higher order calculations in the ssm
play

Higher-order calculations in the SSM Thomas Biek otter in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Higher-order calculations in the SSM Thomas Biek otter in collaboration with Sven Heinemeyer and Carlos Mu noz [hep-ph/1712.07475] Instituto de F sica Te orica (UAM-CSIC) Universidad Aut onoma de Madrid 07/2018 SUSY18


  1. Higher-order calculations in the µ ν SSM Thomas Biek¨ otter in collaboration with Sven Heinemeyer and Carlos Mu˜ noz [hep-ph/1712.07475] Instituto de F´ ısica Te´ orica (UAM-CSIC) Universidad Aut´ onoma de Madrid 07/2018 SUSY18 Barcelona 1 / 20

  2. Introduction The µ ν SSM Scalar potential Renormalization Results Conclusion Why higher-order corrections? - Accurate predictions ( ∆ theo. < ∆ exp. ) for precisely measured observables need to take into account quantum corrections - Every model has to incorporate a SM-like Higgs boson with the properties measured at LHC M e xp = 125 . 09 ± 0 . 21 (stat.) ± 0 . 11 (syst.) GeV H Atlas and CMS [hep-ex/1503.07589] Already a precision observable at the per-mille level! 2 / 20

  3. Introduction The µ ν SSM Scalar potential Renormalization Results Conclusion Why higher-order corrections? - Accurate predictions ( ∆ theo. < ∆ exp. ) for precisely measured observables need to take into account quantum corrections - Every model has to incorporate a SM-like Higgs boson with the properties measured at LHC M e xp = 125 . 09 ± 0 . 21 (stat.) ± 0 . 11 (syst.) GeV H Atlas and CMS [hep-ex/1503.07589] Already a precision observable at the per-mille level! - While in the SM M H is a free parameter, SUSY models predict the Higgs boson mass dependent on the parameters of the model - Higher-order corrections to scalar masses give substantial contributions, in some cases of the order of the tree-level mass ⇒ Large theoretical uncertainties: ∼ 3 GeV (MSSM) Degrassi, Heinemeyer, Hollik, Slavich, Weiglein [hep-ph/0212020] Maybe now ∼ 2 GeV ? Allanach, Voigt [hep-ph/1804.09410] Bahl, Hollik [hep-ph/1805.00867] 2 / 20

  4. Introduction The µ ν SSM Scalar potential Renormalization Results Conclusion Why higher-order corrections? - Accurate predictions ( ∆ theo. < ∆ exp. ) for precisely measured observables need to take into account quantum corrections - Every model has to incorporate a SM-like Higgs boson with the properties measured at LHC M e xp = 125 . 09 ± 0 . 21 (stat.) ± 0 . 11 (syst.) GeV H Atlas and CMS [hep-ex/1503.07589] Already a precision observable at the per-mille level! - While in the SM M H is a free parameter, SUSY models predict the Higgs boson mass dependent on the parameters of the model - Higher-order corrections to scalar masses give substantial contributions, in some cases of the order of the tree-level mass ⇒ Large theoretical uncertainties: ∼ 3 GeV (MSSM) Degrassi, Heinemeyer, Hollik, Slavich, Weiglein [hep-ph/0212020] Maybe now ∼ 2 GeV ? Allanach, Voigt [hep-ph/1804.09410] Bahl, Hollik [hep-ph/1805.00867] Any model beyond the MSSM potentially has even larger uncertainty ⇒ We present full one-loop + partial MSSM-like two-loop corrections to scalar masses in the µ ⌫ SSM. 2 / 20

  5. Introduction The µ ν SSM Scalar potential Renormalization Results Conclusion Why go beyond MSSM? – No new physics at LHC (so far) – Big loop-corrections to Higgs mass needed (fine-tuning) – µ -problem (MSSM superpotential has a scale) – ⌫ -problem: Neutrino masses Why are they so light? from 2013 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 408 012015 3 / 20

  6. Introduction The µ ν SSM Scalar potential Renormalization Results Conclusion Why go beyond MSSM? – No new physics at LHC (so far) – Big loop-corrections to Higgs mass needed (fine-tuning) – µ -problem (MSSM superpotential has a scale) – ⌫ -problem: Neutrino masses Why are they so light? from 2013 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 408 012015 µ ν SSM: Simplest extension of the MSSM solving the µ - and the ν -problem at the same time. 3 / 20

  7. Introduction The µ ν SSM Scalar potential Renormalization Results Conclusion Why go beyond MSSM? – No new physics at LHC (so far) – Big loop-corrections to Higgs mass needed (fine-tuning) – µ -problem (MSSM superpotential has a scale) – ⌫ -problem: Neutrino masses Why are they so light? from 2013 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 408 012015 µ ν SSM: Simplest extension of the MSSM solving the µ - and the ν -problem at the same time. ⌫ c Particle content: MSSM + 3 (1) gauge singlets ˆ j ij ˆ H u ˆ Couplings: Y ν ⌫ c L i ˆ j ) gauge singlet = right-handed neutrino ! EWSB ) Dirac masses for neutrinos ( Y ν ii ⇡ Y e 11 ) i ˆ H u ˆ ⌫ c H d , 1 ⌫ c ⌫ c ⌫ c � i ˆ 3  ijk ˆ i ˆ j ˆ k (NMSSM-like) ! EWSB ) E ff ective µ -term generated at EW scale ! EWSB ) Majorana masses for R-handed neutrinos Lopez-Fogliani, Munoz [hep-ph/0508297] Escudero, Lopez-Fogliani, Munoz, Ruiz de Austri [hep-ph/0810.1507] 3 / 20

  8. Introduction The µ ν SSM Scalar potential Renormalization Results Conclusion Lagrangian and Symmetries ⇣ ⌘ Y e ij ˆ H a d ˆ L b e c j + Y d ij ˆ H a d ˆ Q b i ˆ d c j + Y u ij ˆ H b u ˆ Q a u c W = ✏ ab i ˆ i ˆ j + 1 ⇣ ⌘ ij ˆ H b u ˆ L a ⌫ c ⌫ c i ˆ H b u ˆ H a ⌫ c ⌫ c ⌫ c Y ν + ✏ ab i ˆ j − � i ˆ 3  ijk ˆ i ˆ j ˆ d k – Z 3 symmetry forbids µ -term and Majorana masses ! no scale in superpotential – R -parity explicitly broken (via / L ) ! more complicated particle mixing – Additinal sources of LFV after EWSB – Baryon Triality B 3 to forbid baryon number violation ! no proton decay 4 / 20

  9. Introduction The µ ν SSM Scalar potential Renormalization Results Conclusion Lagrangian and Symmetries ⇣ ⌘ Y e ij ˆ H a d ˆ L b e c j + Y d ij ˆ H a d ˆ Q b i ˆ d c j + Y u ij ˆ H b u ˆ Q a u c W = ✏ ab i ˆ i ˆ j + 1 ⇣ ⌘ ij ˆ H b u ˆ L a ⌫ c ⌫ c i ˆ H b u ˆ H a ⌫ c ⌫ c ⌫ c Y ν + ✏ ab i ˆ j − � i ˆ 3  ijk ˆ i ˆ j ˆ d k – Z 3 symmetry forbids µ -term and Majorana masses ! no scale in superpotential – R -parity explicitly broken (via / L ) ! more complicated particle mixing – Additinal sources of LFV after EWSB – Baryon Triality B 3 to forbid baryon number violation ! no proton decay ⇣ ⌘ T e ij H a d e L b e ⇤ jR + T d ij H a d e Q b iL e d ⇤ jR + T u ij H b u e Q a u ⇤ � L soft = ✏ ab iL e iL e jR + h.c. ✓ ◆ u + 1 T ν ij H b u e L a ⌫ ⇤ jR � T λ ⌫ ⇤ iR H a d H b 3 T κ ⌫ ⇤ ⌫ ⇤ ⌫ ⇤ + iL e e ijk e iR e jR e kR + h.c. ✏ ab i ⇣ ⌘ ⇣ ⌘ ⇣ ⌘ ⇣ ⌘ m 2 Q a ⇤ e iL e Q a m 2 u ⇤ m 2 d ⇤ e iR e m 2 e L a ⇤ iL e L a + jL + ij e iR e u jR + d jR + e e e e QL uR dR LL jL ij ij ij ⇣ ⌘ ⇣ ⌘ ⇣ ⌘ m 2 i H a ⇤ d e L a m 2 ⌫ ⇤ m 2 e ⇤ e jR + m 2 Hd H a ⇤ H a d + m 2 Hu H a ⇤ H a + iL + ij e iR e ⌫ jR + ij e iR e Hd e e ν R e eR d u u LL ⇣ ⌘ 1 B 0 e B 0 + h.c. g + M 2 f W f W + M 1 e + M 3 e g e 2 We put soft masses mixing di ff erent fields to zero at tree-level, explained by diagonal K¨ ahler metric in certain Sugra models Brignole, Ibanez, Munoz [hep-ph/9707209] Ghosh, Lara, Lopez-Fogliani, Munoz, Ruiz de Austri [hep-ph/1707.02471] 4 / 20

  10. Introduction The µ ν SSM Scalar potential Renormalization Results Conclusion Particle Spectrum and Phenomenology 8 (6) CP-even neutral scalars: ' T = ( H R d , H R ⌫ R ⌫ R u , e iR , e jL ) Left and right sneutrinos can be lighter than 125GeV Mixing of left sneutrinos to H suppressed by Y ν and v L 8 (6) CP-odd neutral scalars: � T = ( H I d , H I ⌫ I ⌫ I u , e iR , e jL ) Includes the neutral Goldstone boson Mixing of left sneutrinos to H suppressed by Y ν and v L 8 charged sleptons: C T = ( H � ⇤ , H + e ⇤ e ⇤ u , e iL , e jR ) d Includes the charged Goldstone boson Mixing of sleptons to H suppressed by Y ν and v L 5 charginos: ( � � ) T = (( e iL ) c ⇤ , f d ) , ( � + ) T = (( e jR ) c , f W � , e W + , e H � H + u ) Three light states corresponding to e , µ and ⌧ Mixing of leptons to gauginos suppressed by Y ν and v L 10 (8) Majorana fermions: ( � 0 ) T = (( ⌫ iL ) c ⇤ , e B 0 , f W 0 , e H 0 d , e H 0 u , ⌫ ⇤ jR ) Type-I seesaw at EW scale Mass matrix of rank 10 (6) ) 0 (2) massless states at tree-level 3 (1) neutrino masses of O ( < eV) at tree-level 3 (1) heavy right-handed neutrinos of O ( < TeV) 5 / 20

  11. Introduction The µ ν SSM Scalar potential Renormalization Results Conclusion Particle Spectrum and Phenomenology Collider: MSSM-bounds from Atlas/CMS usually do not hold in the µ ⌫ SSM The LSP 1 can be charged or colored ! Opens distinct regions of parameter space ! Di ff erent decay channels Displaced vertices: Sneutrino:  O (mm), Singlino:  O (m) Ghosh, Lara, Lopez-Fogliani, Munoz, Ruiz de Austri [hep-ph/1707.02471] Lara, Lopez-Fogliani, Munoz, Nagata, Otono, Ruiz de Austri [hep-ph/1804.00067] Novel signals: FS with multi-/leptons/jets, �� + leptons/ / E T Ghosh, Lara, Lopez-Fogliani, Munoz, Ruiz de Austri [hep-ph/1707.02471] Ghosh, Lopez-Fogliani, Mitsou, Munoz, Ruiz de Austri [hep-ph/1410.2070] Ghosh, Lopez-Fogliani, Mitsou, Munoz, Ruiz de Austri [hep-ph/1211.3177] Ghosh, Lopez-Fogliani, Munoz, Ruiz de Austri [hep-ph/1107.4614] 1 Forgetting about the gravitino because it is not relevant for colliders 6 / 20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend