HFpEF: How to optimise management Burkert Pieske M.D. Berlin, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hfpef how to optimise management
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HFpEF: How to optimise management Burkert Pieske M.D. Berlin, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HFpEF: How to optimise management Burkert Pieske M.D. Berlin, Germany Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charit University Medicine Berlin, and Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, German


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Burkert Pieske M.D. Berlin, Germany

HFpEF: How to optimise management

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité University Medicine Berlin, and Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, German Heart Center, Berlin, Germany

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosures

Speaker Bureau, Consultancy, Advisory Board/Committee for: Bayer Healthcare, MSD, Novartis, Astra-Zeneca, Stealth Peptides, Servier, Daiichi- Sankyo, Biotronic, Abbott Vascular

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ESC 2016: How to optimize management

  • 1. Identify the patient – Diagnosis
  • 2. Classify the patient – Etiology and Stratification
  • 3. General principles of management
  • 4. Specific therapeutic approaches
slide-4
SLIDE 4

ESC 2016: Typical demographics and co-morbidities associated with HFpEF – Who are these patients?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ESC HF GL 2016: Definition of heart failure with preserved (HFpEF), mid-range (HFmrEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)

ESC 2016: „Signs and symptoms of HF are often non-specific and do not discriminate well between HF and other clinical conditions“

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Diagnostic algorithm for HF of non-acute onset

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ESC 2016 Key Diagnostic HFpEF Criteria

„Preserved“ EF ≥ 50% Structural alterations: LAVI >34 mL/m2 or LVMI ≥ 115 (males) / ≥95 (females) mg/m2 Functional alterations: E/é ≥ 13 é (mean septal and lateral) <9 cm/s NTproBNP: >125 pg/mL or (SR; increase with Afib!) BNP: >35 pg/mL

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ESC 2016: Normal & abnormal echocardiographic indices of diastolic function according to age categories, differentiated for gender

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ESC 2016 Additional Diagnostic HFpEF Criteria

Longitudinal strain Tricuspid regurgitation velocity Diastolic stress test: Semi-supine exercise echocrdiography Invasive hemodynamics at rest (PCWP≥15 mmHg) and with exercise

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Exercise echocardiography (Diastolic stress test)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ESC 2016: How to optimize management

  • 1. Identify the patient – Diagnosis
  • 2. Classify the patient – Etiology and Stratification
  • 3. General principles of management
  • 4. Specific therapeutic approaches
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Senni & Pieske, Eur Heart J 2014

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Prospective cross-sectional study, symptomatic HFpEF including LVH (LVEDWT ≥12mm)

99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodi-carboxylic acid scintigraphy (99mTc-DPD)

Genetic analysis for mutations in the TTR gene

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Gonzáles-López E et al. Eur Herat J 2015; 36:2585-2594

99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodi-carboxylic acid

scintigraphy (severe 99mTc-DPD cardiac uptake)

Wild-type transthyretrin amyloidosis: Scintigraphy

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Summary: Diagnosis of HFpEF

  • 120 HFpEF patients included
  • 16 patients (13.3%) with moderate-severe 99mTc-DPD

cardiac uptake

  • No mutations found on genetic testing
  • EMB in 4 patients demonstrated ATTR WT in all cases
slide-16
SLIDE 16

ESC 2016: Diagnostic tests for specific causes of HFpEF

slide-17
SLIDE 17

ESC 2016: How to optimize management

  • 1. Identify the patient – Diagnosis
  • 2. Classify the patient – Etiology and Stratification
  • 3. General principles of management
  • 4. Specific therapeutic approaches
slide-18
SLIDE 18

ESC 2016: How to optimize management

  • Only slightly fewer patients with HFpEF appear to receive diuretics,

beta-blockers, MRAs, ACEI, or ARBs - comorbidities or extrapolation?

  • Screen and treat cardiovascular comorbidities – Arterial hypertension,

CAD, pulmonary hypertension

  • Screen and treat non-cardiovascular comorbidities (diabetes, CKD,

anaemia, iron deficiency, COPD, obesity)

  • Hospitalisations/death in HFpEF more likely to be non-cardiovascular

than in HFrEF

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Importance of co-morbidities in patients with HF

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Recommendations for treatment of patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF

slide-21
SLIDE 21

ESC 2016: Management of specific comorbidities

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Treatments not recommended for co-morbidities in patients with HF

slide-23
SLIDE 23

General principles of management

1.Optimal control of risk factors and comorbidities? BP<130/80 mmHg (preferentially by RAS blocker) HBA1c < 6.5 mg% (Metformin, SGL2-Inhibitor; avoid insulin wherever possible) Statin therapy in indicated Correct myocardial ischemia Treat pulmonary disease 2.Inadequate hypertensive blood pressure response to exercise? Stress test – optimize BP response 3.Heart rate response to exercise? Tachycardic – control inadequate increases in heart rate Chronotropic incompetence? Reduce bradycardic agents, consider PM

slide-24
SLIDE 24

General principles of management

4.Atrial fibrillation? Restore SR if possible Anticoagulation as indicated 5.Signs of hypervolemia or pulmonary congestion? Loop diuretics Restrict volume and salt intake 6.Physical inactivity/overweight? Implement physical activity/exercise training programs Initate weight loss preferably by structured programs

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Targeting therapies to the HFpEF phenotype

Senni M & Pieske B, Eur Heart J 2014

slide-26
SLIDE 26

ESC 2016: How to optimize management

  • 1. Identify the patient – Diagnosis
  • 2. Classify the patient – Etiology and Stratification
  • 3. General principles of management
  • 4. Specific therapeutic approaches
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

ESC 2016: Specific HFpEF therapies?

ESC 2016: „No treatment has been shown, convincingly, to reduce morbiditiy and mortality in patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF“

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Mitter SS and Shah SJ., Curr Atheroscler Rep, 2015 Nov, 17(11):64

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Total HF Hosp Spiro : 394 Placebo: 475 P<0.01*

*poisson regression 245/1723 (14.2%) 206/1722 (12.0%)

TOPCAT: Heart Failure Hospitalizations TOPCAT: Heart Failure Hospitalizations

Spironolactone Placebo HR = 0.83 (0.69 – 0.99) p=0.042

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Suggested algorithm for Sprinolactone in HFpEF

Mitter SS and Shah SJ., Curr Atheroscler Rep, 2015 Nov, 17(11):64

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Hasenfuss G et al., J Card Fail, 2015 Jul, 21(7):594-600

Generation of an inter-atrial shunt

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Hasenfuß Lancet 2016

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Kitzman DW et al., JAMA, 2016 Jan 5, 315(1):36-46

slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Ex-DHF pilot: Exercise training in elderly HFpEF

Primary Endpoint: peak VO2 Maximum Workload

Edelmann F et al., JACC 2011;58:1780–91 HFpEF=heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • New definitions: HFpEF vs. HFmrEF, more specific imaging cutoffs
  • Exercise stress test (echo, invasive, mentioned for first time)
  • Mandates for etiological workup to target therapies
  • Mandates for minute assessment and therapy of comorbidities
  • Give general management recommendations, including loop diuretics
  • State that no specific therapies are available yet

Summary: ESC 2016 – Management of HFpEF