Genco Shipping & Trading Limited Noble Capital Markets 14 th - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

genco shipping trading limited
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Genco Shipping & Trading Limited Noble Capital Markets 14 th - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Genco Shipping & Trading Limited Noble Capital Markets 14 th Annual Investor Conference January 2018 Forward Looking Statements "Safe Harbor" Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 This


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Genco Shipping & Trading Limited

Noble Capital Markets’

14th Annual Investor Conference

January 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Forward Looking Statements

"Safe Harbor" Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

  • f 1995

This presentation contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements use words such as “anticipate,” “budget,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with a discussion of potential future events, circumstances or future operating or financial performance. These forward looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and observations. Included among the factors that, in our view, could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward looking statements contained in this report are the following: (i) further declines or sustained weakness in demand in the drybulk shipping industry; (ii) continuation of weakness or further declines in drybulk shipping rates; (iii) changes in the supply of or demand for drybulk products, generally or in particular regions; (iv) changes in the supply of drybulk carriers including newbuilding of vessels or lower than anticipated scrapping of older vessels; (v) changes in rules and regulations applicable to the cargo industry, including, without limitation, legislation adopted by international organizations or by individual countries and actions taken by regulatory authorities; (vi) increases in costs and expenses including but not limited to: crew wages, insurance, provisions, lube, oil, bunkers, repairs, maintenance and general, administrative, and management fee expenses; (vii) whether our insurance arrangements are adequate; (viii) changes in general domestic and international political conditions; (ix) acts of war, terrorism, or piracy; (x) changes in the condition of the Company’s vessels or applicable maintenance or regulatory standards (which may affect, among other things,

  • ur anticipated drydocking or maintenance and repair costs) and unanticipated drydock expenditures; (xi) the Company’s acquisition or

disposition of vessels; (xii) the amount of offhire time needed to complete repairs on vessels and the timing and amount of any reimbursement by our insurance carriers for insurance claims, including offhire days; (xiii) the completion of definitive documentation with respect to charters; (xiv) charterers’ compliance with the terms of their charters in the current market environment; (xv) the extent to which our operating results continue to be affected by weakness in market conditions and charter rates; (xvi) our ability to maintain contracts that are critical to our

  • peration, to obtain and maintain acceptable terms with our vendors, customers and service providers and to retain key executives, managers

and employees; and other factors listed from time to time in our public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission including, without limitation, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 and its subsequent reports on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K. Our ability to pay dividends in any period will depend upon various factors, including the limitations under any credit agreements to which we may be a party, applicable provisions of Marshall Islands law and the final determination by the Board of Directors each quarter after its review of our financial performance. The timing and amount of dividends, if any, could also be affected by factors affecting cash flows, results

  • f operations, required capital expenditures, or reserves. As a result, the amount of dividends actually paid may vary. We do not undertake

any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Overview of Genco & Drybulk Market Dynamics

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Executive Overview

Favorable market fundamentals Commodity demand growth is forecast to outpace vessel supply growth Strengthening global economic landscape Increased demand from emerging market economies Historically low net fleet growth Genco is well positioned for the market recovery Spot exposure to improving freight rate environment Well capitalized balance sheet with attractive debt facilities Largest US based drybulk ship owner Drybulk company focused on major and minor bulk commodities Headquartered in the US Founded in December 2004 (NYSE:GNK) Full service operating platform with a diverse fleet of 60 vessels Shifted business model from tonnage provided to active owner/operator to improve margins Providing logistics solution to major cargo owners Strong corporate governance Transparent, US filer, independent board

We believe that drybulk shipping is in the early stages of a market recovery offering attractive upside potential

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

  • 4%
  • 2%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018F

Fleet Growth Drybulk Trade Growth

Asian financial crisis

Supply & Demand Development – Last 20 Years

Source: Clarksons Research Services Limited 2018

(%)

Drybulk Supply & Demand Growth

Demand outpaced supply leading to strong market Chinese stimulus Record fleet growth Financial Crisis Steady growth, fewer deliveries China joins WTO Demand outpacing supply growth Recovering market since 2H 2017 BDI hit record lows

Demand growth outpaced supply growth during various points in the 2000s

A strong freight rate environment ensued leading to increased ordering of newbuilding vessels

Robust ordering during boom years led to fleet growth outpacing demand growth for several years thereafter

Recently, supply growth has eased to levels not seen since the late 1990s / early 2000s

This led to demand growth exceeding supply growth in 2017 resulting in a stronger drybulk market environment

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

2018 Drybulk Outlook

  • Projected demand growth: 3%-4%
  • Iron ore trade expected to drive
  • verall drybulk trade growth
  • Vale expected to increase iron ore
  • utput by +25MT
  • Steel mill margins anticipated to

incentivize production and use of high quality seaborne iron ore

  • Coal trade remains x-factor for

market, could be boosted by inventory restock in India

  • Steady growth anticipated in minor

bulks led by grain and bauxite trades

  • Projected demand growth: 3%-4%
  • Iron ore trade expected to drive
  • verall drybulk trade growth
  • Vale expected to increase iron ore
  • utput by +25MT
  • Steel mill margins anticipated to

incentivize production and use of high quality seaborne iron ore

  • Coal trade remains x-factor for

market, could be boosted by inventory restock in India

  • Steady growth anticipated in minor

bulks led by grain and bauxite trades

  • Projected supply growth: 1%-2%
  • Orderbook as a percentage of the

fleet is near 15 year low

  • 56.6mdwt is >= 20 years old
  • 45 VLOCs >= 250,000 dwt with an

average age of 24 years could augment Capesize scrapping

  • Expecting seasonal rise in

newbuilding deliveries in Q1

  • Marginal net fleet growth forecast for

2H 2018

  • Expecting ordering activity similar to

what has been seen from Q2 2017

  • nwards
  • Projected supply growth: 1%-2%
  • Orderbook as a percentage of the

fleet is near 15 year low

  • 56.6mdwt is >= 20 years old
  • 45 VLOCs >= 250,000 dwt with an

average age of 24 years could augment Capesize scrapping

  • Expecting seasonal rise in

newbuilding deliveries in Q1

  • Marginal net fleet growth forecast for

2H 2018

  • Expecting ordering activity similar to

what has been seen from Q2 2017

  • nwards

Expected 2018 Demand Fundamentals Expected 2018 Supply Fundamentals Freight rate environment strengthened in 2017 Supply and demand fundamentals are expected to further improve in 2018

Sources: Clarksons Research Services Limited 2018, Marsoft Incorporated

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Key Drybulk Trading Lanes

Source: Braemar

Iron Ore Coal Grain Drybulk shipping is a global business linking trade partners from around the world

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Seaborne Drybulk Trade Increasing Further

Source: Clarksons Research Services Limited 2018

  • 150

300 450 600 750 900 1,050 1,200 1,350 1,500 1,650 1,800 1,950 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

MT

Seaborne Drybulk Trade by Commodity – Last 20 Years

Iron Ore Coal Grain Forest Products Steel Products Other

29% 24% 10% 37%

Iron Ore Coal Grain Minor Bulks Percentage of Global Trade – Last 20 Years

2017 – 5.1 bt 1998 – 2.1 bt 20% 21% 11% 48%

Iron Ore Coal Grain Minor Bulks

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Genco’s Fleet Strongly Aligns With Global Trade Dynamics

Source: Clarksons Research Services Limited 2018

Iron Ore Coal Grain Minor Bulk 37% 10% 24% 29% 34% 14% 23% 29% Genco Cargoes Carried Global Drybulk Trade

Percentage of Trade – 2017

Genco’s fleet of major and minor bulk vessels largely mirrors global trade flows, enabling the Company to capitalize on key trade routes

58% 42%

Major Bulk Fleet Minor Bulk Fleet

Commodity Genco Fleet Distribution (dwt) Primary Vessel Type

Capesize

(13 vessels)

Panamax

(6 vessels)

Supramax

(26 vessels)

Handysize

(15 vessels) (# owned by Genco)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Upside Earnings Potential Combined With Steadier Income Stream

Source: Marsoft Incorporated

13 6 26 15

  • 5

10 15 20 25 30 Capesize Panamax Ultramax / Supramax / Handymax Handysize # of Vessels Minor Bulk 1.9 0.9 0.8 0.4

Genco’s Fleet Concentrates on the Major and Minor Bulks

Shipping Market “Beta” Provides upside potential, highly linked to the iron ore trade Steadier income stream, versatile cargo carrying capabilities Major Bulk

Capesize exposure provides upside earnings potential while minor bulk fleet provides a steadier income stream

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Genco’s Fleet Commercial Strategy – Major & Minor Bulks

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Genco’s Enhanced Commercial Platform Drives Revenue Growth

Active Approach to Revenue Growth Active Approach to Revenue Growth

Focus on increasing margins

Concentration on full in-house commercial platform

Providing full logistics solution to major cargo owners Incorporating Voyage Charters & Direct Cargo Liftings Incorporating Voyage Charters & Direct Cargo Liftings Expanding Customer Base Expanding Customer Base

Repositioned a portion of the fleet to capture Atlantic premium

Identified key trading lanes by vessel

Vessel speed and consumption optimization

Diversifying customer base enabling Genco to get closer to cargo

Strong risk management practices

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Commercial Strategy – Major Bulk

Major Bulk Commercial Strategy

Direct exposure to projected ton-mile demand growth highly driven by iron ore and coal

Positioned the fleet for a stronger 2018

Diversifying and expanding the customer base

Staggering expiration dates of charters

Utilizing a portfolio approach

Singapore office focuses on Capesize vessels as well as backhaul trades on the minor bulk fleet

9 3 1 5 1

  • 2

4 6 8 10 12 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Number of Vessels Minimum Expiration Capesize Panamax

  • Ability to capture potential

market upside in 2018 Major Bulk Charters Positioned for Market Recovery Major Bulk End Users

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Commercial Strategy – Minor Bulks

13% 73% 87% 27% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Nov-16 Current Atlantic vs. Pacific Exposure: Minor Bulk Fleet Atlantic Pacific $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000

Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 Jan-16 Jan-17 Jan-18

Baltic Supramax Index Routes (Atlantic vs. Pacific Routes: 2010 to Present) Atlantic Pacific

Minor Bulk Commercial Strategy

Provide full service logistics solutions to top tier cargo owners

Reallocated freight exposure through a more balanced Atlantic vs. Pacific split

Repositioned select geared vessels during 2017

Reduction of ballast legs and higher fleet utilization through concentrated customer geographic focus

Capture earnings premium offered by Atlantic market

Implementing and integrating new commercial resources

Added Vice President and Commercial Director, Minor Bulk Fleet

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Operational & Capital Structure

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Operations and Technical Management

Post-fixture logistics management of vessels

Enables charterers to efficiently carry cargoes

Monitors vessel performance to maximize revenue

Promotes safety and regulatory compliance

Strong safety record with low incidents

Selected Third-Party Technical Managers

Third-Party Technical Managers In-House Oversight In-House Drydocking Vessel Performance Tracking Benchmarking We believe this is an efficient cost structure Actively oversee third- party technical managers

$5,035 $4,870 $4,514 $4,427

$4,000 $4,200 $4,400 $4,600 $4,800 $5,000 $5,200

2014 2015 2016 9 Mos 2017 DVOE Genco’s Daily Vessel Operating Expenses Technical Management Approach In-House Operations and Logistics Group

We utilize two leading third-party technical managers for the day-to-day management of our fleet

  • Perform routine maintenance
  • Arrange for purchasing and supplies
  • Provide access to large crew pools

Benchmark across managers through KPIs and industry best practices

Benefits from third-party managers’ economies and scalability

In-house technical team directly handles all drydockings

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Consolidated Capital Structure

(1) (1) Token fixed debt repayments of $0.1 million per quarter during 2017 and 2018. Fixed debt repayments step up to $18.6 million per quarter commencing in Q1 2021.

Debt Outstanding: $26.2m Fixed Quarterly Debt Repayments: $0.7m Debt Outstanding: $405.1m Fixed Quarterly Debt Repayments: $7.6m - commencing in Q1 2019 Debt Outstanding: $95.3m Fixed Quarterly Debt Repayments: $2.5m - commencing in Q4 2017 Genco Shipping & Trading Limited $400 Million Credit Facility $98 Million Hayfin Facility $33 Million ABN/Sinosure Facilities 7 Capesize, 3 Panamax, 2 Ultramax, 19 Supramax, 1 Handymax, 13 Handysize Vessels 6 Capesize, 3 Panamax, 2 Supramax, 2 Handysize Vessels 2 Ultramax Vessels

Cash (including restricted cash) 185.1 $ $400m Credit Facility 405.1 $98m Hayfin Facility 95.3 $33m ABN/Sinosure Facilities 26.2 Total Debt Outstanding 526.6 $ Net Debt 341.5 $ September 30, 2017 Balances

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Market Update & Industry Overview

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Market Update and Industry Overview

200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800

Baltic Dry Index

(BDI Points)

Source: Clarkson Research Services Limited 2018

2016 2017 2018

Based on Preliminary Results which are subject to change

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Recent Market Developments

1) Source: Public statements by subject companies

Key Iron Ore Expansion Plans(1)

  • 10.0

20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 2017 2018 2019

MT

BHP Rio Tinto Roy Hill Anglo American Vale Significant Brazilian iron

  • re volume expected
  • ver the next two years

Recent Developments

Freight rates strengthened to multi-year highs in 2H 2017 primarily driven by:

Record steel production in China leading to heightened demand for high quality seaborne iron ore

Increased coal shipments to China

Steady growth in grain cargo flows

Slowing fleet growth

Seasonal slowdown at the start of the year due to:

Frontloaded newbuilding deliveries

Weather related cargo disruptions

Upcoming Chinese New Year holiday

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Short and Long-Term Industry Catalysts

1) Source: World Steel Association 2) Source: Commodore Research

Iron Ore

China’s iron ore imports rose by 5% in 2017 due to increased demand for high quality seaborne iron ore Steel Production

Chinese steel production has increased by 5.7% in 2017 YOY primarily led by output from larger steel mills(1)

Ex-China steel production has risen by 5.5% during the same period led by a 6.2% YOY increase in

  • utput from India

Improved margins have incentivized greater production Coal

China’s coal imports increased by 6% in 2017 YOY

Mining accidents at Chinese domestic coal mines continue to occur which could lead to additional mine inspections and closures(2)

Tighter domestic coal supply as power plant stockpiles have been declining in the YTD

India’s coal power plant stockpiles remain near multi-year lows Grain

Peak South American grain season to commence at the end

  • f Q1 following North American grain season during Q4

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 MT

China’s Iron Ore Imports Growth Remained Strong in 2017

2017 2016 % Variance China 831.7 786.9 5.7% European Union 168.7 162.0 4.1% Japan 104.7 104.8

  • 0.1%

India 101.4 95.5 6.2% South Korea 71.1 68.6 3.6% Global Production 1,674.7 1,587.3 5.5% Ex-China 843.0 800.4 5.3% Global Steel Production (million tons)(1)

+5% YOY

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Improving Supply Side Fundamentals Leading to Slower Net Fleet Growth

Source: Clarkson Research Services Limited 2018

Net fleet growth for 2017 was approximately 3.0%

Slippage rate remained high at over 30%

Scrapping levels have eased due improved sentiment and freight rate environment

Net fleet growth in 2018 could fall to the lowest level seen since 1999

Approximately 9% of the fleet is greater than or equal to 20 years old on a number of vessels basis

33 Capesize vessels were scrapped in 2017 including eight greater than 250,000 dwt

Currently 45 vessels trading in the drybulk fleet greater than 250,000 dwt with an average age

  • f 24 years old, represents 4% of the Capesize fleet on a deadweight tonnage basis
  • 2

4 6 8 10 12

Capesize Panamax Handymax Handysize

  • Newbuilding orderbook as a percentage
  • f the fleet is currently 9.3%

(mdwt)

Current Drybulk Vessel Orderbook by Type

  • 2

2 4 6 8 10

Deliveries Scrapping Net Additions

Jan 2017

(mdwt)

Drybulk Vessel Deliveries vs. Scrapping

0.8%0.8% 0.9% 0.7% 0.4% 1.3% 1.1% 0.9% 0.8% 0.7% 0.6% 0.1% 0.2%

Current

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

What’s on the Horizon?

Sources: IMF, BHP Billiton

IMF forecasts global GDP to increase by 3.9% in both 2018 and 2019

Developing economies and increased global steel output are expected to support trade growth

Strengthening Global Economy Strengthening Global Economy

The drybulk market is expected to be propelled by the improving global economic landscape as well as increased demand for raw materials from developing economies

1 One Belt / One Road One Belt / One Road 2

Initiative covers half of the world’s population and almost one third of the global economy

Could lead to 150MT of incremental steel demand

China’s Development China’s Development 3

Significant focus on environment and higher quality inputs to drive drybulk commodity demand

Continued urbanization and infrastructure development

Environmental Regulations Environmental Regulations 4

Low sulphur fuel cap and BWTS regulations to come in effect in the next several years

Could accelerate the scrapping or removal of older vessels

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Conclusion

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Genco is Attractively Positioned To Capture Potential Market Upside

Sources: IMF, Marsoft Incorporated, Clarksons Research Services Limited 2018

Iron ore capacity expansion plans from Vale to drive ton mile demand

Focus remains on high quality seaborne iron ore from Brazil and Australia Iron Ore Trade Growth Iron Ore Trade Growth 1 Steel Production Steel Production 2

Strong steel mill margins in China to boost output

Low steel inventory levels to support production Strengthening Global Economy Strengthening Global Economy 3 Low Fleet Growth Low Fleet Growth 4

Estimate 1% to 2% net fleet growth which would be the lowest since 1999

Orderbook remains near 15 year lows

IMF forecasts global GDP to increase by 3.9% in both 2018 and 2019

Developing economies are expected to support trade growth Demand growth is expected to outpace supply growth Genco is well positioned for stronger market Commercial strategy driving revenue

Active owner / operator

Increasing margins

Providing direct logistics solution to major cargo owners Genco’s fleet mirrors global trade dynamics

Direct exposure to strong trade growth fundamentals in major and minor bulks Growth Potential

Strong capital position enables Genco to explore further growth potential and the ability to act as a consolidator of the drybulk market

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Thank you

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Appendix

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Genco’s Major Bulk Fleet

Major Bulk

Vessel Name Year Built Dwt Capesize Genco Augustus 2007 180,151 Genco Tiberius 2007 175,874 Genco London 2007 177,833 Genco Titus 2007 177,729 Genco Constantine 2008 180,183 Genco Hadrian 2008 169,025 Genco Commodus 2009 169,098 Genco Maximus 2009 169,025 Genco Claudius 2010 169,001 Genco Tiger 2011 179,185 Baltic Lion 2012 179,185 Baltic Bear 2010 177,717 Baltic Wolf 2010 177,752 Panamax Genco Beauty 1999 73,941 Genco Knight 1999 73,941 Genco Vigour 1999 73,941 Genco Surprise 1998 72,495 Genco Thunder 2007 76,588 Genco Raptor 2007 76,499

13 13 6

Capesize Panamax

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Genco’s Minor Bulk Fleet

Minor Bulk

Vessel Name Year Built Dwt Vessel Name Year Built Dwt Ultramax Genco Rhone 2011 58,018 Baltic Hornet 2014 63,574 Baltic Leopard 2009 53,446 Baltic Wasp 2015 63,389 Baltic Panther 2009 53,350 Baltic Scorpion 2015 63,462 Baltic Jaguar 2009 53,473 Baltic Mantis 2015 63,470 Baltic Cougar 2009 53,432 Supramax/Handymax Genco Muse 2001 48,913 Genco Warrior 2005 55,435 Handysize Genco Hunter 2007 58,729 Genco Explorer 1999 29,952 Genco Predator 2005 55,407 Genco Progress 1999 29,952 Genco Cavalier 2007 53,617 Genco Charger 2005 28,398 Genco Aquitaine 2009 57,981 Genco Champion 2006 28,445 Genco Ardennes 2009 58,018 Genco Challenger 2003 28,428 Genco Auvergne 2009 58,020 Genco Bay 2010 34,296 Genco Bourgogne 2010 58,018 Genco Ocean 2010 34,409 Genco Brittany 2010 58,018 Genco Avra 2011 34,391 Genco Languedoc 2010 58,018 Genco Mare 2011 34,428 Genco Loire 2009 53,430 Genco Spirit 2011 34,432 Genco Lorraine 2009 53,417 Baltic Wind 2009 34,408 Genco Normandy 2007 53,596 Baltic Cove 2010 34,403 Genco Picardy 2005 55,257 Baltic Breeze 2010 34,386 Genco Provence 2004 55,317 Baltic Fox 2010 31,883 Genco Pyrenees 2010 58,018 Baltic Hare 2009 31,887

26 26 15 15

Ultramax / Supramax / Handymax Handysize