how better are predictive
play

How Better Are Predictive Robust Interval . . . Models: Analysis on - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Predictions Are Important Traditional Statistics . . . Predictive Approach Measurement . . . How Better Are Predictive Robust Interval . . . Models: Analysis on the Analysis of the Problem How Accurate Are . . . Practically Important


  1. Predictions Are Important Traditional Statistics . . . Predictive Approach Measurement . . . How Better Are Predictive Robust Interval . . . Models: Analysis on the Analysis of the Problem How Accurate Are . . . Practically Important Comparison of Two . . . How More Accurate? Example of Robust Interval Home Page Uncertainty Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ Vladik Kreinovich 1 , Hung T. Nguyen 2 , 3 , ◭ ◮ Songsak Sriboonchitta 3 , and Olga Kosheleva 1 1 University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, USA Page 1 of 22 olgak@utep.edu, vladik@utep.edu 2 Department of Mathematics, New Mexico State University Go Back Las Cuces, New Mexico 88003, USA, hunguyen@nmsu.edu Full Screen 3 Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai 50200 Thailand, songsakecon@gmail.com Close Quit

  2. Predictions Are Important Traditional Statistics . . . 1. Predictions Are Important Predictive Approach • One of the main applications of science and engineering Measurement . . . is to predict what will happen in the future. Robust Interval . . . Analysis of the Problem • In science, we are most interesting in predicting what How Accurate Are . . . will happen “by itself”. Comparison of Two . . . • Examples: where the Moon will be a year from now? How More Accurate? Home Page • In engineering, we are more interested in what will hap- pen if we apply a certain control strategy. Title Page • Example: where a spaceship will be if we apply a cer- ◭◭ ◮◮ tain trajectory correction? ◭ ◮ • In both science and engineering, prediction is one of Page 2 of 22 the main objectives. Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  3. Predictions Are Important Traditional Statistics . . . 2. Traditional Statistics Approach to Prediction: Predictive Approach Estimate then Predict Measurement . . . • In the traditional statistical approach, we first fix a Robust Interval . . . statistical model with unknown parameters. Analysis of the Problem How Accurate Are . . . • For example, we can assume that the dependence of y Comparison of Two . . . on x 1 , . . . , x n is linear: How More Accurate? n � Home Page y = a 0 + a i · x i + ε, ε ∼ N (0 , σ ) . Title Page i =1 • In this case, the parameters are a 0 , a 1 , . . . , a n , and σ . ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ • Then, we use the observations to confirm this model and estimate the values of these parameters. Page 3 of 22 • After that, we use the model with the estimated pa- Go Back rameters to make the corresponding predictions. Full Screen Close Quit

  4. Predictions Are Important Traditional Statistics . . . 3. Traditional Statistical Approach to Prediction: Predictive Approach Advantages And Limitations Measurement . . . • In the traditional approach: Robust Interval . . . Analysis of the Problem – when we perform estimations, How Accurate Are . . . – we do not take into account what exactly charac- Comparison of Two . . . teristic we plan to predict. How More Accurate? • Advantage of this approach: a computationally inten- Home Page sive parameter estimation part is performed only once. Title Page • In the past, when computations were much slower than ◭◭ ◮◮ now, this was a big advantage. ◭ ◮ • With this advantages, come a potential limitation: Page 4 of 22 – hopefully, by tailoring parameter estimation to a Go Back specific prediction problem, Full Screen – we may be able to make more accurate predictions. Close Quit

  5. Predictions Are Important Traditional Statistics . . . 4. Predictive Approach Predictive Approach • In the past, because of the computer limitations, we Measurement . . . had to save on computations. Robust Interval . . . Analysis of the Problem • Thus, the traditional approach was, in most cases, all How Accurate Are . . . we could afford. Comparison of Two . . . • However, now computers have become much faster. How More Accurate? Home Page • As a result, it has become possible to perform intensive computations in a short period of time. Title Page • So, we can directly solve the prediction problem. ◭◭ ◮◮ • In other words: ◭ ◮ Page 5 of 22 – on the intermediate step of estimating the param- eters, Go Back – we can take into account what exactly quantities Full Screen we need to predict. Close Quit

  6. Predictions Are Important Traditional Statistics . . . 5. What We Do in This Talk Predictive Approach • There are many examples of successful use of the pre- Measurement . . . dictive approach. Robust Interval . . . Analysis of the Problem • However, most of these examples remain anecdotal. How Accurate Are . . . • In this talk: Comparison of Two . . . – on a practically important simple example of robust How More Accurate? Home Page interval uncertainty, – we prove a general result showing that predictive Title Page models indeed lead to more accurate predictions. ◭◭ ◮◮ • Moreover, we provide a numerical measure of accuracy ◭ ◮ improvement. Page 6 of 22 Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  7. Predictions Are Important Traditional Statistics . . . 6. Measurement Uncertainty: Reminder Predictive Approach • Data processing starts with values that come from Measurement . . . measurements. Robust Interval . . . Analysis of the Problem • Measurement are not 100% accurate: How Accurate Are . . . – the measurement result � x is, in general, different Comparison of Two . . . from How More Accurate? – the actual (unknown) value x of the corresponding Home Page quantity. Title Page • In other words, in general, we have a non-zero mea- ◭◭ ◮◮ def surement error ∆ x = � x − x . ◭ ◮ • In some situations, we know the probability distribu- Page 7 of 22 tion of the measurement error. Go Back • For example, we often that the ∆ x is normally dis- Full Screen tributed, with 0 mean and known st. dev. σ . Close Quit

  8. Predictions Are Important Traditional Statistics . . . 7. Robust Interval Uncertainty Predictive Approach • However, often, the only information that we have Measurement . . . about ∆ x is the upper bound ∆: | ∆ x | ≤ ∆. Robust Interval . . . Analysis of the Problem • This bound is provided by the manufacturer of the How Accurate Are . . . measuring instrument. Comparison of Two . . . • In other words: How More Accurate? – we only know that the probability distribution of Home Page the measurement error ∆ x is located on [ − ∆ , ∆], Title Page – but we do not have any other information about ◭◭ ◮◮ the probability distribution. ◭ ◮ • Such interval uncertainty is a particular case of the Page 8 of 22 general robust statistics . Go Back • Why cannot we always get this additional information? Full Screen • To get information about ∆ x = � x − x , we need to have information about the actual value x . Close Quit

  9. Predictions Are Important Traditional Statistics . . . 8. Robust Interval Uncertainty (cont-d) Predictive Approach • In many practical situations, this is possible; namely: Measurement . . . Robust Interval . . . – in addition to our measuring instrument (MI), Analysis of the Problem – we often also have a much more accurate (“stan- How Accurate Are . . . dard”) MI, Comparison of Two . . . – so much more accurate that the corresponding mea- How More Accurate? surement error can be safely ignored, Home Page – and thus, the results of using the standard MI can Title Page be taken as the actual values. ◭◭ ◮◮ • We can then find the prob. distribution for ∆ x if we ◭ ◮ measure quantities by both our MI and standard MI. Page 9 of 22 • In many situations, however, our MI is already state- Go Back of-the-art, no more-accurate standard MI is possible. Full Screen Close Quit

  10. Predictions Are Important Traditional Statistics . . . 9. Robust Interval Uncertainty (cont-d) Predictive Approach • For example, in fundamental science, we use state-of- Measurement . . . the-art measuring instruments. Robust Interval . . . Analysis of the Problem • For a billion-dollar project like space telescope or par- How Accurate Are . . . ticle super-collider, the best MI are used. Comparison of Two . . . • Another frequent case when we have to use ∆ is the How More Accurate? case of routine manufacturing. Home Page • In this case: Title Page – theoretically, we can calibrate every sensor, but ◭◭ ◮◮ – sensors are cheap and calibrating them costs a lot ◭ ◮ – since it means using expensive standard MIs. Page 10 of 22 • In view of the practical importance, in this talk, we Go Back consider the case of robust interval uncertainty. Full Screen Close Quit

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend