GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 1 of 18
GPP 501 Microeconomic Analysis for Public Policy Fall 2017 Given - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
GPP 501 Microeconomic Analysis for Public Policy Fall 2017 Given - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
GPP 501 Microeconomic Analysis for Public Policy Fall 2017 Given by Kevin Milligan Vancouver School of Economics University of British Columbia Lecture November 1 st Public Goods: Theory GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 1 of 18 Review: What are the
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 2 of 18
Review: What are the two elements of a “public good”?
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 3 of 18
Agenda
- 1. The Samuelson model
- 2. Private provision of a public good
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 4 of 18
The Samuelson model
Paul Samuelson: “…one [person]’s consumption does not reduce some other [person]’s consumption.” The focus is on the rivalry aspect.
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 5 of 18
The Samuelson model
For regular private goods, how do we decide how much to produce? Look at costs of production (supply curve) Is any one person willing to pay what it costs to produce (demand curve) Why does this not work well for public goods?
Q p Q0 Q0 p0 Supply Demand
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 6 of 18
The Samuelson model
The key insight: we need to add everyone’s willingness to pay. Why? Because we all get to enjoy each others’ consumption, so it is as if we can sum what everyone is consuming. Let’s try this on a graph….
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 7 of 18
The Samuelson model
Imagine a public good G that has a marginal cost curve looking like this. Q: why does MC curve slope up?
𝐻
Marginal Cost Cost or Benefit
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 8 of 18
The Samuelson model
Now imagine person 1 enjoys a marginal benefit from each unit of G that looks like MB 1 (marginal benefit for person 1) curve. Q: why does this slope down? Q: how much public good would person 1 choose to buy?
𝐻
Marginal Cost MB 1 Cost or Benefit
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 9 of 18
The Samuelson model
Now imagine person 2 also is on the scene. Q: If there is just person 2, how much G would be purchased? Q: if both person 1 and person 2 are there, how much G would be purchased? (Tricky….)
𝐻
Marginal Cost MB 1 MB 2 Cost or Benefit
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 10 of 18
The Samuelson model
Now imagine there is also person 3 on the scene. Since we all benefit from anything that is consumed, the Samuelson rule says we should add
- ur marginal benefit curves together to find the
efficient amount of G.
𝐻 𝐻∗
Marginal Cost MB 1 MB 2 MB 3 MB 1 + MB 2 + MB 3 Cost or Benefit
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 11 of 18
The Samuelson model: Financing
The model so far tells us what is the right amount of G, but how do we pay for it? Let’s consider two ideas: Taxation: if we have to use distortionary taxation to fund the public good, would that push up or down the optimal amount of G? Lindahl pricing: Everyone pays according to his/her marginal benefit.
- But how do we find out the prices?
- Mechanism design / the ‘preference revelation problem’…
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 12 of 18
Private provision: game theory
Setup: Discrete public good costs $10. Each of two people value it privately at $8. If either agrees to purchase it, it is purchased. If neither, it is not. If they both contribute, they each pay $5. If only one contributes, he pays $10. Let’s represent this in a payoff matrix. The left-hand number is what Todd gets; the right- hand number is what Sally gets. Todd Contribute Don’t contribute Contribute 3,3 8,-2 Don’t contribute -2,8 0,0 Sally
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 13 of 18
Private provision: game theory
Q: What should Todd choose? Q: What should Sally choose? Q: What would a ‘social planner’ choose? Q: What is this game called? Todd Contribute Don’t contribute Contribute 3,3 8,-2 Don’t contribute -2,8 0,0 Sally
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 14 of 18
How to overcome the prisoners’ dilemma?
Option #1: Government provision… Upside? Downside?
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 15 of 18
How to overcome the prisoners’ dilemma?
Option #2: Repeated play… What needs to happen for this to work?
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 16 of 18
How to overcome the prisoners’ dilemma?
Option #3: Bundle a private good and a public good… Example: driver’s license bundled with jury duty. Example: get a gift when you make a charitable donation. Other examples?
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 17 of 18
How to overcome the prisoners’ dilemma?
Option #4: Social pressure Social norms: religion, politesse, etc. What happens in this () scene in the movie ‘Reservoir Dogs’? Does community size make any difference?
GPP501: Lecture Nov. 1st 18 of 18
Example Problem:
3 roommates, deciding on a Netflix subscription that everyone in their apartment can use. Addyson values it at $5 a month. Betty values it at $8 a month. Chuck values it at $3 a month. The cost is $9.99 a month. Q’s to consider. Is this a public good? Would a ‘social planner’ advocate this purchase? How would Lindahl pricing work here? Imagine everyone knows all the valuations and they use the following mechanism:
- They all write secret bids on a piece of paper, then reveal bids all at once.
- Each person assumes the others will be truthful, then chooses own bid to
minimize cost.
- What does each bid? Do they have enough for the Netflix subscription?
- What is a way they can get around the prisoners’ dilemma?