glomerulonephritis with non organized non randall
play

Glomerulonephritis with non-organized non-Randall monoclonal Ig - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Glomerulonephritis with non-organized non-Randall monoclonal Ig deposits (PGNMID): French experience of 71 patients V. JAVAUGUE 1,4 , L. ECOTIERE 1 , P. JAMET 1 , S. BOUYER 2 , J.M. GOUJON 3 , S. BENDER 4 , J.P. FERMAND 5 , A. JACCARD 6 , G.


  1. Glomerulonephritis with non-organized non-Randall monoclonal Ig deposits (PGNMID): French experience of 71 patients V. JAVAUGUE 1,4 , L. ECOTIERE 1 , P. JAMET 1 , S. BOUYER 2 , J.M. GOUJON 3 , S. BENDER 4 , J.P. FERMAND 5 , A. JACCARD 6 , G. TOUCHARD 1 , C. SIRAC 4 and F. BRIDOUX 1,4 1 Nephrology, 2 Cytomety and 3 Pathology, CHU Poitiers; 4 CNRS UMR7276, Limoges; 5 Hematology, Saint Louis; 6 Hematology, CHU Limoges Montreal, May 23, 2019

  2. Disclosures None

  3. Previous studies More than 20 case reports and small series 1985 2004 2011 2015 2018 2009 2017

  4. Inclusion criteria • Patients with monotypic glomerular deposits (1993-2018) • Granular electron-dense deposits by EM, resembling immune complex GN • No clinical and biological evidence of cryoglobulinemia 71 patients Chemotherapy Symptomatic treatment n=35 n=21 Immunosuppressive therapy Undetected Detected n=15 B-cell clone B-cell clone n=20 n=15

  5. Clinical characteristics at presentation • Mean age: 59 years (rang : 24-86 years) • Renal presentation : - Renal insufficiency: 73% (CKD stage 3 = 50%, stage 4 = 33%, stage 5 = 17%) - Proteinuria: 100% (mean = 4.8 g/24h) - Nephrotic syndrome: 59% - Hematuria: 85% - Hypertension: 79% • Hypocomplementemia: 18% (low C3 +/- C4) • No extra-renal manifestation Renal-limited disorder

  6. Pathological findings (LM) 1 0 0 8 0 6 0 % 4 0 14% 2 0 75% 0 N N N G l G G P s i a M u g o n n a a r s b e M m 11% e M

  7. Pathological findings (IF) IgG-PGNMID (n=55) 1 0 0 77% 83% 8 0 10% % 6 0 6% 4 0 7% 13% 2 0 4% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 G G G G I g I g I g I g γ3 κ λ

  8. Pathological findings (EM) Subepithelial Mesangial Subendothelial 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 0 1

  9. Hematological characteristics at presentation IgA-PGNMID (n=4) IgM-PGNMID (n=7) LC-PGNMID (n=5) IgG-PGNMID (n=55) IFE+FLC 86% 75% 29% 80% IFE Abnormal FLC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 1 5 0 1 1 % % 1 % % B-cell clone? B-cell clone? 15% 100% 80% 75% Plasmacytic (n=4) Symptomatic MM (n=2) Symptomatic MM (n=1) Lymphoplasmacytic (n=4) CLL (n=2) Indolent MM (n=2) Plasmacytic (n=2) MZL (n=3) Unknown (n=1) MZL(n=2) Unknown (n=1) Unknown (n=47) The detection rate and the nature of the B-cell clone differ according to the subtype of PGNMID

  10. Treatment and outcome Clone detected with clone-directed therapy n=15 Whole cohort Chemotherapy No clone detected with empirical therapy n=20 1 0 0 • CyBorD n=13 IgG-PGNMID Renal survival IS therapy • RTX-CYC-D n=4 IgG-PGNMID Symptomatic • RTX-BorD n=3 IgG-PGNMID 5 0 Rituximab n=4 IgG-PGNMID CYC +/- Pred n=4 (IgG-PGNMID, n=3; LC-PGNMID, n=1) p =0,04 MMF n=3 IgG-PGNMID 0 Prednisone n=4 (IgG-PGNMID, n=3; IgA-PGNMID, n=1) 0 5 0 1 0 0 Months Proven or suspected Clone-directed cohort clone-directed approach 1 0 0 Renal survival seems effective 5 0 Clone detected n=15 IgG3k-PGNMID No clone detected n=20 n=18/20 p =0,09 0 0 5 0 1 0 0

  11. IgG3k-PGNMID : clone detection? Only patients with negative immunofixation and normal FLC at baseline Serum immunoblot Immunoglobulin Repertoire (n=20) Sequencing (n=12) IgG3k detectable in 11 cases

  12. RepSeq analysis (1 patient) vidjil 2017.03 Sensitivity of M-spike (IgGk) was detectable at one-year follow-up immunofixation?

  13. RepSeq analysis (11 patients) vidjil 2017.03 Is it really monoclonal in all cases: oligoclonal ? In progress…

  14. Conclusion • Renal limited disorder with constant proteinuria • Nature and rate of detection of B-cell clone varying according to the subtype of PGNMID • Clone-directed approach seems effective to improve renal outcome • Physiopathology of IgG3k-PGNMID is still unknown RepSeq analysis (bone marrow) vs. Proteomic analysis (kidney)

  15. Thank you Collaborators • APHP : • Bichat – Pr VRTOVSNIK • Cergy Pontoise – Dr MONTSENY • CHRU Tours – Dr GATAULT • Henri Mondor – Dr REMY, Dr STEHLE • Necker – Pr KNEBELMANN, Dr HUMMEL • CH Aix en Provence – Dr COZETTE • CH Avignon – Dr GOBERT • CHU Amiens – Pr CHOUKROUN, Dr LECAQUE • CH Bourg en Bresse – Dr TOUSSAINT, Dr ORFEUVRE • CHU Besançon – Dr BAMOULID • CH Boulogne sur Mer – Dr MESBAH • CHU Bordeaux – Dr RIGOTHIER • CH Cambrai – Dr MORABITI • CHU Clermont-Ferrand – Dr TIPLE, Dr GARROUSTE • CH Chambéry – Dr FOURCADE • CHU Dijon – Pr MOUSSON, Dr ZANETTA, Dr LEGENDRE • CH Douai – Dr CARDON, Dr MOREL • CHRU Lille – Pr HAZZAN, Dr PROVOT, Dr FRIMAT • CH Dunkerque – Dr BEAUMONT • CH Metz – Dr MAURIER, Dr MOUGENOT, Dr GUERARD • CHU Lyon – Dr NOUVIER, Dr KARLIN, Dr CARDOZO • CH Montceau les mines – Dr MONARD • CHU Rouen – Dr POUSSART, Dr KHUZAIE • CH Périgueux – Dr QUERON • CHU Toulouse – Dr RIBES, Dr MEHRENBERGER • CH Roubaix – Dr LE MONIES • CH Tournai – Dr MADHOUN • CH Valenciennes – Dr VANHILLE, Dr ULRICH, Dr LEMOINE

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend