Grammar and graphical semiotics in early syntactic diagrams: Clark - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

grammar and graphical semiotics in early syntactic
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Grammar and graphical semiotics in early syntactic diagrams: Clark - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion Grammar and graphical semiotics in early syntactic diagrams: Clark (1847) and Reed-Kellogg (1876) Nicolas Mazziotta Universit de Lige


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Grammar and graphical semiotics in early syntactic diagrams: Clark (1847) and Reed-Kellogg (1876)

Nicolas Mazziotta Université de Liège & Universität Stuttgart

ICHoLS – Paris, 28 août 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Introduction Semiotic approach The notion of reification Graphical entities are complete signs Early syntactic diagramming Drawing syntax before syntactic trees Clark’s seminal work (1847) The successfull Reed/Kellogg system (1876) Logic of space : Case studies Subject-predicate relation Coordination Subordinate clauses Conclusion

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Introduction

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Introduction

Elements at study

◮ Focus on graphical depiction of syntactic analysis

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Introduction

Elements at study

◮ Focus on graphical depiction of syntactic analysis ◮ The diagrams at study date from the 19th C. in the US, before current

syntactic trees

◮ Paradigm-shift from morphology to syntax ◮ Focus on the “deep structure” (often, word order is abstracted away)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Introduction

Elements at study

◮ Focus on graphical depiction of syntactic analysis ◮ The diagrams at study date from the 19th C. in the US, before current

syntactic trees

◮ Paradigm-shift from morphology to syntax ◮ Focus on the “deep structure” (often, word order is abstracted away)

◮ Compared systems are similar from the point of view of grammatical

theory

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Introduction

Elements at study

◮ Focus on graphical depiction of syntactic analysis ◮ The diagrams at study date from the 19th C. in the US, before current

syntactic trees

◮ Paradigm-shift from morphology to syntax ◮ Focus on the “deep structure” (often, word order is abstracted away)

◮ Compared systems are similar from the point of view of grammatical

theory

Objectives

◮ Identify the graphical entities used to represent grammatical units in the

diagram

◮ Compare their behaviour

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Introduction

Elements at study

◮ Focus on graphical depiction of syntactic analysis ◮ The diagrams at study date from the 19th C. in the US, before current

syntactic trees

◮ Paradigm-shift from morphology to syntax ◮ Focus on the “deep structure” (often, word order is abstracted away)

◮ Compared systems are similar from the point of view of grammatical

theory

Objectives

◮ Identify the graphical entities used to represent grammatical units in the

diagram

◮ Compare their behaviour ◮ Evaluate the theoretical consequences

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Introduction Semiotic approach The notion of reification Graphical entities are complete signs Early syntactic diagramming Drawing syntax before syntactic trees Clark’s seminal work (1847) The successfull Reed/Kellogg system (1876) Logic of space : Case studies Subject-predicate relation Coordination Subordinate clauses Conclusion

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

The notion of reification

Various ways to represent the relations between words

◮ Some look different but are similar ◮ Some look similar but are (very) different

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

The notion of reification

Various ways to represent the relations between words

◮ Some look different but are similar ◮ Some look similar but are (very) different

Formal and semiotic analyses help...

◮ Identifying units inside a given system ◮ Comparing units across systems

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

The notion of reification

Various ways to represent the relations between words

◮ Some look different but are similar ◮ Some look similar but are (very) different

Formal and semiotic analyses help...

◮ Identifying units inside a given system ◮ Comparing units across systems

Conceptual units are turned into graphical entities

◮ They are reified (i.e. ‘turned into ojects’ Kahane/Mazziotta 2015) in the

diagram ⇒ The graphical entity is bound to the conceptual unit

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Graphical entities are complete signs

A stroke is not a mere stroke :

it is a complete sign (form and value) (Billroth 1832 : 102) (Reed/Kellogg 1879[1876] : 62)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Graphical entities are complete signs

A stroke is not a mere stroke :

it is a complete sign (form and value) (Billroth 1832 : 102) (Reed/Kellogg 1879[1876] : 62)

Comparison

◮ words (conceptual units) are

reified by words

◮ relations (conceptual units) are

reified by strokes

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Graphical entities are complete signs

A stroke is not a mere stroke :

it is a complete sign (form and value) (Billroth 1832 : 102) (Reed/Kellogg 1879[1876] : 62)

Comparison

◮ words (conceptual units) are

reified by words

◮ relations (conceptual units) are

reified by strokes

◮ words are reified by labeled

strokes

◮ relations are mostly reified by the

relative positions of words

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Introduction Semiotic approach The notion of reification Graphical entities are complete signs Early syntactic diagramming Drawing syntax before syntactic trees Clark’s seminal work (1847) The successfull Reed/Kellogg system (1876) Logic of space : Case studies Subject-predicate relation Coordination Subordinate clauses Conclusion

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Early syntactic diagramming

Continuity between Clark 1847 and Reed/Kellogg 1876

Most diagrams seem to reify words rather than relations (Clark 1847 : 23)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Early syntactic diagramming

Continuity between Clark 1847 and Reed/Kellogg 1876

Most diagrams seem to reify words rather than relations (Chandler 1860 : 153, apud Brittain 1973)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Early syntactic diagramming

Continuity between Clark 1847 and Reed/Kellogg 1876

Most diagrams seem to reify words rather than relations (Jewell 1861 : 17, apud Brittain 1973)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Early syntactic diagramming

Continuity between Clark 1847 and Reed/Kellogg 1876

Most diagrams seem to reify words rather than relations (Burtt 1869 : 265, apud Brittain 1973)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Early syntactic diagramming

Continuity between Clark 1847 and Reed/Kellogg 1876

Most diagrams seem to reify words rather than relations (Lighthall 1872 : 50, apud Brittain 1973)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Early syntactic diagramming

Continuity between Clark 1847 and Reed/Kellogg 1876

Most diagrams seem to reify words rather than relations (Reed/Kellogg 1879[1876] : 81)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Clark’s seminal work (1847)

General rules

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Clark’s seminal work (1847)

General rules

◮ The sentence is a combination of a subject, a predicate and, optionally,

an object (Clark 1870 : 49) Horizontally arranged bubbles

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Clark’s seminal work (1847)

General rules

◮ The sentence is a combination of a subject, a predicate and, optionally,

an object

◮ These elements can be complemented by adjuncts

(Clark 1847 : 23) Vertically connected bubbles (recursive)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Clark’s seminal work (1847)

General rules

◮ The sentence is a combination of a subject, a predicate and, optionally,

an object

◮ These elements can be complemented by adjuncts ◮ Preprositional phrases are a combination of a preposition (leader) and

a noun (subsequent) (Clark 1847 : 23) Vertically connected bubble for the leader, horizontally arranged with its subsequent

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

The successfull Reed/Kellogg system (1876)

General rules

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

The successfull Reed/Kellogg system (1876)

General rules

◮ The sentence is a combination of a subject, a predicate optionally

containing an object (Reed/Kellogg 1879[1876] : 17) Horizontally arranged strokes

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

The successfull Reed/Kellogg system (1876)

General rules

◮ The sentence is a combination of a subject, a predicate optionally

containing an object

◮ These elements can be complemented by modifiers

(Reed/Kellogg 1879[1876] : 34) Vertically connected strokes (recursive)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

The successfull Reed/Kellogg system (1876)

General rules

◮ The sentence is a combination of a subject, a predicate optionally

containing an object

◮ These elements can be complemented by modifiers ◮ Prepositional phrases are a combination of a preposition and a noun

(Reed/Kellogg 1879[1876] : 62) Vertically connected stroke for the preposition, horizontally arranged with the noun

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Early syntactic diagramming

The rationales in Clark 1847 and Reed/Kellogg 1876 are roughly the same

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Early syntactic diagramming

The rationales in Clark 1847 and Reed/Kellogg 1876 are roughly the same

◮ Distinction between principal parts and adjuncts/modifiers ◮ Hybrid status for prepositional phrases

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Early syntactic diagramming

The rationales in Clark 1847 and Reed/Kellogg 1876 are roughly the same

◮ Distinction between principal parts and adjuncts/modifiers ◮ Hybrid status for prepositional phrases

Visual entities differ

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Early syntactic diagramming

The rationales in Clark 1847 and Reed/Kellogg 1876 are roughly the same

◮ Distinction between principal parts and adjuncts/modifiers ◮ Hybrid status for prepositional phrases

Visual entities differ

◮ Clark : words are represented by bubbles (bidimensonal)

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Early syntactic diagramming

The rationales in Clark 1847 and Reed/Kellogg 1876 are roughly the same

◮ Distinction between principal parts and adjuncts/modifiers ◮ Hybrid status for prepositional phrases

Visual entities differ

◮ Clark : words are represented by bubbles (bidimensonal) ◮ Reed/Kellogg : words are represented by strokes with a specific angle

(monodimensional)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Early syntactic diagramming

The rationales in Clark 1847 and Reed/Kellogg 1876 are roughly the same

◮ Distinction between principal parts and adjuncts/modifiers ◮ Hybrid status for prepositional phrases

Visual entities differ

◮ Clark : words are represented by bubbles (bidimensonal) ◮ Reed/Kellogg : words are represented by strokes with a specific angle

(monodimensional)

What are the consequences ?

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Introduction Semiotic approach The notion of reification Graphical entities are complete signs Early syntactic diagramming Drawing syntax before syntactic trees Clark’s seminal work (1847) The successfull Reed/Kellogg system (1876) Logic of space : Case studies Subject-predicate relation Coordination Subordinate clauses Conclusion

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Subject-predicate relation

Clark

(Clark 1870 : 49)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Subject-predicate relation

Clark

(Clark 1870 : 49)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Subject-predicate relation

Reed/Kellogg

(Reed/Kellogg 1879[1876] : 17)

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Subject-predicate relation

Reed/Kellogg

(Reed/Kellogg 1879[1876] : 17) “I will draw on the board a heavy, or shaded, line, and divide it into two parts [. . . ] I will consider the first part as a sign of the subject of a sentence, and the second part as a sign of the predicate

  • f a sentence.” (Reed/Kellogg 1879[1876] : 17)
slide-42
SLIDE 42

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Subject-predicate relation

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Subject-predicate relation

Comparison

◮ Clark : two entities (bubbles) arranged horizontally

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Subject-predicate relation

Comparison

◮ Clark : two entities (bubbles) arranged horizontally ◮ Reed/Kellogg : three entities (strokes), including a specific entity for

the Subject/Predicate relation

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Subject-predicate relation

Comparison

◮ Clark : two entities (bubbles) arranged horizontally ◮ Reed/Kellogg : three entities (strokes), including a specific entity for

the Subject/Predicate relation ⇒ Using strokes offers no solution but to introduce an additional entity

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Coordination

Clark

(Clark 1847 : 24)

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Coordination

Clark

(Clark 1847 : 24)

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Coordination

Reed/Kellogg

(Reed/Kellogg 1879[1876] : 48)

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Coordination

Reed/Kellogg

(Reed/Kellogg 1879[1876] : 48) “The short line following the subject line represents the entire predicate, and is supposed to be continued in the three horizontal lines that follow, each of which represents one of the parts of the compound predicate. These lines are united by dotted lines, which stand for the connecting words. The × denotes that an and is understood.” (Reed-Kellogg 1879[1876] : 47-48)

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Coordination

Comparison

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Coordination

Comparison

◮ Clark : no more entities than words

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Coordination

Comparison

◮ Clark : no more entities than words ◮ Reed-Kellogg :

◮ one entity reifies independently the “entire predicate”,

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Coordination

Comparison

◮ Clark : no more entities than words ◮ Reed-Kellogg :

◮ one entity reifies independently the “entire predicate”, ◮ other strokes reify its “parts” and are linked by lighter strokes reifying the

part-whole structure

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Coordination

Comparison

◮ Clark : no more entities than words ◮ Reed-Kellogg :

◮ one entity reifies independently the “entire predicate”, ◮ other strokes reify its “parts” and are linked by lighter strokes reifying the

part-whole structure

◮ the special relational status of the conjunction is symbolically rendered

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Coordination

Comparison

◮ Clark : no more entities than words ◮ Reed-Kellogg :

◮ one entity reifies independently the “entire predicate”, ◮ other strokes reify its “parts” and are linked by lighter strokes reifying the

part-whole structure

◮ the special relational status of the conjunction is symbolically rendered

⇒ Using strokes with a specific angle offers no solution but to introduce an additional entity

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Subordinate clauses

Clark

(Clark 1870 : 47)

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Subordinate clauses

Clark

(Clark 1870 : 47)

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Subordinate clauses

Reed/Kellogg

(Reed/Kellogg 1879[1876] : 137)

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Subordinate clauses

Reed/Kellogg

(Reed/Kellogg 1879[1876] : 137) “As this [sentence] subject cannot, in its proper form, be written

  • n the subject line, it is placed above, and, by means of a support,

the [sentence] diagram is made to rest on the subject line.” (Reed/Kellogg 1879[1876] : 107)

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Subordinate clauses

Comparison

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Subordinate clauses

Comparison

◮ Clark : one bubble per word + one bubble for the sentence used as a

constituent

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Subordinate clauses

Comparison

◮ Clark : one bubble per word + one bubble for the sentence used as a

constituent

◮ Reed-Kellogg : additional symbolic stroke between the sentence as a

constituents and its decomposition

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Subordinate clauses

Comparison

◮ Clark : one bubble per word + one bubble for the sentence used as a

constituent

◮ Reed-Kellogg : additional symbolic stroke between the sentence as a

constituents and its decomposition ⇒ The monodimensionality of strokes does not allow to depict inclusion in an iconic way

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Introduction Semiotic approach The notion of reification Graphical entities are complete signs Early syntactic diagramming Drawing syntax before syntactic trees Clark’s seminal work (1847) The successfull Reed/Kellogg system (1876) Logic of space : Case studies Subject-predicate relation Coordination Subordinate clauses Conclusion

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Consequences of using strokes with a specific angle

◮ it makes it impossible not to reify intermediate units (relations) ◮ it emphasizes the reified expression of part-whole relations

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Conclusion

Grammatical theory and graphical conventions

◮ Interfere with one another ◮ Conceptual units are reified ◮ The choice of the graphical conventions constrain what can be

expressed and how

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Introduction Semiotic approach Early syntactic diagramming Logic of space : Case studies Conclusion

Conclusion

Grammatical theory and graphical conventions

◮ Interfere with one another ◮ Conceptual units are reified ◮ The choice of the graphical conventions constrain what can be

expressed and how

History of syntactic diagramming

◮ Necessitates a semiotic analysis that break down diagrams into entities ◮ Shows the evolution between similar systems

nicolas.mazziotta@ulg.ac.be