How to detect dark matter? Part 2 MARIANNA MARIANNA MARIANNA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
How to detect dark matter? Part 2 MARIANNA MARIANNA MARIANNA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
How to detect dark matter? Part 2 MARIANNA MARIANNA MARIANNA MARIANNA SAFRONOV SAFRONOV SAFRONOV SAFRONOV A A A A June 2019, Ameland Netherlands Summer school Search for new physics with low-energy precision tests How to detect
10 10 10 10-
- 22
22 22 22 eV 10
eV 10 eV 10 eV 10-
- 12
12 12 12 eV
eV eV eV µ µ µ µeV eV eV eV eV GeV eV GeV eV GeV eV GeV
How to detect ultralight dark matter?
Ultralight dark matter has to be bosonic – Fermi velocity for DM with mass >10 eV is higher than our Galaxy escape velocity. Bosonic dark matter (DM) with mass mφ < 1eV Dark matter density in our Galaxy > where is the de Broglie wavelength of the particle. Then, the dark matter exhibits coherence and behaves like a classical field.
3 dB
λ −
dB
λ
Such DM classical field can: Cause precession of nuclear and electron spins Drive currents in electromagnetic systems Induce equivalence principle-violating accelerations of matter Modulate the values of the fundamental constants of nature, inducing changes in atomic transition frequencies and local gravitational field.
Effects of ultralight DM on standard model particles
Signal is line at frequency = DM mass and width 10-6
2 6
v 10 c
−
≈
Interactions of bosonic ultralight dark matter
- M. S. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, Derek F. Jackson-Kimball,
- A. Derevianko, and Charles W. Clark, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025008 (2018).
DM: SM: are
Current experimental efforts in searches for bosonic ultralight dark matter
Spin
0 S 0 PS 1 V 1 AV HAYSTAC
- M. S. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, Derek F. Jackson-Kimball,
- A. Derevianko, and Charles W. Clark, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025008 (2018).
The Axion
θ
(think)
T T CP
Slide from: Karl van Bibber, GPMFC workshop
S = 0 pseudoscalar
γ∗
Sea of virtual photons
≡
∴
γ
a Primakoff Effect
B
Classical EM field
Magnet
The Primakoff Effect P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 1415 the
Slide from: Karl van Bibber, GPMFC workshop
The microwave cavity axion search -Your car radio on steroids
×
FFT Local Oscillator Preamplifier Magnet Cavity
a γ γ∗
Power Frequency f = mac2 / h
∆f / f ~ 10–6
For e.g., ma = 10 µeV : ρa ~ 1014 cm–3 λDeB ~ 100 m Slide from: Karl van Bibber, GPMFC workshop
How to go higher & lower in frequency (mass) Size & geometry of the cavity determines the frequency of the microwave cavity experiment
Natural scale is cavities of diameter 50 – 5 cm ~ 0.5 GHz – 5 GHz, or 2 – 20 µeV mass
To go lower in frequency, a lumped-parameter LC circuit allows one to decouple the dimension of the cavity from the frequency
LC, DM Radio
To go higher in frequency, an open (Fabry-Perot) resonator is much more natural than cavities
ORPHEUS, MADMAX
Slide from: Karl van Bibber, GPMFC workshop
Slide from Peter Graham
Slide from Peter Graham
DARK MATTER SEARCHES WITH ATOMIC CLOCKS
How do fundamental constants vary?
Slow drifts Transient variations
Topological dark matter
Oscillations Stochastic
Dilaton dark matter or axion-like particles Dark energy?
- A. Derevianko, Conf. Ser. 723 (2016) 012043
Ultralight dark matter
- A. Arvanitaki et al., PRD 91, 015015 (2015)
Dark matter coupling to the Standard Model photons gluons electrons quarks Dark matter Measure: couplings di vs. DM mass
Ultralight dark matter searches with clocks
Comparing frequencies of hyperfine to optical clocks Comparing frequencies of optical to optical clocks
2 K q E =
2 2
1 E E α α = + − q
Enhancement factor
Dark matter
Measuring ratios of optical clock frequencies for dark matter detection
Need:
- Best short-term stability σ
σ σ σ1 at ∆τ ∆τ ∆τ ∆τ
- Long total measurement time to improve sensitivity
But: only until you reach the DM coherence time
- Lowest systematic uncertainty
- Largest possible enhancement factor combination (K2-K1)
Ultralight dark matter
Dark matter parameters
One oscillation per 11 days One oscillation per second
DM virial velocities ~ 300 km/s
Clock measurement protocols for the dark matter detection
Make N such measurements, preferably regularly spaced Single clock ratio measurement: averaging over time τ1
- A. Arvanitaki et al., PRD 91, 015015 (2015)
∆τ τint Detection signal:
A peak with monochromatic frequency in the discrete Fourier transform of this time series.
Clock measurement protocols for the dark matter detection
Make N such measurements, preferably regularly spaced Single clock ratio measurement: averaging over time τ1
- A. Arvanitaki et al., PRD 91, 015015 (2015)
∆τ τint Detection signal:
A peak with monochromatic frequency in the discrete Fourier transform of this time series.
No more than one dark matter oscillation during this time or use extra pulse sequence Al least one dark matter oscillation during this time
Dy: K. Van Tilburg, N. Leefer, L. Bougas, and D. Budker, Phys.
- Rev. Lett. 115, 011802 (2015).
Rb/Cs: A. Hees, J. Guéna, M. Abgrall, S.Bize,and P. Wolf,
- Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 061301 (2016)
Experimental results
From PRL 120, 141101 (2018)
From PRL 120, 141101 (2018)
?
Projected clock limits
- A. Arvanitaki et al., PRD 91, 015015 (2015)
Sr optical clock vs. silicon cavity project limits
Dark matter clumps: point-like monopoles,
- ne-dimensional strings or two-dimensional
sheets (domain walls). If they are large (size of the Earth) and frequent enough they may be detected by measuring changes in the synchronicity of a global network of atomic clocks, such as the Global Positioning System.
Transient variations
GPM.DM collaboration: Roberts at el., Nature Communications 8, 1195 (2017)
Global sensor network. The participating Sr and Yb optical lattice atomic clocks reside at NIST, Boulder, CO, USA, at LNE-SYRTE, Paris, France, at KL FAMO, Torun, Poland, and at NICT, Tokyo, Japan
Wcisło et al., Sci. Adv. 4: eaau4869 (2018)
Constraints on the coupling of dark matter to electromagnetism. The energy scale Λ which inversely parametrizes the strength of the DM-SM coupling as a function of the wall width d.
Wcisło et al., Sci. Adv. 4 (2018)
- 1. Improve uncertainties of current clocks – [????] more orders.
- 2. Improve stabilities of the clock ratio measurements
(particularly with trapped ion clocks). Clock sensitivity to all types of the searches for the variation
- f fundamental constants, including dark matter searches
require as large enhancement factors K to maximize the signal.
- 3. Build new clocks based on different systems
- a. Highly-charged ions
- b. Nuclear clock
- c. New Yb two-transition clock scheme
- d. Molecular clocks
How to improve laboratory searches for the variation of fundamental constants & dark matter?
The Future Advances in Atomic Clocks
Orders of magnitude improvements with current clocks
Large ion crystals Ion chains 3D optical lattice clocks Measurements beyond the quantum limit Entangled clocks
Image credits: NIST, Innsbruck group, MIT Vuletic group, Ye JILA group
The Future: New Atomic Clocks
Nuclear clock Clocks with ultracold highly charged ions First demonstration of quantum logic spectroscopy at PTB, Germany
Science 347, 1233 (2015)
Nuclear clock
Science 347, 1233 (2015)
229mTh 229Th
Nuclear transition 160(10) nm Lifetime ~ 5000s
Only 7.8eV energy of a nuclear transition (laser-accessible) ! Existence of this isomer 229mTh state was confirmed: Wense et al., Nature 533, 4751 (2016) Laser spectroscopic characterization of the nuclear clock isomer 229mTh (measured isomer nuclear radius and quadrupole moment): Thielking et al., Nature 556, 321(2018) Nuclear charge radii of 229Th from isotope and isomer shifts: Safronova et al., Phys. Rev.
- Lett. 121, 213001 (2018).
Then, possible 4-5 orders of magnitude enhancement to the variation of α and but orders of magnitude uncertainty in the enhancement factors.
Th nuclear clock
Large (MeV) Coulomb energy difference compensated by MeV difference in the nuclear binding energy?
q QCD
m Λ
Provides access to couplings of Standard Model particles to dark matter via other terms besides the de (E&M).
It is crucial to establish actual enhancement!
229mTh 229Th
Nuclear transition 160(10) nm Lifetime ~ 5000s
- M. G. Kozlov, M. S. Safronova, J. R. Crespo López-Urrutia, P. O. Schmidt,
- Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 45005 (2018).