Hydroacoustics using Unsteady CFD - OpenFOAM with Generalised Grid - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Background Using OpenFOAM Summary Hydroacoustics using Unsteady CFD - OpenFOAM with Generalised Grid Interface Chalmers University of Technology OF meeting Thomas P. Lloyd; T.P.Lloyd@soton.ac.uk Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton 16th November 2011

Background Using OpenFOAM Summary Outline Background 1 Hydroacoustics Turbulence modelling Using OpenFOAM 2 Results - TSG Summary 3

Background Using OpenFOAM Summary Hydroacoustics Background Turbomachinery simulations Noise important in numerous rotating devices Need to resolve turbulence which is the noise source Choice of turbulence model important

Background Using OpenFOAM Summary Hydroacoustics Background Turbomachinery simulations Noise important in numerous rotating devices Need to resolve turbulence (which is the noise source) Choice of turbulence model important Christophe et al. (2010)

Background Using OpenFOAM Summary Turbulence modelling Turbulence modelling Acoustic sources Turbulence interacting with surfaces Ideally use wall-resolved LES - fine near-wall mesh Reynolds number/complex geometries mean hybrid RANS/LES currently more feasible Chosen turbulence model Common hybrid RANS/LES model - DES Numerous modifications proposed and implemented Improved Delayed DES (IDDES) currently used

Background Using OpenFOAM Summary Turbulence modelling Turbulence modelling DES versus IDDES LES region RANS region LES region RANS region

Background Using OpenFOAM Summary Results - TSG Timisoara swirl generator test case Case set-up Solver: pimpleDyMFoam Turbulence model: IDDES LES filter: cube root volume Initial condition: URANS data, as supplied ∆ t :4x10 − 5 s (CFL=1) Total time: 0.01s (One flow-through = 0.45 s )

Background Using OpenFOAM Summary Results - TSG Timisoara swirl generator test case Iso-surface of Q = 10 4 s − 2 URANS solution IDDES solution

Background Using OpenFOAM Summary Results - TSG URANS Close Up Iso-surface of Q = 10 4 s − 2 URANS solution

Background Using OpenFOAM Summary Results - TSG IDDES Close Up Iso-surface of Q = 10 4 s − 2 IDDES solution

Background Using OpenFOAM Summary Results - TSG Window 0 URANS solution IDDES solution

Background Using OpenFOAM Summary Results - TSG Blade surface pressures y + Runner blade surface pressure (Pa) 1

Background Using OpenFOAM Summary Summary Areas of Interest using OpenFOAM Unsteady turbomachinery flows Using the GGI Using hybrid RANS/LES turbulence models Using inflow turbulence generators

Background Using OpenFOAM Summary Summary Areas of Interest using OpenFOAM Unsteady turbomachinery flows Using the GGI Using hybrid RANS/LES turbulence models Using inflow turbulence generators Summary Hydroacoustics requires unsteady simulations and resolved turbulence For low Mach number flows, accurate prediction of surface pressures Hybrid RANS/LES models offer accuracy/expense balance Specifying inlet turbulence important OpenFOAM has the potential to accommodate all requirements

Background Using OpenFOAM Summary T.P.Lloyd@soton.ac.uk Thank you for your attention. Do you have any questions?

Hydroacoustics using Unsteady CFD - OpenFOAM with Generalised Grid - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Background Using OpenFOAM Summary Hydroacoustics using Unsteady CFD - OpenFOAM with Generalised Grid Interface Chalmers University of Technology OF meeting Thomas P. Lloyd; T.P.Lloyd@soton.ac.uk Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,

Unsteady Vehicle Simulation Why run unsteady? Steady State Advantages Quick turn-around

. . . . Coupled calculations in OpenFOAM - Multiphysics handling, structures and solvers,

OpenFOAM in Welding applications Alireza Javidi 1 1 University West, Department of Engineering

CFD modelling of aerodynamic vortex generators on an airfoil with OpenFOAM Lorena Fernndez,

Jens Nitzsche NACA0012 Unsteady lift w.r.t. pitch (2-d RANS) NACA0012 =17.00 Re=10 6

Non-Newtonian Models in OpenFOAM, Implementation a non-Newtonian model Naser Hamedi Energy

Outline ITAINNOVA at a glance: 01. OpenFOAM group Contributions to Industrial Manufacturing:

Implementation of a Complete Wall Function for the Standard k- Turbulence Model in OpenFOAM 4.0

Fall in the last year 42.42% 39.76% 31.06% 20.5% Unsteady Gait 30.30% 19.28% 20.45% 16.01%

University of Southampton Fluid-Structure Interactions Group OpenFOAM Research Tom Lloyd

Unsteady Advection-Diffusion Problem Ryan Grove Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson

with the 3D solver OpenFOAM - A comparison of different electromagnetic models - Isabelle

hydropower using OpenFOAM (Foam-extend 4.0) Bercelay Niebles Atencio Department of Mechanics and

for hydropower using OpenFOAM Bercelay Niebles Atencio Department of Mechanics and Maritime

Predictions of added resistance in waves Using OpenFOAM Bjrn Windn Fluid Structure

Use of Nektar++ and OpenFOAM for the simulation of bluff-body flows Hongyi Jiang School of

Experiences with OpenCL in PyFR: 2014Present F.D. Witherden 1 and P.E. Vincent 2 1 Department

CONVERGENCE ACCELERATION TECHNIQUES FOR DUAL TIME STEPPING Niki A. Loppi Brian C. Vermeire

Gradient-based optimization of flow problems using the adjoint method and high-order numerical

Entropy noise in gas turbines - background and challenges

Leonard Kleinrock Leonard Kleinrock Professor, UCLA Computer Science Dept Professor, UCLA

Short range dispersion in urban areas Alan Robins, University of Surrey DAPPLE team Surrey -

Fluid Interface Detection with PETSc and DONLP2 PETSc User Meeting Vienna 2016 Poster Session

u = t ~ t y ~ t y 0 y I.C. I.C. 1 = a = 2 a 1 / 2 Navier- Navier -Stokes Stokes