HCFCs and HFCs An update from the SAP 29th Meeting of the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hcfcs and hfcs an update from the sap
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HCFCs and HFCs An update from the SAP 29th Meeting of the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HCFCs and HFCs An update from the SAP 29th Meeting of the Open-Ended Working Group of the Parties to the United Nations Montreal Protocol July 2009 Geneva, Switzerland Cochairs: Ayit-L Ajavon (Togo) Paul Newman (USA) John Pyle (UK) A.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

HCFCs and HFCs An update from the SAP

Cochairs: Ayité-Lô Ajavon (Togo) Paul Newman (USA) John Pyle (UK)

  • A. R. Ravishankara (USA)

29th Meeting of the Open-Ended Working Group

  • f the Parties to the

United Nations Montreal Protocol July 2009 Geneva, Switzerland

Today: Very brief summary of 2006 SAP finding and Findings since the assessment Findings of SAP 2006 report have been out for 2 years- assessed the HCFC issues.

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The 2006 SAP Synthesis Findings

ODS production ODS in the atmosphere Ozone levels-measured and predicted UV levels-measured and predicted

1980 Now 2100

ODS production Global ozone change Ultraviolet radiation change

(a) (b) (c) (d)

Ozone-depleting chlorine and bromine in the stratosphere

“There is even stronger evidence since the 2002 Assessment that the Montreal Protocol is working.”

HCFCs are one of the major non-CFC

  • zone depleting substances that are being

produced 2 OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Transition from CFCs to HCFCs

CFC production and emission greatly reduced Use of HCFCs, in place of CFCs, increased Use of HFCs in place of HCFCs and CFCs continued

3 OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Updates on HCFC emissions

Emissions of HCFCs have continued

HCFC-22 emissions continue to increase Reported emissions are roughly consistent with that estimated from atmospheric measurements.

Data from Dr. Stephen Montzka, NOAA, ESRL-GMD, Boulder CO

HCFC-142b reported emissions are smaller than those of HCFC-22. Emissions continue to increase slightly. Reported emissions are roughly consistent with that estimated from atmospheric measurements. HCFC-141b reported emissions are a third of that of HCFC- 22. Emissions continue to increase slightly. Reported emissions are not consistent with that estimated from atmospheric measurements.

4

OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Atmospheric Growth rates of HCFCs

Growth rate of HCFC-22 appears to be reasonably constant Growth rate roughly consistent with the reported emissions. Growth rate of HCFC-142b appears to be roughly constant. Growth rate roughly consistent with the reported emissions. Growth rate of HCFC-141b appears to be decreasing. Growth rate roughly consistent with the reported decreased emissions in the last few years.

Data from Dr. Stephen Montzka, NOAA, ESRL-GMD, Boulder CO 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

5

OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Trace gases other than CO2 are shown to be potentially as important as CO2 for long-term climate trends. The relative importance of the 30 or so trace gases included in this study depends on the

problem under consideration. The inferred CO2 increase from preindustrial to the present causes an equilibrium warming of the model surface by 0.5 K, which is amplified by 50% by CH4, CFCl3 (F11), CF2Cl2 (F12), and tropospheric ozone. For the projected increase from year 1980 to 2030, the other trace gases amplify the estimated CO2 warming of 0.7 K by about 110%: CFCl3, CF2Cl2, ozone, and CH4 each contribute in the 0.1–0.2 K range followed by N2O, CHClF2 (F22), CH3CCl3, and CCl4 in the 0.03–0.1 K range. Finally, on a per ppb basis, about 12 trace gases are identified to be important: CBrF3, C2F6 (F116), CHF3, and CF3Cl (F13) have greenhouse effects comparable to those of CFCl3 (F11) and CF2Cl2 (F12).

Climate forcing by ozone-related gases

Because ODSs are known to be strong climate gases, all substitutes for ODSs were checked for their climate forcing- i.e., climate friendliness

6 OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The 2006 SAP Synthesis Findings

Joint IPCC WG1/WG3/TEAP

Fossil fuel CO 2 HFCs HCFCs CFCs

Year

ODS contributions to climate forcing: ~7.5 Gt near 1990, about 33% of that year's CO2 emissions from global fossil fuel burning ~2.5 Gt near 2000, about 10% of that year’s CO2 emissions from global fossil fuel burning Montreal protocol has helped reduce global climate change

7

OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009

slide-8
SLIDE 8

World avoided by the phase out of ODSs by Montreal Protocol? Reduction Montreal Protocol of ~11 GtCO2-eq/yr 5-6 times global Kyoto target

Role of ozone depletion cooling due to CFCs? Could reduce this by perhaps a third.

CO2 emissions

Velders et al., PNAS, 2007

Benefits of Montreal Protocol for Climate

ODSs emitted into the atmosphere ODSs NOT emitted into the atmosphere

8 OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Contributions of HCFCs to ozone depletion and climate forcing

Reduction in HCFC emissions:

  • 12-15 GtCO2-eq potential reduction if replaced

with low-GWP alternatives or reduced through conservation/recycling. Ozone depletion by HCFCs Climate Forcing by HCFCs

HCFCs are small, but significant, contributor to ODS in the early 21st century. Their emissions are decreasing because MP actions!

Velders et al. 2007

9

OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Transition to HFCs

HFC

10 OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Montreal Sep 2007 adjustment: HCFC early phase-out

HFCs are “ozone safe”

HFCs do not contribute to ozone destruction via other functional groups in them

HFCs do not deplete the stratospheric ozone- good “ozone-friendly” substitutes HFCs do not contain chlorine, bromine, or iodine They do not lead to catalytic ozone destruction by halogen radicals Are there other environmental concerns with HFCs?--- Climate

Science, vol 263, pp: 71-75 11 OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009

slide-12
SLIDE 12

GWP-Weighted Emissions

The 2006 SAP Synthesis Findings about HFCs

HFC-23 emissions estimated from atmospheric measurements have increased from 6 Gg/yr in 1990 to about 13 Gg/yr in 2001 (an increase of approximately 120%). These are a byproduct of HCFC-22 production. HFC-23 mixing ratios (18 ppt in 2004) have continued to increase at approximately 0.7 ppt/yr (4%/yr) in 2001-2004. (SAP 2006) The atmospheric abundances of all measured HFCs are increasing due to their rapid introduction as CFC and HCFC replacements. HFC-134a reached 30 ppt in 2004 and increasing at 3.9 ppt/yr (13%/yr). Globally averaged HFC-125 and HFC-152a were ~3.1 ppt in 2004, increase by about 23%/yr and 17%/yr.

HFC emissions are expected to increase a great deal over the coming decades

Short lifetimes of HFCs mean that they will quickly respond to emission changes Their build up is not as large as for CO2 or other longer-lived gases for same emissions

12

OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Guus J. M. Velders, David W. Fahey, John S. Daniel, Mack McFarland, and Stephen O. Andersen, The large contribution of projected HFC emissions to future climate forcing, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 106:10949-10954, doi:10.1073/pnas.0902817106, 2009.

Future climate forcing by HFCs

If emissions remain unchecked, HFCs will be a significant and rapidly growing contributor to climate forcing in the next four decades

13 OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Substitutes for HFCs?

Examples of substitutes for high GWP HFCs include olefins Advantage: short lifetime, low GWP, e.g., CF3CF=CH2 or CF3CF=CHF substitutes for HFC-134a Lifetime <10 days, GWP of <5; compare with HFC134a: lifetime 14 years, GWP ~1400 Other issues to be considered: 1.Can it give TFA (a known toxic substance)? 2.Does it lead to ozone pollution production? 3.Can it lead to ODSs? 4.Can it lead to HFCs with higher GWP ?

Still needs some work to ensure safe substitutes for high GWP HFCs

TFA CF3CF=CH2 + OH CF3-C(O)-F H2O CF3-C(O)-H evaporation evaporation CF3-C(O)-H Removal/deposition

14 OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Summary

Montreal Protocol has successfully led to decreases in ODSs- primarily CFCs and methyl chloroform HCFCs, substitutes for CFCs, are currently increasing as HCFCs are phased down HFCs are “ozone-friendly” and they are being phased in to replace CFCs and HCFCs- they are growing very rapidly There was a major “climate benefit” to the phase out of ODSs There will be a non-negligible ozone layer benefit from phase down of HCFCs The climate contribution by HFCs can be very significant in the coming decades if emissions continue to increase Some climate-friendly short-lived substitutes for CFCs, HCFCs, and high-potency HFCs are available- their environmental friendliness needs to be established

15 OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Thank you for your attention

16 OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Vassileios C. Papadimitriou, Ranajit K. Talukdar, R. W. Portmann, A. R. Ravishankara and James B. Burkholder, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2008, 10, 808 - 820, DOI: 10.1039/b714382f CF3CFCH2 and (Z)-CF3CFCHF: temperature dependent OH rate coefficients and global warming potentials

17 OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009

slide-18
SLIDE 18

OEWG HCFC and HFC workshop, July 14 2009 18

Continues to increase rapidly Growth rate is not accelerating rapidly