hughes brownfield case study hughes brownfield case study
play

Hughes Brownfield Case Study Hughes Brownfield Case Study A S A S - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Hughes Brownfield Case Study Hughes Brownfield Case Study A S A S A State and Tribal Response Program Clean Up of the A State and Tribal Response Program Clean Up of the d T b l R d T b l R P P Cl Cl U U f h f h Former Community Tank


  1. Hughes Brownfield Case Study Hughes Brownfield Case Study A S A S A State and Tribal Response Program Clean Up of the A State and Tribal Response Program Clean Up of the d T b l R d T b l R P P Cl Cl U U f h f h Former Community Tank Farm Generator Footprints in Former Community Tank Farm Generator Footprints in Hughes, Alaska Hughes, Alaska g Caleb Aronson Brownfields Program Manager Sustainable Lands Department Yukon River Inter ‐ Tribal Watershed Council Alaska State and Tribal Response Program Workshop laska State and ibal esponse og am Wo kshop December 11, 2012 Fairbanks, Alaska 1

  2. 2

  3. 3

  4. 4

  5. What Was The Goal? What Was The Goal? • Generally: Finally do a cleanup! – after years of building capacity, assessments, we wanted to use STRP funding to do more and go further further. • Specifically: Mitigate exposure pathways by removing petroleum contaminated soil and replacing with clean fill before ANTHC installs contaminated soil and replacing with clean fill before ANTHC installs a 40,000 gallon water storage tank • DEC & YRITWC collaboration established by dividing tasks and y g incorporated them into EPA funding requests + + YRITWC’s Brownfields Program DEC’s Reuse & Redevelopment Program Environmental Protection Agency

  6. Where Did This All Begin? Where Did This All Begin? Assessments YRITWC conducted Phase I and Limited Phase II YRITWC conducted Phase I and Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment of Lots 11 & 13 in summer of 2008. DEC prepared an Environmental Management Plan in 2009 summarizing the characterization work already done and summarizing the characterization work already done and describing the recommended actions for removal. 6

  7. Assessments Confirmed Contamination: Assessments Confirmed Contamination: • Abandoned Generator Building • L Location of Former Generator i f F G Building • Location of Former Fuel Dispenser Island Dispenser Island • Buried Piping Between Former School Tank Farm and Abandoned Generator Building Abandoned Generator Building • Former School Tank Farm 7

  8. ADEC’s ADEC’s Role Role • SHPO – State Historical Preservation Office • Endangered Species Act Concurrence A C • ABCA – Analysis of Brownfields Cleanup Alternatives Alternatives • CAP – Corrective Action Plan • Regulation 8

  9. ABCA – Analysis of Brownfields Cleanup ABCA – Analysis of Brownfields Cleanup Alternatives Alternatives • Discusses different cleanup strategies and prioritizes the best approach • This project had 5 alternatives: Alternative 1 Alternative 1 – – No Action No Action Alternative 2 Alternative 2 – – Mitigation through capping and Mitigation through capping and institutional controls institutional controls Alternative 3a Alternative 3a – – Limited excavation and off Limited excavation and off- -site treatment site treatment of soil of soil Alternative 3b Alternative 3b – – Excavation and off Excavation and off- -site treatment of soil site treatment of soil Alternative 3c Alternative 3c – – Prioritized excavation and off Prioritized excavation and off- -site site treatment of soil treatment of soil treatment of soil treatment of soil • 30-day public comment period followed release of draft ABCA • YRITWC & DEC held community meeting during the comment period to discuss ABCA • ABCA was finalized after all public 9 comments had been resolved

  10. CAP CAP CAP – CAP – Corrective Action Plan C C Corrective Action Plan ti ti A ti A ti Pl Pl a specific workplan for the project describing: • How cleanup will be done H l ill b d • The number of samples to be taken • Where the contaminated soil will go to be managed Alternative 3c Alternative 3c – – Prioritized excavation and off Prioritized excavation and off- -site treatment of soil site treatment of soil Cleanup priority based on available funding was set to be: Cleanup priority based on available funding was set to be: p p p p y y g g 1. The Abandoned Generator building due to the installation of the new 1. The Abandoned Generator building due to the installation of the new water tank scheduled for 2012; water tank scheduled for 2012; 2. The 2. The footprint of the Former Generator Building due to its proximity footprint of the Former Generator Building due to its proximity to the community drinking water well; to the community drinking water well; 3. 3. The former fuel dispensing island; and The former fuel dispensing island; and 4. The above 4 4. Th Th The above- b b -ground portion of pipeline connecting the former ground portion of pipeline connecting the former d d i i f i f i li li i i h f h f generator buildings to the school tank farm. generator buildings to the school tank farm. 10

  11. YRITWC’s YRITWC’s Role: Role: D D Draft, Review Draft, Review ft R ft R i i Communicate & Plan Communicate & Plan • ABCA, ABCA Public Notice & Announcement • ABCA ABCA Public Notice & Announcement • RFP – Request For Proposals • Contractor Proposals • Contract and Award Notice Contract and Award Notice • Community Involvement Plan/Community Relations Plan • Community Agreements & MOUs • QAPP - Quality Assurance Project Plan y j • Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan • Property Profile Form • Final Report 11

  12. 12

  13. Now The Field Work Now The Field Work C C Can Begin… Can Begin… B B i i 13

  14. • Excavation 1: Abandoned • Excavation 1: Abandoned Generator Building Generator Building • Excavation 2: Former • Excavation 2: Former Generator Footprint Generator Footprint 14

  15. Site Surveying – Containment Cell Site Surveying – Containment Cell 15

  16. Site Surveying – Containment Cell Site Surveying – Containment Cell 16

  17. Site Surveying – Fill Material Site Surveying – Fill Material Hughes Village Council has a Hughes Village Council has a material sale contract with Department of Natural Resources Approximately 300 cubic yards were removed for stockpiling before potential flooding 17

  18. Containment Cell Construction Containment Cell Construction 18

  19. Dimensions are approx: 100ft X 50ft = 5,000 sq. ft. 19

  20. Sampling Prior to Stockpiling Soil Sampling Prior to Stockpiling Soil 10 random screening samples collected within cell and to 1 ft. deep deep 20

  21. First, protective non-woven geotextile fabric t til f b i Then, 20-mil thick petroleum resistant liner l i li 21

  22. 22 Utility Location Utility Location

  23. Excavation 1: Abandoned Generator Excavation 1: Abandoned Generator Building Building Approximately 270 cubic yards removed Approximately 270 cubic yards removed Approximately 270 cubic yards removed Approximately 270 cubic yards removed 23

  24. 24

  25. 25

  26. Excavation 2: Former Generator Excavation 2: Former Generator Footprint Footprint Footprint Footprint Approximately 70 cubic yards removed Approximately 70 cubic yards removed 26

  27. 27

  28. 28

  29. Summary of Results Summary of Results y Approximately 340 cubic yards of potentially contaminated soils were removed from the center of the community and placed in a landfarming cell on the east side of the landfill east side of the landfill Landfarm soil thickness is estimated at 3.5-4 ft. Hughes is recommended to till the landfarm soil at least twice every summer to enhance degradation and y g to also cover the soil with 6-mil polyethylene sheeting in winter – reduces amount of water from entering cell and increases solar heating Contractor estimated 90% of funds stayed in the community: operators, laborers, accounting, equipment – loaders, CAT, excavator, dump trucks, pickup truck, etc. Although a lot of potentially contaminated soil wasn’t removed due to funding Alth h l t f t ti ll t i t d il ’t d d t f di constraints, something got cleaned up! A little goes a long way… First ever STRP funded cleanup for YRITWC First ever STRP funded cleanup for YRITWC - builds capacity, knowledge for builds capacity knowledge for future cleanups 29

  30. Thank You Thank You Hughes Brownfield Case Study Hughes Brownfield Case Study A State and Tribal Response Program Clean Up of the Former A State and Tribal Response Program Clean Up of the Former Community Tank Farm Generator Footprints in Hughes, Alaska Community Tank Farm Generator Footprints in Hughes, Alaska Community Tank Farm Generator Footprints in Hughes Alaska Community Tank Farm Generator Footprints in Hughes Alaska Caleb Aronson Caleb Aronson Brownfields Program Manager Yukon River Inter-Tribal Watershed Council Phone: (907)451-2530 Email: caronson@yritwc.org www.yritwc.org rit c org 30

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend