HBT , Flow, Fluctuations etc.: Confronting Models with BES Data - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hbt flow fluctuations etc confronting models with bes data
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HBT , Flow, Fluctuations etc.: Confronting Models with BES Data - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HBT , Flow, Fluctuations etc.: Confronting Models with BES Data Hannah Elfner 28.03.19, EMMI Workshop, GSI, Darmstadt Introduction Dynamical Description of Heavy Ion Collisions Two regimes with well-established approaches FAIR Hannah


slide-1
SLIDE 1

HBT , Flow, Fluctuations etc.: 
 Confronting Models with BES Data

Hannah Elfner 28.03.19, EMMI Workshop, GSI, Darmstadt

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Dynamical Description of Heavy Ion Collisions

  • Two regimes with well-established approaches

3

FAIR

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Dynamical Description of Heavy Ion Collisions

  • Two regimes with well-established approaches

4

FAIR

‚Standard model‘ at high energies ( = 39 GeV-5.5 TeV+):

  • Non-equilibrium initial evolution
  • Viscous hydrodynamics
  • Hadronic transport

—> Refinement and 
 Bayesian multi-parameter analysis

√sNN

  • J. Putschke et al., arXiv:1903.07706
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Dynamical Description of Heavy Ion Collisions

  • Two regimes with well-established approaches

5

FAIR

At very low beam energies ( < 3 GeV):

  • Hadronic transport approaches
  • Resonance dynamics
  • Nuclear potentials

—> High density phase? 
 Multi-particle interactions?

√sNN

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Dynamical Description of Heavy Ion Collisions

  • Two regimes with well-established approaches

6

FAIR

  • How to interpolate between the two? Transport with

hydro bubbles? Hydro with transport corona?

  • How to model the phase transition/critical point?

Hadron transport at very low beam energies ( < 3 GeV)

√sNN

‚Standard model‘ at high energies ( = 39 GeV-5.5 TeV+) √sNN

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Collective Flow

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Spatial anisotropy

Collective Behaviour

  • Response of the system to initial spatial anisotropy

x y φ

No secondary interactions mean free path λ→∞ Hydrodynamic behaviour mean free path λ→0

✏ = hy2 x2i hy2 + x2i

Momentum anisotropy

v2 = hp2

x p2 yi

hp2

x + p2 yi

Interactions between particles

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Hybrid Approach

  • Initial State:

–Initialization of two nuclei –Non-equilibrium hadron-string dynamics –Initial state fluctuations are included naturally

  • 3+1d Hydro +EoS:

–SHASTA ideal relativistic fluid dynamics –Net baryon density is explicitly propagated –Equation of state at finite µB –Karpenko et al: 3+1d viscous hydrodynamics

  • Final State:

–Hypersurface at constant energy density –Hadronic rescattering and resonance decays within hadron transport

P . Huovinen, HP EPJ A48 (2012) 171 HP et al, PRC78 (2008) 044901, G. Gräf, J. Steinheimer and M. Bleicher, UrQMD-3.4 (urqmd.org) HP , arXiv:1404.1763 (special issue)

  • J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 41 (2014) 124005

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Differential Elliptic Flow

  • Overestimation at higher pT due to missing viscosity
  • Sensitive to particlization switching criterion
  • Hybrid approach reproduces small energy dependence
  • J. Auvinen and HP

, Phys.Rev. C88 (2013) 064908 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Interplay of Hydro + Transport

  • Initial non-equilibrium evolution compensates for

diminished hydrodynamic stage at lower beam energies

  • Contribution of late stage hadronic rescattering ~10%
  • J. Auvinen and HP

, Phys.Rev. C88 (2013) 064908 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

NA49 Data on Elliptic Flow

  • Elliptic flow for pions as

a function of transverse momentum:

– 40A GeV:

  • Pure transport and

hybrid approach give similar results

– 160A GeV:

  • Hadron transport

underestimates elliptic flow by a factor of 2

12

HP et al, Phys.Rev. C79 (2009) 054904

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Equation of State and IC Fluctuations

  • Symbols: Event-by-

event calculations

  • Horizontal lines:

Averaged results

  • Blue: Hadron Gas EoS
  • Black: Bag Model EoS

with first order phase transition

  • NO difference visible in

the centrality dependence of elliptic flow

HP et al, Phys.Rev. C81 (2010) 044906 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Viscous Hybrid

  • (Viscous) hybrid approach reproduces weak energy

dependence – Parameters are fitted to reproduce spectra and yields – η/s = 0.2 results in reasonable description of v2(pT)

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

v2/v3 Excitation Function

  • Elliptic flow also builds up in hadronic transport approach
  • v3 is more sensitive to the viscosity
  • Disappearance of v3 as a signal of the disappearance of the

quark-gluon plasma?

  • J. Auvinen and HP

, Phys.Rev. C88 (2013) 064908 15

Hydrodynamic response in ideal UrQMD hybrid approach Prediction of triangular flow in Karpenko viscous hybrid approach

see also, CERES, arXiv:1604.07469; STAR, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116

  • Y. Karpenko et al, Nucl.Phys. A956
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Directed Flow

  • Collective deflection of particles in reaction plane
  • Non-monotonic energy dependence of v1 slope

–First order phase transition?

16 sketch from ALICE, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 J.Brachmann et al., Phys.Rev. C, 61, 2000

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Directed Flow

  • Collective deflection of particles in reaction plane
  • Non-monotonic energy dependence of v1 slope

– First order phase transition? – No quantitative theory description so far, stopping dynamics, spectators…

17

  • S. Singha, talk at INT-16-3

STAR, PRL 112, (2014) 162301

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

v1 Slope for Pions and Protons

  • Particlization added including hadronic rescattering
  • Isochronous versus iso-energy density transition criterion

– Drastic effect on dip structure

  • J. Steinheimer, J. Auvinen, HP

, M. Bleicher and H. Stöcker, Phys.Rev. C89 (2014) 054913 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

HBT and Fluctuations

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

RO/RS Ratio

  • Idea: Softest point increases the lifetime of the system
  • NA49 and STAR data show a slight peak
  • Hybrid approach confirms larger ratio for first order

transition

20

  • Q. Li et al, Phys.Lett. B674 (2009)
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Pressure in Hybrid Approach

  • For different equations of state the pressure behaves

rather differently as expected

  • Initial time is the starting time (overlap time)

21

  • Q. Li et al, Phys.Lett. B674 (2009)
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

HBT Radii at SPS Energies

  • First order transition leads to larger radii

22

  • Q. Li et al, Phys.Lett. B674 (2009)
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

RO/RS Ratio

  • When are the particles freezing out?
  • First order transition leads to longer fireball lifetimes
  • Rather weak effect of EoS on HBT radii, finite viscosity

has similar influence

23

Y . Karpenko, WPCF 14 Hadron Production

  • n Hypersurface
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Higher Moments

  • Skewness and kurtosis show non-trivial energy dependence
  • New experimental results from BES II, cross-check between

fixed target and collider setup are crucial

  • Propagation of fluctuations through hydro, Cooper-Frye and

hadron cascade -> addressed in other talks at this meeting

24

  • M. Lorenz, QM 17,

STAR: X. Luo, PoS (CPOD 2014) 019

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Systematic Investigations within SMASH

  • Net charge distribution with p cut
  • Fluctuations are increased due to fluctuating particle

number in the full volume

25

Variance Kurtosis

  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

2

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0

Volume fraction 400 pions, production analytic, 1-6p(1-p) 0.3<p<2.0

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0

2/(<N +>+<N

  • >)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0

Volume fraction 400 pions, production analytic, (1-p) 0.3<p<2.0

HP at QM15, will be picked up and extended within SinoGerman DFG grant in 2019

slide-26
SLIDE 26

SMASH A Hadron Transport Approach

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Why a new Approach?

  • Hadronic transport approaches are successfully applied for

the dynamical evolution of heavy ion collisions

  • New experimental data for cross-sections and resonance

properties is available (e.g. COSY , GSI-SIS18 pion beam etc)

  • Philosophy: Flexible, modular approach condensing

knowledge from existing approaches

  • Goal: Baseline calculations with hadronic vacuum properties

essential to identify phase transition

27

  • Hadronic non-equilibrium dynamics is

crucial for – Full/partial evolution at low/ intermediate beam energies – Late stage rescattering at high beam energies (RHIC/LHC)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

SMASH*

  • Hadronic transport approach:

– Includes all mesons and baryons up to ~2 GeV – Geometric collision criterion – Binary interactions: Inelastic collisions through resonance/string excitation and decay – Infrastructure: C++, Git, Doxygen, (ROOT)

28

* Simulating Many Accelerated Strongly-Interacting Hadrons

Au+Au at EKin = 0.8 AGeV, b=3 fm

https://smash-transport.github.io

  • J. Weil et al, PRC 94 (2016)
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Pion Production in Au+Au

  • Potentials decrease pion

production, while Fermi motion increases yield

  • Nice agreement with SIS 


experimental data

29

  • J. Weil et al, PRC 94 (2016)

Note: consecutive addition of features

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Collective Flow -v2

  • Directed and elliptic flow are compared to available

data from FOPI and HADES

  • SMASH agrees well with previous UrQMD calculation for

v2 excitation function

30 HP et al, Phys.Rev. C74 (2006) 064908 by Markus Mayer

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Strangeness Production

  • Kaons and Lambdas in Ar+KCl:
  • Ongoing work: system size dependence and

predictions for pion beam and hyperon potentials

31

Kaons Λ’s

  • V. Steinberg et al., arXiv:1809.03828
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Effective N-particle Scattering

  • At higher densities multi-particle scattering becomes

important -> here: extreme limit

  • Above 0.3 GeV/fm3 local kinetic equilibrium is enforced

by replacing the distribution function with a thermal one

  • Spectra are more „thermal“ and strangeness enhanced

32

normal forced therm.

Tzz

L

Tyy

L

Txx

L

Tzz

L

Tyy

L

Txx

L

Au+Au, EKin = 2.0 GeV, b = 0

pressure [GeV/fm3] @ (0,0,0) in LRF

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

t [fm/c]

−5 5 10 15 20 25

normal forced therm

π+ p K+ π+ p K+

dN/mT

2 dmT

10−2 10−1 100 103 104 105

mT - m0 [GeV]

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7

Dmytro Oliinychenko, HP, JPG 44, 2017

tequi = 3 fm/c tequi = 1 fm/c

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

EoS and Hydro Comparison

  • Equation of state fits lattice hadron gas
  • Interpolation between transport and hydrodynamics

33

Dmytro Oliinychenko, HP, JPG 44, 2017

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Strangeness Production

  • Comparison of particle yields
  • Strange particle yields similar to hybrid results

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Strings and Stopping

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Initial Conditions: 3 Options

  • Color Glass/Gluon saturation approach

– Down to which energy do the assumptions hold?

– How to generalize this formalism to three dimensions and beam velocities smaller than the speed of light?

  • Hadron-string approach

– Can the string model reproduce the stopping mechanism

properly?

  • 3-fluid hydrodynamics

– Baryon-rich projectile and target fluids feed the fireball fluid

via source terms – Can these be used to provide an understanding of baryon stopping?

  • All possibilities need detailed exploration and data confrontation

36 THESEUS by P . Batyuk et al, Phys.Rev. C94 (2016)

To be addressed here

See e.g. L. McLerran, S. Schlichting, S. Sen arXiv: 1811.04089

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Moving to Higher Energies

  • High energy cross-section is dominated by string

excitation and fragmentation

37

  • Soft strings
  • Pythia is only employed for

fragmentation

  • single-diffractive, double

diffractive and non-diffractive processes

  • Hard strings
  • Fully treated by Pythia
  • All species mapped to pions

and nucleons

  • J. Mohs and S. Ryu
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Fragmenting Leading Baryons

  • Different parameters for the fragmentation function of

leading baryons to increase longitudinal momentum of protons

  • Slightly better agreement for Feynman x distribution

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Transverse Momentum

  • Benchmark in elementary collisions
  • Mean pT smooth behaviour as a function of beam energy
  • Work in progress: Find final set of parameters that allows

for best fit of pp data

39

PRELIMINARY

xF = pz pz,beam

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Results in pp

  • Fragmentation function, strangeness suppression and

diquark suppression tuned to reproduce data

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Results in AA

  • Baryon stopping well reproduced
  • At low beam energies, clusters have to be subtracted
  • Shape of pion spectrum agrees with data
  • Work in progress: Study influence of formation times and

cross-section scaling factors

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

How to SMASH?

  • Visit the webpage to find publications


https://smash-transport.github.io

  • Download the code at 


https://github.com/smash-transport/smash

  • Checkout the Analysis Suite at 


http://theory.gsi.de/~smash/analysis_suite/SMASH-1.5/

  • Find user guide and documentation at


https://github.com/smash-transport/smash/releases

  • 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Summary and Outlook

  • Realistic dynamical approaches are the necessary link

between theory expectations and experimental measurements

  • Many observables simultaneously within one approach

– Elliptic and triangular flow more sensitive to viscosity than equation of state – Directed flow still requires quantitative understanding – HBT radii are sensitive to the phase transition – Fluctuation observables are very complex

  • SMASH is available as a new hadronic transport approach

– GSI-SIS 18 data nicely described – Download on Github https://smash-transport.github.io

– Work in progress: Understanding stopping with strings

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Backup

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Analytic Solution

  • Comparison to analytic solution of Boltzmann equation

within expanding metric

  • Perfect agreement proves correct numerical

implementation of collision algorithm

45

  • J. Tindall et al., PLB 770 (2017)
  • D. Bazow et al., PRL 116 (2016) and PRD 94 (2016)
slide-46
SLIDE 46

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Dilepton Production

  • SMASH and UrQMD compare very similar to data
  • Different vector meson thresholds at low masses
  • Adjusted branching ratios of N* and Δ resonances for ρ

peak

46

+ Stephan plot UrQMD

  • S. Endres et al., J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 426 (2013)

HADES, PRL 98 (2007)

  • J. Staudenmaier et al, PRC 98 (2018)

SMASH

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Medium Modifications

  • Dynamical collisional broadening is included in default SMASH

calculation

  • Coarse-grained transport evolution allows for full medium-

modified spectral function

  • First time: Comparison of both approaches based on the same

medium evolution

47

  • J. Staudenmaier et al, PRC 98 (2018)
  • S. Endres et al., PRC 92, 2015

  • R. Rapp et al, EPJA 6, 1999, PRC 63, 2001
  • J. Staudenmaier et al., PRC98 (2018)
slide-48
SLIDE 48

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

Photons

  • Perturbative photon production in hadronic scatterings of

pions and ρ mesons

  • Cross-sections calculated within effective field theory
  • Rates in thermal box nicely reproduced
  • Next: Photons from late non-equilibrium stage at RHIC/LHC

48

Turbide et al.: Int.J.Mod.Phys. A19 (2004)

  • A. Schäfer et al, arXiv:1902.07564

T=200 MeV

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Hannah Elfner EMMI Workshop Fluctuations 2019

η/s Energy Dependence

  • Viscous UrQMD hybrid fitted to beam energy scan and SPS

data allows to extract effective shear viscosity of the hydrodynamic stage

  • More insights on transport coefficients especially at finite µB

are needed

49

  • Y. Karpenko et al, Phys.Rev. C91 (2015)

Auvinen et al., PRC 97 (2018)

Analysis „by eye“ Bayesian framework