hospitalized older adults
play

Hospitalized Older Adults Anil Makam, MD, MAS 1 ; Oanh Nguyen, MD, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Predictors & Variation in LTAC Use among Non-Mechanically Ventilated Hospitalized Older Adults Anil Makam, MD, MAS 1 ; Oanh Nguyen, MD, MAS; Lei Xuan, PhD; Mike Miller, MS; Ethan Halm, MD, MPH 1 Assistant Professor Division of GIM; Division


  1. Predictors & Variation in LTAC Use among Non-Mechanically Ventilated Hospitalized Older Adults Anil Makam, MD, MAS 1 ; Oanh Nguyen, MD, MAS; Lei Xuan, PhD; Mike Miller, MS; Ethan Halm, MD, MPH 1 Assistant Professor Division of GIM; Division of Outcomes & HSR UT Southwestern Medical Center anil.makam@utsouthwestern.edu | @anilmakam

  2. FUNDING DISCLOSURE *No conflicts of interest to disclose @AnilMakam

  3. BACKGROUND • Long-term acute care hospitals (LTACs) specialize in caring for patients with serious & complex illness who need inpatient care for an extended period of time (3-5 weeks) • Most expensive post-acute care provider • LTACs are most effective for ventilation weaning, but fewer than 25% of LTAC patients receive prolonged mechanical ventilation @AnilMakam

  4. KNOWLEDGE GAP • Despite providing an overlapping level of care with acute care hospitals, unclear why non- mechanically ventilated older adults are transferred to LTACs @AnilMakam

  5. RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1. What are the patient, hospital, and region-level predictors of LTAC transfer vs staying in the acute-care hospital? 2. How much of the variation in LTAC use is explained by each of these 3 levels? @AnilMakam

  6. METHODS • Study Design: Observational cohort study • Data: 5% national Medicare data – Hospital : CMS Provider of Services file – Regions : Dartmouth Atlas @AnilMakam

  7. PARTICIPANTS Non-mechanically ventilated hospitalized older adults in FY2012 with continuous Medicare A&B (no part C) in prior 12 months Stay in the Hospital Prolonged hospitalization without a post-acute care Transferred to LTAC transfer, defined as having LOS ≥ average hospital LOS among those transferred to LTAC Restricted to the top 50 most common diagnoses leading to LTAC transfer (~2/3 rds of LTAC population)

  8. ANALYSIS • Predictors: multilevel mixed effects model to account for clustering of patients in hospitals, and hospitals in regions • Variation: sequential multilevel models – Variance partition coefficients (VPCs) • Captures residual variation explained at each level – Adjusted region and hospital LTAC transfer rates • Heat map & variation profile plots – Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) • Assesses how similar hospitals are within regions @AnilMakam

  9. CHARACTERISTICS LTAC Stay in Hospital N=1831 N=11,044 Age ≥85 years 24% 28% Female 55% 56% White 75% 81% Charlson index, median 5 4 Hospital LOS, median 10 12 ICU stay ≥ 3 days 50% 42% @AnilMakam

  10. PREDICTORS Adjusted OR (95% CI) Patient* Prior LTAC stay 1.77 (1.36-2.31) Wheelchair use 1.30 (1.10-1.53) Respiratory diagnosis 0.71 (0.60-0.85) Circulatory diagnosis 0.65 (0.54-0.78) Central line 1.57 (1.34-1.83) Excisional debridement 2.05 (1.31-3.22) Hospital For-profit hospital 1.58 (1.27-1.95) Urban location 0.54 (0.39-0.73) Region* Distance to LTAC, <1.4 vs >34 miles 6.18 (4.21-9.09) Medicare spending, per $3000 1.48 (1.06-2.06) Median income, per $10,000 0.88 (0.79-0.97) *selected list

  11. RESULTS: VARIATION VPCs Case-Mix Only Full Model Between patients 56.9% 74.5% Between hospitals 15.4% 18.4% Between regions 27.8% 7.1% • After accounting for differences in patient case-mix, differences between hospitals (15%) & regions (28%) account for nearly half of why older adults are transferred to an LTAC • Three-quarters of regional variation is explained by the region- level predictors included in the model (28%  7%) @AnilMakam

  12. RESULTS: VARIATION VPCs Case-Mix Only Full Model Between patients 56.9% 74.5% Between hospitals 15.4% 18.4% Between regions 27.8% 7.1% • After accounting for differences in patient case-mix, differences between hospitals (15%) & regions (28%) account for nearly half of why older adults are transferred to an LTAC • Three-quarters of regional variation is explained by the region- level predictors included in the full model (28%  7%) @AnilMakam

  13. ADJUSTED LTAC TRANSFER RATE BY REGION *Adjusted for differences in case-mix @AnilMakam

  14. HOSPITAL VARIATION IN LTAC USE *Adjusted for patient, hospital, and region-level predictors *n=1038 hospitals with ≥5 patients % Transferred to LTAC Median = 7% (IQR, 3%-18%) Hospitals Sorted in Ascending Order of Adjusted LTAC Transfer Rate @AnilMakam

  15. HOSPITAL CORRELATION • Hospitals within the same region are only modestly correlated (ICC 0.25) with one another with respect to LTAC use @AnilMakam

  16. HOSPITAL VARIATION BY REGION @AnilMakam

  17. LIMITATIONS • May have omitted important patient-level predictors of LTAC use due to use of administrative data – VPCs still robust since capture unobserved differences @AnilMakam

  18. CONSLUSIONS • Nearly half of variation in LTAC use is unrelated to patients’ illness severity or preference • Regional differences explain over a quarter of variation, with far greater use in the South • Considerable hospital variation, even among hospitals in same regions with same LTAC access @AnilMakam

  19. IMPLICATIONS • More than one place to recover from serious illness among non-mechanically ventilated older adults – LTAC transfer may improve care by more focus on interdisciplinary rehab, but could increase fragmentation – LTAC transfer generates a separate bundled payment, so more expensive for Medicare & ACOs • Need for comparative effectiveness research of LTAC vs hospital care for recovery & costs @AnilMakam

  20. QUESTIONS? anil.makam@utsouthwestern.edu @anilmakam

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend