Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development Overview - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

michigan department of agriculture and rural development
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development Overview - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Industrial Hemp in Michigan - Program Overview and Update Gina Alessandri, Hemp Director Craig VanBuren, Laboratory Director Nathan Kark, Legislative Liaison Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development Overview Hemp what it


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Industrial Hemp in Michigan - Program Overview and Update Gina Alessandri, Hemp Director Craig VanBuren, Laboratory Director Nathan Kark, Legislative Liaison Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Hemp – what it is and how it is different

from marijuana

  • Brief history of hemp
  • Federal and state legislative history
  • 2019 ag. pilot program & what we

learned in 2019

  • Testing results
  • Plans for 2020

Overview

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Cannabis sativa L. – specie of plant being raised for both industrial hemp and marijuana. “The plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of that plant, including viable seeds of that plant and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts and salts of isomers, whether growing or not, with a delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis.” THC

  • One of at least 113 cannabinoids identified in

cannabis.

  • Principal psychoactive constituent.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Cannabis sativa L. – 4 Key Differences Chemical Composition –

Industrial Hemp

  • Less than 0.3% THC
  • Non-intoxicating

Marijuana

  • 5% - 35% THC
  • Intoxicating
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Cannabis sativa L. – 4 Key Differences Legality

Industrial Hemp

  • Federally legal
  • Removed from the Controlled

Substance List

  • Agricultural commodity that may be

legally grown, processed, transported, possessed and sold.

Marijuana

  • Federally illegal
  • Remains on the Controlled

Substance List

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Cannabis sativa L. – 4 Key Differences Cultivation

Industrial Hemp

  • Typically grown outdoors
  • Can grow up to 20 ft. depending on

variety and purpose of growth.

Marijuana

  • Typically grown in very controlled

environments ▪ Temperature, Lighting & ▪ Humidity

  • Grows up to 5 ft.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Cannabis sativa L. – 4 Key Differences Uses

Industrial Hemp

  • +20,000 products and uses:
  • Seed – Medications, health foods,

bio-fuels and plastics.

  • Fiber – Paper, textiles, construction

materials, clothing, auto parts, animal bedding.

  • Oil – CBD oil, medicine, cosmetics,

lotions.

Marijuana

  • Commonly recognized for:
  • Recreational uses
  • Therapeutic uses
slide-8
SLIDE 8

History of hemp

1600

First introduced in North America

1700s

Farmers in several colonies are required to grow hemp.

1776

Draft of the Declaration

  • f Independence is

written on hemp paper.

1840

Abraham Lincoln uses hemp seed oil to fuel his household lamps.

1900s

Attitudes begin to change as the government increases efforts to fight drug use. Hemp is grouped together with its Cannabis cousin, marijuana.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

History of hemp

1937

The Marijuana Tax Act placed a tax on all cannabis sales, heavily discouraging hemp production.

1942

A brief resurgence….. Government realized it needed hemp for the war

  • effort. Taxation lifted.

1942-1945

400,000 acres planted.

1957

Last commercial hemp fields were planted in the U.S.

1970

Hemp farming officially banned with the passage

  • f the Controlled

Substance Act.

  • Classified hemp as an

illegal Schedule I drug, grouping this crop with drugs like heroin and LSD.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Hemp legislation 2014 2014

2014

2014 U.S. Farm Bill - authorizes state departments of agriculture and colleges and universities to administer pilot programs to study the growth, cultivation and marketing of industrial hemp.

2014

MI Public Act 547 of 2014 - Michigan’s Industrial Hemp Research Act became law.

  • Allowed MDARD to create

an industrial hemp research pilot program.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Hemp legislation 2018 2018

2018

2018 U.S. Farm Bill

  • Legalized industrial hemp
  • USDA oversight
  • Offers states the authority to regulate
  • Requires USDA approved “state plan”
  • Directs USDA to promulgate rules on

state plan submission.

  • Maintains FDA authority.

2018

Michigan Industrial Hemp Research and Development Act, PA 641 signed December 2018.

  • Amends Public Act

547

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Hemp legislation 2019 2019

February 2019

Pending USDA rules, states may continue to operate under the authority of the 2014 Farm Bill which authorized the growth, cultivation and marketing of industrial hemp for research through Ag Pilot Programs.

April 2019

Michigan Ag Pilot Program launched

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Michigan Ag Pilot Program

  • Allowed hemp growing, processing and handling in

Michigan provided:

  • Proper licensure
  • Background check
  • Research agreement
  • 603 Registered Growers
  • 850 outdoor locations, 15,477 acres identified
  • 300 indoor locations, + 10 M square feet

identified

  • 483 Licensed Processor-Handlers
slide-14
SLIDE 14

2019 Laboratory ry Hemp Testing

  • PA 641 requires growers to schedule a

test of their hemp prior to harvest to determine compliance with THC levels.

  • Allows for repeat testing up to 3 times
  • MDARD provided hemp testing services

in 2019

  • 3 business day average turnaround on

results

  • Crop must be harvested within 15 days
  • f receiving results
slide-15
SLIDE 15

2019 MDARD Laboratory Hemp Testing

Synopsis

  • 847 Samples tested
  • 84% Compliance rate
  • Very few 2nd tests conducted
  • Sample Issues
  • Growers not following SOP
  • US Postal Service detaining shipments
  • 242 Growers did not submit any compliance sample
  • 116 Growers did not send samples for all their

growing locations

  • Check email regularly
slide-16
SLIDE 16

2019 MDARD Laboratory Hemp Testing

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00

% THC

Samples 8/21/19 - 12/13/19

2019 Hemp Testing Results (All)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

2019 MDARD Laboratory Hemp Testing

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00

% THC

Samples 8/21/19 - 12/13/19

2019 Hemp Testing Results (Trend)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2019 MDARD Laboratory Hemp Testing

2019 Hemp Compliance

< 0.30% 0.30% - 0.39% > 0.39%

slide-19
SLIDE 19

2019 MDARD Laboratory Hemp Testing

Incorporating Uncertainty into 2020 Testing

Compliant Non- compliant

slide-20
SLIDE 20

2019 MDARD Laboratory Hemp Testing

244 36 28 19 46 17% 6 35% 4 11% 2 5% 60 23 4 1

"Cherry" "Youngsim" "Boax" "Wife"

Most Popular Cultivars

slide-21
SLIDE 21

2019 MDARD La Laboratory Hemp Testi ting

  • Zero THC Detected

Cultivar CBD (%) 450 31 H8 0.15 450-31 E8 0.76 HLESIIA E2 0.00 HLESIIA H2 0.00 HLIANA E3 0.00 HLIANA H3 0.00 HLYKHOUSKII 51 E4 0.47 HLYKHOUSKII51 H4 0.00 HONOLA HONOLG HONOLY 0.29 USO-31 0.50 VARIETY=KATANI 0.26 X-59 0.65 X-59 H1 0.99

slide-22
SLIDE 22

2019 MDARD Laboratory Hemp Testing

  • Hot Samples
  • Ninety-one above 0.5%
  • Hottest 10

Cultivar Total THC (%) AC/DC 8.75 THERAPY 7.45 CHERRY WINE 4.57 JCOO2 4.30 CHERRY WINE 0 0 CHOICE CBDSEEDS.COM 4.04 CHERRY STRUCK 3.97 CHERRY WINE 3.78 JCOO1 3.33 OREGON CHERRY 3.15 CHERRY STRUCK CHOICE CBDSEEDS.COM 2.77

slide-23
SLIDE 23

2019 MDARD La Laboratory Hemp Testi ting

  • Highest (Compliant) CBD Samples
  • All in the “gray” zone

Cultivar Total CBD (%) Total THC (%) CHERRY WINE (CW) 11.09 0.37 CHERRY WINE 10.69 0.39 SAMPLE 2 CBD HEMP 10.67 0.31 BERRY BLOSSOM 5 10.64 0.37 CHERRY WINE 10.37 0.33 CHERRY WINE 10.37 0.38 BERRY BLOSSOM PLOT 1 10.20 0.36 CHARDONAY X CHERRY WINE 9.96 0.37 C4 9.94 0.35 STORMI DANIELZ 9.90 0.37

slide-24
SLIDE 24

2019 MDARD Laboratory Hemp Testing

  • Highest (Compliant) CBD Samples
  • All in the “green” zone

Cultivar Total CBD (%) Total THC (%) BOAX 9.09 0.29 WIFE 9.04 0.29 DREAMY CLOUDS 8.50 0.28 CHERRY WINE 8.47 0.29 ABACUS 8.44 0.30 CHERRY BLOSSOM 8.41 0.28 CAT LADY 8.25 0.30 CHERRY WINE 8.21 0.30 CHERRY WINE STRAIN 8.04 0.29 FEMINIZED CHERRY BLOSSOM 7.98 0.26

slide-25
SLIDE 25

What have we learned so far in 2019?

  • Federal guidance and interpretation is needed.
  • Regulatory pathway for cannabis use in food, drugs

and cosmetics.

Policy and regulation – We don’t have all the answers.

  • Primarily hand harvested in 2019
  • Production processes & equipment need to evolve.

Growing hemp is very labor intensive.

  • THC levels need to be monitored
  • Lab analysis required for compliance must be

scheduled with harvest in mind.

This crop requires farmers to be very attentive.

  • For hemp growers AND marijuana growers.
  • Male plants must be removed.

Cross-pollination is a concern.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

What have we learned so far in 2019?

  • In state processing facilities are needed to

adequately support the industry.

Processors are needed

  • Banking industry
  • Local units of government
  • Law enforcement

Ongoing need for

  • utreach and education
  • Balancing the need for security of growing
  • perations with how we connect growers and

processors.

Connecting growers and processors

  • Identification and review of roles and

responsibilities.

Intersecting issues with marijuana laws

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Preliminary Data – Final Report will be available this spring

  • +60% grew hemp for CBD
  • ~15% seed
  • ~7% GRAS (generally recognized as safe) food items
  • Hemp was grown in 64 of 83 counties
  • ~24% planted feminized seed
  • Bulk seed, clones and seedlings were also planted
  • ~31% had problems with their seed
  • Weeds were the primary pest problem
  • < 9% used pesticides
  • ~58% harvested hemp (primarily by hand)
  • <8% unable to harvest within 15-day window
  • ~55% plan to process hemp in 2020 (~26% for hire)
slide-28
SLIDE 28

USDA publishes Final Interim Rules October 31, 2019

https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules- regulations/establishment- domestic-hemp-production- program Establishes the U.S. Domestic Hemp Production Program.

  • Creates a consistent regulatory

framework for hemp production throughout the United States.

Interim rule is subject to change pending public comment Compliance date 10/31/2020

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Program Oversight – Two options

State Operated Program ▪ Approved state plan OR Federally Operated Program Absent an approved state plan, USDA would administer the hemp program in MI.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

USDA Interim Final Rules

  • Documentation of where hemp is being grown.
  • NEW - Reporting requirements for growers
  • Standards for testing to ensure compliance.
  • NEW - Use of DEA Registered Laboratories
  • NEW - Collection of samples by law

enforcement or other federal or state designated person.

  • Effective disposal of non-compliant plants and

products.

  • NEW - In accordance with the CSA and DEA
  • NEW - Collection for destruction by a person

authorized under the CSA to handle marijuana.

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Communication with law enforcement.
  • NEW - State reporting requirements
  • f all licensees within 30 days of

receipt.

  • Real time availability for law

enforcement

  • Annual inspection requirements
  • NEW - State and Federal

background check requirements

  • Certification that resources are available

to carry out the plan.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Next Steps

Amend Public Act 641

  • Legislation is being developed
  • Discussing scope of change

needed.

  • Late June – goal for completion.

Submit State Plan

  • State plan will be submitted

immediately after PA 641 is updated.

  • USDA has 60 days to review and

approve or reject.

  • Oct. 31, 2020 - Compliance

deadline

slide-33
SLIDE 33

@MichDeptofAg

@MIDeptofAgriculture

@MichiganAgriculture

Michigan Department

  • f Agriculture & Rural

Development Michigan Department

  • f Agriculture & Rural

Development

www.Michigan.gov/industrialhemp