Governing Stoke-on-Trent: A study of system, economic and political - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Governing Stoke-on-Trent: A study of system, economic and political failure Michael Tappin

The Context Matthew Rice (MD Emma Bridgewater) quoted in the Daily Telegraph (23 rd Nov 2010) “If you go around Stoke these days there is (sic) lots of bare land where things have been demolished. I’ve no idea what it looks like in Helmand Province, But I get the feeling it would look a little like here.”

Political Career • 1980-84 Councillor Newcastle-u-Lyme • 1981-97 County Councillor Staffs CC Chair: Planning, Enterprise & Economic Development Committees • 1993-4 Chair West Midlands Strategic Planning Authority • 1985-94 Member Board West Midlands Development Agency

1994-1999 MEP Staffordshire West and Congleton • Member of Budget, Budget Control and Economic & Monetary Affairs Committees • 1995-9 Led for PES on Budget Control Com • 1994-9 President of Ceramic Inter-Group, championing the industry in North Staffs and Europe. Successful in gaining funding for the industry & preventing illegal Chinese imports into Europe

2001-6 Chair Stoke South PCT 2004-8 Councillor Stoke City Cabinet Member for Finance 2007-8 Leader of the Labour Group 2008-10 Member Transition Board

The Stoke Challenges • The spatial dimension • “It’s the economy, stupid.” • The problem of political institutions/governance • A broken political system?

The Spatial Dimension • Geographically constrained. Area 93 sq. km Tightly enclosed by Stafford (598), Staffs Moorlands (576), & Newcastle-u-Lyme (211) • Polycentric not Centre-periphery conurbation • 6 Towns: Hanley, regional shopping centre, Stoke, administrative hub. • 56 Villages • Creates a culture of social and political localism and local rivalry. Problem for governance.

Staffordshire - District Boundaries

Transportation • By passed by M6 • A500 the D Road only serves Stoke • Road networks poor • Public Transport poor: problem of linear city Consequence: 1. Communities isolated/insular. (56 villages) 2. Travel to work problematic 3. Access to public services problematic • Car ownership: 34% households without a car

“It’s the economy, stupid” • Oxford student. “I’m reading P.P.E.” Stokie: “What’s that mean?” Oxford student. “Philosophy, politics & economics, stupid” Stokie: “Well lad, here it means Pits, Pots and Engineering!”

The Stoke economy pre 1990 Stoke Economy 1939 2001 Smithies 256 0 Mines 13 0 Blast Furnaces 2 0 Potteries 350+ 50

Employment 1 1950s 2001 Ceramics 70,000 6,000 Steel 10,000+ 200 Mining 20,000+ 0 • 1951 Mining 8% Manufacturing 58% Total 66% England & Wales figure 40%

Employment 2 Industrial Base 1971-1981 • Trend away from manufacturing to service sector but only 2% of labour force • Manufacturing jobs fell by 28,000 • Ceramics down 12,000 jobs affected by over valuation of sterling • First of pit closures, Chatterley Whitfield • Stoke an “isolated” economy (self sustaining) • A counter cyclical economy

Employment 3 Industrial base 1981 -present • Shift from manufacturing and energy (coal) • Manufacturing employment below 20% • Ceramics decimated and outsourced • Mining gone • Rise in distribution and retailing employment

Chatterley Whitfield Colliery

Shelton Bar - Etruria

Unemployment • 1950s-60s, unemployment averaged 3% Below 2% and under 2,500 for most of the period. Labour shortage. Figures lower than the UK • 1970s-90s Varied between 10-20,000 or hovered around 15% • But unemployment mirrored the UK average

Unemployment: Latest figures • 55,550 on “Out of work” benefits in N. Staffs • Stoke-on-Trent: 35,860 (65%) (Feb 2009) • 24.1% working age population (17.8% W.Mids, 15.7% UK) • 15,350 not worked for 5 yrs or more (43% of those out of work)

Benefit Figures Of the 55,550 on benefit in N. Staffs • 28,470 Incapacity Benefit • 12,660 Job Seekers Allowance and ESA • 6,260 Income support The Culture of Contentment (Galbraith)

Educational attainment Percentage NVQ attainment of working age population Stoke W. Mids England NVQ Level 2 53.8 61.6 64.6 NVQ Level 3 32.3 42.3 45.6 NVQ Level 4 14.4 24.5 28.7

What is particularly frustrating about the housing issues in Stoke is that through their 'regeneration' agenda, they are in the process of creating an affordable housing problem via the demolition of the area's affordable housing.

The Problem of Governance Institutional Problems 1 • 1977-97 Powers to the County. 1. The emergence of County Government: Education, Social Services, Planning etc centralised at Stafford 2. District Council status for Stoke 3. Senior politicians go south 4. The second team remain in Stoke

Stoke-on-Trent Town Hall

Institutional Problems 2 • 1994-6 Powers back to the City OR NOT! The Options 1.Stoke Unitary Council 2.North Staffs Authority: Stoke, Newcastle, Moorlands, Stafford Borough(?) 3.Stoke and Newcastle The politicians are gutless! • 1996 Stoke becomes a Unitary Authority

The Problems of Governance Politics 1 • 1996 Elections: Labour 60 Rest 0 The arrogance of power • 2000-2002 The collapse of Labour Party dominance and the Mayoral campaign. • May 2002 Mayoral referendum: “Who’s afraid of the Big Bad Wolfe?” T.O 27.8% • Elected Mayor system approved 28,601 to 20,578. Wolfe becomes Elected Mayor

Politics 2 2002-2008 Labour declines still further • Election Seats Vote % 2002 21 40.75 2003 26 34.79 2004 30 35.74 2006 32 32.49 2007 24 30.57 2008 17 25.07

Politics 3 • The rise of the “Independents” and the BNP – “all politics is local” • The Conservatives stay grounded • 2005 Election of Labour Mayor • 2006-8 The Grand Coalition: Lab + Cons. Libs join in 2007 • 2009 Mayoral referendum (Again). T.O 19.23% Elected Mayor goes. Leader and Cabinet model.

Politics 4 2009 Council (60 Councillors) Labour 14 Lib Dems 5 BNP 7 City Indep 16 Cons 7 SoT Ind 2 Non-align 3 Libertarian 1 Ind 2 Potteries Alliance 2 • Ross Irving (C) Elected Leader of a coalition with the City Independents • Labour in opposition

Politics 4 2010 Council (60 Councillors) Labour 27 Lib Dems 4 BNP 5 City Indep 8 Cons 7 Community Voice 5 Libertarian 1 Inds 3 • Mohamed Pervez (Lab) elected leader of a coalition with Conservatives and Lib Dems • Opposition fragmented

Former Chief Executive – Steve Robinson

The Problems of Governance Administrative Leadership 2001-10 The paid service 6 Chief Executives Chief Education Officer leaves, SERCO appointed 5 Directors of Social Services/Adult Care 3 Finance Officers Over £6m spent annually on consultants from A budget of £212m

Problems of Governance Who Rules in Stoke? The Fragmentation of Decision-making • Renew: Housing Partnership • Local Strategic Partnership (LSP) Now Public/Private/Third sector + community. Agrees Local Area Agreement (LAA) • North Staffs Regeneration Partnership/LEP • City Council

A Broken Political System A Poorly Performing Council Education 80% indicators in bottom 2 quartiles 2007 34.6% 3A* GCSEs A-C(W Mids 42.7%, Eng 46.5%) 21% 16-18 yr olds Not in Emp / Ed or Training Employment 60% indicators in bottom quartile Health 70% indicators in bottom quartile. Life expectancy for men 73.7yrs (76.9) Women 79.9 (81.1) A baby boy born today will die 3 years earlier and a girl 2 years earlier than in the UK People in Stoke more likely to die of circulatory disease, cancer, respiratory diseases than elsewhere

A Broken Political System Safety 63% indicators in bottom 2 quartiles Community Engagement 82% indicators in bottom 2 quartiles. Audit Commissions Organisational health rating : 68/75 authorities Housing RENEW project to bring 50,000 houses up to modern standards

A Broken Political System Lack of Political Leadership • Quality of councillors poor • Lack of strategic thinking • Localised thinking Lack of Civic Capacity • A small middle class • Long term animosities in the political system

A Broken Political System Lack of Social Capital Partnership working poor. Although partners drawn together and strategies agreed, implementation has been poor. E.g recent announcement on cancelling the strategic partnership Poor economic regeneration. Where are the cranes, where are the jobs?

Governance Commission • Appointed Autumn 2007 • Chair Prof Michael Clarke • Terms of Reference: 1.“To consider options about future governance arrangements for S-O-T Council to deliver that strong, effective & accountable leadership that the city needs to address the economic, social and cohesion challenges which it faces.