HAWC High Energy Upgrade with a Sparse Outrigger Array t h 3 5 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hawc high energy upgrade with a sparse outrigger array
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HAWC High Energy Upgrade with a Sparse Outrigger Array t h 3 5 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HAWC High Energy Upgrade with a Sparse Outrigger Array t h 3 5 I n t e r n a t i o n a l C o s m i c R a y C o n f e r e n c e 2 0 1 7 V i k a s J o s h i a n d A r m e l l e J a r d


slide-1
SLIDE 1

HAWC High Energy Upgrade with a Sparse Outrigger Array

3 5

t h

I n t e r n a t i

  • n

a l C

  • s

m i c R a y C

  • n

f e r e n c e 2 1 7 V i k a s J

  • s

h i a n d A r m e l l e J a r d i n

  • B

l i c q f

  • r

t h e H A W C C

  • l

l a b

  • r

a t i

  • n
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 2

Location : Puebla , Mexico Altitude : 4100 m above sea level Area : 22000 m2 Completed in March 2015 with 300 Water-Cherenkov Detectors.

Pico de Orizaba

The High-Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory (HAWC)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 3

Operates day and night. Large field of view : ~ 2 steradians Energy range : 0.1 - 100 TeV

γ/ p

Particle shower

The High-Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory (HAWC)

+

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 4

>10 TeV Showers at HAWC

Footprint of a ~10 TeV shower is comparable to the main HAWC array.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 5

Edge dominant

>10 TeV Showers at HAWC

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 6

Motivation for Outriggers

  • When

shower core falls

  • utside of the main array, it

can be mis-reconstructed as a lower energy shower closer to the array.

  • Which eventually affects :

➢ Direction reconstruction. ➢ Energy reconstruction. ➢ Gamma hadron separation.

So we have an uncertainty on the location of the shower. Main HAWC Array

True shower Mis-reconstructed shower

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 7

So how can we deal with this?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 8

So how can we deal with this?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 9

So how can we deal with this?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 10

HAWC Outrigger Array Description

  • A sparse outrigger array around the main HAWC array.
  • It is mainly optimized for energies > 10 TeV.
  • Increase in instrumented area by a factor of 4-5.
  • Consist of 350 outrigger tanks, with one Hamamatsu R5912 8" PMT in each of them.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 11

FADC Electronics for Outrigger Nodes

tank from the main array

  • utrigger tank

zone delimitation node

5 sections of 70 outriggers. For each Node:

  • 3 FlashADC cards:

➢ 12 bit FADC sampled at 250 MHz. ➢ Flexible digital multiplicity trigger.

  • 24 channels per card, 1 channel per
  • utrigger.

Flash Adc eLectronics for the Cherenkov Outrigger Node.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 12

Calibration of Outrigger PMTs

  • Full calibration of the PMT using

➢ A laser λ = 398 nm. ➢ HV = 1500 V. ➢ A 6db attenuator.

Time resolution Amplitude resolution

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 13

Sample Size = 4 ns

Typical Example Event

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 14

Typical Event Reconstruction

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 15

Fiducial Cuts for Outriggers

HAWC300 = 70 m HAWC+OR = 170 m

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 16

Core Resolution Comparison with and without Outriggers

  • The data points are at the 68% containment area value of (fit core – true core) histogram.
  • Fiducial cuts:

1> Energy Range : 0.3 TeV to 300 TeV. 2> Maximum zenith angle : 45 degree. 3> Minimum Number of Main Array Tanks Hit = 20.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 17

Trigger Effective Area Vs. Simulated Energy

  • MA Trigger

40 Channels. →

  • OR Trigger

At least 2 OR in any sub-section. →

  • MA+OR Trigger

MA trigger and OR trigger both, as well as only MA trigger. →

  • Area

Area of the simulated showers. →

  • Zenith angle < 13 degree.
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 18

Conclusions

  • What we will achieve with outriggers?

➢ More accurate determination of the core position (above 7TeV ~75% improvement). ➢ Increased trigger effective area above a few TeV by a factor of ~5.

  • Current status:

➢ The installation of outriggers is currently taking place. ➢ Software for combined analysis of outrigger + main array is being developed. ➢ Testing of FALCON with outrigger tanks is being performed on site.

  • Future plan:

➢ Merging of the outrigger system with the central readout system (late summer). ➢ Deployment of full outrigger array by the end of 2017. ➢ Start taking data from the beginning of 2018, enhanced sensitivity above 10 TeV.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 19

Thank You for Your Attention

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 20

Back Up Slides Back Up Slides

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 21

On Site Measurements

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 22

On Site Measurements

Measurement of the rate for a multiplicity 2 and 4, amongst 4 similar tanks.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 23

Trigger and Not Trigger Comparison for Outriggers

  • Total OR Hit

The total number of Outrigger got hit. →

  • Triggered OR Hit

The number of Outrigger got readout. →

  • Left panel is showing the profiles of Total OR hit and Triggered OR Hit with simulated

energy.

  • Right panel is showing the subtraction of these two profiles.
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 24

Outrigger Trigger Ratio with Energy

  • N_total

Total number of outrigger got hit. →

  • N_triggered

Total number of outrigger readout. →

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Vikas Joshi, HAWC Outriggers, ICRC 2017 25

Core Resolution Comparison with and without Outirggers

  • The data points are at the 68% containment area value of (fit core – true core) histogram .
  • Fiducial cuts:

1> Energy Range : 0.3 TeV to 300 TeV. 2> Maximum zenith angle : 45 degree.