“Spacetime tells matter how to move; matter tells spacetime how to curve.” — John Wheeler
General Relativity Spacetime tells matter how to move; matter tells - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
General Relativity Spacetime tells matter how to move; matter tells - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
General Relativity Spacetime tells matter how to move; matter tells spacetime how to curve. John Wheeler 3 Gravitational Waves Strain on spacetime. Generated by time-varying quadrupole moment. Propagate at speed of light. Unimpeded
3
4
Strain on spacetime. Generated by time-varying quadrupole moment. Propagate at speed of light. Unimpeded by matter.
Gravitational Waves
credit: wikipedia
0.000000000000000000001
Hanford, WA Livingston, LA Pisa, Italy
LIGO-Virgo Network
6
7
8
9
O1 BBH: Abbott et al. (2016) PRX 6, 041015 GW170104: Abbott et al. (2017) PRL 118, 221101 GW170608: Abbott et al. (2017) ApJL 851 L35 GW170814: Abbot et al. (2017) PRL 119, 141101
11
Isolated (“Field”) Formation
Belczynski et al. (2016)
12
credit: Carl Rodriguez
Dynamical Formation
Rodriguez et al. (2016)
13
prior
Black Hole Spins
13
GW150914
BH spin not extremal
Abbott et al. (2016):
PRX 6, 041015
Black Hole Spins
13
LVT151012
Abbott et al. (2016):
PRX 6, 041015
Black Hole Spins
13
GW151226
At least one spinning BH
Abbott et al. (2016):
PRX 6, 041015
Black Hole Spins
13
GW151226
At least one spinning BH
Abbott et al. (2016):
PRX 6, 041015
Black Hole Spins
χeff = m1a1 cos θ1 + m2a2 cos θ2 m1 + m2
<latexit sha1_base64="EHdcnmso4rxYQenBhRrmLNfThYw=">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</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="EHdcnmso4rxYQenBhRrmLNfThYw=">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</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="EHdcnmso4rxYQenBhRrmLNfThYw=">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</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="EHdcnmso4rxYQenBhRrmLNfThYw=">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</latexit>O1 + (some of) O2
15
Farr et al (2017): arXiv:1709.07896
16
Simple Population Model
Current Results
17
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75
fraction of informative events w/ χeff > 0 (ρ) fraction of informative events (α)
marginal posterior density
Current Results
17
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75
fraction of informative events w/ χeff > 0 (ρ) fraction of informative events (α)
marginal posterior density
Dynamical
Current Results
17
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75
fraction of informative events w/ χeff > 0 (ρ) fraction of informative events (α)
marginal posterior density
Dynamical Field
Spin Magnitudes
18
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
a
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
p(a)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
a
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
p(a)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
a
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
p(a)
Aligned Isotropic
19 19
GW170817
20
21
Abbott et al. (2017) arXiv:1710.05833
21
Abbott et al. (2017) arXiv:1710.05833
22
- 100 -50
50
GW γ-ray X-ray UV Optical IR Radio
10-2 t-tc (s) t-tc (days) 10-1 100 101
LIGO, Virgo Fermi, INTEGRAL, Astrosat, IPN, Insight-HXMT, Swift, AGILE, CALET, H.E.S.S., HAWC, Konus-Wind Swift, MAXI/GSC, NuSTAR, Chandra, INTEGRAL Swift, HST Swope, DECam, DLT40, REM-ROS2, HST, Las Cumbres, SkyMapper, VISTA, MASTER, Magellan, Subaru, Pan-STARRS1, HCT, TZAC, LSGT, T17, Gemini-South, NTT, GROND, SOAR, ESO-VLT, KMTNet, ESO-VST, VIRT, SALT, CHILESCOPE, TOROS, BOOTES-5, Zadko, iTelescope.Net, AAT, Pi of the Sky, AST3-2, ATLAS, Danish Tel, DFN, T80S, EABA REM-ROS2, VISTA, Gemini-South, 2MASS,Spitzer, NTT, GROND, SOAR, NOT, ESO-VLT, Kanata Telescope, HST ATCA, VLA, ASKAP, VLBA, GMRT, MWA, LOFAR, LWA, ALMA, OVRO, EVN, e-MERLIN, MeerKAT, Parkes, SRT, Effelsberg SALT ESO-NTT SOAR ESO-VLT 7000o 4000o t-tc (days) 1.2 1.4 2.4wavelength (nm) normalized Fλ 400 600 1000 2000
INTEGRAL/SPI-ACS Fermi/GBMt-tc (s)
- 12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
counts/s (arb. scale) frequency (Hz) 500 400 300 200 100 50
LIGO - Virgo Chandra 9d J VLA 16.4d Radio Las Cumbres 11.57h w DECam 11.40h iz MASTER 11.31h W VISTA 11.24h YJKs X-ray DLT40 11.08h h 1M2H Swope 10.86h i
Talking Picture
Abbott et al. (2017) arXiv:1710.05833
Masses
23
Abbott et al. (2018) arXiv:1805.11579
Known NSs
24
Opel and Freire (2016)
25
- 100 -50
50
GW γ-ray X-ray UV Optical IR Radio
10-2 t-tc (s) t-tc (days) 10-1 100 101
LIGO, Virgo Fermi, INTEGRAL, Astrosat, IPN, Insight-HXMT, Swift, AGILE, CALET, H.E.S.S., HAWC, Konus-Wind Swift, MAXI/GSC, NuSTAR, Chandra, INTEGRAL Swift, HST Swope, DECam, DLT40, REM-ROS2, HST, Las Cumbres, SkyMapper, VISTA, MASTER, Magellan, Subaru, Pan-STARRS1, HCT, TZAC, LSGT, T17, Gemini-South, NTT, GROND, SOAR, ESO-VLT, KMTNet, ESO-VST, VIRT, SALT, CHILESCOPE, TOROS, BOOTES-5, Zadko, iTelescope.Net, AAT, Pi of the Sky, AST3-2, ATLAS, Danish Tel, DFN, T80S, EABA REM-ROS2, VISTA, Gemini-South, 2MASS,Spitzer, NTT, GROND, SOAR, NOT, ESO-VLT, Kanata Telescope, HST ATCA, VLA, ASKAP, VLBA, GMRT, MWA, LOFAR, LWA, ALMA, OVRO, EVN, e-MERLIN, MeerKAT, Parkes, SRT, Effelsberg SALT ESO-NTT SOAR ESO-VLT 7000o 4000o t-tc (days) 1.2 1.4 2.4wavelength (nm) normalized Fλ 400 600 1000 2000
INTEGRAL/SPI-ACS Fermi/GBMt-tc (s)
- 12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
counts/s (arb. scale) frequency (Hz) 500 400 300 200 100 50
LIGO - Virgo Chandra 9d J VLA 16.4d Radio Las Cumbres 11.57h w DECam 11.40h iz MASTER 11.31h W VISTA 11.24h YJKs X-ray DLT40 11.08h h 1M2H Swope 10.86h i
Talking Picture
Abbott et al. (2017) arXiv:1710.05833
EM Counterparts to BNS
26
credit: Berger (2014)
GRB and afterglow
27
credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center
GRB and afterglow
27
credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center
credit: Lijnis Nelemans
Kilonova
28
29
30
credit:Open Kilonova Catalog Cowperthwaite et al. (2017)
31
32
Standard Siren
33
Abbott et al. (2017) arXiv:1710.05835
Speed of Gravity
34
temporal offset: 1.74 ± 0.05 s
−3 × 10−15 ≤ ∆v νEM ≥ +7 × 10−16
Abbott et al. (2017) arXiv:1710.05834
Conclusions
35