generalized weyl algebras and their global dimension
play

Generalized Weyl algebras and their global dimension V. V. Bavula 1 - PDF document

Generalized Weyl algebras and their global dimension V. V. Bavula 1 Generalized Weyl algebras Definition of the generalized Weyl algebras . Let D be a ring, = ( 1 , ..., n ) a set of commuting automorphisms of D , ( i j = j i


  1. Generalized Weyl algebras and their global dimension V. V. Bavula 1 Generalized Weyl algebras Definition of the generalized Weyl algebras . Let D be a ring, σ = ( σ 1 , ..., σ n ) a set of commuting automorphisms of D , ( σ i σ j = σ j σ i ), a = ( a 1 , ..., a n ) a set of elements of the centre Z ( D ) of D , such that σ i ( a j ) = a j for all i ̸ = j . The generalized Weyl algebra A = D ( σ, a ) (briefly GWA) of degree n with a base ring D is the ring generated by D and the 2 n indeterminates X + 1 , ..., X + n ,X − 1 , ..., X − n subject to the defining relations: i X + X + X − i X − i = a i , i = σ i ( a i ) , X ± i α = σ ± 1 i ( α ) X ± i , ∀ α ∈ D, [ X − i , X − j ] = [ X + i , X + j ] = [ X + i , X − j ] = 0 , ∀ i ̸ = j, where [ x, y ] = xy − yx . We say that a and σ are the sets of defining elements and automorphisms of A respectively. We use also the following notation: X i := X + and Y i := X − i . i Z -grading on GWA . For an vector k = ( k 1 , . . . , k n ) ∈ Z n we put v k = v k 1 (1) · · · v k n ( n ) where for 1 ≤ i ≤ n and m ≥ 0: v ± m ( i ) = ( X ± i ) m , v 0 ( i ) = 1 . In the case n = 1, we write v m for v m (1). It follows from the definition of the GWA that A = ⊕ k ∈ Z n A k is a Z n -graded algebra ( A k A e ⊆ A k + e , for all k, e ∈ Z n ), where A k = Dv k = v k D . 1

  2. The category of generalized Weyl algebras is closed under the tensor product (over a base field) of algebras: A ⊗ A ′ = D ⊗ D ′ ( σ ∪ σ ′ , a ∪ a ′ ) . Noetherian property . Proposition 1.1 Let A be a generalized Weyl algebra with base ring D . Then 1. if D is left (right) Noetherian, then A is left (right) Noetherian; 2. if D is a domain and a i ̸ = 0 , for all i = 1 , ..., n , then A is a domain. The Weyl algebra A n . Define the n -th Weyl algebra , A n = A n ( K ), over a field (a ring) K to be the associative K -algebra with identity generated by the 2 n indeterminates X 1 , ..., X n , ∂ 1 , ..., ∂ n , subject to the relations: [ X i , X j ] = [ ∂ i , ∂ j ] = [ ∂ i , X j ] = 0 for i ̸ = j, [ ∂ i , X i ] = 1 for all i. The Weyl algebra A n is the generalized Weyl algebra A = D ( σ ; a ) of degree n where D = K [ H 1 , ..., H n ] is a polynomial ring in n variables with coefficients in K . The sets of defining elements and automorphisms of A are { a i = H i | 1 ≤ i ≤ n } and { σ i | σ i ( H j ) = H j − δ ij } , respectively, where δ ij is the Kronecker delta. Moreover, the map A n → A, X i �→ X + i , ∂ i �→ X − i , ∂ i X i �→ H i , i = 1 , . . . , n, is an algebra isomorphism. Examples of generalized Weyl algebras of degree 1. Let A = D ( σ, a ) be a generalized Weyl algebra of degree 1, a ∈ Z ( D ), σ ∈ Aut( D ). The ring A is generated by D , X = X + 1 and Y = X − 1 subject to the defining relations: Xα = σ ( α ) X and Y α = σ − 1 ( α ) Y, ∀ α ∈ D, Y X = a and XY = σ ( a ) . The algebra A = ⊕ n ∈ Z A n 2

  3. is Z -graded, where A n = Dv n , v n = X n ( n > 0) , v n = Y − n ( n < 0) , v 0 = 1 . It follows from the above relations that v n v m = ( n, m ) v n + m = v n + m < n, m > for some ( n, m ) ∈ D . If n > 0 and m > 0 then n ≥ m : ( n, − m ) = σ n ( a ) · · · σ n − m +1 ( a ) , ( − n, m ) = σ − n +1 ( a ) · · · σ − n + m ( a ) , ( n, − m ) = σ n ( a ) · · · σ ( a ) , ( − n, m ) = σ − n +1 ( a ) · · · a, n ≤ m : in other cases ( n, m ) = 1. Let A ( i ) = D i ( σ i , a i ) ( i = 1 , ..., n ) be a GWA of degree 1 over a field K and assume that each σ i is a K -automorphism, then their tensor product ⊗ n 1 A ( i ) = ( ⊗ n 1 D i )(( σ i ) , ( a i )) is a GWA of degree n over K . This construction allows us to build a great deal of examples of generalized Weyl alge- bras of degree n . For example, the n -th Weyl algebra A n ( K ) can be written in this way as A n ( K ) = A 1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ A 1 , n times. Example 1. A = K [ H ]( σ, a ) , where σ is an arbitrary automorphism of K [ H ] , i.e. σ ( H ) = λH + µ, λ ̸ = 0 , µ ∈ K, a ∈ K [ H ] . When σ ( H ) = H − 1 and a = H we get the 1st Weyl algebra: A 1 ≃ K [ H ]( σ, a = H ) . Let F m = A G 1 be the fixed ring where G is the cyclic group of order m , acting on the Weyl algebra A 1 as follows: ∂ �→ ω∂, X �→ ω − 1 X, ω : A 1 → A 1 , where ω is a primitive m ’th root of unity. Then F m = K < ∂ m , ∂X, X m > ≃ K [ H ]( σ, a = m m H ( H − 1 /m ) . . . ( H − ( m − 1) /m ) , 3

  4. ∂ m ↔ Y, X m ↔ X, ∂X/m ↔ H, is a GWA of degree 1, where σ ( H ) = H − 1 , char K = 0. Case, µ = 0 . Let Λ = K < X, Y | XY = λY X >, the quantum plane , then Λ ≃ K [ H ]( σ, a = H ) , σ ( H ) = λH. Let A ( S 2 K < X, Y, H | XH = λHX, Y H = λ − 1 HY, λ ) = λ 1 / 2 Y X = − ( c − H )( d + H ) , λ − 1 / 2 XY = − ( c − λH )( d + λH ) > be the algebra of functions on the quantum 2-dimensional sphere , then A ( S 2 λ ) ≃ K [ H ]( σ, a = − λ − 1 / 2 ( c − H )( d + H )) , σ ( H ) = λH. The quantum Weyl algebra A 1 ( q ) = < x, ∂ | ∂x − qx∂ = 1 > of degree 1 over K ( q ̸ = 0 ∈ K ) is the GWA A 1 ( q ) = K [ H ]( σ, a = H ) of degree 1 where σ ( H ) = q − 1 ( H − 1). Example 2. A = D ( σ, a ) , where D = K [ H, ( H − µ/ (1 − λ )) − 1 ] , σ ( H ) = λH + µ, λ ̸ = 0 , 1 , µ ∈ K, a ̸ = 0 ∈ D . In particular, when µ = 0 we have A = K [ H, H − 1 ]( σ, a ) , σ ( H ) = λH. Example 3. Consider the K -algebra Λ( b ), deformation of Usl (2) which is generated by X, Y, Z subject to the relations: [ H, X ] = X, [ H, Y ] = − Y, [ X, Y ] = b ̸ = 0 ∈ K [ H ] . Then Λ( b ) ∼ = K [ H, C ]( σ, a = C − α ) 4

  5. where σ : K [ H, C ] → K [ H, C ] , H → H − 1 , C → C, and α ∈ K [ H ] is a solution of the equation α − σ ( α ) = b. For b = 2 H , Λ( b ) = Usl (2) . If K is a field of characteristic zero, then the center of Λ( b ) is K [ C ] . For any λ ∈ K the factor algebra Λ( b, λ ) := Λ( b ) / Λ( b )( C − λ ) is isomorphic to the GWA from Example 1 with the defining element λ − α . Let U ( λ ) := Usl (2) /Usl (2)( C − λ ) ≃ K [ H ]( σ, λ − H ( H + 1)) be the infinite dimensional primitive factor of Usl (2). Example 4. The quantum Heisenberg algebra: H q = K < X, Y, H | XH = q 2 HX, Y H = q − 2 HY, XY − q − 2 Y X = q − 1 H >, q ∈ K, q 4 ̸ = 1 is isomorphic to the GWA of degree 1: H q ≃ k [ H, C ]( σ ; a = ρ − 1 C − µH = q 2 ( C − H/q (1 − q 4 )) , σ ( H ) = q 2 H, σ ( C ) = q − 2 C. The element Ω = HC belongs to the centre of H q . For each λ ̸ = 0 ∈ K the factor algebra H q ( λ ) := H q / (Ω − λ ) is the GWA of degree 1: H q ( λ ) ≃ K [ H, H − 1 ]( σ ; a = q 2 ( λH − 1 − H/q (1 − q 4 )) , σ ( H ) = q 2 H. The ambiskew polynomial rings E are GWAs . Let D be an ring, σ ∈ Aut( D ). Suppose that elements b and ρ belong to the centre of D , moreover, ρ is invertible and σ -stable, i.e. σ ( ρ ) = ρ. Then the ambiskew polynomial ring E = D < σ ; b, ρ > is obtained by adjoining to D two symbols X and Y subject to the relations: Xα = σ ( α ) X, Y α = σ − 1 ( α ) Y, ∀ α ∈ D ; XY − ρY X = b. 5

  6. If D = K [ H ] is the polynomial ring, ρ = 1, b = 2 H , and σ ( H ) = H − 1 , we get the universal enveloping algebra Usl (2)). The ring E is the iterated skew polynomial ring E = D [ Y ; σ − 1 ][ X ; σ, ∂ ] where ∂ is the σ − derivation of D [ Y ; σ − 1 ] such that ∂D = 0 and ∂Y = b (here σ is extended from D to D [ Y ; σ − 1 ] by the rule: σ ( Y ) = ρY ). Lemma 1.2 shows that the rings E = D < σ ; b, ρ > are generalized Weyl algebras of degree 1. Lemma 1.2 Each iterated skew polynomial ring E is the generalized Weyl algebra of degree 1 with base polynomial ring D [ H ] and defining automorphism σ : σ ( H ) = ρ ( H ) + b ( σ acts on D as before): D < σ ; b, ρ > ≃ D [ H ]( σ ; a = H ) , X ↔ X, Y ↔ Y, d ↔ d ( ∀ d ∈ D ) , Y X ↔ H. An element d of a ring D is normal if dD = Dd . Lemma 1.3 The following are equivalent. 1. C = ρ ( Y X + α ) = XY + σ ( α ) is normal in D < σ ; b, ρ > ; 2. ρα − σ ( α ) = b for some α ∈ D ; 3. D [ H ] = D [ C 1 ] for some C 1 ∈ D [ H ] such that σ ( C 1 ) = γC 1 where γ ∈ D is invertible and σ ( γ ) = γ. Corollary 1.4 Let E be as in Lemma 1.3. Then D < σ ; b, ρ > ≃ D [ C ]( σ, a = ρ − 1 C − α ) , σ ( C ) = ρC. Putting ρ = 1 we obtain the following Lemma and Corollary. Lemma 1.5 The following are equivalent. 1. C = Y X + α = XY + σ ( α ) is central in D < σ ; b, ρ = 1 > ; 2. α − σ ( α ) = b for some α ∈ D ; 3. D [ H ] = D [ C 1 ] for some C 1 ∈ D [ H ] such that σ ( C 1 ) = C 1 (then C 1 = γC for some central invertible σ -stable element γ ). Corollary 1.6 Suppose that Lemma 1.5 holds. Then D < σ ; b, ρ = 1 > ≃ D [ C ]( σ, a = C − α ) , σ ( C ) = C. 6

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend