gra raph coherent st states tes in loo oop quantum um gra
play

gra raph coherent st states tes in loo oop quantum um gra ravi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

gra raph coherent st states tes in loo oop quantum um gra ravi vity ty Mehdi Assanioussi II. Institute for Th. Physics, University of Hamburg Jurekfest, September 2019 Problem lems to s solve I. Dynamics in LQG II. Coherent


  1. gra raph coherent st states tes in loo oop quantum um gra ravi vity ty Mehdi Assanioussi II. Institute for Th. Physics, University of Hamburg Jurekfest, September 2019

  2. Problem lems to s solve I. Dynamics in LQG II. Coherent states & semi-classical limit in LQG III. Matter fields coupling in LQG IV. LQG cosmology V. Black holes in LQG VI. ...

  3. Warsaw L LQG Co Commando On t the m e move.. e...

  4. … We a e are n e not d done ne yet!

  5. Pla lan o of t f the t talk lk I. Motivation II. Graph coherent states i. Construction concept ii. Example 1: closed loops in the U(1) gauge theory iii. Example 2: closed loops in non-Abelian gauge th s . III. Concluding comments

  6. I. M . Motiv tivati tion on

  7. Graphs in in L LQG QG Graph change? 2

  8. Graphs in in L LQG QG Graph change? Graph superposition Physical solution? Continuum limit? Semi-classical limit? 2

  9. Coherent ent s states es in in L LQG QG Spins Intertwiners e.g.: complexifier (Area) coherent states e.g: Livine-Speziale coherent intertwiners Coherent states Graphs ??? 4

  10. II. G . Graph c coh oherent erent states tes i . Con onstr struc uction on con oncep ept

  11. Construction concept 1 Define a graph change on a colored graph: exp.: 2 Construct the structure of a harmonic oscillator space: exp.: New coherent states (graph coherent states); 5

  12. Construction concept + Key observation: A (generic) graph change (with a “finite structure”) provides a decomposition of the into separable subspaces , which are stable under the action of the operators inducing such graph change. - ancestor graphs: colored graphs with no graph “excitation” 6

  13. II. G . Graph c coh oherent erent states tes ii. Example 1: closed loops in the U(1) gauge theory

  14. Example 1: closed loops in the U(1) gauge theory Closed loop graph excitation 7

  15. Example 1: closed loops in the U(1) gauge theory Canonical structure: + Annihilation & creation operators + Wedge coherent states + Graph coherent states 8

  16. Example 1: closed loops in the U(1) gauge theory Operators correspondence: + Closed loop holonomies + fluxes 9

  17. Graph coherent states I: Maxwell Field Coherence properties: + Expectation values: + Relative variances: 10

  18. Example 1: closed loops in the U(1) gauge theory Example of an observable: + Maxwell field Hamiltonian: “The action of the Hamiltonian at a vertex is reformulated as an action in a space of a finite number of Harmonic oscillators” 11

  19. II. G . Graph c coh oherent erent states tes ii. Example 2: closed loops in non-Abelian gauge theories

  20. Example 2: closed loops in non-Abelian gauge theories Hilbert space structure: + Decomposition of the Hilbert space: , , . . . 12

  21. Example 2: closed loops in non-Abelian gauge theories Canonical structure: + Generalized annihilation & creation operators Imposing 13

  22. Example 2: closed loops in non-Abelian gauge theories Canonical structure: + Generalized annihilation & creation operators Imposing 13

  23. Example 2: closed loops in non-Abelian gauge theories Canonical structure: Abelian case Non-Abelian case 14

  24. Example 2: closed loops in non-Abelian gauge theories Choice of canonical structure: + Non-uniqueness of vacuum states + Non-uniqueness of the mapping between G-tensors Graph coherent states: 15

  25. Example 2: closed loops in non-Abelian gauge theories Example of canonical structure: or . . . + Expectation values: + Relative variances: 16

  26. III. . Con oncludi ding ng com omments ts

  27. Concluding comments Comments on the construction: + The graph change Various valid graph changes, even “non-local” ones + Freedom in choice of vacuum states & tensor mappings adapting the choice of CS to the choice of observables + Canonical structure with fluxes 17

  28. Concluding comments Summary: ✔ New coherent states which exhibit graph coherence; ✔ The construction method applies to various graph excitations; ✔ Flexibility of the mapping on the intertwiner space; Outlook: Explore the dynamics of such states; Explore the possible choices of the intertwiners mapping; Explore different graph excitations for the purposes of investigating semi-classical and continuum limits

  29. Than ank you ou & Ha & Happy birt y birthda day!!! y!!!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend