gaston cleveland lincoln mpo ctp meeting
play

Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln MPO CTP Meeting Brian Wert, P.E. December - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln MPO CTP Meeting Brian Wert, P.E. December 10, 2014 Agenda Project progress to date STIP review Survey analysis Vision statement implications Alternatives analysis preparation Next steps


  1. Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln MPO CTP Meeting Brian Wert, P.E. December 10, 2014

  2. Agenda • Project progress to date • STIP review • Survey analysis • Vision statement implications • Alternatives analysis preparation • Next steps

  3. Quality Moment Check your data early on

  4. Progress to Date • Initiated project • Developed draft goals and objectives survey • Developed draft vision statement • Deployed and deployed goals and objectives survey • Began data collection • Began deficiencies analysis • Revised existing inventories • Began development of Gaston County inventory

  5. Schedule • September 2014 –CTP Kickoff Meeting • October 2014 – Finalize goals and objectives survey. Refine draft vision statement. Begin data collection • November 2014 – Existing Conditions and begin to project future traffic conditions and deficiencies • December/January 2015 – Establish and agree on current and future deficiencies. Begin to develop scenarios. Finalize Survey Analysis • February 2015 - Finalize vision statement, goals, and objectives. Finalize scenarios • March 2015 – Analyze alternative routes to address problems • May 2015 – Complete Draft CTP • Summer/Fall 2015 – Finalize CTP, public involvement, adoptions

  6. Draft STIP Review

  7. Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis • Survey went live 10/22/2014 • Closed on 12/1/2014 • Over 644 responses including hard copies

  8. Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis espondpsptaLtyuotPnls 160 140 120 100 espondpsp 80 60 40 20 0 yuotPnls

  9. Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis espondpsptaLtPnfdgLtrptPnfdgLtInofmTgund 60.00% 55.84% 54.19% 50.00% 40.00% 29.22% 30.00% 25.19% 20.62% 20.00% 14.94% 10.00% 0.00% astonl edLSLdslu rylPndl pNgSLmx7LgPLlo 7nTNdsoynlx7LgPLlo

  10. Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis NkTgtFsrsmtn�tPnd�spgundtT�stLnftNummud�tgnt���sogt�s�n�st��o�nrs�sdgpt T�st�Tls 250 236 218 200 150 �LtTnltLt 100 50 42 29 4 1 0 -nxILdsm pdyOFoxILdsm pnfLxenlOLtoynl �nuLgsoLxenlOLtoynl �LsSmxenlOLtoynl ��ogLfLxenlOLtoynl

  11. Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis �not�sslp 300 249 250 22� 200 162 152 150 13� 104 96 100 �5 53 48 4� 42 42 50 0

  12. Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis �not�sslp 60.00% 50.00% �nosd 40.00% 7LgPLlo 30.00% astonl 7LgPLlo 20.00% edLSLdslu� rylPndl 7LgPLlo 10.00% 0.00%

  13. Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis eTd�tgkstNTLptgnt��o�nrstTt�T�umugL 6.00 5.30 5.00 4.60 4.29 4.22 4.03 4.00 3.10 3.00 2.45 2.00 1.00 0.00 �fTgnSLx�loLgtLPoynlt �uux�gsSLdxrslLt �lPnNgsOLx�I� 7gnSyuLx�oFLgx�nuLt ryfyox�PPLttxnlx-L� �LuNPLx�PPLttxon �llnSsoySLxpogsoLOyLt �sPydyoyLt L�ytoylOx�sPydyoyLt Note: Lower scores are more desirable

  14. Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis �u��spgt��Tdpon�gTgundt�ppfsp 350 316 300 240 250 200 154 143 133 133 150 91 8� 100 �6 52 33 50 0

  15. Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis �npgt��on�gTdgt��Tdpon�gTgundt�nTmp 5.00 4.�4 4.50 4.25 4.21 4.00 3.�� 3.�3 3.69 3.5� 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 �ngLx�gsltyo pLgSyPLx�ngxpTLPysd enffNlyom �lPgLstLux�nuL �PnlnfyPxagn�oF �stoLgx�gsSLdx�yfLt �Ldys�dLx�gsSLdx�yfLt -LLut 7gLtLgSsoynl eFnyPL Note: Lower scores are considered more important

  16. Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis NkTgtpknfmltastgkst�u�pgt�knu�stgntTmmsruTgst�nd�spgund 300 2�6 250 200 150 112 100 49 50 33 20 1� 0 �Nydux�uuyoynlsdxrslLt �Nyduxsx-L�x�sPydyom enlogndx�PPLtt �fTgnSLx�loLgtLPoynlt 7gnSyuLx�doLglsoySLx�nuLt �oFLg

  17. Vision Statement Implications • How does this impact the vision statements? • What changes or clarifications should we make? • What additional data does this committee need?

  18. Alternative Analysis Review

  19. Deficiencies Analysis: Final Product Example

  20. Next Steps • Finalize deficiency analysis • Set January meeting time • Complete goals and objectives survey analysis • Begin to develop scenarios for analysis • Finalize vision statements and goals and objectives

  21. NCDOT Contacts • NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch (CTP): • Brian Wert, PE, bmwert@ncdot.gov, 919-707-0974 • Division 12 Planning Engineer: • David Keilson, PE, dpkeilson@ncdot.gov, 704-480-9031 • Board of Transportation Member: • Lou Wetmore, lswetmore@ncdot.gov, 828-323-8777 • Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln Metropolitan Planning Organization: • Hank Graham, AICP, hankg@cityofgastonia.com, 704-854-6663

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend