Genetic Identification of Citations and Impact Factor Nature is the - - PDF document

genetic identification of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Genetic Identification of Citations and Impact Factor Nature is the - - PDF document

2/26/2013 NATURE -Weekly, International, Interdisciplinary Journal of Science Genetic Identification of Citations and Impact Factor Nature is the world's most C fibres that detect highly cited interdisciplinary science journal,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2/26/2013 1 Genetic Identification of C fibres that detect massage-like stroking of hairy skin in vivo

Martin Requena & Mac Sennett

NATURE -Weekly, International, Interdisciplinary Journal of Science

  • Citations and Impact Factor
  • Nature is the world's most

highly cited interdisciplinary science journal, according to the 2010 Journal Citation Reports Science Edition (Thomson Reuters, 2011)

  • Its Impact Factor is 36.101

(Thomson Reuters) Aims and scope

  • Nature publishes peer-reviewed

research in all fields of science and technology on the basis of its

  • riginality, importance,

interdisciplinary interest, timeliness, accessibility, elegance and surprising conclusions

The Paper Authors (1)

 Sophia Vrontou  Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology  Postdoctoral Scholar  Allan M. Wong,  Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of Technology  Postdoctoral Scholar

Authors (2)

 Kristofer K. Rau  Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Kentucky  Postdoctoral Scholar  H. Richard Koerber  Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh  Professor, Neurobiology  Ph.D., West Virginia University (1981)

Authors (3)

 David J. Anderson  Division of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of Technology  Lab Website: http://davidandersonlab.caltech.edu/

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2/26/2013 2

Background- Nociception

 Nociceptors: Sensory neurons that respond to painful stimuli.  Can respond to thermal, mechanical, or chemical stimulus  Axons of Nociceptors can fall under two categories  C fibers or Aδ

  • fibers. We’ll focus on C fibers.

Background- Nociception

 C fibers are thin, unmyelinated axon fibers that are involved in

nociception.

 When a painful stimulus is detected, a signal is carried toward the

spinal cord via an afferent neuron. The signal crosses the midline of the spinal cord and is transmitted upward to the brain.

 Sensation of touch does not cross the midline and is transmitted

upward on the same side of the spinal cord where it entered.

Receptors and Neurotransmitters

 Signals are transmitted from neuron to neuron by neurotransmitters.  Neurotransmitters bind with receptors on the post-synaptic cell and

cause a change in the post synaptic membrane potential.

 Receptors are ionotropic or metabotropic  The MRPRB4+ and MRGPRD+ receptors are metabotropic  Different neurons express different receptors

Methods

 Two types of mice were used  Mrgprb4-tdTomato-2A-cre mice  MrgprD-EGFP-cre mice  Each type was genetically targeted with an adeno-associated virus

(AAV) expressing GCaMP3.0

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2/26/2013 3

Creation of mrgb4 knockout mice

 The adenovirus showed high specificity and efficiency

Brush/pinch stimulus delivery

  • Due to problems measuring the

action potential electronically, neural activity was measured via 2-photon microscopy using a laminectomy

  • Responses were elicited using

both stroking a pinching stimuli

  • The mouse was anesthetized,

held in position, and either stroked or pinched while an infra-red microscope monitored neural activity in the spinal cord

GCaMP3.0

 GCaMP3.0 is a fluorescence protein created by fusion of GFP and

Calmodulin

 During depolarization, voltage gated calcium channels open and

calcium enters the cell. Calmodulin is one protein that binds calcium.

 When the GCaMP3.0 complex is not bound to calcium, its

conformation is such that it is quenched by the surrounding solvent.

 When calcium is bound, a conformational change occurs, allowing

the GFP unit to absorb radiation in the infrared region and emit light in the visible region. This forms the basis of fluorescence.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2/26/2013 4

Two Photon Excitation Microscopy

 Developed by Winfried Denk at

Cornell University in the early 1990’s.

 Type of fluorescence microscopy

that allows high resolution imaging

  • f living tissue.

 Beam of infrared light is directed

at specimen. When the fluorophore absorbs two infrared photons simultaneously, it is elevated to its excited state and emits one photon of lower energy.

 Emitted photon is typically in the

visible light spectrum, allowing visualization of protein activity.

Methods

 Applied KCl directly to the exposed spinal cord and measured

fluorescence response

 Applied Methylene ATP to peripheral regions via injection  Injected capsaicin in mice genetically engineered to express the

TRPV1 receptor

Methods

 Demonstrated that the preparation was suitable to detect calcium

transients from both central and peripheral stimulus.

 Fluorescence was quantified by measuring ΔF/F

Chemical Stimulation of MRGPRD+ and MRGPRB4+

MRGPRD+ response to central administration of KCl MRGPRB4+ response to central administration of KCl

Chemical Stimulation of MRGPRD+ and MRGPRB4+

MRGPRD+ response to MeATP administered peripherally MRGPRB4+ response to MeATP administered peripherally

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2/26/2013 5

Methods

 After the successfully showing a change in fluorescence from

chemical stimuli, mechanical stimuli was tested.

 Hindpaw was stimulated with either a brush or pinched with tweezers  ΔF/F was measured in each type of mouse in response to each type of

stimulus MRGPRD+ expressing mice response to pinching MRGPRD+ expressing mice response to brushing MRGPRB4+ expressing mice response to brushing MRGPRB4+ expressing mice response to pinching

Methods

 Tested to see if mice developed a behavioral preference for

activation of MRGPRB4+ neurons

 Juvenile mice were injected with an AAV that encoded the hM3-(Gq-

coupled) DREADD.

 DREADD = Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs  DREADD’s used in conjugation with a specific pharmalogical agent

can trigger depolarization in the membrane in which the DREADD exists.

 Clozapine-n-oxide (CNO) was used to activate the DREADD and

was utilized in a chamber preference test.

Methods

 Mice were conditioned for 4 days before the test was run.  Trained to prefer one chamber over another  Test to see if activation of MRGPRB4 neurons can increase the

amount of time mice spend in the non-preferred chamber.

 Test results showed that mice showed preference for the CNO

chamber.

Preference Results

 Mice that initially did not prefer

I.N.P. spent significantly more time in the non-preferred chamber

  • nce CNO was added.

 Mice that initially preferred I.P.

spent less significantly less time in this chamber once saline was placed in it.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2/26/2013 6

Conclusions

 MRGPRB4 is similar to the MRGPRD receptor, which detects pinching

stimuli

 Its nerve-nets resemble receptive fields of C-tactile afferents in

humans

 This receptor innervates hairy skin  Its hypothesized function is detection of pleasant stroking stimuli

associated with grooming

 Unlike similar receptors, MRGPRB4 receptors could not be activated

ex vivo

Conclusions

 This is the first study to

conclusively show that the pleasant sensation produced by petting is controlled by a specific neuron:

 This is significant because the

positively-reinforcing stroking sensation is integral to mammalian grooming and social interactions

 The isolation of the MRGPRB4+

receptor will surely spur further research into mammalian social grooming behaviors

Questions

 1. Why would the evolution of receptors specialized for detecting

hair-stroking stimuli be important for the survival of social mammals?

 2. Why might the MRGPRB4+ neurons have been difficult to activate

in isolated skin-nerve preparations?

 3. How did the researchers test to see whether the mice found the

activation of the MRGPRB4+ pathway pleasurable?

 4. What is so significant about the axons in the MRGPRB4+

pathway? (hint: pain)