Helping Students Bridge the Expectation Divide
A Competency Based Advising Approach
Helping Students Bridge the Expectation Divide A Competency Based - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Helping Students Bridge the Expectation Divide A Competency Based Advising Approach The Expectation Gap 43.4% difference 57.5% difference 54.3% difference
A Competency Based Advising Approach
http://www.naceweb.org/career-readiness/competencies/employers-rate-career-competencies-new-hire-proficiency/
43.4% difference 57.5% difference 54.3% difference
http://www.naceweb.org/career-readiness/competencies/are-college-graduates-career-ready/
46.9% 37.8% 24.1% 8.4% 37.5% 5.9% 23.6% 14.2%
https://www.burning-glass.com/research-project/baseline-skills/
*As advisors, we cannot assume our students have the same fundamental values
Cucinella, E., Torres, R., & Byrd, H. (2017, October). The Power of Purpose: Coaching Students Towards Self-Efficacy. Presented at the 2017 NACADA National Conference, St. Louis, MO.
Take a moment to think about how you spend your advising sessions with students:
advising?
practices as technology makes elements of our roles more efficient?
Problems to address:
competency expectations.
experiences in a meaningful way.
START a job after graduation.
Keeping it universal:
– Advising roles can change depending on the office, college, and institution.
– Size, mission, funding, etc. can shape advising role on any given campus.
(Competency Driven Assessment Model)
(Finish in 4, Competitive in 3)
– Specific – Measurable – Assignable – Relevant – Time-based
– Wish – Outcome – Obstacle – Plan
Hurdles
Observation
– Experiential Collateral
Interventions
– Apps – Google Drive – Worksheet – An actual journal
– Right office – Right person – Advocating for students
– Was it what the student expected? – Did the student like it? – Was the student “successful”?
– Did experience correlate with values? – Can the student link the experience to competencies?
– If “yes,” what is the next step on the path? – If “no,” is remediation possible and if so, what needs to be done?
– Do you have a plan for “Plan B” discussions?
Interpersonal Intrapersonal Cognitive & Reasoning Content Knowledge Students 3.934342744 3.746475727 3.74029799 3.479222897 Employers 3.6 3.619047619 3.353571429 3.25 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
– 8 for employers – 44 for students
– 8 NACE competencies – 16 competencies on survey
– Possibly including a Social Judgement Test