High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models: a bridge between Particle - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

high energy hadronic interaction
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models: a bridge between Particle - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models: a bridge between Particle Physics and Astrophysics Auger Youngsters Meeting 2019 Julien Manshanden Under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Gnter Sigl Outline Motivation Muon Deficit Fireball


slide-1
SLIDE 1

High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models: a bridge between Particle Physics and Astrophysics

Auger Youngsters Meeting 2019 Julien Manshanden Under the supervision of

  • Prof. Dr. Günter Sigl
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Motivation
  • Muon Deficit
  • Fireball Model – Anchordoqui, Goldberg &

Weiler

  • Longitudinal Muon Dist.
  • Muon Number at Ground, Rμ
  • Discussion
  • Outlook

Anchordoqui et al. (2017), arXiv:1612.07328

1/12

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Motivation

Pierre Auger Observatory UHECR EAS Measured observables:

  • Xmax

EAS MC Simulation Input CR properties Expected observables:

  • Xmax

MC MC

Inferring CR properties Inference of CR properties

2/12

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Particle Physics

Motivation

Pierre Auger Observatory UHECR EAS Measured observables:

  • Xmax

EAS MC Simulation Input CR properties HE HIM Expected observables:

  • Xmax

MC MC

Constraining HE HIM Constraining high energy, high pT particle physics ON EQUAL FOOTING

3/12

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Muon Deficit

  • Significantly more muons observed than predicted by EAS simulations
  • Not compatible with Xmax observations
  • Clear inconsistency in current air shower models

New physics? New first interaction?

Figures from: Aab et al. (Pierre Auger Collab.) 2015

4/12

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Fireball Model – Anchordoqui, Goldberg & Weiler

  • Production of a new “fireball” state after the first

interaction

  • Fragmentation of gluons into ss̄ pairs
  • Suppression of pion production
  • Net effect: enhanced ratio of energy in hadronic

to electromagnetic component

Anchordoqui et al. (2017), arXiv:1612.07328

5/12

Mimick model with procedure from Soriano et al. (2018), arXiv:1811.07728

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Longitudinal Muon Dist.

  • ~14%

increase in Nμ

  • Earlier EAS

development

  • Higher

maximum

6/12

To attenuate EM component

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Muon Number at Ground, Rμ

  • Not just the

value of Nμ differs between simulation and

  • bservation
  • Also different

energy dependence: increases faster than linear

For θ = 67°: Rμ = Nμ / (1.455 · 107)

7/12

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Muon Number at Ground, Rμ

Valid for each of the post-LHC hadronic interaction models

EPOS-LHC Sibyll-2.3c QGSJETII-04

8/12

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Muon Number at Ground, Rμ

  • Awkward…
  • For some reason

fireball increases Nμ by ~200%, a slight

  • vershoot..
  • Possible reasons:

Conex, dependence

  • n lower E cut-off in

fireball procedure?

9/12

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Muon Number at Ground, Rμ

  • More interesting:

similar energy dependence as conventional models

  • Is this an automatic

consequence of models relying on a threshold?

  • Not directly excludes

fireball model: threshold more complicated

10/12

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Discussion

  • Gradual change instead of threshold?

– Could allow an increase in Nmu to develop over multiple generations throughout the EAS – Could depend stronger on energy

  • Tanguy Pierog suggested gradual change could

be induced by slightly modified cross-sections: EPOS-LHC allows this.

11/12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Outlook

  • Finish fireball implementation:

– Cross-check CRMC without fireball – Cross-check without Conex – Evaluate at more energies

  • Modify EPOS-LHC cross-sections in line with

Pierog et al. (2019, PoS:358/387)

  • Theoretically understand properties of HE HIM

required to potentially resolve the muon deficit

12/12