how to explain the
play

How to Explain the Scale Invariance Empirical Success of Our Idea - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Fourier Series and . . . Generalized . . . Generalized Trig . . . Physical Meaning of . . . How to Explain the Scale Invariance Empirical Success of Our Idea Our Idea Leads . . . Generalized Trigonometric Conclusion Acknowledgments


  1. Fourier Series and . . . Generalized . . . Generalized Trig . . . Physical Meaning of . . . How to Explain the Scale Invariance Empirical Success of Our Idea Our Idea Leads . . . Generalized Trigonometric Conclusion Acknowledgments Functions in Processing Home Page Discontinuous Signals Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ Pedro Barragan Olague and Vladik Kreinovich ◭ ◮ Department of Computer Science, University of Texas at El Paso Page 1 of 13 El Paso, TX 79968, USA pabarraganolague@miners.utep.edu, vladik@utep.edu Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  2. Fourier Series and . . . Generalized . . . 1. Fourier Series and Their Limitations: A Brief Generalized Trig . . . Reminder Physical Meaning of . . . • Isaac Newton: a prism decomposes each light into Scale Invariance lights of different colors. Our Idea Our Idea Leads . . . • Monochromatic light is a sinusoid Conclusion x ( t ) = A · sin( ω · t + ϕ ) . Acknowledgments • So, any signal can be represented as Home Page n Title Page � x ( t ) = A i · sin( ω i · t + ϕ i ) . ◭◭ ◮◮ i =1 • This Fourier representation helps in solving many ◭ ◮ physics-related differential equations; however: Page 2 of 13 – if we represent a discontinuous signal as a sum of Go Back sinusoids, Full Screen – we get large oscillations near the discontinuity ( Gibbs phenomenon ). Close Quit

  3. Fourier Series and . . . Generalized . . . 2. Fourier Series and Their Limitations (cont-d) Generalized Trig . . . • We can avoid Gibbs phenomenon is we use a linear Physical Meaning of . . . combination of discontinuous functions. Scale Invariance Our Idea • For example, we can use piecewise constant functions Our Idea Leads . . . such as Haar wavelets. Conclusion • However, the resulting representation is not very com- Acknowledgments putationally efficient for smooth signals. Home Page • We need a representation which is efficient both for Title Page smooth and for discontinuous signals. ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ Page 3 of 13 Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  4. Fourier Series and . . . Generalized . . . 3. Generalized Trigonometric Functions: A Suc- Generalized Trig . . . cessful Semi-Heuristic Approach Physical Meaning of . . . • A sinusoid can be defined as a function which is inverse Scale Invariance dt � to the integral (1 − t 2 ) 1 / 2 , expanded by periodicity. Our Idea Our Idea Leads . . . • It is reasonable to consider periodic extension of an Conclusion inverse function to a more general integral Acknowledgments dt Home Page � (1 − t p ) 1 /q . Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ • The derivative of this generalized function is no longer everywhere continuous. ◭ ◮ • The farther p and q from the value 2, the larger this Page 4 of 13 discontinuity. Go Back • Empirically, these functions are good approximations Full Screen both for smooth and for discontinuous signals. Close Quit

  5. Fourier Series and . . . Generalized . . . 4. Generalized Trig Functions: Challenge Generalized Trig . . . • However, so far, there have been no convincing theo- Physical Meaning of . . . retical explanation for this success. Scale Invariance Our Idea • In principle, we can think of many generalizations of Our Idea Leads . . . trigonometric functions. Conclusion • It is not clear whey namely this generalization is em- Acknowledgments pirically successful. Home Page • This absence of theoretical explanation prevents the Title Page wider use of this technique: ◭◭ ◮◮ – the users are reluctant to use it, ◭ ◮ – since they are not sure that the empirical success Page 5 of 13 so far is not an artifact. Go Back • In this talk, we provide a physics-motivated theoretical Full Screen explanation for this empirical success. Close Quit

  6. Fourier Series and . . . Generalized . . . 5. Physical Meaning of Sinusoids: Reminder Generalized Trig . . . • Sinusoidal signals are frequently observed in nature, Physical Meaning of . . . because they correspond to simple oscillations. Scale Invariance Our Idea • They correspond to situations in which the potential energy E pot is equal to E pot = 1 Our Idea Leads . . . 2 · c · x 2 . Conclusion • In Newtonian mechanics, the kinetic energy is equal to Acknowledgments E kin = 1 Home Page x ) 2 , so the overall energy is 2 · m · ( ˙ Title Page E = E pot + E kin = 1 2 · c · x 2 + 1 x ) 2 . 2 · m · ( ˙ ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ • Sinusoidal oscillations correspond to the idealized case Page 6 of 13 when we can ignore the friction: Go Back 1 2 · c · x 2 + 1 x ) 2 = E 0 = const . 2 · m · ( ˙ Full Screen Close Quit

  7. Fourier Series and . . . Generalized . . . 6. Physical Meaning of Sinusoids (cont-d) Generalized Trig . . . • Once we know the coordinate x , we can determine ˙ x Physical Meaning of . . . as Scale Invariance √ 2 E 0 − c · x 2 x = dx Our Idea ˙ dt = . √ m Our Idea Leads . . . • This equation can be simplified if we separate the vari- Conclusion ables: Acknowledgments dx √ m · Home Page √ 2 E 0 − c · x 2 = dt. Title Page • In appropriately selected units of time and x , we have ◭◭ ◮◮ dx dx � dt = 1 − x 2 , thus t = 1 − x 2 . ◭ ◮ √ √ Page 7 of 13 • The desired dependence x ( t ) of x on t is the inverse Go Back function. Full Screen • As we have mentioned, this is exactly the sinusoid. Close Quit

  8. Fourier Series and . . . Generalized . . . 7. Scale Invariance Generalized Trig . . . • The formula for the potential energy E pot = 1 2 · c · x 2 is Physical Meaning of . . . Scale Invariance scale-invariant in the following sense: Our Idea – if we change the measuring unit for x to a one which Our Idea Leads . . . is λ times smaller x ′ = λ · x , Conclusion – then, by appropriately re-scaling the unit for mea- Acknowledgments suring energy, i.e., by taking E ′ = λ 2 · E , Home Page – we will have the exact same dependence between Title Page E ′ and x ′ in the new units: E ′ = 1 2 · c · ( x ′ ) 2 . ◭◭ ◮◮ • Similarly, the dependence E kin = 1 x ) 2 is also ◭ ◮ 2 · c · ( ˙ Page 8 of 13 scale-invariant. Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  9. Fourier Series and . . . Generalized . . . 8. Our Idea Generalized Trig . . . • Physical laws should not depend on the choice of mea- Physical Meaning of . . . suring units. Scale Invariance Our Idea • Thus, scale-invariance is an important physical princi- Our Idea Leads . . . ple. Conclusion • Scale-invariance does not necessarily mean that Acknowledgments E pot ( x ) = c · x 2 : e.g., E pot = x 3 is also scale-invariant. Home Page • Let us therefore consider a general case in which both Title Page E pot ( x ) and E kin ( ˙ x ) are scale-invariant. ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ Page 9 of 13 Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  10. Fourier Series and . . . Generalized . . . 9. Our Idea Leads Exactly to Generalized Generalized Trig . . . Trigonometric Functions Physical Meaning of . . . • Scale-invariance of the dependence E pot ( x ) means that: Scale Invariance Our Idea – for every parameter λ describing re-scaling of the Our Idea Leads . . . coordinate x , Conclusion – there exists an appropriate re-scaling µ ( λ ) of energy Acknowledgments – that preserves this dependence, i.e., for which E = E pot ( x ) implies that E ′ = E pot ( x ′ ), where Home Page E ′ = µ ( λ ) · E and x ′ = λ · x. Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ • Here, µ ( λ ) · E = E pot ( λ · x ), i.e., ◭ ◮ µ ( λ ) · E pot ( x ) = E pot ( λ · x ) . Page 10 of 13 • It is known that all continuous solutions of this func- tional equation have the form E pot ( x ) = c · x p . Go Back Full Screen • Similarly, scale-invariance of the expression for kinetic x ) q . energy implies that E kin ( ˙ x ) = m · ( ˙ Close Quit

  11. Fourier Series and . . . Generalized . . . 10. Our Idea (cont-d) Generalized Trig . . . x ) = c · x p + m · ( ˙ x ) q . • Thus, E = E pot ( x ) + E kin ( ˙ Physical Meaning of . . . Scale Invariance • In the no-friction approximation, energy is preserved: Our Idea E = const . Our Idea Leads . . . Conclusion • By selecting appropriate units for E , x , and t (hence x ), we get a simplified expression 1 = x p + ( ˙ Acknowledgments x ) q . for ˙ Home Page x = dx x ) q = 1 − x p , hence ˙ dt = (1 − x p ) 1 /q , • In this case, ( ˙ Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ dx � dx dt = (1 − x p ) 1 /q , and t ( x ) = (1 − x p ) 1 /q . ◭ ◮ Page 11 of 13 • The desired dependence x ( t ) is the inverse function to this integral t ( x ). Go Back • This is exactly the above-described generalized Full Screen trigonometric function. Close Quit

  12. Fourier Series and . . . Generalized . . . 11. Conclusion Generalized Trig . . . • We have shown that: Physical Meaning of . . . Scale Invariance – a seemingly arbitrary generalization of sinusoids Our Idea – can be naturally derived from a physically mean- Our Idea Leads . . . ingful model, Conclusion – and the only functions obtained from this model Acknowledgments are indeed the generalized trigonometric functions. Home Page • This derivation provides a theoretical explanation of Title Page the empirical success of these functions: ◭◭ ◮◮ – while there are many mathematically possible gen- ◭ ◮ eralizations of sinusoids, Page 12 of 13 – these functions are the only one which are consis- Go Back tent with the corresponding physical model. Full Screen Close Quit

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend