HCV resistance - Clinical point of view Daniel Beer PZB Aachen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hcv resistance clinical point of view daniel beer pzb
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HCV resistance - Clinical point of view Daniel Beer PZB Aachen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HCV resistance - Clinical point of view Daniel Beer PZB Aachen AREVIR-Meeting - Cologne 05.05.2017 t = 25min www.pzb.de Disclosures Within the last 2 years I received lecture fees and/or sponsoring by the following companies Abbvie, BMS,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

www.pzb.de

HCV resistance

  • Clinical point of view

Daniel Beer

PZB Aachen AREVIR-Meeting - Cologne 05.05.2017 t = 25min

slide-2
SLIDE 2

www.pzb.de

Within the last 2 years I received lecture fees and/or sponsoring by the following companies Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, Hexal, Janssen, MSD, ViiV

Disclosures

slide-3
SLIDE 3

www.pzb.de

http://www.malteser-krankenhaus-stcarolus.de/medizin-und-pflege/anaesthesie-und-intensivmedizin/intensivmedizin.html

Antibiotic treatment Meropenem + Vancomycine

slide-4
SLIDE 4

www.pzb.de

https://www.miamed.de/amboss/antibiotika-mosaik

slide-5
SLIDE 5

www.pzb.de

EASL - guidelines 2016 (excerpt)

https://www.easl.eu/medias/cpg/HCV2016/English-report.pdf

slide-6
SLIDE 6

www.pzb.de

Upcoming

http://www.natap.org/2016/AASLD/AASLD_34.htm http://www.natap.org/2016/images/111516/111516-9/HCV2.gif

…should we do it the „anaesthesiological way“?

VOX

NS3/4A PI

VEL

NS5A inhibitor

SOF

Nucleotide polymerase inhibitor

slide-7
SLIDE 7

www.pzb.de

https://www.miamed.de/amboss/antibiotika-mosaik

slide-8
SLIDE 8

www.pzb.de

EASL - guidelines 2016

https://www.easl.eu/medias/cpg/HCV2016/English-report.pdf

slide-9
SLIDE 9

www.pzb.de

EASL - guidelines 2016

https://www.easl.eu/medias/cpg/HCV2016/English-report.pdf

slide-10
SLIDE 10

www.pzb.de

EASL - guidelines 2016

https://www.easl.eu/medias/cpg/HCV2016/English-report.pdf

slide-11
SLIDE 11

www.pzb.de

Reasons to not do it the „anaesthesiological way“

cost-effectiveness shorter duration of treatment reduced pill-burden therapeutic success

  • ptions for further treatment after treatment-failure
slide-12
SLIDE 12

www.pzb.de

Case 1 – resistance testing in genotype 1a

slide-13
SLIDE 13

www.pzb.de

Patient M., V. male, 30 years old, caucasian (RUS) GT 1a, diagnosed in 2008 former IVDU F0-fibrosis (FibroScan 6,8 kPa) VL 835.000 IE/ml (abbott) normal transaminases Treatment history: IFN + RBV in 2010, Relapse Substitution: Buprenorphine 4mg drugs: occasionally heroine inhalative

Case 1 – ID 58346

slide-14
SLIDE 14

www.pzb.de

Points of interest

genotype fibosis/ cirrhosis pretreatment viral load comorbidities potential interactions

  • economic

reasons duration of treatment adherence

Decision

slide-15
SLIDE 15

www.pzb.de

Case 1 – ID 58346

https://www.easl.eu/medias/cpg/HCV2016/English-report.pdf

12 wk treatment SOF/LDV 3D GZR/EBR expenses    interactions    easy application    effectiveness   /

slide-16
SLIDE 16

www.pzb.de

Case 1 – ID 58346

https://www.easl.eu/medias/cpg/HCV2016/English-report.pdf

slide-17
SLIDE 17

www.pzb.de

Resistance analysis in genotype 1a

Zeuzem S, Ann Int. Med. 2015, 163, 1-13; http://www.hcv-trials.com/showStudy.asp?Study=10

slide-18
SLIDE 18

www.pzb.de

Resistance analysis in genotype 1a

Zeuzem S, Ann Int. Med. 2015, 163, 1-13; http://www.hcv-trials.com/showStudy.asp?Study=10

slide-19
SLIDE 19

www.pzb.de

Case 1 – ID 58346

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/208261Orig1s000lbl.pdf

slide-20
SLIDE 20

www.pzb.de

Case 1 – ID 58346

slide-21
SLIDE 21

www.pzb.de

Decision: treatment with GZR/EBR for 12 weeks

Case 1 – ID 58346

Cost calculation: 12wk SOF/LDV ~53.000€ 12wk GZR/EBR ~35.000€ difference ~18.000€ vs. Resistance analysis ~260€

slide-22
SLIDE 22

www.pzb.de

Case 2 – resistance testing in retreatment-setting

slide-23
SLIDE 23

www.pzb.de

Case 2 - ID 20098

gender male age 52 years height 182 cm weight 88 Kg

  • rigin

Italy time of infection unknown first consultation at PZB 01/2001 reason for consultation HIV-infection firstly diagnosed HIV 02/2001 firstly diagnosed HBV 02/2001 firstly diagnosed HCV 07/2001

slide-24
SLIDE 24

www.pzb.de

HIV

02/2001 stomatitis due to candida (CD4=242 / 9,7%) 02/2001 initiation of ART: AZT+3TC+SQV/r 12/2001 AZT+3TC+TDF (failure of pre-treatment) 03/2007 AZT+TDF/FTC (simplification) 09/2009 TDF/FTC + RAL (lipodystrophy)

HBV

HBV-DNA consistently below detection

HCV

21.08.2003 HCV-VL: 1,14 Mio IU/ml HCV genotype: 1a IL28B: T/T Liverbiopsy 09/2003: chron. fibros. Inflammation and steatosis, no cirrhosis 05.04.2004 GPT 114 ↑ / PLT 163.000  patient asks for IFN-treatment

Case 2 - ID 20098

slide-25
SLIDE 25

www.pzb.de

05.04.2004 PEG-IFN 180µg + RBV 1200mg → Non-responder ↓ Progression of fibrosis ↓ 11.01.2007 PEG-IFN 360µg + RBV 1400mg → Non-responder

Case 2 - ID 20098

09.05.2012 HCV VL: 6,0 Mio IU/ml / GPT=114 ↑ / PLT=103.000 FibroScan 26,5 kPa = F4 22.05.2012 RBV 1200 mg (Lead in 4 weeks) 19.06.2012 RBV 1200mg + Telaprevir 2250mg + PEG-IFN 180µg

slide-26
SLIDE 26

www.pzb.de

Resistance analysis week 4 (retrospective) R155I

Case 2 - ID 20098

HCV- RNA (IE/ml) Resistance analysis week 8 V36M + R155K

slide-27
SLIDE 27

www.pzb.de

Persistence of RAS

Loss of detectable RAS in patients with earlier RAS when failing to treatment with TVR + PegIFN/RBV

Sullivan J, et al. EASL 2011. Abstract 8.

Months after treatment failure

slide-28
SLIDE 28

www.pzb.de

2014 …two years later…

Case 2 - ID 20098 HCV RNA = 2.2 Mio IU/ml

slide-29
SLIDE 29

www.pzb.de

Therapeutic options in 2016 ?

Case 2 - ID 20098 genotype 1a HCV RNA = 387.440 IU/ml

liver-cirrhosis CHILD-Pugh A

2 x PEG-IFN + RBV – failure 1 x PEG-IFN + RBV + Telaprevir – failure NS3 RAS: Q80K + R155G ART: TDF/FTC + RAL (VL bld) Co-medication: Omeprazol, Nitrendipin, Citalopram, Ramipril

slide-30
SLIDE 30

www.pzb.de

Therapeutic options 2016 ?

Treatment recommendations for retreatment of HCV-monoinfected or HCV/HIV coinfected patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to achieve an SVR on prior antiviral therapy containing one or several DAA(s). Potential drug-drug-interactions with co-medication

http://www.easl.eu/research/our-contributions/clinical-practice-guidelines/detail/easl-recommendations-on-treatment-of-hepatitis-c-2016 http://www.hep-druginteractions.org

slide-31
SLIDE 31

www.pzb.de

Therapeutic approach no. 4

06.12.16 SOF/LDV + RBV (planned 12 weeks) 15.12.16 multiple side effects discontinuation of RBV (allergic reaction) 09.01.17 discontinuation of SOF/LDV by the patient 16.01.17 HCV-PCR = 2214 IU/ml

slide-32
SLIDE 32

www.pzb.de

HCV resistance analysis 16.01.2017

slide-33
SLIDE 33

www.pzb.de

Future options

http://www.natap.org/2016/AASLD/AASLD_34.htm http://www.natap.org/2016/images/111516/111516-9/HCV2.gif

VOX

NS3/4A PI

VEL

NS5A inhibitor

SOF

Nucleotide polymerase inhibitor

2018 (?) autumn 2017 autumn 2017

slide-34
SLIDE 34

www.pzb.de

Future options

Poordad F., MAGELLAN-I, EASL 2017

G/P in GT 1 or 4 patients with DAA failure

slide-35
SLIDE 35

www.pzb.de

Future options

SVR12 by baseline RASs, %

20 40 60 80 100

98 96 97 100 94 Any RASs NS3 only NS5A only NS3 + NS5A No RASs 43 208 9 127 72

%

  • Two patients had S282T at baseline, both achieved SVR12
  • None of the patients who relapsed had treatment-emergent RASs

N=

POLARIS-1 study: SOF/VEL/VOX in NS5A inhibitor-experienced patients with genotype 1 to 6

Bourlière M. AASLD 2016, Abs. 194

slide-36
SLIDE 36

www.pzb.de

Future options

RASs 46/49 94%

3/49 No RASS 12/43 28%

RASs 31/43 72%

No RASs 18/43 42%

RASs 25/43 58%

No RASs 14/49 29%

RASs 35/49 71% PREVALENCE

NS5A NS3

16 Weeks + RBV 16 Weeks + RBV 24 Weeks 24 Weeks

46 46 3 3 35 35 14 14 31 31 12 12 25 25 18 18

GZR/RZR/UPR – C-SURGE Impact of Baseline NS5A or NS3 RASs on SVR12

Wedemeyer H., C-SURGE 1, EASL 2017

slide-37
SLIDE 37

www.pzb.de

Conclusion

We could do it the „anaesthesiological way“. We should not do it the „anaesthesiological way“ by routine. Even in genotype 1a-infection and especially in re-treatment after DAA-failure, HCV-resistance analysis can give useful information. Use of „future options“ will be driven mainly by label and oeconomic issues.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

www.pzb.de

…thanks for your attention!

slide-39
SLIDE 39

www.pzb.de

slide-40
SLIDE 40

www.pzb.de

Zeuzem S, Ann Int. Med. 2015, 163, 1-13; http://slides.hcvonline.org/uploads/179/cedge_treatment_nave.pdf

Resistance analysis in genotype 1a

C-EDGE TN: GZR/EBR in GT 1,4 and 6

slide-41
SLIDE 41

www.pzb.de

Wedemeyer H., C-SURGE 1, EASL 2017

slide-42
SLIDE 42

www.pzb.de

Wedemeyer H., C-SURGE 1, EASL 2017

slide-43
SLIDE 43

www.pzb.de

Stuart KR, POLARIS 1-4, EASL 2017

slide-44
SLIDE 44

www.pzb.de

Stuart KR, POLARIS 1-4, EASL 2017