HCP 3.0 NAREIT Presentation Senior Housing Life Science Medical - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hcp 3 0 nareit presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HCP 3.0 NAREIT Presentation Senior Housing Life Science Medical - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HCP 3.0 NAREIT Presentation Senior Housing Life Science Medical Office NAREIT November 15-16, 2016 HCP Delivered on Near-Term Goals Completed on Oct 31, 2016 Execute the Spin-off of the HCR ManorCare Portfolio Will be reduced from 35%


slide-1
SLIDE 1

HCP 3.0 NAREIT Presentation

NAREIT November 15-16, 2016

Senior Housing Life Science Medical Office

slide-2
SLIDE 2

1

HCP Delivered on Near-Term Goals

HCP 3.0

Execute the Spin-off of the HCR ManorCare Portfolio Reduce and Improve Brookdale Concentration Improve Balance Sheet Metrics Become a Leader in Transparency and Clarity Establish the Next Generation of Leadership for HCP 3.0 Completed on Oct 31, 2016 Will be reduced from 35% immediately post-spin to 27% via announced transactions(1) Executing and refining financing plan announced in May 2016, resulting in better credit metrics than initially anticipated Revamped and enhanced Supplemental disclosures in 3Q16

(1) Concentration is based on cash NOI plus interest income. Reflects the announced RIDEA II transaction, sale of 64 Brookdale triple-net assets, sale or transfer of 25 Brookdale triple-net assets and transfer of 4 Brookdale communities to another operator.

Deep team with diverse and complimentary experience

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2

  • Investment plan emphasizing prudent capital allocation and

accretive growth objectives

  • Improvement in credit metrics over time to regain Baa1/BBB+ ratings
  • Best-in-class disclosures and transparency

What Differentiates HCP 3.0  Strong and improving investment grade balance sheet with ample

liquidity and no significant debt maturities through end of 2018

 Diversified senior housing portfolio with strong triple-net lease

coverage

 Premier Life Science platform featuring The Cove development  Stable on-campus MOB portfolio well-known for its consistent

performance

 Global leader in sust

sustainability ainability

 Smaller investment base to grow off of

We Will Strive to be Recognized in Our Industry for Our:

Senior Housing - The Solana Preserve Houston, TX Evergreen Medical Office Lone Tree, CO

HCP 3.0

 High quality portfolio reinforcing stability and organic growth, with 94% private-pay revenue sources

and improved tenant concentration

slide-4
SLIDE 4

3

HCP is a Platform for Growth

HCP 3.0

Well-positioned to grow off a smaller base and revitalized portfolio

  • Growth will come from all three of our major business lines: senior housing, life science, and MOB

Grow existing relationships by generating “tuck-in” acquisitions and developments Capitalize on development and redevelopment opportunities across all segments Enhance business development to target operators and health systems Manage the balance sheet and be prepared for opportunistic acquisitions Advance research and analytics capabilities to capitalize on segment-specific cycles Recycle non-core assets into quality properties with strong local-market fundamentals

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4

HCP 3.0

Experienced Senior Leadership Team

Michael McKee Executive Chairman, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer Michael McKee Executive Chairman, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer Kai Hsiao

EVP – Senior Housing

Kai Hsiao

EVP – Senior Housing

Justin Hutchens

President (Effective 1/1/17)

Justin Hutchens

President (Effective 1/1/17)

Troy McHenry

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Troy McHenry

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary OPEN Chief Financial Officer OPEN Chief Financial Officer

Tom Herzog

Chief Executive Officer (Effective 1/1/17)

Tom Herzog

Chief Executive Officer (Effective 1/1/17)

Tom Klaritch

EVP – Medical Office

Tom Klaritch

EVP – Medical Office

Jon Bergschneider

EVP – Life Science Estates

Jon Bergschneider

EVP – Life Science Estates

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5

Senior Housing NNN 24% Life Science 21% Medical Office 22%

Best-in-Class Portfolio

(1) Represents HCP’s preliminary 2017 Outlook provided on 11/1/16 for cash NOI plus interest income from debt investments. (2) Other segment primarily consists of hospitals, U.K. real estate, and all debt investments. (3) After giving effect to the QCP spin and announced BKD transactions. (4) Self-pay and private insurance (including managed care); medical office properties are considered 100% private-pay. (5) Percentage based on cash NOI plus interest income. (6) Percentage based on cash NOI. (7) Source: Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI).

  • Large, diversified healthcare REIT with high-quality cash flows from needs-based private pay sources
  • Complementary triple-net leases and operating business platforms across multiple healthcare sectors

Other 14%(2)

Senior Housing Operating Portfolio “SHOP” 19%

$1.3B

Cash NOI plus Interest Income(1)

HCP 3.0

94%

Private Pay(4)(5)

77%

Concentrated in Top 50 MSAs(6)

800

Properties(3)

39%

Top 3 Tenants

Diversified Tenants(5)

6%

(vs. 4% national avg)

Strong Population Growth over Next 5 Years(7)

87 MSAs 43 States

Geographically Diversified

43% Senior Housing

Post-Spin, HCP has a Younger, Higher Quality Portfolio of Private Pay Assets in Top 50 MSAs with Above Average Population Growth

slide-7
SLIDE 7

6

  • Improved lease coverage with announced Brookdale

transactions(2)

  • Added 6 new operators, diversifying our relationships
  • 74% located in Top 50 MSAs(3)

Premier Portfolio in Attractive Healthcare Markets

43%(1)

  • 83% located on-campus; 7% adjacent; 87% in Top 50

MSAs(3)

  • 95% affiliated with 200+ hospitals and healthcare

systems(3)

  • Steady occupancy consistently above 90%

Medical Office

22%(1)

Represents recently sourced new relationships

(1) Percentages by segment are based on 2017 Outlook for cash NOI plus interest income from debt investments. Excludes the Other segment, which primarily consists

  • f hospitals, U.K. real estate, and all debt investments.

(2) After giving effect to the announced BKD transactions, EBITDAR-to-Rent coverage for the retained 78 triple-net properties increases to 1.21x for the trailing 12 months ended 9/30/16. (3) Percentage based on cash NOI for senior housing and square footage for medical office and life science. HCP 3.0

  • 93% located in 2 of the top 3 core markets(3)
  • Largest owner and developer on the West Coast
  • The Cove development represents a 1.0M sq. ft.,

LEED Silver waterfront campus in S. San Francisco

  • 87% of revenues from public or well-established

private companies

Life Science

21%(1)

Amgen Amgen

Senior Housing

slide-8
SLIDE 8

7 7

Senior Housing

HCP | The Solana Germantown Operated by Brookdale Germantown, TN

slide-9
SLIDE 9

8

24% 16% 14% 6% 40%

$573M

54% Triple-net

Leased Portfolio

46% SHOP

Investments

a b a b c a b c a b

Cash NOI(1)

a b c

Diversified Senior Housing Portfolio

SENIOR HOUSING (1) Based on HCP’s preliminary 2017 Outlook provided on 11/1/16. Note that following the completion of the announced Brookdale transactions, Brookdale will

  • perate 204 communities for HCP generating approximately $350 million of expected annualized cash NOI, of which one third will be under triple-net

leases and two thirds in RIDEA joint ventures.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

9

Triple-Net Leases Anchor Recurring Internal Growth

Assisted Living Independent Living Memory Care

(1) Based on HCP’s preliminary 2017 Outlook provided on 11/1/16 for cash NOI. (2) Trailing twelve months ending 9/30/16, after giving effect to the announced Brookdale transactions. SENIOR HOUSING

Senior Housing – Oakmont of Roseville Roseville, CA Senior Housing – The Fairfax, operated by Sunrise

  • Ft. Belvoir, VA
  • $312M cash NOI(1) from 200+ triple-net leased senior housing properties managed by 20+ operators
  • Brookdale property EBITDAR-to-rent coverage improves to 1.21x and HCP’s triple-net senior housing

portfolio coverage up to 1.13x upon completing the Brookdale asset sales(2)

  • 2% to 3% average annual escalators
  • 5-mile median income and net worth above the national average
  • Limited expirations – weighted average remaining term of 10 years
slide-11
SLIDE 11

10

  • $262M cash NOI from over 100 properties(1)
  • High mix of independent living, which has been less impacted by new supply in our markets

SHOP Portfolio is Well-Positioned

15+ years

  • Avg. affordability for

portfolio (2)

Only 3.2%

  • f Cash NOI exposed

to new supply(3)

6

New relationships added past year Management team with national operating experience

SHOP Portfolio Mix by Cash NOI

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017E

Annual Inventory Growth(4)

Assisted Living Independent Living

63 63% of supply coming online o % of supply coming online over ne r next xt 24 mont months hs will will be AL - be AL - HCP HCP’s por portfolio lio is 6 is 64% IL % IL

(1) Based on HCP’s preliminary 2017 Outlook provided on 11/1/16 for cash NOI. (2) Affordability represents the number of years an individual can support the cost of residing in a senior housing facility. Affordability is calculated using the median net worth for individuals ages 75 and older, divided by the annualized revenue per occupied room (REVPOR) less the median income for individuals ages 75 and older. Markets with median income in excess of REVPOR reflect an Affordability metric of greater than (>) 15 years. (3) Represents the percentage of company Cash NOI and Interest income exposed to new senior housing construction and expansion. As reported on 9/30/16. (4) Supply data from NIC.

Assisted Living 36% Independent Living 64%

SENIOR HOUSING

slide-12
SLIDE 12

11

  • Invest in high-quality assets with attractive risk-adjusted return profiles
  • Expand local-market operator relationships
  • Provide our operators with exclusive analytics and business support tools
  • Capitalize on expansion, conversion, and redevelopment opportunities
  • Selectively pursue one-off and strategic acquisitions

Senior Housing Near-Term Growth Objectives

SENIOR HOUSING

Tactics to ctics to Achiev hieve Goals e Goals

Incre Increase se HCP HCP Mark Market et Pr Presence esence ■ Continue to foster relationships with new operators ■ Deliver quickly and reliably for customers ■ Refine and optimize investment process with a customer-centered process Help Our Help Our Opera Operators Win

  • rs Win

■ “Center for Operational Excellence” will leverage HCP’s scale to provide our operators analytics and business services support and best practices

  • Smaller operators gain scale to grow their business; provides HCP with repeat customers
  • More robust market data helps HCP allocate capital between MSAs and operators

Por Portfolio Mining folio Mining ■ Systematically evaluate the portfolio for accretive organic growth opportunities ■ Work with existing and new relationships to proactively reposition assets for growth

slide-13
SLIDE 13

12 Curr Current ent HCP 3 HCP 3.0 BKD NNN BKD NNN BKD NNN BKD NNN Po Portfolio(1

(1)

Po Portfolio # of Properties 167 78 Located in Top 99 NIC Markets 74% 5% 79% Contractual Rent(2) $222M $121M % of Ov % of Overall erall HCP HCP(3) 16% 16% 6% 6% 10% 10% Pr Proper

  • perty EBITD

ty EBITDAR-to-R to-Rent Co ent Coverage rage(4) 1. 1.02x 19 bps bps 1.21x 21x Occupancy 86.5% 260 bps 89.1% EBITDAR Margin(5) 30.2% 470 bps 34.9% Qualified Care Giver Population Growth(6) 11.6% 11.9% Senior 75+ Population Growth 17.9% 18.0% Median Net Worth 75+ $210K $211K HCP NOI Exposed to New Supply 4.0% 1.9%

Reconstitute and Upgrade Our Brookdale NNN Portfolio

  • Transaction improves lease coverage, occupancy, and margins while reducing exposure to new

supply

(1) Excludes eight properties with upcoming lease expirations in the next six months. (2) Reflects contractual rent adjusted for the rent re-allocation as part of the 25 NNN sale/transition as of September 2016, annualized. (3) Concentration is based on cash NOI plus interest income. Taking into account RIDEA communities managed by Brookdale, our total Brookdale exposure is reduced from 35% immediately post Spin to 27% (also reflecting the RIDEA II transaction). (4) EBITDAR-to-Rent Coverage for the retained 78 communities is calculated using trailing 12 months EBITDAR as of September 30, 2016 and re-allocated rents. All other coverages use rents for the trailing 12 months ended September 30, 2016 before giving effect to the rent re-allocation. (5) Based on trailing 12 months ended September 30, 2016. (6) Qualified Care Givers: Households – Age 45-64 and Income $100,000+. SENIOR HOUSING

slide-14
SLIDE 14

13 13

Life Science

HCP | The Cove at Oyster Point South San Francisco, CA

slide-15
SLIDE 15

14

  • $271M of cash NOI from 118 properties encompassing over 7M sq. ft. in three states(1)
  • Largest life science owner on the West Coast with concentrations in Bay Area and San Diego

Irreplaceable Life Science Portfolio

(1) Based on HCP’s preliminary 2017 Outlook provided on 11/1/16 for cash NOI. (2) Current pipeline as of 3Q16. Cost, leasing, and yields do not include Cove Phase III.

97%

Average occupancy

  • ver past two years

87%

Revenues from public or well- established private companies

20+ Years

As a premier developer with 2.1M

  • sq. ft. of remaining

entitlements Life Science Development Overview

LIFE SCIENCE

SAN DIEGO - 2.1M sq. ft. SAN FRANCISCO – 4.6M sq. ft.

Current pipeline(2) $464M Pre-leased 57% Stabilized yield 7.5% - 8% Recently commenced $211M Cove Phase III

Key Subm Key Submarkets arkets

  • So. San Francisco
  • Redwood City
  • Mountain View
  • Hayward

Key Subm Key Submarkets arkets

  • Torrey Pines
  • University Towne

Center

  • Sorrento Mesa
  • Poway
slide-16
SLIDE 16

15

Strong Occupancy

84% 88% 92% 96% 100% 2012 2013 2014 2015 3Q16

  • 500

1,000 1,500 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 YTD Renewal New

Leased sq. ft. (000s)

High Leasing Volume

Strong Life Science Internal Growth

  • Portfolio is concentrated in research hubs in core cluster markets resulting in strong demand

from high-quality tenants

  • Occupancy is up nearly 500 basis points over the last four years reaching stabilized levels

Strong fundamentals in our top-tier clusters

LIFE SCIENCE

slide-17
SLIDE 17

16

The Cove at Oyster Point Development

Can we get an in process pic?

  • Pr

Premier Class emier Class A Lif A Life Science Science development project totaling one million sq. ft. at the gateway to South San Francisco, where overall Life Science vacancy is below 3%

  • $610M delivered or in-process; 16

164,000 sq. 000 sq. ft. ft.

  • f r
  • f remaining

maining entitlements entitlements

  • Phase I is 73% leased; 247,000 sq. ft. in two

buildings (opened 3Q 2016)

  • Phase II is 50% pre-leased; 230,000 sq. ft. in

two buildings (commenced in February 2016; anticipated delivery 4Q 2017)

  • Commencing Phase III; 336,000 sq. ft. in two

buildings (anticipated delivery 4Q 2018)

  • LEED Silv

LEED Silver er campus with rich amenity profile, including food service, fitness, meeting space, hotel & retail

LIFE SCIENCE

slide-18
SLIDE 18

17

  • Develop Class-A “trophy” campuses like The Cove
  • Acquire high-quality assets in top-5 life science markets; build on “estate concept” strategy
  • Recycle non-core assets
  • Focus on occupancy, retention, and tenant credit quality
  • Continue advancing LEED and sustainability initiatives

Life Science Near-Term Growth Objectives

SENIOR HOUSING

Tactics to ctics to Achiev hieve Goals e Goals

De Development lopment ■ Build –out, lease, and stabilize The Cove campus ■ Continue pre-development for entitled Bay Area and San Diego land parcels ■ Develop speculatively when market conditions are appropriate Acquisitions quisitions ■ Leverage cost of capital post-spin to compete more aggressively for core acquisitions ■ Opportunistically acquire value-add assets Tenant Pr nant Profile ile ■ Maintain focus on core life science clusters where Bio Pharma/Big Biotech want to be ■ Utilize HCP’s “estate concept” strategy to grow with tenants ■ Use capital to improve curb appeal to attract high-quality tenants

LIFE SCIENCE

slide-19
SLIDE 19

18 18

Medical Properties

Medical Office Buildings

HCP | 833 Chestnut MOB Philadelphia, PA

slide-20
SLIDE 20

19

Industry-Leading On-Campus Portfolio

MEDICAL OFFICE

[82]%

On-Campus

  • r Adjacent

[82]%

Multi-Tenant Buildings

Current pipeline $135M Pre-leased 63% Stabilized yield 7.5%-8%

MOB Development Overview

  • $280M cash NOI from 226 properties encompassing 17M sq. ft.(1)

83%

  • n-campus and

an additional 7% adjacent(2)

87%

located in top 50 MSAs(2)

95%

affiliated with 200+ hospitals and health systems(2)

(1) Based on HCP’s preliminary 2017 Outlook provided on 11/1/16 for cash NOI. (2) Percentage based on square feet. Adjacent defined as a medical office building located within 0.25 miles of a hospital campus.

Medical City Dallas Campus (HCA) Dallas, Texas Skyridge MOB Aspen, CO

MOB Redevelopment Overview

Current pipeline $40M Cash-on-cash returns 9%-12%

slide-21
SLIDE 21

20

Strong Retention

70% 80% 90% 100%

2012 2013 2014 2015 YTD 2016

  • 500

1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 YTD 2016 Renewal New

Leased sq. ft. (000s)

Consistent Leader in Tenant Satisfaction(1) High Leasing Volume

50% 60% 70% 80% 2012 2013 2014 2015 YTD 2016

Medical Office Internal Growth: Strong, Steady, Stable

4.14 4.16 4.19 4.24 4.20 3.95 4.09 4.15 4.13 4.13

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

HCP Kingsley Index

(1) Kingsley Associates’ tenant survey measuring tenant satisfaction with MOB landlords. .

Steady Occupancy

MEDICAL OFFICE

slide-22
SLIDE 22

21

  • Create new relationships with top health systems and hospitals
  • Focus investment and resources in top 50 MSAs with strong population and income growth
  • Execute on redevelopment pipeline and continue to add projects to shadow pipeline
  • Deliver steady operating results

MOB Near-Term Growth Objectives

SENIOR HOUSING

Tactics to ctics to Achiev hieve Goals e Goals

Ext External ■ Foster existing relationships to grow on-campus portfolio via development ■ Target new relationships with leading health systems ■ Leverage key brokerage relationships and our scale Or Orga ganic ■ Pursue accretive redevelopment in our existing, well-positioned assets ■ Build on our leadership position in sustainability to improve operational efficiency Oppor Opportunistic tunistic ■ Acquire assets from top health system and hospital relationships ■ Selectively pursue large strategic acquisitions

MEDICAL OFFICE

slide-23
SLIDE 23

22 22

Hospitals and International

HCP | Physicians Park MOB Nashville, TN

slide-24
SLIDE 24

23

  • $570M investment dollars, 15 properties and

2,100 beds in 12 MSAs

  • NNN leases with 1.5%-2.5% average annual rent

escalators

  • Key relationships: HCA, Hoag, HealthSouth

HCP’s Hospital and International Portfolios

6.3x

EBITDAR lease coverage(1)

70%

Cash NOI from acute-care hospitals

Hospital International

  • $460M debt investments dollars and $390M

real estate investment dollars, 61 properties and 3,200 beds

  • NNN leases with 1.5%-2.5% average annual rent

escalators

  • Deep partnerships with top UK operators HC-

One and Maria Mallaband

1.3x

EBITDAR lease coverage(1)

91%

Occupancy

Hoag Hospital Irvine, CA

(1) EBITDAR lease coverage is for the trailing 12-months ended June 30, 2016.

HC- One - Greenfield Park United Kingdom

HOSPITAL AND INTERNATIONAL

slide-25
SLIDE 25

24 24

Financial Outlook and Balance Sheet

HCP | The Solana Deer Park Deer Park, IL

slide-26
SLIDE 26

25 25

2016 Nov 1st Guidance (mid‐point) 2016 Pro Forma Run Rate(1) 2017 Outlook (mid‐point) NAREIT FFO per share $2.38 $1.58 $1.91 FFO as Adjusted per share $2.72 $1.92 $1.92 Cash NOI SPP 3.25% n/a 3.0% NOI SPP 2.2% n/a 2.0% Assumed timing of transactions: Spin 10/31/16 1/1/16 10/31/16 RIDEA II transaction 11/30/16 1/1/16 11/30/16 Sale of 64 Brookdale triple‐net properties No Impact 1/1/16 2/1/17

2016 Guidance, Pro Forma Run Rate and 2017 Outlook

(1) Represents the annualized, run-rate impact from the Spin, RIDEA II transaction and the sale of 64 Brookdale triple-net properties for $1.1B as if all transactions

  • ccurred on January 1, 2016 and excluding the gains from participating debt recognized in 2016.

FINANCIAL OUTLOOK AND BALANCE SHEET

slide-27
SLIDE 27

26

Substantial Liquidity; No Meaningful Near-term Debt Maturities

(1) Excludes revolver and other debt maturities. (2) As of 9/30/16, excluding revolver and other debt maturities. Projected maturity schedule reflects $3.15 billion of anticipated debt paydown using proceeds from QCP financing, RIDEA II transaction and Brookdale asset sales during Q4’16 and through Q2’17 (see page 32 for detailed assumptions).

$1,574 $637 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 Column1 2016 2017 2018

  • Negligible debt maturities through 2018(1)
  • $1.85 billion projected availability on $2.0 billion revolver

9/30/16

($ millions)

$1,372

Revolver Availability $2.2 Billion Debt Maturities

Projected

$241 $37 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 Column1 2016 2017 2018 $2,000 Revolver Availability $0.3 Billion Debt Maturities(2)

FINANCIAL OUTLOOK AND BALANCE SHEET

$2,000

$150

Senior Unsecured Notes Secured Debt (incl pro rata JV debt) Unsecured Term Loans (natural hedge for UK investments) Revolver Balance Revolver Availability

slide-28
SLIDE 28

27

$241 $37 $752 $838 $1,224 $918 $806 $1,153 $1,371 $403 $0 $400 $800 $1,200 $1,600 $2,000 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Thereafter Senior Unsecured Notes Secured Debt (incl/ pro rata JV) Unsecured Term Loans

Projected Debt Maturity Schedule(1)

  • $7.7B of total debt
  • 4.1% weighted average interest rate
  • 6.7 years weighted average maturity

($ in millions)

We Will Have Addressed Substantially All Debt Maturities Through the End of 2018

(1) As of 9/30/16, excluding revolver and other debt. Projected maturity schedule reflects $3.15 billion of anticipated debt paydown using proceeds from QCP financing, RIDEA II transaction and Brookdale asset sales during Q4’16 and through Q2’17 (see page 32 for detailed assumptions).

(natural hedge for UK investments)

FINANCIAL OUTLOOK AND BALANCE SHEET

slide-29
SLIDE 29

28

Committed to a Strong Balance Sheet

Preliminary Post Spin Targets at Announcement(1) 2017 Targets(2) General Targets Net Debt / EBITDA ~6.5x Low to mid-6x 5.5x-6.0x Financial Leverage 45% 43%-44% <40% Fixed Charge Coverage 3.75x 3.6x-3.8x >3.5x Top 3 Tenant Concentration(3) ~40% 35%-40% 30-35%

(1) Post-spin targets discussed at the time of the Spin announcement in May 2016. (2) Represents year end 2017 targets. (3) Top three tenant concentration was 55% pre-spin. Concentration is based on cash NOI plus interest income.

2017 Target Credit Metrics are Better than our Preliminary Post-Spin Targets… with the Goal of Reducing Leverage Further and Regaining Baa1/BBB+ Ratings Over Time

  • Current credit ratings are Baa2 (stable) for Moody’s, BBB (stable) for S&P (reaffirmed in

October), and BBB (stable) for Fitch (stable-positive ratings action in October)

  • Ample liquidity with $2 billion revolver and large unencumbered asset base

FINANCIAL OUTLOOK AND BALANCE SHEET

slide-30
SLIDE 30

29

Appendix

slide-31
SLIDE 31

30 30

Bridge to 2016 “Pro Forma Run Rate”

Combined, these transactions generate gross proceeds totaling $3.3B to HCP and reduce annual income by $600M

(1) Based on the mid-point of the Company’s 2016 guidance on 11/1/16. Guidance reflects the Spin completion on 10/31/16 and RIDEA II transaction on 11/30/16, and assumes the Brookdale transactions are completed in 2017. (2) Substantially all of the gross proceeds are used to repay debt at a blended interest rate of 5.2%. Remaining proceeds are used to fund transaction and prepayment costs and for reinvestment.

$ per share

FFO as Adjusted 2016 Current Guidance(1) $ 2.72 plus: 2-month net impact from Spin transaction 0.15 2016 Guidance – “WholeCo” Basis 2.87 Gains from participating debt (0.04) 2016 WholeCo Run Rate $ 2.83 Reduced annual income contribution from NOI from assets transferred to QCP (1.03) NOI (rent) on Brookdale 64 NNN assets (0.20) RIDEA II transaction (0.06) Subtotal (1.29) Use of proceeds Repay bonds, mortgage debt, revolver and other(2) 0.38 HCP Pro Forma Run Rate (Annual RemainCo) $ 1.92

APPENDIX

slide-32
SLIDE 32

31

($0. 0.01 01) $1 $1.92 $0 $0.05 $0 $0.02 2 ($0 ($0.02) ($0. 0.04 04) $1 $1.92

2016 Run Rate FFO as Adj. 3.0% Cash SPP, less Straight Line Rent & Other Committed Re/Development Projects Drag from Add'l Re/Dev Projects Tenant Purchase Options & Other Capital Recycling Other Items, net 2017 Outlook FFO as Adj.

2016 Run Rate to 2017 Outlook:

Major Drivers Impacting FFO as Adjusted

(1) 2016 Run Rate represents the annualized, run-rate impact from the QCP Spin, sale of 64 Brookdale triple-net assets, and the RIDEA II transaction. (2) Includes straight-line & above/below market rents, accretion on DFL investments and termination fees and adjustments for CCRC non-refundable entrance fees. (3) Includes ($0.03) from tenant purchase options for Genentech ($310M in Nov’16) and Tenet ($43M in Feb’17), and ($0.01) from other capital recycling activities.

Organic Growth from Same-Store and Development Earn-In are Offset by Tenant Purchase Options and other Capital Recycling Activities

(1) (3)

$/share

(2)

APPENDIX

slide-33
SLIDE 33

32 32

Combined Sources and Uses

(1) Revolver balance includes 2016 YTD debt maturities totaling $600 million ($200 million mortgage at 6.6% and $400 million unsecured bonds at 6.3%) at a blended 6.4%. (2) Includes QCP spin costs (approximately $155 million including financing costs) and debt prepayment penalties (approximately $50 million).

Sources Uses

$B Timing $B Rate Timing QCP gross proceeds $1.75 4Q16 HCP debt repayment RIDEA II transaction 0.47 4Q16 Unsecured bonds and mortgage debt $1.21 6.3% 4Q16 BKD 64 asset sales 1.13 1Q17 Mortgage debt 0.47 5.7% 1Q17 Unsecured bonds 0.25 5.6% 2Q17 Subtotal 1.93 6.1% Revolver draw for 2016 maturities(1) 0.60 6.4% 4Q16-1Q17 Revolver (other) 0.62 1.5% 4Q16-1Q17 Total de l debt re repa payment 3.15 5.2% 2% Spin transaction costs(2) 0.20 Tota Total $3. 3.35 Tota Total $3. 3.35

  • With proceeds from QCP, RIDEA II transaction, and Brookdale asset sales, we plan to

pay down $3.15 billion of debt, resulting in an improved credit profile

APPENDIX

slide-34
SLIDE 34

33

Well-Managed Debt Profile(1)

(1) As of 9/30/16. Projected figures reflect $3.15 billion of anticipated debt paydown using proceeds from QCP financing, RIDEA II transaction and Brookdale asset sales during Q4’16 and through Q2’17 (see page 32 for detailed assumptions).

  • Weighted average interest rate 200

basis points lower since 2010

  • Weighted average maturity increased

to 6.7 years

  • Limited exposure to floating rate debt

4.0% 4.5% 5.0% 5.5% 6.0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 3Q16 Proj

Weighted Average Interest Rate

4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 3Q16 Proj

Weighted Average Maturity

75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 3Q16 Proj

Percentage of Fixed Rate Debt

Weighted Average Interest Rate Weighted Average Maturity Percentage of Fixed Rate Debt

APPENDIX

slide-35
SLIDE 35

34 34

Assumptions for 2016 Guidance & 2017 Outlook

APPENDIX

2016 Guidance 2017 Outlook

YoY Cash NOI SPP Growth(1) 2.75%-3.75% 2.5%-3.5% YoY NOI SPP Growth(1) 1.7%-2.7% 1.5%-2.5% G&A Expense $103M-$105M

($89M-$92M excl. severance charges)

$83M-$88M Interest Expense $463M-$467M $305M-$315M Net Dispositions $1.3B @ 7% $1.2B-$1.7B @ 8%

(primarily $1.1B BKD assets)

Recurring CapEx / 2nd Generation(2) $88M-$90M

(7% of cash NOI)(3)

$92M-$97M

(8% of cash NOI)

1st Generation TIs (non-recurring)(2) $152M-$155M $80M-$90M Re/Development Spend(2) $248M-$251M

@ 7.5%-8.0% stabilized ROC(4)

$315M-$325M

@ 7.5%-8.0% stabilized ROC(4)

Dividend per Share(5) $2.095 $1.48 Fully Diluted FFO as Adj. Wtd. Avg. Share Count 473M 476M

(1) 2016 Nov 1st Guidance reflects full year same-store growth excluding QCP. (2) Excludes pro rata share of unconsolidated JV capital spend of: $5M-$7M recurring and $40M-$45M non-recurring/development spend in 2016; $10M-$15M recurring and $25M-$30M non-recurring/development spend in 2017. (3) 2016 Cash NOI excludes contribution from QCP. (4) Estimated stabilized ROC for ground-up development projects only. (5) 2016 dividend per share is $0.575 for 1Q-3Q and $0.37 for 4Q; 2017 dividend per share is based on last quarter declared, annualized for modeling purposes.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

35

Full Year 2016 & 2017 Same Property Performance

(1) Represents forecasted same-store cash NOI growth at the mid-point, excluding QCP for 2016.

Cash NOI SPP Growth(1)

Our Diversified Portfolio is Projected to Generate Same-Store Cash NOI Growth in 2017 of 3%, Led by Continued Strength in our SHOP Platform

  • Improvement in Senior Housing triple-net performance is primarily driven by contractual rent increases and

additional CapEx rents (2016 impacted by previous rent reduction in BKD portfolio to cancel purchase options)

  • SHOP performance is primarily driven by higher rates and growth from capital investments
  • 2017 Life Science performance is primarily driven by contractual rent escalators, partially offset by projected

rent abatements and downtime on expiring leases

  • Steady Medical Office performance benefits from high tenant retention and on-campus locations

1.0% 4.25% 7.75% 2.8% 1.25% 3.25% 3.75% 4.5% 2.2% 2.5% 1.25% 3.0%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% SH NNN SHOP Life Science Medical Office Other Total HCP 2016F 2017F

APPENDIX

slide-37
SLIDE 37

36

This presentation is being presented solely for your information, is subject to change and speaks only as of the date hereof. This presentation and comments made by management do not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities of HCP or any investment interest in any business ventures of HCP. This presentation is not complete and is only a summary of the more detailed information included elsewhere, including in HCP’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings. No representation or warranty, expressed or implied is made and no reliance should be placed on the accuracy, fairness or completeness of the information presented. HCP, its affiliates, advisers and representatives accept no liability whatsoever for any losses arising from any information contained in this presentation.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Statements in this presentation, as well as statements made by management, that are not historical factual statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, our statements regarding our planned or pending transactions, our financing plans, our prospects, and our economic guidance, outlook and

  • expectations. All forward-looking statements are made as of the date hereof, are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to known and unknown risks,

uncertainties, assumptions and other factors—many of which are out of our and our management's control and difficult to forecast—that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: our reliance on a concentration of a small number of tenants and operators for a significant portion of our revenues, with our concentration in Brookdale increasing as a result of the consummation of the spin-off of QCP on October 31, 2016; the financial condition of our existing and future tenants, operators and borrowers, including potential bankruptcies and downturns in their businesses, and their legal and regulatory proceedings, which results in uncertainties regarding our ability to continue to realize the full benefit of such tenants' and operators' leases and borrowers' loans; the ability of our existing and future tenants, operators and borrowers to conduct their respective businesses in a manner sufficient to maintain or increase their revenues and to generate sufficient income to make rent and loan payments to us and our ability to recover investments made, if applicable, in their operations; competition for tenants and operators, including with respect to new leases and mortgages and the renewal or rollover of existing leases; competition for skilled management and other key personnel; availability of suitable properties to acquire at favorable prices and the competition for the acquisition and financing of those properties; our ability to negotiate the same or better terms with new tenants or operators if existing leases are not renewed or we exercise our right to replace an existing tenant or operator upon default; the risks associated with our investments in joint ventures and unconsolidated entities, including our lack of sole decision making authority and our reliance on our partners' financial condition and continued cooperation; our ability to achieve the benefits of investments, including those investments discussed above, within expected time frames or at all, or within expected cost projections; the potential impact on us and our tenants, operators and borrowers from current and future litigation matters, including the possibility of larger than expected litigation costs, adverse results and related developments; the effect on our tenants and operators of legislation and other legal requirements, including licensure, certification and inspection requirements, and laws addressing entitlement programs and related services, including Medicare and Medicaid, which may result in future reductions in reimbursements; changes in federal, state or local laws and regulations, including those affecting the healthcare industry that affect our costs of compliance or increase the costs, or otherwise affect the operations, of our tenants and operators; volatility or uncertainty in the capital markets, the availability and cost of capital as impacted by interest rates, changes in our credit ratings, and the value of our common stock, and other conditions that may adversely impact our ability to fund our obligations or consummate transactions, or reduce the earnings from potential transactions; changes in global, national and local economic conditions, and currency exchange rates; changes in the credit ratings on U.S. government debt securities or default or delay in payment by the government of its obligations; our ability to manage our indebtedness level and changes in the terms of such indebtedness; our ability to maintain our qualification as a real estate investment trust; the impact of the spin-off transaction on our business; and other risks and uncertainties described from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We assume no, and hereby disclaim any, obligation to update any of the foregoing or any other forward-looking statements as a result of new information or new or future developments, except as otherwise required by law.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

This presentation contains certain supplemental non-GAAP financial measures. While HCP believes that non-GAAP financial measures are helpful in evaluating its

  • perating performance, the use of non-GAAP financial measures in this presentation should not be considered in isolation from, or as an alternative for, a measure of

financial or operating performance as defined by GAAP. You are cautioned that there are inherent limitations associated with the use of each of these supplemental non- GAAP financial measures as an analytical tool. Additionally, HCP’s computation of non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to those reported by other

  • REITs. Reconciliations of the non‐GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in the Appendix to this presentation.

Disclaimer

36

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Defin init itio ions

1

Funds From Operations (“FFO”) We believe FFO applicable to common shares, diluted FFO applicable to common shares, and diluted FFO per common share are important supplemental non-GAAP measures of operating performance for a REIT. Because the historical cost accounting convention used for real estate assets utilizes straight-line depreciation (except on land), such accounting presentation implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen and fallen with market conditions, presentations of operating results for a REIT that use historical cost accounting for depreciation could be less informative. The term FFO was designed by the REIT industry to address this issue. FFO, as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”), is net income (loss) applicable to common shares (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of depreciable property, including any current and deferred taxes directly associated with sales of depreciable property, impairments of, or related to, depreciable real estate, plus real estate and other depreciation and amortization, and adjustments to compute our share of FFO and FFO as adjusted (see below) from joint ventures. Adjustments for joint ventures are calculated to reflect our pro-rata share of both our consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. We reflect our share of FFO for unconsolidated joint ventures by applying our actual ownership percentage for the period to the applicable reconciling items on an entity by entity basis. We reflect our share for consolidated joint ventures in which we do not own 100% of the equity by adjusting

  • ur FFO to remove the third party ownership share of the applicable reconciling items based on actual ownership percentage for the applicable periods. Our pro-rata

share information is prepared on a basis consistent with the comparable consolidated amounts, is intended to reflect our proportionate economic interest in the

  • perating results of properties in our portfolio and is calculated by applying our actual ownership percentage for the period. We do not control the unconsolidated joint

ventures, and the pro-rata presentations of reconciling items included in FFO (see above) do not represent our legal claim to such items. The joint venture members

  • r partners are entitled to profit or loss allocations and distributions of cash flows according to the joint venture agreements, which provide for such allocations

generally according to their invested capital. The presentation of pro-rata information has limitations which include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) the amounts shown on the individual line items were derived by applying our overall economic ownership interest percentage determined when applying the equity method of accounting or allocating noncontrolling interests, and do not necessarily represent our legal claim to the assets and liabilities, or the revenues and expenses; and (ii) other companies in our industry may calculate their pro-rata interest differently, limiting the usefulness as a comparative measure. Because of these limitations, the pro-rata financial information should not be considered independently or as a substitute for our financial statements as reported under GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on

  • ur GAAP financial statements, using the pro-rata financial information as a supplement. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in

accordance with GAAP, is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs and should not be considered an alternative to net income (loss). We compute FFO in accordance with the current NAREIT definition; however, other REITs may report FFO differently or have a different interpretation of the current NAREIT definition from ours. In addition, we present FFO before the impact of non-comparable items including, but not limited to, severance-related charges, litigation settlement charges, preferred stock redemption charges, impairments (recoveries) of non-depreciable assets, prepayment costs (benefits) associated with early retirement or payment of debt, foreign currency remeasurement losses (gains) and transaction-related items (“FFO as adjusted”). Prepayment costs (benefits) associated with early retirement

  • f debt include the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, or additional costs, expenses, discounts, make-whole payments, penalties or premiums incurred

as a result of early retirement or payment of debt. Transaction-related items include acquisition and pursuit costs (e.g., due diligence and closing) and gains/charges incurred as a result of mergers and acquisitions and lease amendment or termination activities. Management believes that FFO as adjusted provides a meaningful supplemental measurement of our FFO run-rate and is frequently used by analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of our performance as a

  • REIT. At the same time that NAREIT created and defined its FFO measure for the REIT industry, it also recognized that “management of each of its member

companies has the responsibility and authority to publish financial information that it regards as useful to the financial community.” We believe stockholders, potential investors and financial analysts who review our operating performance are best served by an FFO run-rate earnings measure that includes, in addition to adjustments made to arrive at the NAREIT defined measure of FFO, other adjustments to net income (loss). FFO as adjusted is used by management in analyzing

  • ur business and the performance of our properties, and we believe it is important that stockholders, potential investors and financial analysts understand this

measure used by management. We use FFO as adjusted to: (i) evaluate our performance in comparison with expected results and results of previous periods, relative to resource allocation decisions, (ii) evaluate the performance of our management, (iii) budget and forecast future results to assist in the allocation of resources, (iv) assess our performance as compared with similar real estate companies and the industry in general and (v) evaluate how a specific potential investment will impact our future results. Other REITs or real estate companies may use different methodologies for calculating an adjusted FFO measure, and accordingly, our FFO as adjusted may not be comparable to those reported by other REITs. Net Operating Income from Continuing Operations (“NOI”) NOI and adjusted NOI are non-U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) supplemental financial measures used to evaluate the operating performance of real estate. We include properties from our consolidated portfolio, as well as our pro-rata share of properties owned by our unconsolidated joint ventures in our NOI and adjusted NOI. We believe providing this information assists investors and analysts in estimating the economic interest in our total portfolio of real estate. Our pro-rata share information is prepared on a basis consistent with the comparable consolidated amounts, is intended to reflect our proportionate economic interest in the operating results of properties in our portfolio and is calculated by applying our actual ownership percentage for the period. We do not control the unconsolidated joint ventures, and the pro-rata presentations of revenues and expenses included in NOI (see below) do not represent our legal claim to such items. The joint venture members or partners are entitled to profit or loss allocations and distributions of cash flows according to the joint venture agreements, which provide for such allocations generally according to their invested capital. The presentation of pro-rata information has limitations, which include, but are not limited to, the following (i) the amounts shown on the individual line items were derived by applying our overall economic ownership interest percentage determined when applying the equity method of accounting and do not necessarily represent

  • ur legal claim to the assets and liabilities, or the revenues and expenses and (ii) other companies in our industry may calculate their pro-rata interest differently,

limiting the usefulness as a comparative measure. Because of these limitations, the pro-rata financial information should not be considered independently or as a substitute for our financial statements as reported under GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP financial statements, using the pro-rata financial information as a supplement.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Defin init itio ions

2

NOI is defined as rental and related revenues, including tenant recoveries, resident fees and services, and income from DFLs, less property level operating expenses; NOI excludes all other financial statement amounts included in net income (loss). Management believes NOI provides relevant and useful information because it reflects only income and operating expense items that are incurred at the property level and presents them on an unleveraged basis. Adjusted NOI is calculated as NOI after eliminating the effects of straight-line rents, DFL non-cash interest, amortization of market lease intangibles, non-refundable entrance fees and lease termination fees (“non-cash adjustments”). Adjusted NOI is oftentimes referred to as “cash NOI.” We use NOI and adjusted NOI to make decisions about resource allocations, to assess and compare property level performance, and to evaluate our same property portfolio (“SPP”), as described below. We believe that net income (loss) is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to NOI. NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of operating performance to net income (loss) as defined by GAAP since it does not reflect various excluded items. Further, our definition of NOI may not be comparable to the definition used by

  • ther REITs or real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating NOI.

Operating expenses generally relate to leased medical office and life science properties and senior housing RIDEA properties. We generally recover all or a portion

  • f our leased medical office and life science property expenses through tenant recoveries. We present expenses as operating or general and administrative based on

the underlying nature of the expense. Periodically, we review the classification of expenses between categories and make revisions based on changes in the underlying nature of the expenses Same Property Portfolio SPP NOI and adjusted NOI information allows us to evaluate the performance of our property portfolio under a consistent population by eliminating changes in the composition of our portfolio of properties. We include properties from our consolidated portfolio, as well as properties owned by our unconsolidated joint ventures in our SPP NOI and adjusted NOI (see NOI above for further discussion regarding our use of pro-rata share information and its limitations). We identify our SPP as stabilized properties that remained in operations and were consistently reported as leased properties or RIDEA properties for the duration of the year-over-year comparison periods presented, excluding assets held for sale. Accordingly, it takes a stabilized property a minimum of 12 months in

  • perations under a consistent reporting structure to be included in our SPP. Newly acquired operating assets are generally considered stabilized at the earlier of

lease-up (typically when the tenant(s) control(s) the physical use of at least 80% of the space) or 12 months from the acquisition date. Newly completed developments and redevelopments are considered stabilized at the earlier of lease-up or 24 months from the date the property is placed in service. SPP NOI excludes (i) certain non-property specific operating expenses that are allocated to each operating segment on a consolidated basis and (ii) entrance fees and related activity such as deferred expenses, reserves and management fees related to entrance fees. A property is removed from our SPP when it is sold, placed into redevelopment or changes its reporting structure.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Non

  • n-GAAP R

Reconcilia iliatio ions

3

Projected Cash NOI(1) Dollars in thousands (Unaudited)

For the projected mid-point full year 2017: Senior Housing Triple-net SHOP Life Science Medical Office Other Total Cash (adjusted) NOI $ 311,700 $ 261,700 $ 270,700 $ 279,700 $ 126,700 $ 1,250,500 Non-cash adjustments to NOI(2) 1,000 (20,000 ) (750 ) 3,050 5,600 (11,100 ) NOI $ 312,700 $ 241,700 $ 269,950 $ 282,750 $ 132,300 1,239,400 Other income and expenses(3) 224,000 Costs and expenses(4) (929,800 ) Net income $ 533,600

Projected Future Operations(1) (Unaudited)

Full Year 2016 Full Year 2017 Low High Low High Diluted earnings per common share $ 1.49 $ 1.55 $ 1.07 $ 1.13 Depreciation and amortization 1.20 1.20 1.11 1.11 Other depreciation and amortization 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 Taxes associated with real estate disposition 0.11 0.11 — — Gain on sales of real estate (0.54) (0.54) (0.43) (0.43) Joint venture FFO adjustments 0.06 0.06 0.11 0.11 Diluted FFO per common share $ 2.35 $ 2.41 $ 1.88 $ 1.94 Transaction-related items and other 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.01 Loss on extinguishment of debt(5) 0.10 0.10 — — Severance-related charges(6) 0.03 0.03 — — Diluted FFO as adjusted per common share $ 2.69 $ 2.75 $ 1.89 $ 1.95

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Non

  • n-GAAP R

Reconcilia iliatio ions

4

Projected SPP NOI and SPP Cash NOI(1) Dollars in thousands (Unaudited)

For the projected full year 2016 (low):

Senior Housing Triple-net SHOP Life Science Medical Office Other QCP Total NOI $ 416,800 $ 236,700 $ 289,700 $ 272,000 $ 123,700 $ 402,600 $ 1,741,500 Non-SPP NOI (22,700 ) (126,200 ) (38,600 ) (35,150 ) (27,850 ) (402,600 ) (653,100 ) SPP NOI 394,100 110,500 251,100 236,850 95,850 — 1,088,400 Non-cash adjustments to SPP NOI(2) (11,200 ) — 1,500 (250 ) (900 ) — (10,850 ) SPP cash (adjusted) NOI $ 382,900 $ 110,500 $ 252,600 $ 236,600 $ 94,950 $ — 1,077,550 Addback adjustments(7) 663,950 Other income and expenses(3) 253,000 Costs and expenses(4) (1,286,700 ) Net income $ 707,800

For the projected full year 2016 (high):

Senior Housing Triple-net SHOP Life Science Medical Office Other QCP Total NOI $ 421,100 $ 238,500 $ 292,500 $ 274,600 $ 124,900 $ 408,500 $ 1,760,100 Non-SPP NOI (23,000 ) (126,950 ) (39,000 ) (35,450 ) (28,100 ) (408,500 ) (661,000 ) SPP NOI 398,100 111,550 253,500 239,150 96,800 — 1,099,100 Non-cash adjustments to SPP NOI(2) (11,400 ) — 1,500 (250 ) (900 ) — (11,050 ) SPP cash (adjusted) NOI $ 386,700 $ 111,550 $ 255,000 $ 238,900 $ 95,900 $ — $ 1,088,050 Addback adjustments(7) 672,050 Other income and expenses(3) 257,200 Costs and expenses(4) (1,282,500 ) Net income $ 734,800

For the year ended December 31, 2015:

Senior Housing Triple-net SHOP Life Science Medical Office Other QCP Total NOI $ 424,841 $ 178,706 $ 278,261 $ 254,555 $ 119,474 $ 598,254 $ 1,854,091 Non-SPP NOI (31,890 ) (72,191 ) (36,106 ) (20,774 ) (24,941 ) (598,254 ) (784,156 ) SPP NOI 392,951 106,515 242,155 233,781 94,533 — 1,069,935 Non-cash adjustments to SPP NOI(2) (11,929 ) — (6,630 ) (2,465 ) (291 ) — (21,315 ) SPP cash (adjusted) NOI $ 381,022 $ 106,515 $ 235,525 $ 231,316 $ 94,242 $ — 1,048,620 Addback adjustments(7) 805,471 Other income and expenses(3) 162,951 Costs and expenses(4) (1,113,712 ) Impairments, net (1,403,853 ) Impairment of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures (45,895 ) Net loss $ (546,418 )

Projected SPP NOI change for the full year 2016:

Senior Housing Triple-net SHOP Life Science Medical Office Other Total

Low

0.3% 3.75% 3.7% 1.3% 1.4% 1.7%

High

1.3% 4.75% 4.7% 2.3% 2.4% 2.7%

Projected SPP cash NOI change for the full year 2016:

Senior Housing Triple-net SHOP Life Science Medical Office Other Total

Low

0.5% 3.75% 7.25% 2.3% 0.75% 2.75%

High

1.5% 4.75% 8.25% 3.3% 1.75% 3.75%

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Non

  • n-GAAP R

Reconcilia iliatio ions

5

Projected SPP NOI and SPP Cash NOI(1) Dollars in thousands (Unaudited)

For the projected full year 2017 (low):

Senior Housing Triple-net SHOP Life Science Medical Office Other Total NOI $ 310,600 $ 240,500 $ 268,500 $ 281,400 $ 131,700 $ 1,232,700 Non-SPP NOI (18,200 ) (50,600 ) (37,300 ) (25,300 ) (20,450 ) (151,850 ) SPP NOI 292,400 189,900 231,200 256,100 111,250 1,080,850 Non-cash adjustments to SPP NOI(2) 650 — 6,200 (700 ) (4,450 ) 1,700 SPP cash (adjusted) NOI $ 293,050 $ 189,900 $ 237,400 $ 255,400 $ 106,800 1,082,550 Addback adjustments(7) 150,150 Other income and expenses(3) 220,500 Costs and expenses(4) (933,300 ) Net income $ 519,900

For the projected full year 2017 (high):

Senior Housing Triple-net SHOP Life Science Medical Office Other Total NOI $ 314,800 $ 242,900 $ 271,400 $ 284,100 $ 132,900 $ 1,246,100 Non-SPP NOI (19,550 ) (51,200 ) (37,900 ) (25,400 ) (20,550 ) (154,600 ) SPP NOI 295,250 191,700 233,500 258,700 112,350 1,091,500 Non-cash adjustments to SPP NOI(2) 650 — 6,200 (800 ) (4,500 ) 1,550 SPP cash (adjusted) NOI $ 295,900 $ 191,700 $ 239,700 $ 257,900 $ 107,850 1,093,050 Addback adjustments(7) 153,050 Other income and expenses(3) 227,500 Costs and expenses(4) (926,300 ) Net income $ 547,300

For the projected mid-point full year 2016:

Senior Housing Triple-net SHOP Life Science Medical Office Other QCP Total NOI $ 418,950 $ 237,600 $ 291,100 $ 273,300 $ 124,300 $ 405,550 $ 1,750,800 Non-SPP NOI (130,050 ) (55,000 ) (57,800 ) (22,700 ) (14,900 ) (405,550 ) (686,000 ) SPP NOI 288,900 182,600 233,300 250,600 109,400 — 1,064,800 Non-cash adjustments to SPP NOI(2) (5,100 ) — 100 (200 ) (3,400 ) — (8,600 ) SPP cash (adjusted) NOI $ 283,800 $ 182,600 $ 233,400 $ 250,400 $ 106,000 $ — 1,056,200 Addback adjustments(7) 694,600 Other income and expenses(3) 255,100 Costs and expenses(4) (1,284,600 ) Net income $ 721,300

Projected SPP NOI change for the full year 2017:

Senior Housing Triple-net SHOP Life Science Medical Office Other Total

Low

1.2% 4.0% (0.9)% 2.2% 1.7% 1.5%

High

2.2% 5.0% 0.1% 3.2% 2.7% 2.5%

Projected SPP cash NOI change for the full year 2017:

Senior Housing Triple-net SHOP Life Science Medical Office Other Total

Low

3.25% 4.0% 1.7% 2.0% 0.75% 2.5%

High

4.25% 5.0% 2.7% 3.0% 1.75% 3.5%

(1)

The foregoing projections reflect management's view of current and future market conditions, including assumptions with respect to rental rates, occupancy levels, development items and the earnings impact of the events referenced in this Appendix. These projections do not reflect the impact of unannounced future transactions, except as described herein, other impairments or recoveries, the future bankruptcy or insolvency of our operators, lessees, borrowers or other obligors, the effect of any future restructuring of our contractual relationships with such entities, gains or losses on marketable securities, ineffectiveness related to our cash flow hedges, or existing and future litigation matters including the possibility of larger than expected litigation costs and related developments. Our actual results may differ materially from the projections set forth above. The

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Non

  • n-GAAP R

Reconcilia iliatio ions

6

aforementioned ranges represent management’s best estimates based upon the underlying assumptions as of the date of this Appendix. Except as otherwise required by law, management assumes no, and hereby disclaims any, obligation to update any of the foregoing projections as a result of new information or new or future developments.

(2)

Represents straight-line rents, DFL non-cash interest, amortization of market lease intangibles, lease termination fees and adjustments for CCRC non-refundable entrance fees.

(3)

Represents interest income, gain on sales of real estate, other income, net, income taxes and equity income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures, excluding NOI.

(4)

Represents interest expense, depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, and acquisition and pursuit costs.

(5)

Prepayment costs associated with early retirement or payment of debt subsequent to the spin-off of Quality Care Properties, Inc. and RIDEA II transactions.

(6)

Severance-related charges primarily relate to the departure of our former President and Chief Executive Officer.

(7)

Represents non-SPP NOI and non-cash adjustments to SPP NOI.