bootstrapping the genesis of
play

Bootstrapping the genesis of Nambu-Goldstone Bosons from Quark - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bootstrapping the genesis of Nambu-Goldstone Bosons from Quark Gluon Plasma Yu Nakayama (Kavli IPMU, Caltech) in collaboration with Tomoki Ohtsuki (Kavli IPMU) arXiv:1404.0489 arXiv:1407.6195 with further updates From BCS theory to hadron


  1. Bootstrapping the genesis of Nambu-Goldstone Bosons from Quark Gluon Plasma Yu Nakayama (Kavli IPMU, Caltech) in collaboration with Tomoki Ohtsuki (Kavli IPMU) arXiv:1404.0489 arXiv:1407.6195 with further updates

  2. From BCS theory to hadron mass Nambu-san had been interested in condensed matter physics. Especially BCS theory fascinated him. • BSC mechanism = chiral condensation • Explains mass of fermions (with chiral symmetry) • Masslessness of pions (Nambu-Goldstone bosons) • It allows Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm of phase transition…

  3. What is the order of chiral phase transition in our real QCD? • To make it well-defined, consider massless flavors (say up and down quarks) ? • At finite temperature, chiral symmetry is restored • How does Nambu-Goldstone bosons (dis)appear? • Is it first order or second order? • Huge controversies in lattice/theory community

  4. Various results in 2 flavor QCD Claim Pisarski Wilczek (RG, 1-loop) 1st order (or O(4)) 2 nd order Karsch (lattice simulation) 2 nd order (O(4)?) Iwasaki et al (lattice simulation) 1 st order D’Elia et al (lattice simulation) 2 nd order Ejiri et al (lattice simulation) Cannot be O(4), 1 st order. Aoki et al (lattice theoretical study) 1 st order Delamotte et al (functional RG) 1 st order Bonati et al (lattice simulation) 2 nd order (new fixed point) Pelissetto et al (RG,6-loop) 2 nd order Grahl (functional RG) 2 nd order Sato et al (RG with U(1) breaking) 1 st order Aharony et al (AdS/QCD, probe) 3 rd order Kiritstis et al (AdS/QCD, bulk)

  5. Two main theoretical controversies • What is the effective symmetry that governs the chiral phase transition? (A) U(1) A is fully recovered (Pisarski-Wilczek, Cohen) (B) U(1) A is partially recovered (Aoki et al) (C) U(1) A is fully broken (Lee-Hatsuda) 3d LG theory: • Is there RG attractive fixed point with each symmetries?(no fixed point  1 st ) • (A) Very controversial (no near d=4, but…) • (B) Not very much studied (no near d=4) • (C) Most probably O(4) Heisenberg

  6. Conformal bootstrap is a non-perturbative method to approach RG fixed point • Assume conformal invariance (rather than scale invariance) is realized at RG fixed point • Ask for the consistency of 4pt functions • Give rigorous bounds on critical exponents for a given symmetry • With more data, one may determine the existence of fixed point • No explicit Lagrangian/Hamiltonian is necessary. Fully non-perturbative and universal

  7. Schematic conformal bootstrap equations • Consider 4pt functions • Operator product expansions (OPE) • Crossing relations CFT Data No Bootstrap machine Maybe

  8. BCS Superfluidity (Kos et al) No Maybe The existence of “ kink ” suggests RG fixed point Critical exponents for BCS superfulidity can be predicted:

  9. What to expect in conformal bootstrap? • Assume conformal invariant (conformal hypothesis) • Hypothesis: non-trivial behavior of the bound indicates conformal fixed point • Try O(4) x O(2) (with deformations from possible anomaly) • Pisarski-Wilzcek, Delamotte etc said no • Calabrese, Vicari etc said yes

  10. O(4) x O(2) fixed point (yes!) No Maybe If anomaly is suppressed  2 nd order phase transition in QCD

  11. Summarizing O(4) x O(2) results and RG • We found a fixed point with O(4) x O(2) symmetry in bootstrap • Symmetry breaking pattern can be studied from bootstrap • This establishes the following RG picture (A) U(1) A is fully recovered (Pisarski-Wilczek, Cohen)  non-trivial fixed point exists: second order phase transition  one-loop prediction by Pisarski-Wilczek is not trusted (B) U(1) A is partially recovered (Aoki et al)  Fixed point (A) is unstable under non-symmetric deformation with  first order phase transition (C) U(1) A is fully broken (Lee-Hatsuda)  Fixed point (A) is unstable under non-symmetric deformation with (this gives crossover exponent)  Second order phase transition with

  12. Future of conformal bootstrap • At strings 2013, Slava Rychkov said “Conformal bootstrap is mathematically well-defined (convergent) so even if you cannot solve it, you can at least put it on a computer” • Perturbative QFT is not mathematically well-defined, so if you cannot solve it, what can you do? • More applications to come: frustrated spin systems, quantum liquid, asymptotic safe/ non-renormalizable (Gross-Nuveu, NJL) etc …

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend