SLIDE 2 STREAMLINING HEALTHCARE
SM
DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION
June 28, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is constitutional if the federal government does not penalize states (i.e., withhold funds) that choose not to implement this expansion. 1
Expanding Medicaid in 2014 is no longer a mandate on states, but a choice.
State governments continue to weigh the decision
- f whether or not to participate
- Six states plan to decline funding for a Medicaid
expansion (FL, LA, MS, SC, TX and WI); Texas and Florida represent large numbers of uninsured
- A total of 15 states are leaning toward rejecting the
Medicaid expansion (AL, GA, IN, IA, KS, MO, NE, NV and VA)
- Some states believe the expansion could save them
significant amounts of money (AR, OK)
- Worst case – 26 states that sued the federal
government after the passage of healthcare reform could decide to opt out leaving 11-13 million uninsured
1 Kaiser Family Foundation, A Guide to the Supreme Court’s Affordable Care Act Decision (July 2012), available at: http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/8332.pdf n States challenging the ACA (25 states) n States both challenging and supporting the ACA (2 states) n States supporting the ACA (11 states) States not taking a position in the litigation (12 states)
MI IN OH WA OR ID SD IA IL KY NC SC GA AL LA AR OK KS CO AK WV PA ME MA NH RI CT NJ DE MD DC MS TX NM AZ HI UT WY NE MT ND WI VA FL NV MO TN MN CA NY VT
States’ Positions in FL. v. HHS Supreme Court Case
Source: http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/Health-Care-Reform-at-the-U-S-Supreme-Court-Presentation-Slides.pdf
Note: VA filed its own challenge separately and is not a party in the case accepted by the Su- preme Court
The Supreme Court Decision: Breaking Down the Impact