helcom ospar ices data flows
play

HELCOM/OSPAR - ICES data flows CORESET II /BALSAM WP2 meeting, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HELCOM/OSPAR - ICES data flows CORESET II /BALSAM WP2 meeting, Helsinki 2-4 February 2015 Agenda item 3 on Long term data-arrangements for the core indicators Hans Mose Jensen (ICES) Present situation of the HELCOM/OSPAR hazardous substances


  1. HELCOM/OSPAR - ICES data flows CORESET II /BALSAM WP2 meeting, Helsinki 2-4 February 2015 Agenda item 3 on Long term data-arrangements for the core indicators Hans Mose Jensen (ICES) Present situation of the HELCOM/OSPAR hazardous substances and bio-effects data flows though ICES Spatial units and monitoring stations Transparency of assessment products Improving reporting infrastructure and data flows, the BALSAM Action Plan

  2. HELCOM/OSPAR - ICES data flow National ICES Assessment -National collection -Registration of data -Assessment processing by submission in the ICES working groups (HELCOM -QC (HELCOM COMBINE/ accession system (DAD) CORESET indicators, OSPAR guidelines and OSPARMIME) manuals) -QC (DATSU) on input -Assessment report products -Data formatting to ICES -Data storage in central and online assessment format database (DOME) application (HELCOM -Connection point to other CORESET indicators, systems (OBIS, SDN, OSPARMIME) EMODNET, EIONET) -Storage of processed -Open online access to data assessment data (OSPAR, (CSV, ODV, web-service, shp, HELCOM) kml) -Predefined dataviews for assessment purposes (assessment input)

  3. QC – DATSU http://dome.ices.dk/datsu/ ICES Data Screening Utility • For hazardous substances the exchange format is Environmental Reporting Format (ERF32) • Data can be read according to ERF32 • Submitted concepts in vocabularies used, e.g. ICES Reference Codes (RECO), taxonomic vocabularies (WoRMS/ITIS/PEG-biovolume) and SeaDataNet platform vocabulary • Data is in line with the requirements as defined for the monitoring programme (HELCOM, OSPAR)

  4. ICES Reference Codes http://vocab.ices.dk/

  5. QC – DATSU

  6. QC – DATSU

  7. QC – DATSU

  8. DATSU checks overview http://dome.ices.dk/datsu/rptChk.aspx

  9. New! Automatic upload of resubmissions • Extension to DATSU – if no critical errors – if accession is identified in DOME • Submitter identification: individual password is required • Comparison to existing DOME submission • Comparison criteria must be met • Submitter replaces the original submission • Accession database (DAD) is updated

  10. Automatic upload of resubmissions Parameter group summary /comparison

  11. Automatic upload of resubmissions Station summary /comparison

  12. Automatic upload of resubmissions Taxonomic summary /comparison

  13. Data output format from DOME for assessment input Species UNCRT Country SpeciesType UNCRT_std RLABO SEXCO METCU MSFD_region NOINP QFLAG OSPAR_region PARAM VFLAG OSPAR_subregion MATRX ALABO OSPAR_shore BASIS SMTYP StationName MUNIT SUBNO SD_StationName Value tblAnalysisID MYEAR Value_std tblParamID DATE DETLI tblBioID Latitude DETLI_std tblSampleID Longitude LMQNT PURPM LMQNT_std FINFL

  14. OSPAR MIME example Standard units: Contaminants in biota: µg/kg Effects in Biota: none Contaminants in sediment: -Metals mg/kg -Everything else µg/kg

  15. OSPAR MIME example Standard basis: W (wet weight), L (lipid weight), D (dry weight) Standard Fish Bivalves / Crustacean basis Gastropods s Metals W D W Organotins W D W All other L D L organics

  16. OSPAR MIME example Uncertainty convertions: METCU Description Convert to SD % percent uncertainty Uncertainty (%) * measured value /100 SD standard deviation (+/-) - U2 expanded uncertainty (U) Uncertainty (U2) / 2 coverage factor 2

  17. OSPAR MIME example Uncertainty convertions: METCU Description Convert to SD % percent uncertainty Uncertainty (%) * measured value /100 SD standard deviation (+/-) - U2 expanded uncertainty (U) Uncertainty (U2) / 2 coverage factor 2

  18. OSPAR MIME station name allocation Critical for the grouping of time series data • Station name in submitted data must match ICES Station Dictionary • Data submitted without a station name will be matched with ICES Station Dictionary – if inside spatial/temporal/thematic window of the defined monitoring station

  19. Fixed station vocabulary ICES lead initiative together with SeaDataNet, EMODnet and EEA (WFD, MSFD and INSPIRE) to develop a model on harmonization of the monitoring station concept • Distributed network • Through ICES vocab system • One station, multiple applications (HELCOM, OSPAR, WFD, MSFD, National, …) • Governance coded as EDMO entries Station name “Monitoring type (HELCOM, OSPAR, WFD, MSFD, national)” Geographic position “Type of data” Governance “Purpose” Date from “HELCOM fields” Date until …

  20. OSPAR MIME “automated” assessment Processing (R- Assessment script) according Input data product to defined application methodology http://dome.ices.dk/osparmime/main.html Dataset availability Coming input/output

  21. New! DOME standard views in test

  22. Spatial assessment units • HELCOM sub- basins/sub-divisions • WFD • MSFD assessment units

  23. New update of ICES Ecoregions

  24. Indicator data flows non-fisheries

  25. WISE SoE – transitional coastal and marine data flows

  26. BALSAM Action Plan Action points to improve reporting infrastructure and data flows • 3.1 - Development of data management guidelines “toolkit”, including inventory of standards and tools available, e.g. unit conversion tables (ICES) • 3.2 -Harmonization of station concepts and practice of labelling of data to regional/national (ICES/CP) -Labelling automatically all data points to HELCOM assessment units when adding to database (ICES) • 3.3 -Accepting data in ODV format to HELCOM database (ICES) -Accepting data via web services from SDN/EMODnet to be incorporated to HELCOM database (ICES/EMODnet?) -Explore opportunities where CP have systems in place to harvest data provided as XML outputs to be imported to HELCOM database (ICES/CP)

  27. BALSAM Action Plan Action points to improve reporting infrastructure and data flows • 3.4 -Definition of data requirements for core indicators and proposals for improvements (CORESET II) -Modification of reporting format(CORESET II, ICES) • 3.5 -Data reported to EIONET would be incorporated in HELCOM assessment products (with possible duplicate removal)(ICES) -Explore funding opportunities to expand the automated submission/resubmission of COMBINE datasets (ICES/HELCOM) • 3.6 -Defining data view for data extraction and processing for core indicator requirements (CORESET II) -Cataloguing the data products used in the indicatiors to the ICES geoportal (ICES/HELCOM secretariat)

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend