gene-expression studies on limiting sample amounts Stefaan Derveaux - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

gene expression studies on limiting sample amounts
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

gene-expression studies on limiting sample amounts Stefaan Derveaux - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

RNA pre-amplification enables large-scale RT-qPCR gene-expression studies on limiting sample amounts Stefaan Derveaux 1,2 , Jolle Vermeulen 1 1 Ghent University 2 Biogazelle RNA degradation Small sample Different size platforms Pitfalls


slide-1
SLIDE 1

RNA pre-amplification enables large-scale RT-qPCR gene-expression studies on limiting sample amounts

Stefaan Derveaux 1,2, Joëlle Vermeulen 1

1 Ghent University 2 Biogazelle

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Advances in Genomics, January 28th 2010

RNA degradation Different platforms Inappropriate study design Invalidated statistical methods Lack of validation Small sample size

Pitfalls and bottlenecks compromising gene expression studies

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Advances in Genomics, January 28th 2010

RNA degradation Different platforms Inappropriate study design Invalidated statistical methods Lack of validation Small sample size

Pitfalls and bottlenecks compromising gene expression studies

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Advances in Genomics, January 28th 2010

RNA pre-amplification 5 to 50 ng RNA

RNA pre-amplification WT-Ovation (NuGEN)

5 µg cDNA quantification of ~1000 genes by qPCR

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Advances in Genomics, January 28th 2010

RNA pre-amplification 5 to 50 ng RNA

RNA pre-amplification WT-Ovation (NuGEN)

5 µg cDNA quantification of ~1000 genes by qPCR

  • 6 neuroblastoma cell lines
  • 4 commercially available

reference RNA samples

  • 740 neuroblastoma

samples

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Advances in Genomics, January 28th 2010

pre-amplification yield as a function of RNA input

5 – 15 – 50 ng the yield of pre-amplified cDNA is independent of the amount of input RNA

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Advances in Genomics, January 28th 2010

preservation of differential expression after pre-amplification 10 differentially expressed genes dCq = Cq MNS – Cq MNA similar results comparing 6 different cell lines

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Advances in Genomics, January 28th 2010

preservation of differential expression after pre-amplification

TGFBI

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Advances in Genomics, January 28th 2010

correlation of differential gene expression before and after pre-amplification

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Advances in Genomics, January 28th 2010

unbiased pre-amplification procedure 194 genes, 4 RNA reference samples, 1164 data points ddCq (bias) dCqNA - dCqA difference in dCq value between 2 samples before and after pre-amplification

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Advances in Genomics, January 28th 2010

pre-amplification without introduction of substantial bias

the lower the gene is expressed the higher the bias lower pre-amplification efficiency results in higher bias

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Advances in Genomics, January 28th 2010

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Advances in Genomics, January 28th 2010

pre-amplification as a function of RNA quality

RNA pre- amplification RNA quality control

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Advances in Genomics, January 28th 2010

conclusions: linear isothermal Ribo-SPIA pre-amplification method

  • constant yield of pre-amplified cDNA

independent of the amount of input RNA

  • preservation of differential gene-expression

after pre-amplification without introduction of substantial bias

  • generates sufficient material for diagnostic and prognostic work-up
  • enables large-scale qPCR gene-expression studies using limited amounts of

sample material

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Advances in Genomics, January 28th 2010

Acknowledgements

  • Joëlle Vermeulen
  • Steve Lefever
  • Els De Smet
  • Katleen De Preter
  • Nurten Yigit
  • Anne De Paepe
  • Filip Pattyn
  • Frank Speleman
  • Jo Vandesompele
  • Lars Vahlkamp
  • Bas Hulshof
  • Roderick Jensen

http://medgen.ugent.be