Globally Polarized Quark Gluon Plasma in Non-Central A+A Collisions - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

globally polarized quark gluon plasma in non central a a
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Globally Polarized Quark Gluon Plasma in Non-Central A+A Collisions - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The 9th Workshop on Hadron physics in China and Opportunities Worldwide Globally Polarized Quark Gluon Plasma in Non-Central A+A Collisions at High Energies (Liang Zuo-tang) (School of physics, Shandong


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

The 9th Workshop on Hadron physics in China and Opportunities Worldwide

Globally Polarized Quark Gluon Plasma in Non-Central A+A Collisions at High Energies

梁作堂 (Liang Zuo-tang) 山东大学物理学院 (School of physics, Shandong University) 2017年7月25日,南京 July 25, 2017, NanJing

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

The 9th Workshop on Hadron physics in China and Opportunities Worldwide

STAR Collaboration, arXiv:1701.06657[nucl-exp] to appear in Nature (2017).

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

Outline

Ø Introduction Ø Orbital angular momentum of QGP in non-central AA collisions Ø Global polarization of QGP in non-central AA collisions Ø Direct consequences: Hyperon polarization & vector meson spin alignment Ø Measurements and results Ø Further discussions and developments Ø Summary and out look

ZTL & Xin-Nian Wang, PRL 94 (2005), Phys. Lett. B629 (2005); Jian-Hua Gao, Shou-Wan Chen, Wei-Tian Deng, ZTL, Qun Wang, Xin-Nian Wang, PRC77 (2008). ZTL, plenary talk at the 19th Inter. Conf. on Ultra-Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions (QM2006).

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2017年7月24-28日,南京

Hadron2017 4

Introduction

Nuclear physics: Nuclear shell model and L-S-coupling Condensed matter physics: Spintronics High energy physics: proton’s spin crisis

Spin effects usually provide us with useful information and often surprises.

Much more …....... Examples:

p+ p/ A→ Λ+ X

p(↑)+ p→ p+ p

Ø Since 1970s: Transverse polarization of hyperon in unpolarized pp or pA collisions; Ø Since 1970s: Single-spin left-right asymmetry in inclusive production Ø Since 1970s: Spin analyzing power in pp elastic scattering

p(↑)+ p→π + X p(↑)+ p→ p+ p

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2017年7月24-28日,南京

Hadron2017 5

Introduction

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2017年7月24-28日,南京

Hadron2017 6

Introduction

Do spin physics in AA collisions without polarizing A ?

heavy ion collider polarized pp collider heavy ion physics spin physics spin physics in heavy ion collisions ? RHIC

two important aspects in QCD physics Nuclear dependence Spin dependence

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

7

Global Orbital Angular Momentum

Y b

  • Huge orbital angular momentum of the colliding system.

reaction plane: can be determined by measuring v2 and v1.

normal of the reaction plane impact parameter

| | b p b p n

in in re

  • ×

× =

  • Ly in unit of 105

b/RA

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

8

Global orbital angular momentum

Gradient in pz-distribution along the x-direction

x z impact parameter b

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

9

Gradient in pz-distribution along x-direction

GeV s c s p 22 . 2 ) ( 2 / ≈ = Au+Au at 200AGeV pz(x,b) in unit of p0

ZTL & X.N. Wang, PRL 94, 102301(2005), PLB 629, 20(2005); J.H. Gao, S.W. Chen, W.T. Deng, ZTL, Q. Wang, X.N. Wang, PRC77, 044902 (2008). GeV/fm 68 . / 2 ≈

A

R p

dpz\dx in unit of 2p0\RA

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

10

Local Orbital Angular Momentum

x Δ

x dx dp p

z z

Δ = Δ 7 . 1 − ≈ Δ Δ − = Δ x p L

z y

for b =RA, Δx=1fm

impact parameter of the two partons

T

x

  • T

x has a preferred direction ( ) !

b

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2017年7月24-28日,南京

Hadron2017 11

Question

Can such a local orbital angular momentum be transferred to the polarization of quark or anti-quark through the interactions between the partons in a strongly interacting QGP?

take a collision as an example.

q1 +q2 → q1 +q2

slide-12
SLIDE 12

average over the preferred directions

T

x

  • 2017年7月24-28日,南京

Hadron2017

12

Quark scattering with fixed reaction plane

Scattering amplitude in momentum space

) , (

,

E q M

T

i

  • λ

λ

spin independent part

Differential cross section w.r.t. the impact parameter

spin dependent part

T

x

  • =

=

∑ ∫

⋅ −

) , ( ) , ( 2 1 ) 2 ( ) 2 (

* , , ) ( 2 2 2 2 2

E q M E k M e k d q d x d d

T T x q k i T T T

i i i T T T

  • λ

λ λ λ λ λ

π π σ

+λ dΔσ d2xT

dσ unp d2xT

Quark polarization after the scattering:

unp q

P σ σ / Δ ≡

a 2-dimensional Fourier transformation to impact parameter space

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

13

Qualitative results

), ( 4

2 2 2 T D s T T unp

x K c x d d µ α σ =

  • Static potential model with “small angle approximation”

Both have exactly the same form !

) ( ) ( 4 ) ( ) (

1 2 2 T D T D s T q D T T

x K x K c m E E p x p n x d d µ µ α µ σ

λ

+ × ⋅ − = Δ

  • Bessel functions

) (

2 2 2 2 T s qq T T T unp

x F c x d d x d d x d d α σ σ σ = + ≡

− +

  • QCD at finite temperature with HTL(hard thermal loop) gluon propagator

) ( ) (

2 2 2 2 T s qq T T T T

x F c x p n x d d x d d x d d Δ × ⋅ − = − ≡ Δ

− +

α σ σ σ

λ

  • scalar functions of xT

spin direction of the quark after the scattering

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

14

Qualitative results

dΔσ d2xT ∝−! nλ ⋅(! p× ! xT )

has a preferred direction

! xT

! b

has a preferred direction

! p× ! xT

−! nre ∝ ! pin × ! b

a polarization of quark in the direction opposite to the normal of the reaction plane!

normal of the AA-reaction plane

dΔσ d2xT = dΔσ d2xT ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟

max

at ! nλ = −! nre

slide-15
SLIDE 15

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

15

Quantitative results with QCD at finite temperature

Δp/T

  • Quark polarization

Pq T: temperature

ZTL & X.N. Wang, PRL 94, 102301(2005), PLB 629, 20(2005); J.H. Gao, S.W. Chen, W.T. Deng, ZTL, Q. Wang, X.N. Wang, PRC77, 044902 (2008).

P

q ∼0.02−0.25

slide-16
SLIDE 16

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

16

A new picture of QGP in non-central AA collisions

f

p

  • p
  • T

x

  • re

n

  • The scattered quark acquires a

negative polarization in the normal direction of the reaction plane!

“global polarization”

slide-17
SLIDE 17

2017年7月24-28日,南京

Hadron2017 17

Direct consequences

e+e− → Z 0 → ! q + ! q → H(or V)+ X

Compare to: global polarization of quarks & anti-quarks polarization

  • f hadrons

hadronization

ρ00 : probability for the third component of the spin of K*0 to take zero.

In a non-central AA collision:

OPAL e+e− → K *0 + X ρ00=1/3: unpolarized Vector meson spin alignment Lambda polarization

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

18

Consequence I: Hyperon polarization

Recombination scenario

P

u = P d = P u = P d = P s = P s

Hyperon Λ Σ Ξ Ω PH Ps PH in the case that Pq = Ps Pq Pq Pq Pq

We expect

P

u = P d = P u = P d ≡ P q, P s = P s .

P

H = P q for all H's and H 's.

In the case that

4P

q − P s −3P sP q 2

3−4P

qP s + P q 2

4P

s − P q −3P sP q 2

3−4P

qP s + P s 2

P

s(5+ P s 2)

3(1+ P

s 2)

q1

↑ +q2 ↑ +q3 ↑ → H↑

slide-19
SLIDE 19

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

19

Consequence I: Hyperon polarization

Fragmentation scenario

Hyperon Λ Σ Ξ Ω PH PH in the case of Pq =Ps PH in the case of Pq =Ps and ns =fs

nsP

s

ns +2fs

4 fsP

q −nsP s

3(ns +2fs) 4nsP

s − fsP q

3(2ns + fs) P

s

3 ns ns +2fs P

q

4 fs −ns 3(ns +2fs)P

q

4ns − fs 3(2ns + fs)P

q

P

s

3 3

q

P

Nu :Nd :Ns =1:1:ns for quarks in QGP Nu :Nd :Ns =1:1: fs for quarks produced in fragmentation

3

q

P 3

q

P 3

q

P

q↑ → H + X

slide-20
SLIDE 20

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

20

Consequence I: Hyperon polarization

Some of the expected qualitative features

n The same for hyperons and anti-hyperons. n (Approximately) the same for different hyperons. n No polarization at b=0, increases approximately linearly with b.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

21

Consequence II: Vector meson spin alignment

q↑ →V + X or q ↑ →V + X

ρV( frag) >1/3 for q↑ →V + X or q ↑ →V + X

ρ00

ρ( frag) =

1+ βP

q 2

3− βP

q 2 ,

ρ00

K*(rec) =

fs ns + fs 1+ βP

q 2

3− βP

q 2 +

ns ns + fs 1+ βP

s 2

3− βP

s 2 ,

In analog to (parameterization)

e+e− → Z 0 → ! q + ! q → K *+ + X

β ≈0.5

ρ00

V(rec) <1/3 for q↑ +q ↑ →V

ρ00

ρ(rec) =

1− P

q 2

3+ P

q 2 ,

ρ00

K*(rec) =

1− P

qP s

3+ P

qP s

,

Fragmentation scenario Recombination scenario q1

↑ +q2 ↑ →V

slide-22
SLIDE 22

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

22

Measurements

dN dΩ* = N 4π (1+αP

H cosθ *)

Hyperon: Spin self-analyzing parity violating decay

dN dΩ* = 3N 4π [(1− ρ00

V )+(3ρ00 V −1)cos2θ *].

Vector meson: Strong decay H → N + M

V → M1 + M2

slide-23
SLIDE 23

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

23

Earlier Measurements by STAR on global polarization STAR Collaboration

slide-24
SLIDE 24

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

24

Results of STAR beam energy scan

STAR Collaboration, arXiv:1701.06657 [nucl-exp] (2017).

l At each energy, a polarization is

  • bserved at 1.1-3.6σ level

l The polarization decreases with

increasing energy

l Averaged over energy l (Electro)magnetic field leads to

difference between and

P

Λ =(1.08±0.15)%

P

Λ =(1.38±0.30)%

P

Λ

P

Λ

slide-25
SLIDE 25

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

Further theoretical discussions/developments

Other directly measurable quantities:

(1) Spin alignment of vector meson

25

“Lambda polarization and phi spin alignment Measurements at RHIC”, Aihong Tang (BNL), talk to be presented in workshop on “QCD physics and ‘973’-project annual exchange meeting”, August 1-5, Weihai, China.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

Further theoretical discussions/developments

Other directly measurable quantities:

Influence from hyperon decay on Λ polarization is very large!

E.g.: take only (1/2)+ baryons into account.

P

Λ final = P Λ direct 2+3λ(1+γ )

6(1+ λ) = 0.33P

Λ direct for λ →0

0.44P

Λ direct for λ =1

⎧ ⎨ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪

(2) Polarization of other JP=(1/2)+ hypeons and anti-hyperons

t

Λ,Σ0 D

= −1/3; tΛ,Ξ

D =(1+γ )/2, γ = 0.87

Σ0 → Λ+γ Ξ→ Λ+π

26

Decay spin transfer factor for a parity conserving decay if M is a JP=0- meson.

Hi → H j + M

Other (1/2)+ hypeons and anti-hyperons are more sensitive.

Decay spin transfer factor:

slide-27
SLIDE 27

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

27

Further theoretical discussions/developments

Other directly measurable quantities:

(3) Spin correlation of hyperon(s) and/or anti-hyperon(s)

CNN

H1H2 ≡ σ(↑↑)+σ(↓↓)−σ(↑↓)−σ(↓↑)

σ(↑↑)+σ(↓↓)+σ(↑↓)+σ(↓↑) = P

H1 ⋅P H2

dN1 dΩ1

* = 1

4π (1+α1 ! P

H1 ⋅ !

ncosθ1

*)

dN2 dΩ2

* = 1

4π (1+α2 ! P

H2⋅ !

ncosθ2

*)

dN12 dΩ1

*dΩ2 * =

1 (4π)2(1+α1 ! P

H1 ⋅ !

ncosθ1

* +α2

! P

H2⋅ !

ncosθ2

* +α1α2

! P

H1 ⋅ !

n ! P

H2⋅ !

ncosθ1

*cosθ2 *)

〈cosθ1

*cosθ2 *〉 =α1α2(

! P

H1 ⋅ !

n)( ! P

H2⋅ !

n)=α1α2CNN

H1H2

Independent of the direction of reaction plane!

slide-28
SLIDE 28

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

28

Further theoretical discussions/developments

The essence: spin-orbital coupling Dirac equation

i ∂ ∂tψ = ˆ Hψ ˆ H = ! α ⋅ ! ˆ p+ βm [ ˆ H, ! ˆ L]= −i " α × " ˆ p ≠ 0 [ ˆ H, ! Σ]= 2i ! α × ! ˆ p ≠ 0 [ ˆ H, ! ˆ J]= 0 ! ˆ J = ! ˆ L + ! Σ /2 [ ˆ H, ! ˆ L2]= 2" α ⋅ " ˆ p ≠ 0

Spin-orbital coupling is intrinsic in relativistic Quantum Dynamics!

〈ψ | ! ˆ M|ψ 〉 → 〈ϕ| e 2m( ! ˆ L + ! σ )|ϕ〉 ! ˆ M = e 2 ! r × ! α ψ = ϕ χ ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ ˆ Hψ = Eψ

slide-29
SLIDE 29

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

29

Further theoretical discussions/developments

Thermal equilibrium?

l solar surface flow: 10-7 sec-1 l large-scale terrestrial atmospheric patterns: 10-7-10-5 sec-1 l supercell tornado core: 10-1 sec-1 l the Great Red Spot of Jupiter: up to 10-4 sec-1 l rotating, heated soap bubbles: 100 sec-1 l turbulent flow in bulk superfluid He-II: 150 sec-1 l superfluid nanodroplet: 107 sec-1

Betz, Gyulassy, Torrieri, PRC (2007); …....................... Becattini, Piccinini, Rizzo, PRC(2008); Becattini, Karpenko, Lisa, Upsal, Voloshin, PRC(2017).

A single collision multiple collisions equilibration

ω ~2P

ΛT ~(9±1)×1021sec−1

STAR data implies the most vortical fluid STAR Collaboration: arXiv:1701.06657[nucl-exp]. ! P

H = 1

2tanh ω 2T ε m ˆ ω − ˆ ω ⋅ ! p m(ε +m) ! p ⎡ ⎣ ⎢ ⎤ ⎦ ⎥~ ω 2T ˆ ω

Relativistic ideal (vortical) gas

slide-30
SLIDE 30

2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

30

Further theoretical discussions/developments

QGP as a vortical fluid

spin transport in strongly interacting medium Spintronics in strong interaction ?

Huge orbital angular momentum

statistical-hydrodynamic approach quantum kinetic approach hydro-dynamical model chiral kinetic approach holographic description chiral magnetic effects local polarization …...........

“Global and local spin polarization in heavy ion collisions: a brief overview”, Qun Wang (USTC), plenary talk at 26th International Conference on Ultrarelativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions (Quark Matter 2017), arXiv:1704.04022 [nucl-th].

slide-31
SLIDE 31

2017年7月24-28日,南京

Hadron2017 31

Summary

n A great advantage to study spin effects in non-central

AA-collisions is: the reaction plane can be determined experimentally by measuring v1 and v2.

n There exists a huge orbital angular momentum of the colliding

system w.r.t. the reaction plane.

n Quarks and anti-quarks are “globally polarized” in the

  • pposite direction as the normal of the reaction plane due to

spin-orbital interaction in QCD.

n Many consequences, many open questions ……

slide-32
SLIDE 32

2017年7月24-28日,南京

Hadron2017 32

Outlook

………………………

Ø A possible method to study the role of orbital angular

momentum in high energy spin physics.

Ø An effective way to study spin-orbital interaction in QCD ? Ø A new window to look at the properties of QGP ?

Thanks for your attention!

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33 2017年7月24-28日,南京 Hadron2017

Description of polarization of particles with different spins

Spin 1/2 hadrons: Spin 1 hadrons: The spin density matrix is 3x3:

ρ = ρ11 ρ10 ρ1−1 ρ01 ρ00 ρ0−1 ρ−11 ρ−10 ρ−1−1 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ = 1 3 (1 + 3 2 ! S ⋅ ! Σ + 3T ijΣij )

Vector polarization: Sµ = (0,

! ST,λ)

Tensor polarization:

SLT

µ = (0,SLT x ,SLT y ,0),

STT

xµ = (0,STT xx ,STT xy ,0)

SLL,

8 The spin density matrix is 2x2: Vector polarization: Sµ = (0,

! ST,λ)

ρ = ρ++ ρ+− ρ−+ ρ−− ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ = 1 2 (1 + ! S ⋅ ! σ )

See e.g. A. Bacchetta, & P.J. Mulders, PRD62, 114004 (2000).

transverse plane

independent components. 3 5