GENERALIZED DENSITY FUNCTIONAL EQUATION OF STATE FOR SUPERNOVA & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

generalized density functional equation of state for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

GENERALIZED DENSITY FUNCTIONAL EQUATION OF STATE FOR SUPERNOVA & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

GENERALIZED DENSITY FUNCTIONAL EQUATION OF STATE FOR SUPERNOVA & NEUTRON STAR SIMULATIONS MacKenzie Warren J.P . Olson, M. Meixner, & G. Mathews Symposium on Neutron Stars in the Multimessenger Era Ohio University May 24th, 2016


slide-1
SLIDE 1

GENERALIZED DENSITY FUNCTIONAL EQUATION OF STATE FOR SUPERNOVA & NEUTRON STAR SIMULATIONS

MacKenzie Warren

J.P . Olson, M. Meixner, & G. Mathews Symposium on Neutron Stars in the Multimessenger Era Ohio University May 24th, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

GENERALIZED DENSITY FUNCTIONAL EQUATION OF STATE FOR SUPERNOVA & NEUTRON STAR SIMULATIONS

MacKenzie Warren

J.P . Olson, M. Meixner, & G. Mathews Symposium on Neutron Stars in the Multimessenger Era Ohio University May 24th, 2016

slide-3
SLIDE 3

EQUATION OF STATE IN CCSNE

➤ Multi-component system: electrons, photons, nuclei, free

nucleons, pions, etc

➤ Large range of thermodynamic conditions: ➤ Electron fraction Ye = 0 →1 ➤ Density n = 0 → 1015 g/cm3 ➤ Temperature T = 0 → 150 MeV ➤ Problems persist… ➤ Phenomenological approaches necessary ➤ Uncertainties in nuclear data ➤ Neutron stars want stiff EoS, supernovae want soft EoS

slide-4
SLIDE 4

NUCLEAR EQUATIONS OF STATE FOR ASTROPHYSICAL SIMULATIONS

Liquid Drop Model:

Lattimer & Swesty

Relativistic Mean Field:

  • G. Shen et al, H.

Shen et al, Hempel et al, etc

Density Functional Theory:

????

slide-5
SLIDE 5

NUCLEAR EQUATIONS OF STATE FOR ASTROPHYSICAL SIMULATIONS

Liquid Drop Model:

Lattimer & Swesty

Relativistic Mean Field:

  • G. Shen et al, H.

Shen et al, Hempel et al, etc

Density Functional Theory:

Notre Dame- Livermore

➤ Harness existing

DFT models for astrophysical simulations

slide-6
SLIDE 6

WHAT WE DID

➤ Developed Notre Dame-

Livermore Equation of State

➤ DFT approach with three-

body forces

➤ Transition 0.1 n0 → n0 ➤ Includes pions ➤ First order or crossover

transition to QGP

➤ Explored EoS dependence of

CCSNe

0.1 0.2 0.3

Denisty (fm )

20 40 60 80 100

Pressure (MeV/fm )

LS220 Shen NDL - GsKI NDL - KDE0v1 NDL - LNS

  • 3

T = 10 MeV Ye = 0.3

  • 3

Olson et al (in prep)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

REGIONS OF HADRONIC EOS

Below n0:

➤ NSE ➤ 9 element

nuclear network

➤ “Pasta”

Above n0:

➤ Skyrme force ➤ Pions

Transition to QGP?

Soft Repulsive 3-body force Stiff Soft again?

Ravenhall, Pethick, & Wilson Lattimer & Swesty

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ABOVE n0

QGP modeled using MIT Bag model:

Ω = X

i

(Ωi

q0 + Ωi q2) + Ωg0 + Ωg2 + BV

McLerran (1986)

QGP Phase transition?

u,d (massless) s (massive)

165 ≤ B1/4 ≤ 240 MeV Ftherm → Ω(n, T) − Ω(n, T = 0) Ftot = FSkyrme + Ftherm + Fπ +Fel+rad + 8.79 MeV

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PIONS

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

Density (fm )

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

Pions (and other resonances) soften EoS at high T

Charge fraction Yp Yπ Ye

  • 3

Olson et al (in prep)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Olson et al (2016)

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Radius (km)

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Mass (M )

GsKI GsKII KDE0 LNS MSL0 NRAPR Ska25s20 Ska35s20 SKRA SkT1 SkT2 SkT3 Skxs20 SQMC650 SQMC700 SV-sym32

⦿

J0348+0432

Olson et al (in prep)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

LIVERMORE SUPERNOVA MODEL

2 4 6 8 Time post-bounce (s) 10

5

10

6

10

7

10

8

10

9

10

10

Radius (cm)

General relativistic spherically symmetric supernova model

➤ Flux limited diffusion

scheme

➤ Explodes via enhanced

convection below neutrinosphere

νe, ¯ νe, νx

slide-12
SLIDE 12

EOS DEPENDENCE OF CCSNE

  • 0.05

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

Time post-bounce (s)

10

50

10

51

10

52

Kinetic energy (ergs)

Bowers & Wilson GSkI GSkII KDE0v1 LNS MSL0 NRAPR Ska25s20 Ska35s20 SKRA SkT1 SkT2 SkT3 Skxs20 SQMC650 SQMC700 SV-sym32

Olson et al (in prep)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

EOS DEPENDENCE OF CCSNE

  • 0.05

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

Time post-bounce (s)

10

51

10

52

10

53

Luminosity (ergs/s)

Bowers & Wilson GSkI GSkII KDE0v1 LNS MSL0 NRAPR Ska25s20 Ska35s20 SKRA SkT1 SkT2 SkT3 Skxs20 SQMC650 SQMC700 SV-sym32

Olson et al (in prep)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

MIXED PHASE

GSI

slide-15
SLIDE 15

MIXED PHASE

GSI

?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

QGP MIXED PHASE

1 χ

Quark-Gluon Plasma Hadronic

Figure from J.P . Olson

χ = VQ/(VQ + VH)

Assume: Pressure equilibrium Global charge & baryon number conservation QGP modeled using MIT Bag model: Ω = X

i

(Ωi

q0 + Ωi q2) + Ωg0 + Ωg2 + BV

slide-17
SLIDE 17

MIXED PHASE: SAGERT RESULTS

Sagert et al (2009)

➤ Secondary collapse to QGP

results in second shock

➤ Successful explosion in 1D ➤ Distinct neutrino emission

slide-18
SLIDE 18

MAXIMUM MASS DEPENDS ON BAG CONSTANT

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Radius (km)

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Mass (M )

None B = 180 MeV B = 190 MeV B = 200 MeV B = 210 MeV No 2-loop

⦿

1/4 1/4 1/4 1/4

Need B1/4 ≥190

Olson et al (in prep)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Density (fm )

  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 Y Y

  • 3

p q

χ = 0.1 χ = 0.3 χ = 0.5 χ = 0.7 χ = 0.9

Pure hadronic Mixed phase Pure QGP

T = 10 MeV Ye = 0.3

QGP MIXED PHASE

slide-20
SLIDE 20

QGP MIXED PHASE

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2

Density (fm )

20 40 60 80 100 120

Temperature (MeV)

  • 3

Hadronic phase Mixed phase Quark phase

  • 3

Olson et al (in prep)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

MIXED PHASE: PRESSURE

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Density (fm )

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

Pressure (MeV/fm )

Y = 0.1 Y = 0.25 Y = 0.4

  • 3

Olson et al (in prep)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

QGP MIXED PHASE

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Density (fm )

1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4

Adiabatic index

T = 10 MeV T = 25 MeV T = 50 MeV

Secondary collapse? (Effective)

  • 3

Olson et al (in prep)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

QGP MIXED PHASE

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Density (fm )

1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4

Adiabatic index

T = 10 MeV T = 25 MeV T = 50 MeV

Secondary collapse! (Effective)

  • 3

Olson et al (in prep)

Coming soon: SN simulations!

slide-24
SLIDE 24

IN CONCLUSION…

➤ New nuclear EoS for use in CCSNe

simulations

➤ EoS will be publicly available ➤ Updates: ➤ Add kaons, hyperons, etc… ➤ Improve pasta phases ➤ Continued study of EoS dependence of

CCSNe

➤ Convection ➤ QGP phase transition possible with new

NDL EoS

➤ Secondary collapse may lead to

successful explosion (Sagert et al 2009)

➤ Observables?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

THANK YOU!

slide-26
SLIDE 26