hl lhc
play

HL-LHC Ian Lim September 15, 2017 About Me Stanford University, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Vertex Reconstruction at the HL-LHC Ian Lim September 15, 2017 About Me Stanford University, B.S. in Physics with Honors (2017) Interests in cats, baking, and high-energy physics SULI intern, autumn 2017 (August 21-December 8)


  1. Vertex Reconstruction at the HL-LHC Ian Lim September 15, 2017

  2. About Me • Stanford University, B.S. in Physics with Honors (2017) • Interests in cats, baking, and high-energy physics • SULI intern, autumn 2017 (August 21-December 8) • Working with Maurice, Ben, and Simone on vertex reconstruction for the HL-LHC upgrade 2

  3. How well do existing vertexing algorithms perform at large mu? And how can they be improved? 3

  4. Plan of Attack 1. Intro to vertexing 2. The problem, in more detail 3. My studies so far 4. Future work 4

  5. What is Vertexing? • Primary vertices are locations of proton-proton collisions in the detector • Two main parts – position reconstruction and track association • How well can we determine where a collision happened in space? • Given the tracks left in our detector by collision products, how well can we associate them to the correct vertex? 5

  6. Definitions: Events, Hard Scatter, and Pile-Up • Today, protons are collided in bunches with a period of 25 ns. • Each bunch crossing (event) results in about 20-40 actual collisions ( μ ). • One special “hard scatter” vertex and many others (pile -up) • We can also categorize events by how well we reconstruct vertices. Image credit to Ariel Schwartzman, SLAC. Hard scatter tracks in red and pile-up tracks in blue. 6

  7. Based on https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.10235.pdf 7

  8. Central problems of vertexing • At the HL-LHC, we expect μ ~ 200 – a tenfold increase! • With increased vertex density, performing a clean reconstruction becomes significantly harder. • Hard scatter is obscured by 10x more pile-up • More tracks to assign • Greater likelihood of merging • But the detector will be upgraded as well (e.g. pseudorapidity |η|< 4, vs. | η |<2.5 now) 8

  9. Current approach (my work) • First, benchmark existing algorithms on simulated μ =200 data • Vertex reconstruction efficiency • Event classification and distribution • Next, determine new/alternate metrics for measuring performance • Bias introduced by misidentified tracks • Finally, implement and test new vertexing procedures. 9

  10. Truth and reco vertices/event 10

  11. Reconstruction efficiency + distribution 11

  12. Event classification vs. μ 12

  13. Vertex density and event classification 13

  14. Hard scatter z-resolution 14

  15. Spread of hard scatter contributions 15

  16. Future work • Continuing to develop interesting metrics for vertexing • Working on improved vertexing methods • Use of high η tracks from the forward region? • Track clustering methods (cf. Meloni 2017, arXiv:1705.00022v1) • Vertex candidate substructure (cf. Schwartzman) 16

  17. Thank you for your time! 17

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend