 planned dispositions and NOI from non-retail properties included in the 2017 planned dispositions do not represent alternatives to “Net income” or “Net income attributable to common shareholders” in accordance with GAAP as indictors of our financialNon-GAAP Financial Measures & Other Definitions (continued)
Adjusted EBITDA Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure and represents net income attributable to common shareholders before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, as further adjusted to eliminate the impact of certain items that we do not consider indicative of our ongoing performance. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is useful because it allows investors and management to evaluate and compare our performance from period to period in a meaningful and consistent manner in addition to standard financial measurements under GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to "Net income attributable to common shareholders" as an indicator of our financial performance. Comparison of our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA to similarly titled measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in definition and application by such REITs. Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure and represents (i) our total notional debt, excluding unamortized premium, discount and capitalized loan fees, less cash and cash equivalents and disposition proceeds temporarily restricted related to potential 1031 Exchanges divided by (ii) Adjusted EBITDA for the prior three months, annualized. We believe that this ratio is useful because it provides investors with information regarding our total notional debt net of cash and cash equivalents and disposition proceeds temporarily restricted related to potential 1031 Exchanges, which could be used to repay debt, compared to our performance as measured using Adjusted EBITDA. Comparison of our presentation of Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA to similarly titled measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in definition and application by such REITs. Unencumbered NOI ratio Unencumbered NOI ratio is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure and represents (i) NOI from the unencumbered properties in our portfolio, as defined by the agreement that governs our Unsecured Credit Facility (comprised of the unsecured term loans and unsecured revolving line of credit) in effect at the end of the given period, for the trailing twelve month period, divided by (ii) total NOI, as defined by the agreement that governs our Unsecured Credit Facility in effect at the end of the given period, for the same trailing twelve month period. We believe that this ratio is useful because it allows investors and management to understand and evaluate our progress in unencumbering our portfolio. Unencumbered NOI ratio should not be considered an alternative to “Net income attributable to common shareholders” as an indicator of our financial performance. Comparison of our presentation of Unencumbered NOI ratio to similarly titled measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in definition and application by such REITs. For a complete listing of definitions related to our Unsecured Credit Facility, refer to the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.8 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed on February 17, 2016, the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, dated May 13, 2013, and the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Amendment No. 5 of our Form S-11, dated March 9, 2012. 46Reconciliation of Net (Loss) Income Attributable to Common Shareholders to Same Store NOI
47Reconciliation of Net Loss Attributable to Common Shareholders to FFO Attributable to Common Shareholders and Operating FFO Attributable to Common Shareholders
48Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 Net loss attributable to common shareholders (11,462) $ Depreciation and amortization of depreciable real estate 53,079 Gain on sales of depreciable investment properties (41,164) FFO attributable to common shareholders 453 $ FFO attributable to common shareholders per common share outstanding 0.00 $ FFO attributable to common shareholders 453 $ Impact on earnings from the early extinguishment of debt 66,357 Provision for hedge ineffectiveness 6 Other 130 Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders 66,946 $ Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders per common share outstanding 0.28 $
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders to NOI from Retail Properties Included in the 2017 Planned Dispositions
49
2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders 157,367 $ 115,646 $ 33,850 $ 4,176 $ (710) $ Adjustments to reconcile to Same Store NOI: Preferred stock dividends 9,450 9,450 9,450 9,450 263 Net income attributable to noncontrolling interestReconciliation of Net Loss Attributable to Common Shareholders to Adjusted EBITDA and Reconciliation of Mortgages and Notes Payable, Net, Unsecured Notes Payable, Net, Unsecured Term Loans, Net and Unsecured Revolving Line of Credit to Total Net Debt
50 March 31, 2017 March 31, 2013 Net loss attributable to common shareholders (11,462) $ (4,242) $ Preferred stock dividends 2,362 2,362 Interest expense 85,532 47,127 Depreciation and amortization 53,474 54,816 Gain on sales of investment properties (41,164) (9,173) Adjusted EBITDA 88,742 $ 90,890 $ Annualized 354,968 $ 363,560 $ March 31, 2017 March 31, 2013 Mortgages and notes payable, net 373,221 $ 2,022,809 $ Unsecured notes payable, net 695,287Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders to Unencumbered NOI
51 March 31, 2017 March 31, 2013 Net income attributable to common shareholders 100,841 $ 11,336 $ Adjustments to reconcile to NOI: Preferred stock dividends 9,450 2,625 Gain on sales of investment properties (149,132) (14,423) Income from discontinued operationsReconciliation of Mortgages and Notes Payable, Net to Notional Secured Debt and Reconciliation of Total Assets to Total Assets Excluding the Effect of Accumulated Depreciation
52March 31, 2017 March 31, 2013 Mortgages and notes payable, net 373,221 $ 2,022,809 $ Premium, net of accumulated amortization (1,330)
612 1,364 Capitalized loan fees, net of accumulated amortization, including amounts associated with investment properties held for sale 869 17,734 Notional secured debt 373,372 2,041,907 Total assets 4,466,617 5,085,610 Accumulated depreciation 1,440,089 1,315,681 Accumulated depreciation associated with investment properties held for sale 20,608
5,927,314 $ 6,401,291 $ Secured Debt to Total Assets 6.3% 31.9%
Non-GAAP Guidance Reconciliation – Operating FFO Guidance
53Low High Net income attributable to common shareholders 0.91 $ 0.96 $ Depreciation and amortization of depreciable real estate 0.84 0.84 Provision for impairment of investment properties
(1.08) (1.08) FFO attributable to common shareholders 0.67 $ 0.72 $ Impact on earnings from the early extinguishment of debt 0.31 0.31 Provision for hedge ineffectiveness
0.02 0.02 Other
1.00 $ 1.05 $ Per Share Guidance Range Full Year 2017