HELCOM/OSPAR - ICES data flows CORESET II /BALSAM WP2 meeting, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
helcom ospar ices data flows
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HELCOM/OSPAR - ICES data flows CORESET II /BALSAM WP2 meeting, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mar 12, 2023 152 likes •436 views

HELCOM/OSPAR - ICES data flows CORESET II /BALSAM WP2 meeting, Helsinki 2-4 February 2015 Agenda item 3 on Long term data-arrangements for the core indicators Hans Mose Jensen (ICES) Present situation of the HELCOM/OSPAR hazardous substances

slide-1
SLIDE 1

HELCOM/OSPAR - ICES data flows

CORESET II /BALSAM WP2 meeting, Helsinki 2-4 February 2015 Agenda item 3 on Long term data-arrangements for the core indicators Hans Mose Jensen (ICES) Present situation of the HELCOM/OSPAR hazardous substances and bio-effects data flows though ICES Spatial units and monitoring stations Transparency of assessment products Improving reporting infrastructure and data flows, the BALSAM Action Plan

slide-2
SLIDE 2

HELCOM/OSPAR - ICES data flow

National

  • National collection
  • QC (HELCOM COMBINE/

OSPAR guidelines and manuals)

  • Data formatting to ICES

format

ICES

  • Registration of data

submission in the ICES accession system (DAD)

  • QC (DATSU) on input
  • Data storage in central

database (DOME)

  • Connection point to other

systems (OBIS, SDN, EMODNET, EIONET)

  • Open online access to data

(CSV, ODV, web-service, shp, kml)

  • Predefined dataviews for

assessment purposes (assessment input)

Assessment

  • Assessment processing by

working groups (HELCOM CORESET indicators, OSPARMIME)

  • Assessment report products

and online assessment application (HELCOM CORESET indicators, OSPARMIME)

  • Storage of processed

assessment data (OSPAR, HELCOM)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

QC – DATSU

http://dome.ices.dk/datsu/ ICES Data Screening Utility

  • For hazardous substances the exchange format is

Environmental Reporting Format (ERF32)

  • Data can be read according to ERF32
  • Submitted concepts in vocabularies used, e.g. ICES

Reference Codes (RECO), taxonomic vocabularies (WoRMS/ITIS/PEG-biovolume) and SeaDataNet platform vocabulary

  • Data is in line with the requirements as defined for the

monitoring programme (HELCOM, OSPAR)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ICES Reference Codes

http://vocab.ices.dk/

slide-5
SLIDE 5

QC – DATSU

slide-6
SLIDE 6

QC – DATSU

slide-7
SLIDE 7

QC – DATSU

slide-8
SLIDE 8

DATSU checks overview

http://dome.ices.dk/datsu/rptChk.aspx

slide-9
SLIDE 9

New! Automatic upload of resubmissions

  • Extension to DATSU

– if no critical errors – if accession is identified in DOME

  • Submitter identification: individual password is

required

  • Comparison to existing DOME submission
  • Comparison criteria must be met
  • Submitter replaces the original submission
  • Accession database (DAD) is updated
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Automatic upload of resubmissions

Parameter group summary /comparison

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Automatic upload of resubmissions

Station summary /comparison

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Automatic upload of resubmissions

Taxonomic summary /comparison

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Data output format from DOME for assessment input

Country RLABO MSFD_region OSPAR_region OSPAR_subregion OSPAR_shore StationName SD_StationName MYEAR DATE Latitude Longitude PURPM FINFL Species SpeciesType SEXCO NOINP PARAM MATRX BASIS MUNIT Value Value_std DETLI DETLI_std LMQNT LMQNT_std UNCRT UNCRT_std METCU QFLAG VFLAG ALABO SMTYP SUBNO tblAnalysisID tblParamID tblBioID tblSampleID

slide-14
SLIDE 14

OSPAR MIME example

Standard units: Contaminants in biota: µg/kg Effects in Biota: none Contaminants in sediment:

  • Metals mg/kg
  • Everything else µg/kg
slide-15
SLIDE 15

OSPAR MIME example

Standard basis Fish Bivalves / Gastropods Crustacean s Metals W D W Organotins W D W All other

  • rganics

L D L Standard basis: W (wet weight), L (lipid weight), D (dry weight)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

METCU Description Convert to SD % percent uncertainty Uncertainty (%) * measured value /100 SD standard deviation (+/-)

  • U2

expanded uncertainty (U) coverage factor 2 Uncertainty (U2) / 2

OSPAR MIME example

Uncertainty convertions:

slide-17
SLIDE 17

METCU Description Convert to SD % percent uncertainty Uncertainty (%) * measured value /100 SD standard deviation (+/-)

  • U2

expanded uncertainty (U) coverage factor 2 Uncertainty (U2) / 2

OSPAR MIME example

Uncertainty convertions:

slide-18
SLIDE 18

OSPAR MIME station name allocation

Critical for the grouping of time series data

  • Station name in submitted data must

match ICES Station Dictionary

  • Data submitted without a station

name will be matched with ICES Station Dictionary – if inside spatial/temporal/thematic window

  • f the defined monitoring station
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Fixed station vocabulary

ICES lead initiative together with SeaDataNet, EMODnet and EEA (WFD, MSFD and INSPIRE) to develop a model on harmonization of the monitoring station concept

  • Distributed network
  • Through ICES vocab system
  • One station, multiple applications (HELCOM, OSPAR, WFD,

MSFD, National, …)

  • Governance coded as EDMO entries

Station name “Monitoring type (HELCOM, OSPAR, WFD, MSFD, national)” Geographic position “Type of data” Governance “Purpose” Date from “HELCOM fields” Date until …

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Input data Processing (R- script) according to defined methodology Assessment product application

OSPAR MIME “automated” assessment

http://dome.ices.dk/osparmime/main.html

Dataset availability input/output

Coming

slide-21
SLIDE 21

New! DOME standard views in test

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Spatial assessment units

  • HELCOM sub-

basins/sub-divisions

  • WFD
  • MSFD assessment

units

slide-23
SLIDE 23

New update of ICES Ecoregions

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Indicator data flows non-fisheries

slide-25
SLIDE 25

WISE SoE – transitional coastal and marine data flows

slide-26
SLIDE 26

BALSAM Action Plan

Action points to improve reporting infrastructure and data flows

  • 3.1
  • Development of data management guidelines “toolkit”, including

inventory of standards and tools available, e.g. unit conversion tables (ICES)

  • 3.2
  • Harmonization of station concepts and practice of labelling of data to

regional/national (ICES/CP)

  • Labelling automatically all data points to HELCOM assessment units

when adding to database (ICES)

  • 3.3
  • Accepting data in ODV format to HELCOM database (ICES)
  • Accepting data via web services from SDN/EMODnet to be

incorporated to HELCOM database (ICES/EMODnet?)

  • Explore opportunities where CP have systems in place to harvest data

provided as XML outputs to be imported to HELCOM database (ICES/CP)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

BALSAM Action Plan

Action points to improve reporting infrastructure and data flows

  • 3.4
  • Definition of data requirements for core indicators and proposals for

improvements (CORESET II)

  • Modification of reporting format(CORESET II, ICES)
  • 3.5
  • Data reported to EIONET would be incorporated in HELCOM

assessment products (with possible duplicate removal)(ICES)

  • Explore funding opportunities to expand the automated

submission/resubmission of COMBINE datasets (ICES/HELCOM)

  • 3.6
  • Defining data view for data extraction and processing for core

indicator requirements (CORESET II)

  • Cataloguing the data products used in the indicatiors to the ICES

geoportal (ICES/HELCOM secretariat)