Global Gas Flaring Reduction - Proposed New Initiative Sustainable - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

global gas flaring reduction
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Global Gas Flaring Reduction - Proposed New Initiative Sustainable - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Global Gas Flaring Reduction - Proposed New Initiative Sustainable Energy For All Forum, New York, June 4, 2014 2 These are Not Cities They are Gas Flares 3 Gas flaring what is it? What kind of gas? Gas that is produced in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Global Gas Flaring Reduction

  • Proposed New Initiative

Sustainable Energy For All Forum, New York, June 4, 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

These are Not Cities – They are Gas Flares

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Gas flaring – what is it?

  • What kind of gas?
  • Gas that is produced in association with oil, but flared instead of used
  • This “associated gas” is a blend of
  • Natural gas used in gas networks – mostly methane gas
  • Heavier types of gas – mostly butane and propane

3

  • What could the gas be used for?
  • Fuel for power plants
  • Sent into gas pipeline networks
  • Heating, cooking, industrial processes
  • Distributed in pressurized tanks
  • Butane, propane
  • Feedstock for industry
  • Petrochemical, fertilizer
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Gas flaring – why does it happen?

  • Infrastructure and markets that are under-developed and poorly

functioning discourage investments in flare elimination

  • Policy environment: Legal, regulatory, investment, and operating

environment often not conducive

4

  • Distance from energy users, gas pipelines, and power networks may

make investments in gas utilization less attractive

  • Gas characteristics for the flared gas may be less favorable
  • Often small, scattered, declining, uncertain gas volumes
  • Still – utilizing associated gas is in most cases “investment” rather

than “cost”

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Who flares gas? Top 20 countries

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Gas flaring – why should it stop?

Example Nigeria

  • 150 million people with only 6500 MW power generation

capacity

  • Of which nearly 2000 MW stands idle for lack of gas and

adequate infrastructure

6

  • Only half the population has electricity

network access

  • and it’s unreliable
  • Coping mechanism: 4000 MW of household-

size diesel generators

  • …While flaring 13 billion cubic meters of

gas (2013)

  • Enough to feed 6500 MW of power
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Gas Flaring – Why Should It Stop?

Example Iraq

  • 32 million people with only 6000 MW power generation effective capacity
  • Power is scarce and unreliable
  • Power plant fuel – mostly liquids
  • Fuel oil, diesel, crude oil
  • Only 2000 MW fueled by gas
  • The whole demand (18000 MW) could be met by current gas production

7

  • Flaring about 12 billion cubic meters of gas
  • Yearly economical loss estimate
  • $4 billion direct; $40 billion indirect (for

society)

  • “Oil will fund Iraq’s development; gas will

fuel it”

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Gas flaring – why should it stop?

Globally

  • The CO2 emissions
  • About 350 million tons annually
  • Equivalent to about 77 million cars

8

  • The black carbon from flares…
  • The large volumes
  • About 140 billion cubic meters annually
  • Enough to produce 750 billion kWh power
  • More than the continent of Africa’s power use
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Gas flaring – why should it stop?

  • Black Carbon (BC) has strong influence
  • n radiative forcing in the Arctic
  • Albedo changes after BC deposition on

snow and ice

  • Highest rate of global warming is
  • ccurring in the Arctic
  • BC is a short-lived climate forcer –

reduction would have an immediate benefit

  • See paper by Stohl et al (Sep. 2013) in

“Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics”

  • n BC emissions and their impact in the

Arctic

9

Model estimates of the percent contribution of gas flaring to total surface concentrations of Black Carbon (Stohl & al (2013))

  • New model seems to better match on-ground
  • bservations of BC after improved inclusion of gas

flaring and refining the model for household BC emissions

  • Gas flaring may contribute 42% (study result) to

the annual mean BC surface concentrations in the Arctic (i.e. north of 66 degrees). However, the report says: “Better quantification of gas flaring emissions of BC is urgently needed”

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Arctic – Satellite flare detections

10

Source: NOAA and Energy Redefined

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Source: NOAA and Energy Redefined

The Arctic/near Arctic: Satellite flare detections

N60º

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Gas flaring – how are we doing?

Global gas flaring and oil production

12

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Oil production, 'ooo b/d

Gas flared, bcm

Gas flaring Oil production

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Satellite detection

  • f gas flares.

Compilation for 2013 (VIIRS Satellite)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Satellite detection

  • f gas flares.

Compilation for 2013 (VIIRS Satellite)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Satellite detection

  • f gas flares.

Compilation for 2013 (VIIRS Satellite)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Who works on reducing flaring?

Companies, countries… and GGFR

The Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership – Members:

16

Oil companies

  • BP
  • Chevron
  • Eni
  • ExxonMobil
  • Kuwait Oil Company
  • Pemex (Mexico)
  • Qatar Petroleum
  • Shell
  • SNH (Cameroon)
  • SOCAR (Azerbaijan)
  • Sonatrach (Algeria)
  • Statoil
  • TOTAL

Governments

  • Alberta (Canada)
  • Republic of Congo
  • France
  • Gabon
  • Indonesia
  • Iraq
  • Kazakhstan
  • Khanty-Mansiysk (Russia)
  • Mexico (SENER)
  • Nigeria
  • Norway
  • USA
  • Uzbekistan
  • Yamal-Nenets AO (Russia)

Institutions, other

  • EBRD
  • European Commission
  • World Bank
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Will natural oil field depletion take care of the flaring problem? Not really

17

Source: Energy Redefined

Global gas flaring: 2013-2030

Estimate for existing oil fields only – assuming good oilfield depletion practice and no flare reduction intervention

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Zero Flar Flarin ing Glo Globall lly by y 20 2030 30

  • Zero flaring or venting in new oil field developments
  • Cease legacy flaring no later than 2030
  • Governments provide conducive investment/regulatory/operating

environment for developing efficient energy networks

  • Initiative to be endorsed by governments and oil companies

18

Note: Initiative pertains to routine flaring and not to flaring for safety reasons

World Bank’s proposed global gas flaring reduction initiative

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Next Steps – 2030 Initiative

  • Complete the document for endorsement
  • Consultations/feedback
  • Seek endorsements of the Initiative
  • Governments, oil companies, institutions/others
  • Timeline
  • 2014-2015

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Towards a world free

  • f flares

More information on flaring: www.worldbank.org/ggfr Contact: Bjorn Hamso Program Manager 1-202 458 1065 bhamso@worldbank.org