Hydrofracking Risks & Opportunities: What Insurers & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hydrofracking risks opportunities what insurers
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Hydrofracking Risks & Opportunities: What Insurers & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Hydrofracking Risks & Opportunities: What Insurers & Reinsurers Need to Know April 5, 2011 Gregory S. Hoffnagle Robert W. DiUbaldo New York, New York New York, New York 212.912.2741 212.912.2881 GHoffnagle@eapdlaw.com


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Hydrofracking Risks & Opportunities: What Insurers & Reinsurers Need to Know

www.eapdlaw.com • www.InsureReinsure.com

Gregory S. Hoffnagle New York, New York 212.912.2741 GHoffnagle@eapdlaw.com Robert W. DiUbaldo New York, New York 212.912.2881 RDiUbaldo@eapdlaw.com

April 5, 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Hydraulic Fracturing (“Hydrofracking”): Outline of Webinar

  • Hydrofracking 101
  • Brief Overview of the Evolving Regulatory

Landscape

  • Types of Exposures
  • Fiorentino et al. v Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. et al.
  • Potential Insurance/Reinsurance Implications
  • Questions and Answers
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

What is Hydrofracking?

  • Often oil- or gas-bearing formations have poor flow

rates due to low permeability, or from damage or clogging of the formation during drilling of the access well

  • Hydrofracking is a technique used to create fractures

that extend from the well bore into shale formations to extract shale gas (i.e., natural gas from shale)

  • These fractures allow gas to travel more easily from the

rock (shale) pores, where the gas is trapped, to the production well and then to the surface

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

What is Hydrofracking? (con’t)

  • Typically, in order to create these fractures large

amounts of pressurized water, “proppants” (sand or ceramic beads) and chemicals (diesel), are injected into underground shale formations

  • In oil and gas exploration, before hydrofracking,

shale used to be considered the “sorry rock” drilled through to get to good reservoir rock – sandstone, limestone or dolomite to get to the oil

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

How Hydrofracking Works

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Why is Shale Gas on the Rise?

  • Over approximately the past 20 years, shale has

come to the forefront as a major productive form

  • f producing useable “cleaner” energy
  • The more recent push can be primarily linked to

several factors

  • 1. Hydrofracking
  • 2. High-volume Horizontal Drilling/Hydrofracking
  • 3. Higher prices for crude oil and natural gas (import)

made it financially viable to drill

  • 4. National Security
  • 5. Unemployment – “Jobs”
  • 6. President Obama’s “Blueprint for a Secure Energy

Future”

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Horizontal vs. Vertical Hydrofracking

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Hydrofracking Numbers: Size and Scope

  • Generally done between 5,000-20,000 feet below earth

surface

8,000 feet = 6.5 Empire State Buildings 20,000 feet = 16 Empire State Buildings

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

  • Generally, 1-8 million gallons of water may be used

to Hydrofrack a well

  • 60-90% of fluids sent down into the well remain

underground

  • A well may be Hydrofracked up to 18 times
  • More than 200 chemicals may be used in

Hydrofracking fluid

  • For each Hydrofrack, 80-300 tons of chemicals may

be used

Hydrofracking Numbers: Size and Scope

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

  • Hydrofracking equipment operates over a range of

pressures and injection rates

  • Can reach up to 15,000 pounds per square inch

(psi) and can produce 100 barrels gas per minute

  • Evaporators evaporate off volatile organic compounds

(VOCs) and condensate tanks steam off VOCs, 24 hours a day, seven days a week

  • There are currently approximately 495,000 shale gas

wells in the U.S.

  • Texas has approximately 93,000 wells
  • Pennsylvania has approximately 71,000 wells
  • The EPA projects that by 2020, shale gas will comprise
  • ver 20-35% of the nation's gas supply

Hydrofracking Numbers: Size and Scope

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

U.S. Shale Gas Basins

“Saudi Arabia of Natural Gas” As of 2010

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Northeastern U.S. Shale Gas

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Brief Overview of the Evolving Regulatory Landscape: Federal Laws

  • Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
  • The Energy Policy Act of 2005
  • “Halliburton Loophole”
  • Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of

Chemicals Act of 2009 (FRAC Act)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Brief Overview of the Evolving Regulatory Landscape: Federal Laws to Keep in Mind

  • Clean Water Act (CWA)
  • Clean Air Act (CAA)
  • Comprehensive Environmental Response

Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Hydrofracking: Types of Risks

  • Some environmental and human health concerns

possibly associated with Hydrofracking include:

  • Contamination of aquifer/ground water
  • Contamination of fresh/navigable surface waters
  • Contamination of air quality
slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Hydrofracking: Types of Risks

  • Property Damage (devaluation)
  • Migration of gases and hydrofracking chemicals to

the surface

  • Impacts on rock shelf causing seismic events or lead

to surface subsidence

  • Presure explosions
  • Loss of land value/enjoyment
  • Contamination/loss of crops and livestock
  • Accidents in the transportation, handling and

storage of toxic waste/chemicals

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Hydrofracking: Types of Claims

  • Violation of Federal Statutes (CWA, CAA, CERCLA)
  • Violation of State Environmental Statutes
  • Negligence Per Se/Res Ipsa Loquitur
  • Breach of Contract
  • Medical Monitoring Trust Fund Statutory Claims
  • Common Law Causes of Action
  • Negligence/Gross Negligence/Strict Liability
  • Negligence Per Se/Res Ipsa Loquitur
  • Private/Public Nuisance
  • Trespass
  • Misrepresentation/Fraudulent Misrepresentation
slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Fiorentino et al. v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. et al.

  • Plaintiff’s claim that (improper) Hydrofracking

caused the release of methane, natural gas and

  • ther toxins onto plaintiff’s land and into their

groundwater

  • As a result, plaintiff’s suffer and will suffer current

and future illnesses and emotional distress

  • Plaintiff’s seek:
  • Injunction prohibiting future Hydrofracking
  • perations
  • Compensatory and punitive damages
  • Cost of future health monitoring
  • Attorney’s fees and costs
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Fiorentino et al. v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. et al. (con’t)

  • On November 15, 2010, the District Court denied most
  • f defendants’ motion to strike and motion to dismiss
  • The Court held the following:
  • Property owners sufficiently plead claims against

defendants which allege that defendants were/are responsible for

  • Causing release of hazardous substances
  • Failing to take necessary steps to remedy contaminated

water supplies

  • Plaintiffs becoming physically sick and ill in a manner that

could continue into the future

  • Costs incurred by plaintiffs to respond to defendants

release of hazardous substances and contaminants, including but not limited to

  • Costs of health assessments/effects study
  • Medical monitoring
slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Potential Insurance Implications of Hydrofracking

  • Commercial General Liability Policy Claims
  • Environmental Policy Claims
  • Directors and Officers (D&O) Policy Claims
  • Engineers and Architects (E&O) Policy Claims
  • Worker’s Comp Policy Claims
  • Operators’ Extra Expense (Control of Well) Policy

Claims

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Potential Insurance/Reinsurance Considerations

  • Notice
  • Aggregation – event, occurrence, cause, series,

arising out of, common origin

  • Allocation
  • Exclusions
  • Follow the settlements/Follow the fortunes
  • Inuring Clauses
  • Clash covers