Giving Verbal Feedback and How to Receive the Responses - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

giving verbal feedback
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Giving Verbal Feedback and How to Receive the Responses - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Giving Verbal Feedback and How to Receive the Responses Association for Surgical Education Committees: Graduate Surgical Education Faculty Development Assessment and Evaluation Simulation Adopted with modification from: Nancy Schindler


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Giving Verbal Feedback – and How to Receive the Responses

Association for Surgical Education Committees:

Graduate Surgical Education Faculty Development Assessment and Evaluation Simulation

Adopted with modification from:

Nancy Schindler MD MHPE FACS, Hilary Sanfey MB BCh FACS, Steve Evans MD FACS

slide-2
SLIDE 2

We have no disclosures to report

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Session Agenda

Introductions and learning objectives 1:10-1:15 Definition and importance of feedback 1:15-1:25 Elements of effective feedback, including practical tools 1:25-1:35 Challenges of verbal feedback and responding to learner reactions 1:35-1:45 OSTE feedback scenarios 1:45-2:25 Implementation at home 2:25-2:35 Evaluation and conclusion 2:35-2:40

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this session, participants will be able to:

 Define the purpose of providing feedback  Describe 5 steps in giving effective feedback  Demonstrate effective feedback techniques

slide-5
SLIDE 5

What is feedback?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Feedback

Interactive process

aimed at

reinforcing positive behavior

and

providing specific guidelines

for

modifying future behavior

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Why Is Feedback Important?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

FEEDBACK BENEFITS

Saedon H et al. BMC Medical Education 2012;12:25. Trehan A et al. BMJ Open 2015;5:e006759. Hayes V et al. Perspect Med Educ 2017;6:319-324.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

FEEDBACK BENEFITS

Min H et al. Surgery 2015;158:1168-1191.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

FEEDBACK OBSTACLES

slide-11
SLIDE 11

FEEDBACK OBSTACLES

McQueen SA et al. Am J Surg 2016;211:464-475; Mitchell JD and Jones SB. Int Anesth Clin 2016;54:54-65.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

FEEDBACK OBSTACLES

Bing-You R et al. Acad Med 2018;93:657-663.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Principles of Effective Feedback

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Can you share a positive (or negative) feedback experience?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

What are the critical elements in a feedback encounter?

 Source  Recipient  Message  Timing/ Delivery  Action Plan

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Effectiveness influenced by:

 Source

 Credible  Trustworthy  Knowledgeable

 Recipient

 Self esteem  Mindset

 Message

 Positive versus negative feedback  Accuracy: supporting evidence or examples  Feedback sandwich

As giver of feedback, is my true intent to help them improve?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Timing: Is There A “Right Time” ?

 As close to the event as possible  Longer delays reduce effectiveness but may

be beneficial if the student/resident (or faculty member!) is upset

 Emergencies may preclude (or necessitate)

immediate feedback

 Examples

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Feedback Strategies

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Feedback Methods

 Informal

 Teachable or “feedback” moments  Usually verbal

 Formal

 Provided during scheduled sessions  Verbal or written

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Feedback Guidelines

FAST

Frequent/Accurate/Specific/Timely

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Create a supportive learning environment and

  • rient the learner to the focus of the session

Base feedback on observations

  • Be specific!
  • Focus on behaviors

Encourage self-reflection Make a specific plan of action and follow up

Tips for an Effective Feedback Session

“I am going to give you Feedback now”

Respond to the learner’s reaction

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Responding to the Learner’s Reaction

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Documentation of Trainee Performance

 Start a dated, written record  Needs to be practical, sustainable

 Keep a trainee “file”: add regularly  “File”: Paper, electronic, index cards, note pad,

Smartphone, dictate, calendar

 Specifics: critical!

 give examples (good & bad) – a FEW

 Focus: behaviors & outcomes rather than attitudes  Reports from others: document but be circumspect

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Positive feedback

 Easy?  Must reinforce good actions and behavior

 Learners not always aware, especially novices

 Be specific!

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Negative feedback

 Personality issue vs. real problem

 Be up front about your expectations at the beginning  Talk with colleagues – is it just you?

 Unless it’s critical, frame the issue and rehearse

the conversation

 May mean feedback in a few hours or next day

 “Feedback Sandwich”… maybe

 Start with learner’s perspective

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Negative feedback

 Present from “I want you to be the best doctor

you can be”

 Be prepared for any response

 Tears  Passive  Defensive  Angry  Surprised

 Don’t back down: firmly but gently stay on point

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Negative feedback

 Action plan

 How do we fix this?  By when do you expect improvement?

 Record the exchange

 Serious enough to give heads-up to higher level

supervisor?

 Follow-up at appointed time  Mention response to feedback in final

evaluation

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Summary and Tips

 Frequent oral feedback

 (Say: “I’m going to give you…”!!) in time for correction

 Sit down if feedback is important or negative  Document specific actions & behaviors, +/-  Summative comments: will upper-level

supervisor get an accurate picture?

 Negative is hard, but you’re the Mom! (or Dad!)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Feedback Scenarios

slide-30
SLIDE 30

 Divide into groups of 3-4

 Standardized learner will rotate through groups  Decide who will go first as “teacher”  Others will observe and give FEEDBACK to the teacher

 Teacher reads the scenario then holds a feedback

session (10 min)

 Follow guidelines for feedback (5-6 min)

Orient the learner

Provide feedback

Develop a specific follow-up plan

 Debrief: (4-5 min)

Observers and learner give feedback on feedback

Use the Observer Evaluation Form  Repeat with new teacher and learner scenario (x3-4)  Return for group discussion

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Create a supportive learning environment and

  • rient the learner to the focus of the session

Base feedback on observations

  • Be specific!
  • Focus on behaviors

Encourage self-reflection Make a specific plan of action and follow up

Tips for an Effective Feedback Session

“I am going to give you Feedback now”

Respond to the learner’s reaction

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Group Debrief

 What was the most challenging part of the

teacher role?

 What was the easiest?  Did the teacher orient the learner using the word

“feedback”?

 How did the teacher respond to the learner’s

reaction?

 What was the learner’s feedback vs. the

  • bserver’s feedback?
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Implementation at Home

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Implementation

 Identify Stakeholders

 Learners: Faculty, Fellows, Residents, Students  Program / Clerkship Director  Institution

 Obtain resources

 Learner time  Space (groups need some separation)  Materials: Scenarios, Framework  Facilitators  Standardized Learners (SLs)  Cost: minimal unless you pay SLs

 Role play vs. Standardized learners

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Standardized Learners

 Who?

 MS4 (not MS3), lab residents, other specialty

residents or faculty, professional actors

 Look for those interested in education

 Training?

 Minimal needed to play the role  Helpful if you can train them to facilitate

 Compensation?

 Credit, Starbucks card, offer to help other group

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Plan 1: Intern Orientation for six interns

(Zero level checklist for PBLI 2 Milestone)

  • One hour session

– 2 groups of: 1 faculty facilitator, 2 interns, and one standardized learner (SL) – Total need: 3 faculty, 3 SLs

Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 20 min F1, Intern 1 and 2 SL 1 F2, Intern 3 and 4 SL 2 F3, Intern 5 and 6 SL 3 20 min F1, Intern 1 and 2 SL 3 F2, Intern 3 and 4 SL 1 F3, Intern 5 and 6 SL 2

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Plan 2: Faculty Development for 20 faculty

  • 90 minute session

– Principles of Effective Feedback: 20 min – OSTE: 60 min – Recap and key learning discussion: 10 min

  • 5 groups of: 4 faculty learners and one SL (rotating facilitator)
  • Total need: 2 facilitators and 5 standardized learners

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 10 min 5 min Faculty 1 SL 1 Feedback Faculty 5 SL 2 Feedback Faculty 9 SL 3 Feedback Faculty 13 SL 4 Feedback Faculty 17 SL 5 Feedback 10 min 5 min Faculty 2 SL 2 Feedback Faculty 6 SL 3 Feedback Faculty 10 SL 4 Feedback Faculty 14 SL 5 Feedback Faculty 18 SL 1 Feedback 10 min 5 min Faculty 3 SL 3 Feedback Faculty 7 SL 4 Feedback Faculty 11 SL 5 Feedback Faculty 15 SL 1 Feedback Faculty 19 SL 2 Feedback 10 min 5 min Faculty 4 SL 4 Feedback Faculty 8 SL 5 Feedback Faculty 12 SL 1 Feedback Faculty 15 SL 2 Feedback Faculty 20 SL 3 Feedback

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Summary

 Effective feedback requires collaboration

between teacher and learner

 Self-appraisal followed by discussion is better

than top-down feedback

 Consistency of feedback improves perception of

accuracy

 Avoid negative feedback in front of peers or

patients

 Always end with encouragement and a plan

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Feedback is a skill we can all learn and improve!

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Remember FAST!

Frequent/Accurate/Specific/Timely

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Questions?

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Workshop Evaluation

https://redcap.wakehealth.edu/re dcap/surveys/?s=TRPJWNYK8C

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Workshop Faculty Contact Information

 Michael Hulme

mhulme@wakehealth.edu

 Megan Miller megan.miller431@gmail.com  John Paige

JPaige@lsuhsc.edu

 Barb Pettitt

barbara.pettitt@emory.edu

 Jim Rucinski

jar9008@nyp.org

 Nancy Schindler

NSchindler@northshore.org

slide-44
SLIDE 44

References

Saedon H et al. The role of feedback in improving the effectiveness

  • f workplace based assessments: a systematic review. BMC Med

Educ 2012;12-25

Trehan A et al. The impact of feedback of intraoperative technical performance in surgery: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2015;5:e006759

Hayes V et al. Is feedback to medical learners associated with characteristics of improved patient care? Perspect Med Educ 2017;6:319-324

Min H et al. Systematic review of coaching to enhance surgeons'

  • perative performance. Surgery 2015;158:1168-1191

McQueen SA et al. Examining the barriers to meaningful assessment and feedback in medical training. Am J Surg 2016;211:464-475

slide-45
SLIDE 45

References

Mitchell JD and Jones SB. Faculty Development in Feedback

  • Provision. Int Anesth Clin 2016;54:54-65.

Bing-You R et al. The Feedback Tango: An Integrative Review and Analysis of the Content of the Teacher–Learner Feedback

  • Exchange. Acad Med 2018;93:657-663.

Sachdeva A. Use of effective feedback to facilitate adult learning. Journal of Cancer Education 1996;11:106-118

Salermo et al. Faculty development seminars based on the one minute preceptor improve feedback in the ambulatory setting. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17:779-787

Schartel SA. Giving feedback- an integral part of education. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2012; 26:77-87

Spickard A. Words hard to say and hard to hear: May I give you some feedback? J Gen Intern Med 1998;13:142-143

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Workshop Faculty Contact Information

 Michael Hulme

mhulme@wakehealth.edu

 Megan Miller megan.miller431@gmail.com  John Paige

JPaige@lsuhsc.edu

 Barb Pettitt

barbara.pettitt@emory.edu

 Jim Rucinski

jar9008@nyp.org

 Nancy Schindler

NSchindler@northshore.org