Guidelines for MPA pressure evaluation - draft update Matti Sahla - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

guidelines for mpa pressure evaluation draft update
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Guidelines for MPA pressure evaluation - draft update Matti Sahla - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Guidelines for MPA pressure evaluation - draft update Matti Sahla & Lasse Kurvinen Parks & Wildlife Finland STATE & CONSERVATION 9-2018 Copenhagen, Denmark, 22-26 October 2018 Background At STATE & CONSERVATION 5-2016


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Guidelines for MPA pressure evaluation - draft update

Matti Sahla & Lasse Kurvinen Parks & Wildlife Finland STATE & CONSERVATION 9-2018 Copenhagen, Denmark, 22-26 October 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

  • At STATE & CONSERVATION 5-2016 Finland present ed a proposal f or harmonising

HELCOM MPA pressure evaluat ion.

  • Used in Finland while updat ing t he HELCOM MPA dat abase, in order t o maint ain

consist ency bet ween evaluat ions of dif f erent MPAs, since t here was no excist ing guidelines.

  • At STATE & CONSERVATION 7-2017, it was not ed t hat t he guideline might be f or some

part s out dat ed and Finland was invit ed t o present updat es t o t he draf t at STATE & CONSERVATION 9-2018.

  • The updat es can be classif ied in t hree classes:
  • 1. Edit orial changes t o t he language.
  • 2. Areal pressure evaluat ions have been modif ied based on new insight s f rom e. g. St at e of t he

Balt ic Sea – report .

  • 3. Some more dif f use pressures, which were based on areal analysis or where quit e vague in t he

earlier draf t , have been modif ied in a way t o capt ure t he direct ef f ect s on t he ecosyst ems.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Areal evaluat ions

  • Change of seabed substrate or morphology
  • High: The pressure af f ect s more t han 5% of t he MPA´s seabed OR it occurs in one or more areas

wit h not able species diversit y OR in known locat ions of t hreat ened species occurrence.

  • Medium: Pressure af f ect s 1-5% of t he MPA´s seabed, but NOT in areas wit h not able species

diversit y or in known locat ions of t hreat ened species occurrence.

  • Low: Pressure occurs in t he MPA, but af f ect s less t han 1%
  • f t he MPA´s seabed.
  • High: The pressure af f ect s more t han 1% of t he MPA´s seabed OR it occurs in one or more areas wit h

not able biological diversit y OR in known locat ions of t hreat ened ecosyst em component s.

  • Medium: Pressure af f ect s 0-1% of t he MPA´s seabed, but NOT in areas wit h not able biological

diversit y or in known locat ions of t hreat ened ecosyst em component s.

  • Low: Pressure might occur in very limit ed locat ions and in areas of low ecological import ance.
  • In t he Balt ic it has been est imat ed, t hat in t he high int ensit y areas physical loss covers 1-5%

, whereas t he average f or t he whole Balt ic is 1% (Helcom 2018).

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Disturbance or damage to seabed
  • High: The pressure af f ect s more t han 25%
  • f t he MPA´s seabed OR it has negat ive impact s t o one or

mult iple areas wit h not able species diversit y OR in locat ions wit h known t hreat ened species

  • ccurrences OR t he pressures int ensit y or f requency is having long-last ing ef f ect s on t he MPA.
  • Medium: The pressure af f ect s 10 - 25%
  • f t he MPA´s seabed, but it is NOT af f ect ing one or more

areas of not able species diversit y OR in known locat ions of t hreat ened species occurrence and t he pressures int ensit y or f requency is NOT causing long-last ing ef f ect s t o t he MPA.

  • Low: The pressure is occurring, but it af f ect s less t han 10%
  • f t he MPA´s seabed, and it is NOT
  • ccurring in one or mult iple areas of not able species diversit y OR in known locat ions of t hreat ened

species occurrence and t he pressures int ensit y or f requency is NOT causing long-last ing ef f ect s t o t he MPA.

  • High: The pressure af f ect s continuously more t han 25%
  • f t he MPA´s seabed OR it has negat ive

impact s t o one or mult iple areas wit h not able biological diversit y OR in locat ions wit h known t hreat ened ecosyst em component s.

  • Medium: The pressure af f ect s continuously 10 - 25%
  • f t he MPA´s seabed, but it is NOT af f ect ing one
  • r more areas of not able biological diversit y OR in known locat ions of t hreat ened ecosyst em

component s.

  • Low: The pressure is occurring, but it is inf requent and af f ect s less t han 10%
  • f t he MPA´s seabed,

and it is NOT occurring in any areas of not able biological diversit y OR in known locat ions of t hreat ened ecosyst em component s

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Diffuse pressures

  • Input of water
  • High: Input of wat er is signif icant ly af f ect ing one or more areas of not able species diversit y OR in

known locat ions of t hreat ened species occurrence (and lowered salinit y can be considered as a t hreat ening f act or).

  • Medium: Input of wat er is af f ect ing one or more areas wit h not able species diversit y OR in known

locat ions of t hreat ened species occurrence (and lowered salinit y can be considered as a t hreat ening f act or).

  • Low: Input of wat er is af f ect ing t he salinit y levels inside t he MPA, but it ´s not causing not able t hreat

t o t he species in t he area.

  • High: Input of wat er has caused regime shif t f rom marine/ brackish t o f reshwat er species composit ion.
  • Medium: Input of wat er has not ably shif t ed t he syst em t owards f reshwat er species dominance inside

t he MPA.

  • Low: Input of wat er is af f ect ing t he salinit y levels inside t he MPA, but is not causing not able t hreat t o

t he species in t he area.

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Change in water temperature
  • High: Act ivit ies af f ect not ably t o wat er t emperat ure in more t han 5%
  • f t he MPA OR af f ect t he

ecological condit ions in one or more areas wit h not able species diversit y OR in known locat ions of t hreat ened species occurrence.

  • Medium: Act ivit ies af f ect not ably t o wat er t emperat ure in 1 - 5%
  • f t he MPA´s wat er area.
  • Low: Act ivit ies af f ect not ably t o wat er t emperat ure in t he MPA, but af f ect in less t han 1%
  • f it s wat er

areas.

  • High: Act ivit ies af f ect t o wat er t emperat ure in more t han 5%
  • f t he MPA OR af f ect t he ecological

condit ions in one or more areas wit h high biological diversit y OR in known locat ions of t hreat ened ecosyst em component s OR has created a refuge for invasive species inside the MPA.

  • Medium: Act ivit ies af f ect not ably t o wat er t emperat ure in 1 - 5%
  • f t he MPA´s wat er area.
  • Low: Act ivit ies af f ect not ably t o wat er t emperat ure in t he MPA but af f ect in less t han 1%
  • f it s wat er

areas.

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Input of nutrients and organic matter
  • High: Input of nut rient s and/ or organic mat t er has not ably af f ect ed over 10 %
  • f t he MPA OR it has an

adverse ef f ect s on one or more areas wit h not able species diversit y OR in known locat ions of t hreat ened species occurrence OR t he pressures int ensit y or f requency is having long-last ing ef f ect s on t he MPA OR t he nut rient levels have increased f rom t he last evaluat ion.

  • Medium: Input of nut rient s and/ or organic mat t er has not ably af f ect ed 5 – 10 %
  • f t he MPA, but it is

NOT occurring in one or more areas wit h not able species diversit y OR in known locat ions of t hreat ened species occurrence and t he pressures int ensit y or f requency does NOT have long-last ing ef f ect s on t he MPA and t he nut rient levels have NOT increased f rom t he last evaluat ion.

  • Low: Input of nut rient s and/ or organic mat t er has not ably af f ect ed less t han 5 %
  • f t he MPA, but it is

NOT occurring in one or more areas wit h not able species diversit y OR in known locat ions of t hreat ened species occurrence and t he pressures int ensit y or f requency does NOT have long-last ing ef f ect s on t he MPA and t he nut rient levels have NOT increased f rom t he last evaluat ion.

  • High: The MPA shows clear signs of eut rophicat ion such as increased hypoxia at t he seaf loor OR shif t s t o

dominance of species benef it t ing f rom high nut rient cont ent .

  • Medium: Increased coverage of species benef it t ing f rom high nut rient cont ent .
  • Low: There are visible signs of eut rophicat ion, but t he ecosyst ems remain unaf f ect ed.
slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Input of contaminants
  • High: Coast al indust ry, harbor/ dock act ivit ies or oil handling f acilit ies cause signif icant discharges of

cont aminant s int o wat er inside or near t he MPA OR a pollut ing ship accident has occurred wit h signif icant ef f ect s OR dredging of cont aminat ed sediment has occurred.

  • Medium: Coast al indust ry, harbor/ dock act ivit ies or oil handling f acilit ies cause some discharges of

cont aminant s int o wat er or air inside or near t he MPA OR pollut ing ship accident has occurred wit h pot ent ial ef f ect s OR dredging of pot ent ially cont aminat ed sediment has occurred.

  • Low: Pot ent ial sources of cont aminant s are present in or near t he MPA, but no report ed spills has
  • ccurred.
  • High: Input of cont aminant s has caused observed physiological or behavioral changes t o t he species

inside t he MPA. Known discharges of cont aminant s are occurring in or near t he MPA.

  • Medium: Input of cont aminant s has caused pot ent ial physiological or behavioral changes t o t he species

inside t he MPA. Known discharges of cont aminant s have occurred in or near t he MPA and are pot ent ially st ored in t he sediment s.

  • Low: Pot ent ial sources of cont aminant s are present in or near t he MPA, but no report ed spills have
  • ccurred.
slide-9
SLIDE 9

www.facebook.com/ metsahallitus www.twitter.com/ metsahallitus

www.metsa.fi

lasse.kurvinen@metsa.fi